1. Development of a video-observation method for examining doctors' clinical and interpersonal skills in a hospital outpatient clinic in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.
- Author
-
Aujla, Navneet, Ilori, Temitope, Irabor, Achiaka, Obimakinde, Abimbola, Owoaje, Eme, Fayehun, Olufunke, Ajisola, Motunrayo M., Bolaji, Sinmisola O., Watson, Samuel I., Hofer, Timothy P., Omigbodun, Akinyinka, and Lilford, Richard J.
- Subjects
CLINICAL competence ,PHYSICIANS ,MEDICAL personnel ,MIDDLE-income countries ,OUTPATIENT medical care ,CROSS-sectional method ,RESEARCH funding ,SOCIAL skills ,OUTPATIENT services in hospitals - Abstract
Background: Improving the quality of primary healthcare provision is a key goal in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, to develop effective quality improvement interventions, we first need to be able to accurately measure the quality of care. The methods most commonly used to measure the technical quality of care all have some key limitations in LMICs settings. Video-observation is appealing but has not yet been used in this context. We examine preliminary feasibility and acceptability of video-observation for assessing physician quality in a hospital outpatients' department in Nigeria. We also develop measurement procedures and examine measurement characteristics.Methods: Cross-sectional study at a large tertiary care hospital in Ibadan, Nigeria. Consecutive physician-patient consultations with adults and children under five seeking outpatient care were video-recorded. We also conducted brief interviews with participating physicians to gain feedback on our approach. Video-recordings were double-coded by two medically trained researchers, independent of the study team and each other, using an explicit checklist of key processes of care that we developed, from which we derived a process quality score. We also elicited a global quality rating from reviewers.Results: We analysed 142 physician-patient consultations. The median process score given by both coders was 100 %. The modal overall rating category was 'above standard' (or 4 on a scale of 1-5). Coders agreed on which rating to assign only 44 % of the time (weighted Cohen's kappa = 0.26). We found in three-level hierarchical modelling that the majority of variance in process scores was explained by coder disagreement. A very high correlation of 0.90 was found between the global quality rating and process quality score across all encounters. Participating physicians liked our approach, despite initial reservations about being observed.Conclusions: Video-observation is feasible and acceptable in this setting, and the quality of consultations was high. However, we found that rater agreement is low but comparable to other modalities that involve expert clinician judgements about quality of care including in-person direct observation and case note review. We suggest ways to improve scoring consistency including careful rater selection and improved design of the measurement procedure for the process score. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF