Search

Background: Congenital cytomegalovirus infection is a leading cause of long-term sequelae. Cytomegalovirus is also frequently transmitted to preterm infants postnatally, but these infections are mostly asymptomatic. A correlation between cytomegalovirus genotypes and clinical manifestations has been reported previously in infants with congenital infection, but not in preterm infants with postnatal infection., Objectives: The main objective of this study was to investigate cytomegalovirus genotype distribution in postnatal and congenital cytomegalovirus infection and its association with disease severity., Methods: Infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of the University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands between 2003-2010 and diagnosed with postnatal or congenital cytomegalovirus infection were included. Classification of cytomegalovirus isolates in genotypes was performed upon amplification and sequencing of the cytomegalovirus UL55 (gB) and UL144 genes. Clinical data, cerebral abnormalities, neurodevelopmental outcome and viral load were studied in relation to genotype distribution., Results: Genotyping results were obtained from 58 preterm infants with postnatal cytomegalovirus infection and 13 infants with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Postnatal disease was mild in all preterm infants and all had favourable outcome. Infants with congenital infection were significantly more severely affected than infants with postnatal infection. Seventy-seven percent of these infants were symptomatic at birth, 2/13 died and 3/13 developed long-term sequelae (median follow-up 6 (range 2-8) years). The distribution of cytomegalovirus genotypes was comparable for postnatal and congenital infection. UL55 genotype 1 and UL144 genotype 3 were predominant genotypes in both groups., Conclusions: Distribution of UL55 and UL144 genotypes was similar in asymptomatic postnatal and severe congenital CMV infection suggesting that other factors rather than cytomegalovirus UL55 and UL144 genotype are responsible for the development of severe disease.

Nosocomial infections are serious complications among preterm infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICU). Hand hygiene is one of the most effective measures to prevent these infections. This study, performed in a tertiary level NICU, highlights the importance of a multimodal intervention program for adherence to hand hygiene. The compliance with hand hygiene among health care workers of the NICU increased significantly from 23% in the baseline assessment to 50% in the second assessment and the incidence of sepsis decreased from 13.4% to 11.3% after implementation of an intervention program.

Outbreaks with Enterobacter spp. have been described frequently in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). This study investigated the factors that determine whether a neonate becomes colonised with Enterobacter spp., how long colonisation continues and whether the termination of isolation measures leads to spread of the organism. Neonates transferred from the NICUs of tertiary care hospitals were screened for the presence of Enterobacter spp. and any potential predictors for colonisation recorded. Those infected were monitored during their hospital stay and colonised neonates were screened every month for six months. Isolation infection control precautions were lifted and all neonates were screened for the presence of Enterobacter spp. six and 12 months later. Fifteen colonised neonates and 33 non-colonised controls were identified for study. Multivariate analysis showed that antibiotic therapy for more than three days and an Apgar score of <8 after 1 min were independently associated with Enterobacter spp. colonisation. Molecular typing using single-enzyme amplified-fragment length polymorphism (seAFLP) analysis revealed 22 different seAFLP genotypes. Three infants remained colonised with the same Enterobacter genotype after discharge; however, most neonates lost their strain or became colonised with another genotype. Lifting infection control measures for neonates colonised with Enterobacter spp. in a neonatal ward did not lead to increased incidence of colonisation and none of the infants became infected. Isolating neonates with susceptible Enterobacter spp. was not found to be necessary.