15 results on '"Folberth, Christian"'
Search Results
2. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison
- Author
-
Rosenzweig, Cynthia, Elliott, Joshua, Deryng, Delphine, Ruane, Alex C., Müller, Christoph, Arneth, Almut, Boote, Kenneth J., Folberth, Christian, Glotter, Michael, Khabarov, Nikolay, Neumann, Kathleen, Piontek, Franziska, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Schmid, Erwin, Stehfest, Elke, Yang, Hong, and Jones, James W.
- Published
- 2014
3. Weather-induced crop failure events under climate change: a storyline approach.
- Author
-
Goulart, Henrique M. D., Wiel, Karin van der, Folberth, Christian, Balkovic, Juraj, and Hurk, Bart van den
- Subjects
CLIMATE change ,AGRICULTURAL meteorology ,GLOBAL warming ,WEATHER ,CROPS - Abstract
Unfavourable weather is a common cause for crop failures all over the world. Whilst extreme weather conditions may cause extreme impacts, crop failure commonly is induced by the occurrence of multiple and combined anomalous meteorological drivers. For these cases, the explanation of conditions leading to crop failure is complex, as the links connecting weather and crop yield can be multiple and non-linear. Furthermore, climate change is likely to perturb the meteorological conditions, possibly altering the occurrences of crop failures or leading to unprecedented drivers of extreme impacts. The goal of this study is to identify important meteorological drivers that cause crop failures and to explore changes in crop failures due to global warming. For that, we focus on a historical failure event, the extreme low soybean production during the 2012 season in the Midwest US. We first train a random forest model to identify the most relevant meteorological drivers of historical crop failures and to predict crop failure probabilities. Second, we explore the influence of global warming on crop failures and on the structure of compound drivers. We use large ensembles from the EC-Earth global climate model, corresponding to present day, pre-industrial +2 °C and 3 °C warming respectively, to isolate the global warming component. Finally, we explore the meteorological conditions inductive for the 2012 crop failure, and construct analogues of these failure conditions in future climate settings. Unlike present-day conditions, future warming may increase the probability of crop failures resulting from univariate meteorological features, reducing the importance of compound failure drivers. Impact-analogues show a significant increase under global warming, with changes in the corresponding drivers. This has implications for risk assessment, as changing drivers of extreme impact events are highly relevant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Potential yield simulated by global gridded crop models: using a process-based emulator to explain their differences.
- Author
-
Ringeval, Bruno, Müller, Christoph, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Mueller, Nathaniel D., Ciais, Philippe, Folberth, Christian, Liu, Wenfeng, Debaeke, Philippe, and Pellerin, Sylvain
- Subjects
BEER-Lambert law ,RADIATION absorption ,GROWING season ,CROPS ,PRIMARY productivity (Biology) ,BIOMASS ,BIOMASS conversion - Abstract
How global gridded crop models (GGCMs) differ in their simulation of potential yield and reasons for those differences have never been assessed. The GGCM Intercomparison (GGCMI) offers a good framework for this assessment. Here, we built an emulator (called SMM for simple mechanistic model) of GGCMs based on generic and simplified formalism. The SMM equations describe crop phenology by a sum of growing degree days, canopy radiation absorption by the Beer–Lambert law, and its conversion into aboveground biomass by a radiation use efficiency (RUE). We fitted the parameters of this emulator against gridded aboveground maize biomass at the end of the growing season simulated by eight different GGCMs in a given year (2000). Our assumption is that the simple set of equations of SMM, after calibration, could reproduce the response of most GGCMs so that differences between GGCMs can be attributed to the parameters related to processes captured by the emulator. Despite huge differences between GGCMs, we show that if we fit both a parameter describing the thermal requirement for leaf emergence by adjusting its value to each grid-point in space, as done by GGCM modellers following the GGCMI protocol, and a GGCM-dependent globally uniform RUE, then the simple set of equations of the SMM emulator is sufficient to reproduce the spatial distribution of the original aboveground biomass simulated by most GGCMs. The grain filling is simulated in SMM by considering a fixed-in-time fraction of net primary productivity allocated to the grains (frac) once a threshold in leaves number (nthresh) is reached. Once calibrated, these two parameters allow for the capture of the relationship between potential yield and final aboveground biomass of each GGCM. It is particularly important as the divergence among GGCMs is larger for yield than for aboveground biomass. Thus, we showed that the divergence between GGCMs can be summarized by the differences in a few parameters. Our simple but mechanistic model could also be an interesting tool to test new developments in order to improve the simulation of potential yield at the global scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. The GGCMI Phase 2 emulators: global gridded crop model responses to changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen (version 1.0).
- Author
-
Franke, James A., Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Ruane, Alex C., Jägermeyr, Jonas, Snyder, Abigail, Dury, Marie, Falloon, Pete D., Folberth, Christian, François, Louis, Hank, Tobias, Izaurralde, R. Cesar, Jacquemin, Ingrid, Jones, Curtis, Li, Michelle, Liu, Wenfeng, Olin, Stefan, Phillips, Meridel, Pugh, Thomas A. M., and Reddy, Ashwan
- Subjects
ATMOSPHERIC carbon dioxide ,AGRICULTURAL climatology ,CLIMATE change ,CROPS ,GROWING season ,TEMPERATURE distribution - Abstract
Statistical emulation allows combining advantageous features of statistical and process-based crop models for understanding the effects of future climate changes on crop yields. We describe here the development of emulators for nine process-based crop models and five crops using output from the Global Gridded Model Intercomparison Project (GGCMI) Phase 2. The GGCMI Phase 2 experiment is designed with the explicit goal of producing a structured training dataset for emulator development that samples across four dimensions relevant to crop yields: atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations, temperature, water supply, and nitrogen inputs (CTWN). Simulations are run under two different adaptation assumptions: that growing seasons shorten in warmer climates, and that cultivar choice allows growing seasons to remain fixed. The dataset allows emulating the climatological-mean yield response of all models with a simple polynomial in mean growing-season values. Climatological-mean yields are a central metric in climate change impact analysis; we show here that they can be captured without relying on interannual variations. In general, emulation errors are negligible relative to differences across crop models or even across climate model scenarios; errors become significant only in some marginal lands where crops are not currently grown. We demonstrate that the resulting GGCMI emulators can reproduce yields under realistic future climate simulations, even though the GGCMI Phase 2 dataset is constructed with uniform CTWN offsets, suggesting that the effects of changes in temperature and precipitation distributions are small relative to those of changing means. The resulting emulators therefore capture relevant crop model responses in a lightweight, computationally tractable form, providing a tool that can facilitate model comparison, diagnosis of interacting factors affecting yields, and integrated assessment of climate impacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Potential yield simulated by Global Gridded Crop Models: a process-based emulator to explain their differences.
- Author
-
Ringeval, Bruno, Müller, Christoph, Pugh, Thomas A.M., Mueller, Nathaniel D., Ciais, Philippe, Folberth, Christian, Liu, Wenfeng, Debaeke, Philippe, and Pellerin, Sylvain
- Subjects
BEER-Lambert law ,RADIATION absorption ,PRIMARY productivity (Biology) ,GROWING season ,CROPS ,BIOMASS ,BIOMASS conversion - Abstract
How Global Gridded Crop Models (GGCMs) differ in their simulation of potential yield and reasons for those differences have never been assessed. The GGCM Inter-comparison (GGCMI) offers a good framework for this assessment. Here, we built an emulator (called SMM for Simple Mechanistic Model) of GGCMs based on generic and simplified formalism. The SMM equations describe crop phenology by a sum of growing degree days, canopy radiation absorption by the Beer-Lambert law, and its conversion into aboveground biomass by a radiation use efficiency (RUE). We fitted the parameters of this emulator against gridded aboveground maize biomass at the end of the growing season simulated by eight different GGCMs in a given year (2000). Our assumption is that the simple set of equations of SMM, after calibration, could reproduce the response of most GGCMs, so that differences between GGCMs can be attributed to the parameters related to processes captured by the emulator. Despite huge differences between GGCMs, we show that if we fit both a parameter describing the thermal requirement for leaf emergence by adjusting its value to each grid-point in space, as done by GGCM modellers following the GGCMI protocol, and a GGCM-dependent globally uniform RUE, then the simple set of equations of the SMM emulator is sufficient to reproduce the spatial distribution of the original aboveground biomass simulated by most GGCMs. The grain filling is simulated in SMM by considering a fixed in time fraction of net primary productivity allocated to the grain (frac) once a threshold in leaves number (nthresh) is reached. Once calibrated, these two parameters allow to capture the relationship between potential yield and final aboveground biomass of each GGCM. It is particularly important as the divergence among GGCMs is larger for yield than for aboveground biomass. Thus, we showed that the divergence between GGCMs can be summarized by the differences in few parameters. Our simple but mechanistic model could also be an interesting tool to test new developments in order to improve the simulation of potential yield at the global scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. The GGCMI Phase 2 experiment: global gridded crop model simulations under uniform changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen levels (protocol version 1.0).
- Author
-
Franke, James A., Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Ruane, Alex C., Jägermeyr, Jonas, Balkovic, Juraj, Ciais, Philippe, Dury, Marie, Falloon, Pete D., Folberth, Christian, François, Louis, Hank, Tobias, Hoffmann, Munir, Izaurralde, R. Cesar, Jacquemin, Ingrid, Jones, Curtis, Khabarov, Nikolay, Koch, Marian, Li, Michelle, and Liu, Wenfeng
- Subjects
SHIFTING cultivation ,IRRIGATION farming ,CROPS ,CROP yields ,DATA libraries ,DRY farming - Abstract
Concerns about food security under climate change motivate efforts to better understand future changes in crop yields. Process-based crop models, which represent plant physiological and soil processes, are necessary tools for this purpose since they allow representing future climate and management conditions not sampled in the historical record and new locations to which cultivation may shift. However, process-based crop models differ in many critical details, and their responses to different interacting factors remain only poorly understood. The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) Phase 2 experiment, an activity of the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP), is designed to provide a systematic parameter sweep focused on climate change factors and their interaction with overall soil fertility, to allow both evaluating model behavior and emulating model responses in impact assessment tools. In this paper we describe the GGCMI Phase 2 experimental protocol and its simulation data archive. A total of 12 crop models simulate five crops with systematic uniform perturbations of historical climate, varying CO2 , temperature, water supply, and applied nitrogen ("CTWN") for rainfed and irrigated agriculture, and a second set of simulations represents a type of adaptation by allowing the adjustment of growing season length. We present some crop yield results to illustrate general characteristics of the simulations and potential uses of the GGCMI Phase 2 archive. For example, in cases without adaptation, modeled yields show robust decreases to warmer temperatures in almost all regions, with a nonlinear dependence that means yields in warmer baseline locations have greater temperature sensitivity. Inter-model uncertainty is qualitatively similar across all the four input dimensions but is largest in high-latitude regions where crops may be grown in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. The GGCMI phase II emulators: global gridded crop model responses to changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen (version 1.0).
- Author
-
Franke, James, Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Ruane, Alex C., Jägermeyr, Jonas, Snyder, Abigail, Dury, Marie, Falloon, Pete, Folberth, Christian, François, Louis, Hank, Tobias, Izaurralde, R. Cesar, Jacquemin, Ingrid, Jones, Curtis, Li, Michelle, Wenfeng Liu, Olin, Stefan, Phillips, Meridel, Pugh, Thomas A. M., and Reddy, Ashwan
- Subjects
ATMOSPHERIC carbon dioxide ,AGRICULTURAL climatology ,CLIMATE change ,CROPS ,GROWING season - Abstract
Statistical emulation allows combining advantageous features of statistical and process-based crop models for understanding the effects of future climate changes on crop yields. We describe here the development of emulators for nine process-based crop models and five crops using output from the Global Gridded Model Intercomparison Project (GGCMI) Phase II. The GGCMI Phase II experiment is designed with the explicit goal of producing a structured training dataset for emulator development that samples across four dimensions relevant to crop yields: atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO
2 ) concentrations, temperature, water supply, and nitrogen inputs (CTWN). Simulations are run under two different adaptation assumptions: that growing seasons shorten in warmer climates, and that cultivar choice allows growing seasons to remain fixed. The dataset allows emulating the climatological mean yield response without relying on interannual variations; we show that these are quantitatively different. Climatological mean yield responses can be readily captured with a simple polynomial in nearly all locations, with errors significant only in some marginal lands where crops are not currently grown. In general, emulation errors are negligible relative to differences across crop models or even across climate model scenarios. We demonstrate that the resulting GGCMI emulators can reproduce yields under realistic future climate simulations, even though the GGCMI Phase II dataset is constructed with uniform CTWN offsets, suggesting that effects of changes in temperature and precipitation distributions are small relative to those of changing means. The resulting emulators therefore capture relevant crop model responses in a lightweight, computationally tractable form, providing a tool that can facilitate model comparison, diagnosis of interacting factors affecting yields, and integrated assessment of climate impacts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. The GGCMI Phase II experiment: global gridded crop model simulations under uniform changes in CO2, temperature, water, and nitrogen levels (protocol version 1.0).
- Author
-
Franke, James, Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Ruane, Alex C., Jagermeyr, Jonas, Balkovic, Juraj, Ciais, Philippe, Dury, Marie, Falloon, Peter, Folberth, Christian, Francois, Louis, Hank, Tobias, Hoffmann, Munir, Izaurralde, R. Cesar, Jacquemin, Ingrid, Jones, Curtis, Khabarov, Nikolay, Koch, Marian, Michelle Li, and Wenfeng Liu
- Subjects
SHIFTING cultivation ,IRRIGATION farming ,CROP yields ,CROPS ,SOIL fertility ,DRY farming - Abstract
Concerns about food security under climate change motivate efforts to better understand future changes in crop yields. Process-based crop models, which represent plant physiological and soil processes, are necessary tools for this purpose since they allow representing future climate and management conditions not sampled in the historical record and new locations to which cultivation may shift. However, process-based crop models differ in many critical details, and their responses to different interacting factors remain only poorly understood. The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) Phase II experiment, an activity of the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP), is designed to provide a systematic parameter sweep focused on climate change factors and their interaction with overall soil fertility, to allow both evaluating model behavior and emulating model responses in impact assessment tools. In this paper we describe the GGCMI Phase II experimental protocol and its simulation data archive. Twelve crop models simulate five crops with systematic uniform perturbations of historical climate, varying CO
2 , temperature, water supply, and applied nitrogen ("CTWN") for rainfed and irrigated agriculture, and a second set of simulations represents a type of adaptation by allowing the adjustment of growing season length. We present some crop yield results to illustrate general characteristics of the simulations and potential uses of the GGCMI Phase II archive. For example, modeled yields show robust decreases to warmer temperatures in almost all regions, with a nonlinear dependence that indicates yields in warmer baseline locations have greater temperature sensitivity. Inter-model uncertainty is qualitatively similar across all the four input dimensions, but is largest in high-latitude regions where crops may be grown in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Parameterization-induced uncertainties and impacts of crop management harmonization in a global gridded crop model ensemble.
- Author
-
Folberth, Christian, Elliott, Joshua, Müller, Christoph, Balkovič, Juraj, Chryssanthacopoulos, James, Izaurralde, Roberto C., Jones, Curtis D., Khabarov, Nikolay, Liu, Wenfeng, Reddy, Ashwan, Schmid, Erwin, Skalský, Rastislav, Yang, Hong, Arneth, Almut, Ciais, Philippe, Deryng, Delphine, Lawrence, Peter J., Olin, Stefan, Pugh, Thomas A. M., and Ruane, Alex C.
- Subjects
- *
CROP management , *SOIL profiles , *PLANT performance , *CROP yields , *CROPS - Abstract
Global gridded crop models (GGCMs) combine agronomic or plant growth models with gridded spatial input data to estimate spatially explicit crop yields and agricultural externalities at the global scale. Differences in GGCM outputs arise from the use of different biophysical models, setups, and input data. GGCM ensembles are frequently employed to bracket uncertainties in impact studies without investigating the causes of divergence in outputs. This study explores differences in maize yield estimates from five GGCMs based on the public domain field-scale model Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) that participate in the AgMIP Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison initiative. Albeit using the same crop model, the GGCMs differ in model version, input data, management assumptions, parameterization, and selection of subroutines affecting crop yield estimates via cultivar distributions, soil attributes, and hydrology among others. The analyses reveal inter-annual yield variability and absolute yield levels in the EPIC-based GGCMs to be highly sensitive to soil parameterization and crop management. All GGCMs show an intermediate performance in reproducing reported yields with a higher skill if a static soil profile is assumed or sufficient plant nutrients are supplied. An in-depth comparison of setup domains for two EPIC-based GGCMs shows that GGCM performance and plant stress responses depend substantially on soil parameters and soil process parameterization, i.e. hydrology and nutrient turnover, indicating that these often neglected domains deserve more scrutiny. For agricultural impact assessments, employing a GGCM ensemble with its widely varying assumptions in setups appears the best solution for coping with uncertainties from lack of comprehensive global data on crop management, cultivar distributions and coefficients for agro-environmental processes. However, the underlying assumptions require systematic specifications to cover representative agricultural systems and environmental conditions. Furthermore, the interlinkage of parameter sensitivity from various domains such as soil parameters, nutrient turnover coefficients, and cultivar specifications highlights that global sensitivity analyses and calibration need to be performed in an integrated manner to avoid bias resulting from disregarded core model domains. Finally, relating evaluations of the EPIC-based GGCMs to a wider ensemble based on individual core models shows that structural differences outweigh in general differences in configurations of GGCMs based on the same model, and that the ensemble mean gains higher skill from the inclusion of structurally different GGCMs. Although the members of the wider ensemble herein do not consider crop-soil-management interactions, their sensitivity to nutrient supply indicates that findings for the EPIC-based sub-ensemble will likely become relevant for other GGCMs with the progressing inclusion of such processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Global patterns of crop yield stability under additional nutrient and water inputs.
- Author
-
Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Ruane, Alex C., Ciais, Philippe, Balkovic, Juraj, Deryng, Delphine, Folberth, Christian, Izaurralde, R. Cesar, Jones, Curtis D., Khabarov, Nikolay, Lawrence, Peter, Liu, Wenfeng, Reddy, Ashwan D., Schmid, Erwin, and Wang, Xuhui
- Subjects
CROP yields ,AGRICULTURAL productivity ,CARBON sequestration ,CARBON in soils ,DEFORESTATION - Abstract
Agricultural production must increase to feed a growing and wealthier population, as well as to satisfy increasing demands for biomaterials and biomass-based energy. At the same time, deforestation and land-use change need to be minimized in order to preserve biodiversity and maintain carbon stores in vegetation and soils. Consequently, agricultural land use needs to be intensified in order to increase food production per unit area of land. Here we use simulations of AgMIP’s Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) phase 1 to assess implications of input-driven intensification (water, nutrients) on crop yield and yield stability, which is an important aspect in food security. We find region- and crop-specific responses for the simulated period 1980–2009 with broadly increasing yield variability under additional nitrogen inputs and stabilizing yields under additional water inputs (irrigation), reflecting current patterns of water and nutrient limitation. The different models of the GGCMI ensemble show similar response patterns, but model differences warrant further research on management assumptions, such as variety selection and soil management, and inputs as well as on model implementation of different soil and plant processes, such as on heat stress, and parameters. Higher variability in crop productivity under higher fertilizer input will require adequate buffer mechanisms in trade and distribution/storage networks to avoid food price volatility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Crop calendar optimization for climate change adaptation in rice-based multiple cropping systems of India and Bangladesh.
- Author
-
Wang, Xiaobo, Folberth, Christian, Skalsky, Rastislav, Wang, Shaoqiang, Chen, Bin, Liu, Yuanyuan, Chen, Jinghua, and Balkovic, Juraj
- Subjects
- *
CROPPING systems , *CLIMATE change , *CROPS , *AGRICULTURAL climatology , *CROP losses , *IRRIGATION - Abstract
• Planting date shifts are effective to avoid yield loss induced by climate change in rice and wheat. • Short time intervals between kharif-crop harvest and rabi-crop planting limit the scope for growing season adaptation. • Early planting of kharif rice and rabi wheat provides both yield and water requirement benefits. • A trade-off is projected for yield improvement and blue water saving on the Indo-Gangetic plain under climate change. Adjusting crop calendars may present an effective adaptation measure to avoid crop yield loss and reduce water use in a changing climate. In order to better understand potentials and limitations of adjusting crop calendars for climate change adaptation of tropical multi-cropping systems with short fallow periods, we used a regionally calibrated Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) agronomic model to estimate annual caloric yield and blue water requirement (BWR) of irrigated double-rice and rice-wheat cropping systems in India and Bangladesh. We adjusted crop calendars by (a) single-objective optimization to maximize annual caloric yield and (b) multi-objective optimization to minimize BWR under current and future climate scenarios, focusing on climatic drivers of optimal growing seasons. While the short time intervals between harvest of kharif crops and (trans-)planting of rabi crops limit the space for planting date shift in the study area, our results indicate that crop calendar adjustment has great potential to reverse yield loss induced by temperature rise and decrease BWR by utilizing monsoon precipitation. The study indicates a trend towards earlier planting of rabi wheat to mitigate heat stress during the reproductive stage. Moreover, earlier planting of kharif rice can help to utilize monsoon precipitation, avoid cold stress of kharif rice during anthesis, and allow for early wheat sowing during the historic period. By the 2080s, the increase of heat stress in summer and the decrease of cold stress in winter seems to allow more flexibility for late rice in kharif season, but a conflict between later planting for yield improvement and earlier planting for blue water saving is expected in kharif rice on the Indo-Gangetic plain of India and Bangladesh. Therefore, the trade-off between yield improvement and irrigation water use needs to be carefully considered to promote adaptive adjustment of crop calendars under climate change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. A Global and Spatially Explicit Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on Crop Production and Consumptive Water Use.
- Author
-
Liu, Junguo, Folberth, Christian, Yang, Hong, Röckström, Johan, Abbaspour, Karim, and Zehnder, Alexander J. B.
- Subjects
- *
AGRICULTURAL productivity , *CLIMATE change , *EVAPOTRANSPIRATION , *WATER use , *WATER shortages , *FOOD security , *SUSTAINABLE development , *COMPUTATIONAL biology - Abstract
Food security and water scarcity have become two major concerns for future human's sustainable development, particularly in the context of climate change. Here we present a comprehensive assessment of climate change impacts on the production and water use of major cereal crops on a global scale with a spatial resolution of 30 arc-minutes for the 2030s (short term) and the 2090s (long term), respectively. Our findings show that impact uncertainties are higher on larger spatial scales (e.g., global and continental) but lower on smaller spatial scales (e.g., national and grid cell). Such patterns allow decision makers and investors to take adaptive measures without being puzzled by a highly uncertain future at the global level. Short-term gains in crop production from climate change are projected for many regions, particularly in African countries, but the gains will mostly vanish and turn to losses in the long run. Irrigation dependence in crop production is projected to increase in general. However, several water poor regions will rely less heavily on irrigation, conducive to alleviating regional water scarcity. The heterogeneity of spatial patterns and the non-linearity of temporal changes of the impacts call for site-specific adaptive measures with perspectives of reducing short- and long-term risks of future food and water security. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Strong regional influence of climatic forcing datasets on global crop model ensembles.
- Author
-
Ruane, Alex C., Phillips, Meridel, Müller, Christoph, Elliott, Joshua, Jägermeyr, Jonas, Arneth, Almut, Balkovic, Juraj, Deryng, Delphine, Folberth, Christian, Iizumi, Toshichika, Izaurralde, Roberto C., Khabarov, Nikolay, Lawrence, Peter, Liu, Wenfeng, Olin, Stefan, Pugh, Thomas A.M., Rosenzweig, Cynthia, Sakurai, Gen, Schmid, Erwin, and Sultan, Benjamin
- Subjects
- *
RICE yields , *AGRICULTURAL climatology , *CROPS , *CROPPING systems , *SOYBEAN , *AGRICULTURAL productivity , *FOOD crops - Abstract
• Systematically examines climatic forcing data in agricultural model performance • Explores uncertainty across up to 91 climate data / crop model combinations • Isolates key climatic features driving interannual yield variation in each region • Quantifies performance of climatic forcing datasets for top countries and crop species • More extensive bias correction improves climatic forcing datasets for crop models We present results from the Agricultural Model Intercomparison and Improvement Project (AgMIP) Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison (GGCMI) Phase I, which aligned 14 global gridded crop models (GGCMs) and 11 climatic forcing datasets (CFDs) in order to understand how the selection of climate data affects simulated historical crop productivity of maize, wheat, rice and soybean. Results show that CFDs demonstrate mean biases and differences in the probability of extreme events, with larger uncertainty around extreme precipitation and in regions where observational data for climate and crop systems are scarce. Countries where simulations correlate highly with reported FAO national production anomalies tend to have high correlations across most CFDs, whose influence we isolate using multi-GGCM ensembles for each CFD. Correlations compare favorably with the climate signal detected in other studies, although production in many countries is not primarily climate-limited (particularly for rice). Bias-adjusted CFDs most often were among the highest model-observation correlations, although all CFDs produced the highest correlation in at least one top-producing country. Analysis of larger multi-CFD-multi-GGCM ensembles (up to 91 members) shows benefits over the use of smaller subset of models in some regions and farming systems, although bigger is not always better. Our analysis suggests that global assessments should prioritize ensembles based on multiple crop models over multiple CFDs as long as a top-performing CFD is utilized for the focus region. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Climate response uncertainty and crop productivity changes at 1.5°C and 2°C.
- Author
-
Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich, Deryng, Delphine, Müller, Christoph, Elliot, Joshua, Folberth, Christian, Wenfeng Liu, Xuhui Wang, Pugh, Thomas A. M., Thiery, Wim, Seneviratne, Sonia I., and Rogelj, Joeri
- Subjects
- *
UNCERTAINTY , *CLIMATOLOGY , *CROPS , *CROP allocation - Published
- 2018
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.