Search

Background: There are reported variations in the intraoperative management of Crohn's disease. This consensus statement aimed to develop a standardised protocol for photographic documentation of intraoperative findings and critical procedural steps in ileocolonic Crohn's disease surgery., Methods: Colorectal surgeons with a specialist interest in minimally invasive surgery and inflammatory bowel disease were invited as committee members to develop a survey on the use of photo-documentation in Crohn's disease surgery. A 15 item survey was developed on ethical considerations and applications of photo-documentation in audit and quality control, research, and training., Results: There was strong agreement on the potential application of intraoperative photo-documentation in Crohn's disease for training, research, quality control and tertiary referrals. Reviewers agreed that intraoperative staging required photo-documentation of strictures, skip lesions, perforations, fat wrapping and mesenteric disease. The necessary steps to be photo-documented were very specific to Crohn's disease surgery, such as views of anastomosis and strictureplasties, and extent of resection(s)., Conclusions: Our consensus statement identified several items for appropriate intraoperative photo-documentation in Crohn's disease surgery, to be used as an adjunct to accurate annotation of intraoperative findings and procedures., (© 2022 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.)

Background: The extent of resection in colonic Crohn's disease [cCD] is still a topic of debate, depending on the number of locations, the risk of recurrence and permanent stoma, and the role of medical therapy., Methods: The Segmental COlecTomy for CroHn's disease [SCOTCH] international study is a retrospective analysis on six tertiary centre prospective databases, comprising all consecutive, unselected patients operated on between 2000 and 2019 with segmental colectomy [SC] or total colectomy [TC] for cCD. The primary aim was long-term surgical recurrence. Secondary aims were perioperative complications, stoma formation and predictors of recurrence., Results: Among 687 patients, SC was performed in 285 [41.5%] and TC in 402 [58.5%]. Mean age at diagnosis and surgery, disease duration, and follow-up were 30 ± 15.8, 40.4 ± 15.4, 10.4 ± 8.6 and 7.1 ± 5.2 years respectively. Isolated cCD, inflammatory pattern, perianal CD, younger age, longer disease duration and preoperative maximal therapy were more frequent in TC, while SC presented more small bowel locations and perforating disease, required fewer 90-day re-admissions, and fewer temporary and definitive stomas. Morbidity and mortality were similar. The 15-year surgical recurrence was 44% in TC and 27% in SC [p = 0.006]. In patients with one to three diseased segments, recurrence risk was related to the omission of biological therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 5.6), the number of segments [HR 2.5], perianal disease [HR 1.9] and paediatric diagnosis [HR 2.8]., Conclusion: When technically feasible, SC is safe and reduces temporary and permanent stoma. Young age, number of locations and perianal disease adversely affect, but postoperative biological therapy significantly reduces, the long-term surgical recurrence., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Aims: Post-surgical recurrence of Crohn's disease (CD) after ileocolonic resection is common. Early identification of features associated with recurrence is a standard procedure of postoperative management, but the prognostic role of such features when detected at later time points is unclear. We compared the predictivity for Crohn's disease recurrence of common clinical-instrumental variables when assessed early (<12 months) or late (>36 months) after surgery., Methods: This retrospective study considered CD patients who had ileocolonic resection and were followed for a median of 7.6 years. Clinical characteristics, post-surgical therapy, endoscopy recurrence (Rutgeerts' score ≥i2) and ultrasound features were compared between subgroups who had a early or late post-surgical assessment. Univariate and multivariate analyses were done to identify variables associated with recurrence (clinical and surgical)., Results: Of 201 patients, 70 (32%) had a early and 39 (19%) had a late post-surgical assessment. The Early and Late subgroups had similar clinical characteristics. Overall, clinical relapse was observed in 131 patients (66%), surgical relapse in 31 (16%), endoscopic recurrence in 149 (75%) and ultrasonographic recurrence in 132 (66%), without significant differences in frequencies between subgroups. By Cox proportional hazard regression, endoscopic recurrence was a significant predictor of clinical recurrence overall (HR=2.31, P = 0.002) and in the Early (HR=3.85, P = 0.002) but not Late subgroup., Discussion: The most informative postoperative CD assessment is the one done within the first year of surgery. Later endoscopic evaluations have no prognostic value and should be done only for clinical needs or for research purposes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest GDP, MM, MM, CR, PM, MC, CR, EM, EE, AL, RR, AF: reported no conflict of interest to disclose CG: Roche boards MD: Advisory board/Lecturer/Grants/Congress participation from Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, Ferring, MSD, Mundipharma, Pfizer, SOFAR, Chiesi, Roche, Bioclinica, (Copyright © 2020 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A limited ileocaecal resection is the most frequently performed procedure for ileocaecal CD and different anastomotic configurations and techniques have been described. This manuscript audited the different anastomotic techniques used in a national study and evaluated their influence on postoperative outcomes following ileocaecal resection for primary CD. This is a retrospective, multicentre, observational study promoted by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR), including all adults undergoing elective ileocaecal resection for primary CD from June 2018 May 2019. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days of surgery was the primary endpoint. Postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) and anastomotic leak rate were the secondary outcomes. 427 patients were included. The side to side anastomosis was the chosen configuration in 380 patients (89%). The stapled anastomotic (n = 286; 67%), techniques were preferred to hand-sewn (n = 141; 33%). Postoperative morbidity was 20.3% and anastomotic leak 3.7%. Anastomotic leak was independent of the type of anastomosis performed, while was associated with an ASA grade ≥ 3, presence of perianal disease and ileocolonic localization of disease. Four predictors of LOS were identified after multivariate analysis. The laparoscopic approach was the only associated with a reduced LOS (p = 0.017), while age, ASA grade ≥ 3 or administration of preoperative TPN were associated with increased LOS. The side to side was the most commonly used anastomotic configuration for ileocolic reconstruction following primary CD resection. There was no difference in postoperative morbidity according to anastomotic technique and configuration. Anastomotic leak was associated with ASA grade ≥ 3, a penetrating phenotype of disease and ileo-colonic distribution of CD.

Background: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) offers many benefits for patients with colorectal cancer. However, its application to patients with Crohn's disease (CD) is questioned., Aim: The aim of this propensity-matched study was to validate the results of ERAS protocol on CD patients., Methods: Patients undergoing ileocolic resection for primary or relapsed CD from 2007 to 2018 were retrospectively analyzed and propensity-matched into two equal groups (ERAS vs standard of care). Demographic characteristics, length of stay, bowel function, oral intake, and perioperative morbidity were analyzed., Results: Ninety four out of 299 patients were selected for analysis. No significant difference was observed for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, previous surgery and therapy, operative time and laparoscopy. The median length of stay in ERAS and non-ERAS groups was 6 and 8 days (p < 0.001). Median postoperative days of first bowel movement and solid oral intake were day 1 and day 2 p < 0,001, and day 2 and day 4.5 p < 0,001 in ERAS and non-ERAS group, respectively. No statistically differences in other postoperative outcomes were shown., Conclusions: ERAS implementation showed decreased length of stay, faster bowel function restoration and earlier solid oral intake in patients who underwent laparoscopic or open ileocolic resection for primary or relapsing CD., (Copyright © 2020 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Percutaneous ultrasonography (perc-US) and magnetic resonance enterography (e-MR) are the present standards for staging patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, intraoperative data still have some discrepancies with preoperative ones. The contribution of intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) has never been evaluated. Sixty-five consecutive patients scheduled for ileal/colonic resection for CD between 2010 and 2014 were prospectively enrolled. All patients had perc-US, e-MR and IOUS. Data from different imaging modalities were compared. The reference standard was the final pathology. Surgery was scheduled because of intestinal obstruction (n = 31 patients), inflammatory mass (n = 21), fistula (n = 10), or abdominal pain/sepsis (n = 3). Fourteen (21.5%) patients had a major discrepancy between preoperative and intraoperative data that required a modification of the surgical planning (five additional ileal lesions, three unknown ileo-sigmoid fistulas, and six not confirmed CD sites). IOUS correctly staged CD in all but one patients (missed ileo-colonic fistula). Pathology data differed from Perc-US data in 13 (20%) patients, from e-MR data in 14 (21.5%), and from IOUS data in one (1.5%). The sensitivity of Perc-US, e-MR and IOUS was: for the identification of CD sites 84.2%, 86.1%, and 100%; for the identification of stenoses 86.8%, 86.8%, and 100%; for the identification of fistulas 75.0%, 81.3%, and 93.8%, respectively. IOUS contributed to the surgical planning in 8 (12.3%) patients. IOUS is a safe, feasible and easy-to-perform procedure that optimizes staging of CD and, in some patients, helps to better define the treatment strategy. It could be helpful to face complex disease presentations on the basis of objective and reproducible data.