Search

Background: Evaluating clinical data on the safety and efficacy of vedolizumab (VDZ) in 'real-world' setting is still desirable. Recent reports have raised concerns that arthralgia may be associated with VDZ.Aims: The aim of this study is to present clinical experience with VDZ from a tertiary IBD center.Methods: Retrospective chart reviews were performed of consecutive patients exposed to VDZ between 2015 and 2018. Clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic efficacy and safety data were evaluated.Results: A total of 130 IBD (75CD, 55UC) patients were included. Median duration of VDZ therapy was 65 weeks. Probability of drug discontinuation was 4.9% and 9.4% at 1 and 2 years. Dose intensification was more frequent in CD compared to UC (at 1 and 2 years: 64.8/87.9% vs. 26.5/35.7%, p < 0.001). Clinical remission rates at 3-, 6- and 12 months were 44.4%, 71.4% and 77.1% in UC, and 9.1%, 26.7% and 29.2% in CD patients, respectively. Prior use of multiple biologic agents was associated with diminished efficacy of VDZ in CD. Three new cases of arthralgia were encountered during follow-up.Conclusion: Vedolizumab (VDZ) therapy displayed good drug sustainability and clinical efficacy in a population with severe disease phenotype and high rates of previous anti-TNF failure. Frequent dose intensification was required. The safety profile was good, and no association between newly onset arthralgia and VDZ therapy was observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Patients with Crohn's disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC] are at increased risk for colorectal dysplasia [CRD] and colorectal cancer [CRC]. Adherence to CRC surveillance guidelines is reportedly low internationally. Aim To evaluate surveillance practices at the tertiary IBD Center of the McGill University Health Center [MUHC] and to determine CRD/CRC incidence. Methods A representative inflammatory bowel disease cohort with at least 8 years of disease duration [or with primary sclerosing cholangitis] who visited the MUHC between July 1 and December 31, 2016 were included. Adherence to surveillance guidelines was compared to modified 2010 British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines. Incidence rates of CRC, high-grade dysplasia [HGD], low-grade dysplasia [LGD] and colorectal adenomas [CRA] were calculated based on pathology. Results In total, 1356 CD and UC patients (disease duration: 12 [interquartile range: 6–22) and 10 [interquartile range: 5–19] years) were identified. The surveillance cohort consisted of 680 patients [296 UC and 384 CD]. Adherence to surveillance guidelines was 76/82% in UC/colonic CD. An adequate number of biopsies were taken in 54/54% of UC/colonic CD patients. The incidence of CRC/HGD in UC and CD with colonic involvement was 19.5/58.5 and 25.1/37.6 per 100,000 patient-years, respectively. The incidence of dysplasia before 8 years of disease duration was low in both UC/CD [19.5 and 12.5/100,000 patient-years] with no CRC detected. The CRA rate was 30/38% in UC/colonic CD. Conclusion High adherence to surveillance guidelines and low CRC and dysplasia, but not CRA rates were found, suggesting that adhering to updated, stratified, surveillance recommendations may result in low advanced neoplasia rates. The incidence of dysplasia before the start of surveillance was low. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims Measuring quality of care [QoC] in inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD] has become increasingly important, yet complex assessment of QoC from the patients' perspective is rare. We evaluated perceived QoC using the Quality of Care Through the Patient's Eyes—IBD [QUOTE-IBD] questionnaire, and investigated associations between QoC, disease phenotype, work productivity, and health-related quality of life [HRQoL] in a high-volume IBD centre. Methods Consecutive patients attending McGill University Health Centre [MUHC]–IBD Centre completed the QUOTE-IBD, Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [SIBDQ], IBD-Control, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI] questionnaires. The QUOTE-IBD comprises 23 questions, each rated by a quality impact [QI] score. QI scores were calculated for the evaluation of IBD specialists, general practitioners [GPs], and hospital care. Results In all, 525 patients completed the questionnaire. Total QI scores for IBD specialists, GPs, and hospital care were 8.57, 8.70, and 8.33, respectively. The lowest QI scores were related to 'accessibility' for both IBD specialists and GPs. Female gender, current disease activity, poor HRQoL [SIBDQ score ≤50], and poor disease control [IBD-Control score <13] were associated with lower mean QI scores [ p <0.001 for all]. Disease phenotype was not associated with QI scores in either Crohn's disease [CD] or ulcerative colitis [UC] [ p = 0.69, p = 0.791, respectively]. An inverse correlation was found between total QI scores and work productivity loss [IBD specialist: p <0.001; GP: p = 0.004]. Conclusions Overall patient satisfaction with QoC was good; however, improving patient accessibility to care is warranted. Disease phenotype was not associated with patient satisfaction, whereas female gender, current disease activity, HRQoL, and work productivity loss were associated with patients' quality assessment, underlining that perceived QoC could be partly subjective regarding disease control and quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background and aims We aimed to evaluate the quality of care at a tertiary inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center using quality of care indicators (QIs) including patient assessment strategy, monitoring, treatment decisions and outcomes. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the quality of care pre- and post-referral and during follow-up at the at the McGill University Health Center (MUHC) IBD center. Consecutive patients were included presenting with an outpatient visit ('index visit') between July and December 2016. Disease characteristics, biochemistry, imaging and endoscopy data, changes in medications, and vaccination profiles were captured. Results 1357 patients were included. At referral, a large proportion of patients were objectively re-evaluated (ileocolonoscopy: 79%, cross-sectional imaging: 39.3%, biomarkers: 89.9%, 81.9%). Therapeutic strategy was changed in 53.6% with 22.5% of patients starting biologics. Tight objective patient monitoring was applied during follow-up (colonoscopy: 79%, cross-sectional imaging: 61.8% were available at index visit; C-reactive protein: 78%, Faecal calprotectin: 37.6%, therapeutic drug monitoring: 16.3% were performed additionally). Maximum therapeutic step was biologicals in 48.8% of the patients, while only 6.6% of all patients were steroid dependent. Implementation of a rapid access clinic improved healthcare delivery. Conclusions Our data support that tight monitoring was applied at the MUHC IBD center with a high emphasis on objective patient (re)evaluation, timely access and accelerated treatment strategy at referral and during follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]