Search

Your search keyword '"K. Popper"' showing total 4 results
Start Over Descriptor "K. Popper" Topic critical rationalism
4 results on '"K. Popper"'

2. EL POPPERIANO COMO UN PIRRÓNICO: LA NOCIÓN DE JUSTIFICACIÓN EPISTÉMICA EN KARL POPPER.

Author

ARMANDO CÍNTORA, G.

Abstract

Popper argues in the Logic of Scientific Discovery (published in 1934 in German) against both an externalist and an internalist epistemic justification for observational statements; Popper then opts in the LSD for a position that substitutes the justification of the basic statements of science with their criticism; and he stops a regress of criticisms with some conventional decisions. Later, in the Open Society (1945) he argues for a critical rationalism, one that requires some argumentatively unjustified and unjustifiable presuppositions, i.e., it requires some dogmas. The late Popper (circa 1983), seems inclined towards a pancritical rationalism, a position that leads, however, to a logical paradox, which can only be evaded if some presuppositions are to be accepted as not criticizable. Thus, the Popperian requires either some unjustifiable or some uncriticizable presuppositions. These dogmatic presuppositions should be believed passively and judgment about their truth value should be suspended. This is the Popperian's Pyrrhonian attitude. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2014

3. The Open State: The Thinking of Karl R. Popper in the Work of Peter Häberle

Author

Pedro Rivas Martínez

Subjects
media_common.quotation_subject, Critical rationalism, Constitutionalism, Estado constitucional, K. Popper, P. Häberle, open society, critical rationalism, Constitutional Sate, German, lcsh:Political science (General), Relevance (law), lcsh:JA1-92, Order (virtue), media_common, Presumption, Philosophy, lcsh:Law, K. Popper, P. Häberle, sociedad abierta, racionalismo crítico, Estado constitucional, language.human_language, Epistemology, K. Popper, open society, critical rationalism, P. Häberle, language, Constitutional Sate, Ideology, Humanities, sociedad abierta, racionalismo crítico, lcsh:K
Abstract

El objetivo primordial del presente texto es coadyuvar a la comprensión de la ideología académicadel constitucionalista alemán Peter Häberle. Para alcanzar un entendimiento consistentede su obra es necesario tener como presupuesto el trabajo de varios pensadores deimportancia histórica en los que Häberle fundamentó su pensamiento; este texto se ocupaexclusivamente y parcialmente de uno de ellos: Karl Raymund Popper. Häberle reconoceabiertamente que su obra ha sido realizable gracias a los trabajos de Popper y remite con frecuenciaa los mismos, en ocasiones dando por supuesto su conocimiento, por lo que convieneexplicitar algunas nociones fundamentales, así como la forma en que operan la recepción yaplicación de las mismas. The main purpose of this text is to aid in the comprehension of the academic ideology ofthe German constitutionalist Peter Häberle. In order to have a coherent understanding ofhis work it is necessary to take into account the presumption of the works of several thinkersof historic relevance on which Häberle based his thinking; here we will be talking about oneof them: Karl Raymund Popper. Häberle publicly acknowledges that his work was possiblethanks to the work of Popper and frequently refers to him, occasionally taking for grantedthat the reader possesses that knowledge, therefore it is advisable to explain some of the fundamentalnotions, and how the learning and application thereto is performed.

Published
2016

4. Analytical dimension of the open society in the research of post-communism

Author

Laurėnas, Vaidutis

Subjects
K. Popper, Lietuva (Lithuania), third way, Post-communism, Piecemeal ingineering, Atviroji visuomenė, Pokomunizmas, Piecemeal inžinerija, Critical rationalism, Open society, piecemeal enginnering, Pi'ecemeal inžinerija, trečiasis kelias, Open society
Abstract

Negalėtume pasakyti, kad atvirosios visuomenes analitinė dimensija yra užėmusi nors kiek svaresnę vietą pokomunizmo tyrimų teorinio instrumentarijaus rinkinyje. Jeigu ji ir taikoma atliekant Šiuos tyrimus, tai tapatinama su dabartiniais liberalių demokratijų ir kapitalistinių rinkos ekonomikų standartais, kaip tai darė ir pats atvirosios visuomenės idėjos autoritetas K. R. Popperis, svarstydamas apie „kapitalistinę" visuomenę. Tuo tarpu atsirado pakankamai kontrargumentų tokiam tapatinimui. Bet tai ne kontrargumentai pačiai atvirosios visuomenės analitinei perspektyvai. Šiame straipsnyje aptariamos K. R. Popperio atvirosios visuomenės idėjos, kuri pasiūlyta prieš 60 metų, taikymo, atliekant pokomunizmo tyrimus, galimybės. It would be an exaggeration to state that the analytical dimension of the open society has ever played a significant role in the research of post-communism. If even it has ever been employed in the said research, it has been simplified to the standards of the current liberal democracies and capitalist market economies, just as it has been done by the expert of the open society K. Popper himself in his reflections on the "capitalist" society. He failed to discern at least the slightest prospect of "the third way". Meanwhile counter-arguments to such perception of the open society appeared. But these are not counter-arguments to the analytical dimension of the open society itself. The present article is devoted to the discussion of the possibility of employing K. Popper's open society idea, shaped over 60 years ago, for the research of post-communism.

Published
2003

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results