1. Association between timing of intubation and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients: A meta-analysis.
- Author
-
Xixi NA, Kremmydas P, Xourgia E, Giannopoulou V, Sarri K, and Siempos II
- Subjects
- Humans, Intensive Care Units, Intubation, Intratracheal adverse effects, COVID-19 therapy, Critical Illness
- Abstract
Purpose: Optimal timing of intubation is controversial. We attempted to investigate the association between timing of intubation and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients., Methods: PubMed was systematically searched for studies reporting on mortality of critically ill patients undergoing early versus late intubation. Studies involving patients with new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) were excluded because a relevant meta-analysis has been published. "Early" intubation was defined according to the authors of the included studies. All-cause mortality was the primary outcome. Pooled risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effects model. The meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021284850)., Results: In total, 27 studies involving 15,441 intubated patients (11,943 early, 3498 late) were included. All-cause mortality was lower in patients undergoing early versus late intubation (7338 deaths; 45.8% versus 53.5%; RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.97; p = 0.001). This was also the case in the sensitivity analysis of studies defining "early" as intubation within 24 h from admission in the intensive care unit (6279 deaths; 45.8% versus 53.6%; RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.98; p = 0.005)., Conclusion: Avoiding late intubation may be associated with lower mortality in critically ill patients without COVID-19., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared for all authors., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF