Search

Background: Increased protein provision might ameliorate muscle wasting and improve long-term outcomes in critically ill patients. The aim of the PRECISe trial was to assess whether higher enteral protein provision (ie, 2·0 g/kg per day) would improve health-related quality of life and functional outcomes in critically ill patients who were mechanically ventilated compared with standard enteral protein provision (ie, 1·3 g/kg per day)., Methods: The PRECISe trial was an investigator-initiated, double-blinded, multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial in five Dutch hospitals and five Belgian hospitals. Inclusion criteria were initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation within 24 h of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and an expected duration of invasive ventilation of 3 days or longer. Exclusion criteria were contraindications for enteral nutrition, moribund condition, BMI less than 18 kg/m 2 , kidney failure with a no dialysis code, or hepatic encephalopathy. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four randomisation labels, corresponding with two study groups (ie, standard or high protein; two labels per group) in a 1:1:1:1 ratio through an interactive web-response system. Randomisation was done via random permuted-block randomisation in varying block sizes of eight and 12, stratified by centre. Participants, care providers, investigators, outcome assessors, data analysts, and the independent data safety monitoring board were all blinded to group allocation. Patients received isocaloric enteral feeds that contained 1·3 kcal/mL and 0·06 g of protein/mL (ie, standard protein) or 1·3 kcal/mL and 0·10 g of protein/mL (ie, high protein). The study-nutrition intervention was limited to the time period during the patient's ICU stay in which they required enteral feeding, with a maximum of 90 days. The primary outcome was EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) health utility score at 30 days, 90 days, and 180 days after randomisation, adjusted for baseline EQ-5D-5L health utility score. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04633421) and is closed to new participants., Findings: Between Nov 19, 2020, and April 14, 2023, 935 patients were randomly assigned. 335 (35·8%) of 935 patients were female and 600 (64·2%) were male. 465 (49·7%) of 935 were assigned to the standard protein group and 470 (50·3%) were assigned to the high protein group. 430 (92·5%) of 465 patients in the standard protein group and 419 (89·1%) of 470 patients in the high protein group were assessed for the primary outcome. The primary outcome, EQ-5D-5L health utility score during 180 days after randomisation (assessed at 30 days, 90 days, and 180 days), was lower in patients allocated to the high protein group than in those allocated to the standard protein group, with a mean difference of -0·05 (95% CI -0·10 to -0·01; p=0·031). Regarding safety outcomes, the probability of mortality during the entire follow-up was 0·38 (SE 0·02) in the standard protein group and 0·42 (0·02) in the high protein group (hazard ratio 1·14, 95% CI 0·92 to 1·40; p=0·22). There was a higher incidence of symptoms of gastrointestinal intolerance in patients in the high protein group (odds ratio 1·76, 95% CI 1·06 to 2·92; p=0·030). Incidence of other adverse events did not differ between groups., Interpretation: High enteral protein provision compared with standard enteral protein provision resulted in worse health-related quality of life in critically ill patients and did not improve functional outcomes during 180 days after ICU admission., Funding: Netherlands Organisation for Healthcare Research and Development and Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests EDW receives honoraria for scientific lectures from Baxter Healthcare, Nutricia–Danone, and Nestlé. ARHvZ receives grants from AOP Pharma, Nutricia–Danone, Fresenius Kabi, PAION, and Rousselot; receives consulting fees from AOP Pharma, Medcaptain, and PAION; receives honoraria for lectures from Abbott, AOP Pharma, Baxter, Nestlé, Nutricia–Danone, Fresenius Kabi, GE Healthcare, and Dutch Medical Food; receives support for travel from Nutricia–Danone and Dutch Medical Food; is a member of the adult intensive care unit patient nutrition guideline committee of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism, the executive team of SepsisNet Netherlands, and the executive team of the Netherlands Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition; and is the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Section Feeding, Rehabilitation Endocrinology and Metabolism chair. ZP receives grants from Fresenius Kabi, Nestlé, and Baxter; receives consulting fees from Fresenius Kabi, Nestlé, Baxter, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, and Bioage Pharmaceuticals; and receives honoraria for lectures from Baxter, Nestlé, Fresenius Kabi, and Nutricia. MCGvdP receives grants from the Netherlands Organisation of Health Research and Development and the Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; receives in-kind support from Nutricia; receives consulting fees from Nutricia and Nestlé; and receives honoraria for lectures and support for travel from Nutricia. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

Background: The PRECISe trial is a pragmatic, multicenter randomized controlled trial that evaluates the effect of high versus standard enteral protein provision on functional recovery in adult, mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. The current protocol presents the rationale and analysis plan for an evaluation of the primary and secondary outcomes under the Bayesian framework, with an emphasis on clinically important effect sizes., Methods: This protocol was drafted in agreement with the ROBUST-statement, and is submitted for publication before database lock and primary data analysis. The primary outcome is health-related quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L health utility score and is longitudinally assessed. Secondary outcomes comprise the 6-min walking test and handgrip strength over the entire follow-up period (longitudinal analyses), and 60-day mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and EQ-5D-5L health utility scores at 30, 90 and 180 days (cross-sectional). All analyses will primarily be performed under weakly informative priors. When available, informative priors elicited from contemporary literature will also be incorporated under alternative scenarios. In all other cases, objectively formulated skeptical and enthusiastic priors will be defined to assess the robustness of our results. Relevant identified subgroups were: patients with acute kidney injury, severe multi-organ failure and patients with or without sepsis. Results will be presented as absolute risk differences, mean differences, and odds ratios, with accompanying 95% credible intervals. Posterior probabilities will be estimated for clinically important benefit and harm., Discussion: The proposed secondary, pre-planned Bayesian analysis of the PRECISe trial will provide additional information on the effects of high protein on functional and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, such as probabilistic interpretation, probabilities of clinically important effect sizes, and the integration of prior evidence. As such, it will complement the interpretation of the primary outcome as well as several secondary and subgroup analyses., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest MvdP received travel and speaker fees from Nutricia and research funding from Nestle Health Science and Fresenius-Kabi, not related to this research. EDW received research grants, travel and speakers fees from the Belgian Government Health, KCE (Belgian Health Care), Baxter Healthcare, Fresenius, Nestlé and Art Medical., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Muscle wasting starts already within the first week in critically patients and is strongly related to poor outcome. Nevertheless, the early detection of muscle wasting is difficult. Therefore, we investigated the reliability and accuracy of ultrasonography to evaluate skeletal muscle wasting in critically ill children and adults., Methods: This prospective observational study enrolled 30 sedated critically ill children and 14 critically ill adults. Two independent investigators made 210 ultrasonographical assessments of muscle thigh thickness. Inter- and intraobserver reliability and cutoff levels were calculated as a function of muscle thickness and the expected reduction in muscle size (predefined at 20% and 30%)., Results: Mean ± SD muscle thickness was 1.67 ± 0.55 cm in the pediatric and 2.10 ± 0.85 cm in the adult population. The median absolute interobserver variability was 0.07 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 0.04-0.20 cm) in the pediatric population and 0.05 cm (IQR, 0.03-0.09 cm) in the adult population. However, the absolute intraobserver accuracy had a 95% confidence interval of 0.43 cm in children and 0.22 cm in adults. Only a 30% decrease (0.50 cm) in muscle thickness can be detected in critically ill children., Conclusion: Although the interobserver variability is acceptable in the pediatric population, the intraobserver variability is too large with respect to the expected reduction in muscle thickness. In adults, ultrasonography may be a reliable tool for early detection of muscle mass wasting., (© 2015 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.)

Background: Recent trials have questioned the benefit of early parenteral nutrition in adults. The effect of early parenteral nutrition on clinical outcomes in critically ill children is unclear., Methods: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial involving 1440 critically ill children to investigate whether withholding parenteral nutrition for 1 week (i.e., providing late parenteral nutrition) in the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) is clinically superior to providing early parenteral nutrition. Fluid loading was similar in the two groups. The two primary end points were new infection acquired during the ICU stay and the adjusted duration of ICU dependency, as assessed by the number of days in the ICU and as time to discharge alive from ICU. For the 723 patients receiving early parenteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition was initiated within 24 hours after ICU admission, whereas for the 717 patients receiving late parenteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition was not provided until the morning of the 8th day in the ICU. In both groups, enteral nutrition was attempted early and intravenous micronutrients were provided., Results: Although mortality was similar in the two groups, the percentage of patients with a new infection was 10.7% in the group receiving late parenteral nutrition, as compared with 18.5% in the group receiving early parenteral nutrition (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.66). The mean (±SE) duration of ICU stay was 6.5±0.4 days in the group receiving late parenteral nutrition, as compared with 9.2±0.8 days in the group receiving early parenteral nutrition; there was also a higher likelihood of an earlier live discharge from the ICU at any time in the late-parenteral-nutrition group (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.37). Late parenteral nutrition was associated with a shorter duration of mechanical ventilatory support than was early parenteral nutrition (P=0.001), as well as a smaller proportion of patients receiving renal-replacement therapy (P=0.04) and a shorter duration of hospital stay (P=0.001). Late parenteral nutrition was also associated with lower plasma levels of γ-glutamyltransferase and alkaline phosphatase than was early parenteral nutrition (P=0.001 and P=0.04, respectively), as well as higher levels of bilirubin (P=0.004) and C-reactive protein (P=0.006)., Conclusions: In critically ill children, withholding parenteral nutrition for 1 week in the ICU was clinically superior to providing early parenteral nutrition. (Funded by the Flemish Agency for Innovation through Science and Technology and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01536275.).

Hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and glycemic variability are all independently associated with morbidity and mortality of critically ill patients. A strategy aiming at normoglycemia (so-called tight glycemic control) could improve outcomes of critically ill patients, but results from randomized controlled trials of tight glycemic control are conflicting. Strict glycemic control is associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia, which could offset the benefit of this intervention. Notably, the risk of hypoglycemia is not necessarily removed with less tight glucose control regimens. The best targets of blood glucose control in critically ill patients, therefore, remain a matter of debate. It should be realized that blood glucose control is a complex intervention, consisting of many critical aspects that have the potential to affect its efficacy and safety. Efficacy, and in particular safety, of blood glucose control could still improve. First, glucose algorithms could overcome the lack of knowledge and skills of nursing staff when they are less experienced in safe and efficient blood glucose control. Several computerized glucose control algorithms have been developed over recent years, but they all need clinical validation. Also, the workload induced by such algorithms should be evaluated. Second, continuous blood glucose monitoring has the potential to improve safety and efficacy. Until recently, blood glucose levels were monitored manually using point-of-care devices with significant inaccuracies. Various continuous monitoring systems have been developed, but studies testing their accuracies and usefulness in an intensive care unit setting are highly needed., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Objective: To assess current nutritional practices in critically ill children worldwide., Design: A two-part online, international survey. The first part, "the survey", was composed of 59 questions regarding nutritional strategies and protocols (July-November 2013). The second part surveyed the "point prevalence" of nutritional data of patients present in a subgroup of the responding PICUs (May-September 2014)., Setting: Members of the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies were asked to complete the survey., Subjects: Pediatric critical care providers., Interventions: Survey., Measurements and Main Results: We analyzed 189 responses from 156 PICUs in 52 countries (survey). We received nutritional data on 295 patients from 41 of these 156 responding PICUs in 27 countries (point prevalence). According to the "survey", nutritional protocols and support teams were available in 52% and 57% of the PICUs, respectively. Various equations were in use to estimate energy requirements; only in 14% of PICUs, indirect calorimetry was used. Nutritional targets for macronutrients, corrected for age/weight, varied widely. Enteral nutrition would be started early (within 24 hr of admission) in 60% of PICUs, preferably by the gastric route (88%). In patients intolerant to enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition would be started within 48 hours in 55% of PICUs. Overall, in 72% of PICUs supplemental parenteral nutrition would be used if enteral nutrition failed to meet at least 50% of energy delivery goal. Several differences between the intended (survey) and the actual (point prevalence) nutritional practices were found in the responding PICUs, predominantly overestimating the ability to adequately feed patients., Conclusion: Nutritional practices vary widely between PICUs worldwide. There are significant differences in macronutrient goals, estimating energy requirements, timing of nutrient delivery, and threshold for supplemental parenteral nutrition. Uniform consensus-based nutrition practices, preferably guided by evidence, are desirable in the PICU.

Objective: In ICU patients, abnormal liver tests are common. Markers of cholestasis are associated with adverse outcome. Research has focused on the possibility that mild hyperbilirubinemia, instead of indicating inadvertent cholestasis, may be adaptive and beneficial. These new insights are reviewed and integrated in the state-of-the-art knowledge on hepatobiliary alterations during sepsis and other critical illnesses., Data Sources: Relevant publications were searched in Medline with search terms bile, bile acids, cholestasis, critical illness, intensive care, sepsis, alone or in combination., Data Synthesis: Studies have shown that bilirubin, but also bile acids, the main active constitutes of bile, are increased in plasma of patients with critical illnesses. In particular the conjugated fractions of bilirubin and bile acids are high, indicating that during critical illness the liver is capable of converting these molecules to less toxic forms. In human liver biopsies of prolonged critically ill patients, expression of bile acid excretion pumps towards the bile canaliculi was lower, while alternative transporters towards the systemic circulation were upregulated. Remarkably, in the presence of increased circulating bile acids, expression of enzymes controlling synthesis of bile acids was not suppressed. This suggested loss of feedback inhibition of bile acids synthesis, possibly explained by the observed cytoplasmic retention of the nuclear FXR/RXR heterodimer. As macronutrient restriction during acute critical illness, an intervention that improved outcome, was found to further increase plasma bilirubin while reducing other markers of cholestasis, a potentially protective role of hyperbilirubinemia was suggested., Conclusion: The increase in circulating levels of conjugated bile acids and bilirubin in response to acute sepsis/critical illnesses may not necessarily point to cholestasis as a pathophysiological entity. Instead it may be the result of an adaptively altered bile acid production and transport back towards the systemic circulation. How these changes could be beneficial for survival should be further investigated.

Blood glucose management in people with acute myocardial infarction and critical illness has always attracted controversy. Compared with the era before 2001 when no attention was given to blood glucose management, DIGAMI-1 in 1995 and the first Leuven study in 2001 showed improved outcomes with strict control of blood glucose, thereby suggesting a causal association between hyperglycaemia and mortality risk. These landmark trials have set the standard in clinical practice that excessive hyperglycaemia is not acceptable. Multicentre trials contradicted the benefits of tight control of patients' blood glucose and results showed that different standard operating procedures for blood glucose control (eg, blood glucose meters or algorithms), divergent concomitant feeding strategies, and varying patient populations are important confounders. The general consensus now is that excessive hyperglycaemia (>10 mmol/L) and severe hypoglycaemia (<2·2 mmol/L) should be avoided in critically ill adults. If adequate blood glucose meters and clinically validated protocols for insulin-dosing are available, targeting of blood glucose concentrations to less than 8 mmol/L (moderate glycaemic control), while avoiding mild hypoglycaemia (<3·9 mmol/L), is a reasonable strategy in adult patients who are critically ill. This recommendation is not based on findings from randomised controlled trials, but merely represents a very common, pragmatic approach by physicians at the bedside. As a result of the few properly validated technologies for tighter blood glucose control, targeting blood glucose concentrations to less than 6 mmol/L is not recommended, because its risk-to-benefit ratio becomes questionable. Because blood glucose control in the target of adult ranges does not improve patient outcomes for children in the intensive care unit, glucose management in this patient population should be limited to avoid excessive hyperglycaemia (>10 mmol/L)., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: Cholestatic liver dysfunction (CLD) and biliary sludge often occur during critical illness and are allegedly aggravated by parenteral nutrition (PN). Delaying initiation of PN beyond day 7 in the intensive care unit (ICU) (late PN) accelerated recovery as compared with early initiation of PN (early PN). However, the impact of nutritional strategy on biliary sludge and CLD has not been fully characterized. This was a preplanned subanalysis of a large randomized controlled trial of early PN versus late PN (n = 4,640). In all patients plasma bilirubin (daily) and liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase [GGT], alkaline phosphatase [ALP], twice weekly; n = 3,216) were quantified. In a random predefined subset of patients, plasma bile acids (BAs) were also quantified at baseline and on days 3, 5, and last ICU-day (n = 280). Biliary sludge was ultrasonographically evaluated on ICU-day 5 (n = 776). From day 1 after randomization until the end of the 7-day intervention window, bilirubin was higher in the late PN than in the early PN group (P < 0.001). In the late PN group, as soon as PN was started on day 8 bilirubin fell and the two groups became comparable. Maximum levels of GGT, ALP, and ALT were lower in the late PN group (P < 0.01). Glycine/taurine-conjugated primary BAs increased over time in ICU (P < 0.01), similarly for the two groups. Fewer patients in the late PN than in the early PN group developed biliary sludge on day 5 (37% versus 45%; P = 0.04)., Conclusion: Tolerating substantial caloric deficit by withholding PN until day 8 of critical illness increased plasma bilirubin but reduced the occurrence of biliary sludge and lowered GGT, ALP, and ALT. These results suggest that hyperbilirubinemia during critical illness does not necessarily reflect cholestasis and instead may be an adaptive response that is suppressed by early PN., (© 2014 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Achieving adequate glucose control in critically ill patients is a complex but important part of optimal patient management. Until relatively recently, intermittent measurements of blood glucose have been the only means of monitoring blood glucose levels. With growing interest in the possible beneficial effects of continuous over intermittent monitoring and the development of several continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, a round table conference was convened to discuss and, where possible, reach consensus on the various aspects related to glucose monitoring and management using these systems. In this report, we discuss the advantages and limitations of the different types of devices available, the potential advantages of continuous over intermittent testing, the relative importance of trend and point accuracy, the standards necessary for reporting results in clinical trials and for recognition by official bodies, and the changes that may be needed in current glucose management protocols as a result of a move towards increased use of CGM. We close with a list of the research priorities in this field, which will be necessary if CGM is to become a routine part of daily practice in the management of critically ill patients.

Background: Cholestatic liver dysfunction frequently occurs during critical illness. Administration of parenteral nutrition (PN) is thought to aggravate this. Underlying mechanisms are not clear., Methods: In a burn model of prolonged critical illness, rabbits were randomized to a nutritional strategy either accepting caloric deficits (fasted, n = 11) or covering caloric needs by PN (fed, n = 10). At baseline and after 7 days of critical illness, markers of hepatotoxicity, circulating bile acids, and the hepatobiliary transport system were studied., Results: Fasted animals had lower circulating alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase levels than did the fed animals at day 7. Compared with baseline values, fed animals displayed lower serum unconjugated cholic acid (CA) and deoxycholic acid (DCA) levels. Unconjugated DCA remained unaltered in fasted animals. Unconjugated lithocholic acid was increased comparably in all animals, whereas hyodeoxycholic acid was not altered. In contrast, fasting induced a shift from unconjugated CA and DCA to glyco-CA and glyco-DCA. Total bile acids did not correlate with the bile acid-producing enzyme CYP7A1, but with the basolateral efflux transporter MRP3. Fasting increased protein expression of the basolateral (MRP3) and the canalicular (BSEP) transporter, whereas the canalicular efflux pump MRP2 was suppressed. Gene expression levels of the nuclear receptor farnesoid X receptor were lower with fasting and correlated inversely with MRP3. The heterodimer partner of farnesoid X receptor, retinoid X receptor α, was increased with fasting and correlated positively with MRP3., Conclusions: During prolonged critical illness, withholding PN improved markers for hepatocyte injury and accentuated bile acid transport toward the blood. This suggests that the latter is an adaptive rather than a dysfunctional feedback to illness.

Objective: The goal of enhanced nutrition in critically ill patients is to improve outcome by reducing lean tissue wasting. However, such effect has not been proven. This study aimed to assess the effect of early administration of parenteral nutrition on muscle volume and composition by repeated quantitative CT., Design: A preplanned substudy of a randomized controlled trial (Early Parenteral Nutrition Completing Enteral Nutrition in Adult Critically Ill Patients [EPaNIC]), which compared early initiation of parenteral nutrition when enteral nutrition was insufficient (early parenteral nutrition) with tolerating a pronounced nutritional deficit for 1 week in ICU (late parenteral nutrition). Late parenteral nutrition prevented infections and accelerated recovery., Setting: University hospital., Patients: Fifteen EPaNIC study neurosurgical patients requiring prescheduled repeated follow-up CT scans and six healthy volunteers matched for age, gender, and body mass index., Intervention: Repeated abdominal and femoral quantitative CT images were obtained in a standardized manner on median ICU day 2 (interquartile range, 2-3) and day 9 (interquartile range, 8-10). Intramuscular, subcutaneous, and visceral fat compartments were delineated manually. Muscle and adipose tissue volume and composition were quantified using standard Hounsfield Unit ranges., Measurements and Main Results: Critical illness evoked substantial loss of femoral muscle volume in 1 week's time, irrespective of the nutritional regimen. Early parenteral nutrition reduced the quality of the muscle tissue, as reflected by the attenuation, revealing increased intramuscular water/lipid content. Early parenteral nutrition also increased the volume of adipose tissue islets within the femoral muscle compartment. These changes in skeletal muscle quality correlated with caloric intake. In the abdominal muscle compartments, changes were similar, albeit smaller. Femoral and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments were unaffected by disease and nutritional strategy., Conclusions: Early parenteral nutrition did not prevent the pronounced wasting of skeletal muscle observed over the first week of critical illness. Furthermore, early parenteral nutrition increased the amount of adipose tissue within the muscle compartments.

The management reporting and assessment of glycemic control lacks standardization. The use of different methods to measure the blood glucose concentration and to report the performance of insulin treatment yields major disparities and complicates the interpretation and comparison of clinical trials. We convened a meeting of 16 experts plus invited observers from industry to discuss and where possible reach consensus on the most appropriate methods to measure and monitor blood glucose in critically ill patients and on how glycemic control should be assessed and reported. Where consensus could not be reached, recommendations on further research and data needed to reach consensus in the future were suggested. Recognizing their clear conflict of interest, industry observers played no role in developing the consensus or recommendations from the meeting. Consensus recommendations were agreed for the measurement and reporting of glycemic control in clinical trials and for the measurement of blood glucose in clinical practice. Recommendations covered the following areas: How should we measure and report glucose control when intermittent blood glucose measurements are used? What are the appropriate performance standards for intermittent blood glucose monitors in the ICU? Continuous or automated intermittent glucose monitoring - methods and technology: can we use the same measures for assessment of glucose control with continuous and intermittent monitoring? What is acceptable performance for continuous glucose monitoring systems? If implemented, these recommendations have the potential to minimize the discrepancies in the conduct and reporting of clinical trials and to improve glucose control in clinical practice. Furthermore, to be fit for use, glucose meters and continuous monitoring systems must match their performance to fit the needs of patients and clinicians in the intensive care setting.

Context: Tight glucose control (TGC) to normal-for-age fasting blood glucose levels reduced morbidity and mortality in surgical adult and pediatric intensive care unit (ICU) patients. In adults, TGC did not affect the illness-induced alterations in thyroid hormones. With better feeding in children than in adult patients, we hypothesized that TGC in pediatric ICU patients reactivates the thyroid axis., Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of TGC on the thyroid axis in pediatric ICU patients and to investigate how these changes affect the TGC outcome benefit., Design and Patients: We conducted a preplanned analysis of all patients not treated with thyroid hormone, dopamine, or corticosteroids who were included in a randomized controlled trial on TGC (n=700)., Main Outcome Measures: Serum TSH, T4, T3, and rT3 were measured upon admission and on ICU day 3 or the last ICU day for patients discharged earlier. Changes from baseline were compared for the TGC and usual care groups. The impact on the outcome benefit of TGC was assessed with multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, correcting for baseline risk factors., Results: TGC further lowered the T)/rT3 ratio (P=0.03), whereas TSH (P=0.09) and T4 (P=0.3) were unaltered. With TGC, the likelihood of earlier live discharge from the ICU was 19% higher at any time (hazard ratio, 1.190; 95% confidence interval, 1.010-1.407; P=0.03). This benefit was statistically explained by the further reduction of T3/rT3 with TGC because an increase in T3/rT3 was strongly associated with a lower likelihood for earlier live discharge (hazard ratio per unit increase, 0.863; 95% confidence interval, 0.806-0.927; P<0.0001)., Conclusions: TGC further accentuated the peripheral inactivation of thyroid hormone. This effect, mimicking a fasting response, statistically explained part of the clinical outcome benefit of TGC.

Hyperglycemia during critical illness is associated with adverse outcome. The proof-of-concept Leuven studies assessed causality, and revealed that targeting strict normoglycemia (80-110 mg/dL) with insulin improved outcome compared with tolerating hyperglycemia to the renal threshold (215 mg/dL). A large multicenter trial (NICE-SUGAR [Normoglycaemia in Intensive Care Evaluation and Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation]) found an intermediate blood glucose target (140-180 mg/dL) safer than targeting normoglycemia. Differences in design and in execution of glycemic control at the bedside may have contributed to these results. In NICE-SUGAR (Normoglycaemia in Intensive Care Evaluation and Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation), the blood-glucose target range in the control group was lower, there were problems to reach and maintain normoglycemia in the intervention group, and inaccurate handheld blood glucose meters and variable blood sampling sites were allowed. Inaccurate tools led to insulin-dosing errors with consequently (undetected) hypoglycemia and unacceptable blood glucose variability. Also, the studies were done superimposed upon different nutritional strategies. Thus, such differences do not allow simple, evidence-based recommendations for daily practice, but an intermediate blood glucose target may be preferable while awaiting better tools to facilitate safely reaching normoglycemia.

Studies on tight glycemic control by intensive insulin therapy abruptly changed the climate of limited interest in the problem of hyperglycemia in critically ill patients and reopened the discussion on accuracy and reliability of glucose sensor devices. This article describes important components of blood glucose measurements and their interferences with the focus on the intensive care unit setting. Typical methodologies, organized from analytical accuracy to clinical accuracy, to assess imprecision and bias of a glucose sensor are also discussed. Finally, a list of recommendations and requirements to be considered when evaluating (time-discrete) glucose sensor devices is given., (© 2012 Diabetes Technology Society.)

Stress hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia are associated with increased mortality and morbidity in critically ill patients. Three randomized controlled trials, in the surgical, medical, and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of the Leuven University in Belgium, demonstrated the beneficial response of tightly controlling blood glucose levels within age-adjusted narrow limits by applying intensive insulin therapy. Follow-up studies could not confirm the results obtained in the Leuven studies but revealed the complexity associated with tight glycemic control (TGC). This article gives an overview of the methodological aspects typical of the Leuven TGC concept, with the focus on the PICU. Differences between the adult and the PICU are described. This overview article might help other ICUs by addressing potential differences in clinical practice when implementing TGC., (© 2012 Diabetes Technology Society.)

Unlabelled: Hyperbilirubinemia is common during critical illness and is associated with adverse outcome. Whether hyperbilirubinemia reflects intensive care unit (ICU) cholestasis is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze hyperbilirubinemia in conjunction with serum bile acids (BAs) and the key steps in BA synthesis, transport, and regulation by nuclear receptors (NRs). Serum BA and bilirubin levels were determined in 130 ICU and 20 control patients. In liver biopsies messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of BA synthesis enzymes, BA transporters, and NRs was assessed. In a subset (40 ICU / 10 controls) immunohistochemical staining of the transporters and receptors together with a histological evaluation of cholestasis was performed. BA levels were much more elevated than bilirubin in ICU patients. Conjugated cholic acid (CA) and chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) were elevated, with an increased CA/CDCA ratio. Unconjugated BA did not differ between controls and patients. Despite elevated serum BA levels, CYP7A1 protein, the rate-limiting enzyme in BA synthesis, was not lowered in ICU patients. Also, protein expression of the apical bile salt export pump (BSEP) was decreased, whereas multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP) 3 was strongly increased at the basolateral side. This reversal of BA transport toward the sinusoidal blood compartment is in line with the increased serum conjugated BA levels. Immunostaining showed marked down-regulation of nuclear farnesoid X receptor, retinoid X receptor alpha, constitutive androstane receptor, and pregnane X receptor nuclear protein levels., Conclusion: Failure to inhibit BA synthesis, up-regulate canalicular BA export, and localize pivotal NR in the hepatocytic nuclei may indicate dysfunctional feedback regulation by increased BA levels. Alternatively, critical illness may result in maintained BA synthesis (CYP7A1), reversal of normal BA transport (BSEP/MRP3), and inhibition of the BA sensor (FXR/RXRα) to increase serum BA levels., (Copyright © 2011 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: Controversy exists about the timing of the initiation of parenteral nutrition in critically ill adults in whom caloric targets cannot be met by enteral nutrition alone., Methods: In this randomized, multicenter trial, we compared early initiation of parenteral nutrition (European guidelines) with late initiation (American and Canadian guidelines) in adults in the intensive care unit (ICU) to supplement insufficient enteral nutrition. In 2312 patients, parenteral nutrition was initiated within 48 hours after ICU admission (early-initiation group), whereas in 2328 patients, parenteral nutrition was not initiated before day 8 (late-initiation group). A protocol for the early initiation of enteral nutrition was applied to both groups, and insulin was infused to achieve normoglycemia., Results: Patients in the late-initiation group had a relative increase of 6.3% in the likelihood of being discharged alive earlier from the ICU (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.13; P=0.04) and from the hospital (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.13; P=0.04), without evidence of decreased functional status at hospital discharge. Rates of death in the ICU and in the hospital and rates of survival at 90 days were similar in the two groups. Patients in the late-initiation group, as compared with the early-initiation group, had fewer ICU infections (22.8% vs. 26.2%, P=0.008) and a lower incidence of cholestasis (P<0.001). The late-initiation group had a relative reduction of 9.7% in the proportion of patients requiring more than 2 days of mechanical ventilation (P=0.006), a median reduction of 3 days in the duration of renal-replacement therapy (P=0.008), and a mean reduction in health care costs of €1,110 (about $1,600) (P=0.04)., Conclusions: Late initiation of parenteral nutrition was associated with faster recovery and fewer complications, as compared with early initiation. (Funded by the Methusalem program of the Flemish government and others; EPaNIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00512122.).

Context: Intensive insulin therapy (IIT) improved outcome in the adult and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) compared with conventional insulin therapy (CIT). IIT did not increase the anabolic hormone IGF-I in critically ill adults, but feeding in critically ill children and pediatric hormonal responses may differ. Twenty-five percent of the children with IIT experienced hypoglycemia, which may have evoked counterregulatory responses., Objective: We hypothesized that IIT reactivates the somatotropic axis and anabolism in PICU patients., Design: This was a preplanned subanalysis of a randomized controlled trial on IIT., Patients: We studied 369 patients who stayed in PICU for at least 3 d (study 1) and 126 patients in a nested case-control study (study 2)., Main Outcome Measures: Circulating insulin, C-peptide, GH, IGF-I, bioavailable IGF-I, IGF-binding protein (IGFBP)-1, IGFBP-3, and acid-labile subunit were analyzed upon admission and d 3. In the nested case-control study, the somatotropic axis, cortisol, and glucagon were analyzed before and after hypoglycemia., Results: On d 3, C-peptide was more than 10-fold lower (P < 0.0001) in the IIT group than in the CIT group. IIT increased circulating GH (P = 0.04) and lowered bioavailable IGF-I (P = 0.002). IIT also decreased IGFBP-3 (P = 0.0005) and acid-labile subunit (P = 0.007), while increasing IGFBP-1 (P = 0.04) and the urea/creatinine ratio, a marker of catabolism (P = 0.03). In the nested case-control study, IGFBP-1 was increased after hypoglycemia, whereas the somatotropic axis and the counterregulatory hormones cortisol and glucagon did not change., Conclusions: Despite improved PICU outcome, IIT did not counteract the catabolic state of critical illness. Suppression of portal insulin may have resulted in lower bioavailable IGF-I.

Context: Targeting normoglycemia with intensive insulin therapy (IIT) improved short-term outcome of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients but increased the incidence of hypoglycemia. Both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia may adversely affect the developing brain., Objective: We studied the impact of targeting normoglycemia with IIT on brain injury markers., Design: This is a preplanned analysis of PICU patients included in a randomized controlled study., Setting: The study was conducted at a university hospital PICU., Patients: Seven hundred PICU patients participated., Interventions: Patients were assigned to IIT targeting normal-for-age fasting blood glucose levels or insulin infusion only to prevent excessive hyperglycemia., Main Outcome Measures: Serum S100B and neuron-specific enolase (NSE), biomarkers of astrocytic and neuronal damage, respectively, were measured on fixed days (n = 700) and in a nested case-control design before and after hypoglycemia (n = 126)., Results: Admission levels of S100B and NSE differed according to diagnosis and illness severity (P < 0.0001). IIT did not affect the time course of these markers. Patients experiencing hypoglycemia in PICU had higher S100B and NSE from admission onward than those without hypoglycemia. In the nested case-control study, both markers decreased after hypoglycemia (P = 0.001 and P = 0.009), unlike in the controls on matched days., Conclusions: IIT in PICU did not evoke neurological damage detectable by circulating S100B and NSE, despite increased incidence of hypoglycemia. Elevated markers in patients with hypoglycemia were not caused by hypoglycemia itself but rather reflect an increased incidence of hypoglycemia in the most severely ill. This hypoglycemia risk appears difficult to capture by classical illness severity scores.

Critically ill patients face a high risk of death, which is mostly due to non-resolving multiple organ failure. The plethora of endocrine and metabolic disturbances that hallmark critical illness may play a key role. The major part of our research performed during the period 2004-2009 focused on the disturbed glucose metabolism that commonly develops during critical illness. The onset of this research interest was the landmark randomized clinical study on strict blood glucose control (80-110 mg/ dl) with intensive insulin therapy performed by Prof. Van den Berghe and our clinical team members. This study, published in 2001 in the New England Journal of Medicine, showed reduced morbidity and improved survival with intensive insulin therapy versus toleration of hyperglycemia up to 215 mg/dl. This review summarizes our findings in both patients and animal models on mechanisms contributing to the clinical benefits of strict blood glucose control. Intensive insulin therapy appeared to lower blood glucose levels by ameliorating insulin sensitivity and stimulation of glucose uptake in skeletal muscle, whereas hepatic insulin resistance was not affected. The therapy also improved the lipid profile and the immune response and attenuated inflammation. Maintenance of strict normoglycemia appeared essentially most important, rather than elevating insulin levels. Avoiding hyperglycemia protected the endothelium and the mitochondria. In our animal model, nutritional interventions counteracted the hypercatabolic state of critical illness and insulin improved myocardial contractility, but only when normoglycemia was maintained. Interestingly, we identified the adipose tissue as a functional storage depot for toxic metabolites during critical illness.

While stress hyperglycaemia has traditionally been regarded as an adaptive, beneficial response, it is clear that hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia are associated with increased risk of death in critically ill intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Recent studies on blood-glucose control failed to fully clarify whether this association is causal. Early proof-of-concept single-centre randomised controlled studies found that maintaining normoglycaemia by intensive insulin therapy, as compared with tolerating hyperglycaemia as an adaptive response, improved patient outcome. However, recent large multicentre studies VISEP, GLUCONTROL and NICE-SUGAR) could not confirm this survival benefit. Methodological disparity in the execution of the complex intervention of tight glycaemic control may have contributed significantly to the contradicting results. First, different target ranges for blood glucose were used in the control group of the GLUCONTROL and 'Normoglycemia in intensive care evaluation and survival using glucose algorithm' regulation' (NICE-SUGAR) studies. Second, problems to steer blood-glucose levels within target range in the intervention group resulted in a significant overlap of the treatment groups. Third, allowing inaccurate blood-glucose measurement devices, in combination with different blood sampling sites and types of infusion pumps, may have led to unnoticed swings in blood-glucose levels. Fourth, the level of expertise of the intensive care nurses with the therapy may have been variable due to low number of study patients per centre. Finally, the studies on tight blood-glucose control were done with vastly different nutritional and end-of-life strategies. The currently available studies do not allow to confidently recommend one optimal target for glucose in heterogeneous ICU patient groups and settings. Provided that adequate devices for blood-glucose measurement and insulin administration are available, together with an extensive experience of the nursing staff, blood-glucose levels should be controlled as close to normal as possible, without evoking unacceptable fluctuations and hypoglycaemia.

Context: Hyper- and hypoglycemia are associated with increased mortality of critically ill patients, but whether this association is causal remains unclear. Early randomized-controlled studies compared insulin infusion targeting "age-normal" blood glucose levels, labeled intensive insulin therapy, with an approach that considered hyperglycemia as a beneficial adaptation. These studies found benefits with maintaining normoglycemia. A recent large multicenter study, NICE-SUGAR, compared a similar age-normal with an intermediate glucose target and found the intermediate target superior. These results require explanation., Evidence Acquisition: All published randomized controlled studies on glucose control in ICU were reviewed. The methodological differences between the repeat studies, most specifically NICE-SUGAR, and the original proof-of-concept studies, were systematically analyzed., Evidence Synthesis: There were important methodological differences, possibly explaining different outcomes. These comprised different target ranges for blood glucose in control and intervention groups, different routes for insulin administration and types of infusion-pumps, different sampling sites, and different accuracies of glucometers, as well as different nutritional strategies and varying levels of expertise., Conclusions: These differences do not permit confident recommendations for a single optimal glucose target in variable ICU settings. Respecting the "primum non nocere" principle, it appears safe not to embark on targeting age-normal levels in ICUs that are not equipped to accurately and frequently measure blood glucose and have not acquired extensive experience with iv insulin administration using a customized guideline. A simple overall fall-back position could be to maintain blood glucose levels as close to normal as possible without evoking unacceptable fluctuations, hypoglycemia, and hypokalemia.

Background: Critical illness results in activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which might be accompanied by a peripheral adaptation in glucocorticoid sensitivity. Tissue sensitivity is determined by the active glucocorticoid receptor GRalpha, of which two splice variants involving the hormone-binding domain exist, GRbeta and GR-P., Objective: To study tissue mRNA expression of the GR and its splice variants in fatal critical illness., Design and Methods: We assessed mRNA expression of the GRalpha, GRbeta and GR-P variants in liver (n = 58) and muscle (n = 65) of patients who had died after intensive care, and had been randomized for insulin treatment. We analysed whether GR mRNA expression was associated with insulin treatment, cortisol levels and glucocorticoid treatment., Results: GRalpha and GR-P mRNA constituted 87 +/- 8% and 13 +/- 2%, respectively, of total GR mRNA in liver. GRbeta mRNA could only be amplified in five liver samples. All variants were present in most muscle samples (alpha = 96 +/- 11%, P = 3.9 +/- 0.4%, beta = 0.010 +/- 0.002%). GR expression was not associated with insulin therapy. A strong positive relationship was observed between the different GR variants in both liver and muscle (P < 0.001 for all). Serum cortisol levels were negatively associated with liver GRalpha and muscle GR-P expression (P < 0.05). mRNA expression of both liver GRalpha and GR-P, but not muscle GR, was substantially lower in patients who had received exogenous glucocorticoids (P < 0.01)., Conclusion: We demonstrate the presence of GRalpha and GR-P mRNA in liver and of GRalpha, GRbeta and GR-P mRNA in muscle, with no evidence for altered splicing in critical illness. In contrast to muscle GR, liver GR expression was substantially lower in patients receiving exogenous glucocorticoids.

Background and Aims: Cholestatic liver dysfunction and biliary sludge are common problems in critically ill patients. No specific strategies have been described to prevent cholestasis and biliary sludge in the intensive care unit (ICU). We examined liver dysfunction and biliary sludge prospectively in a large medical long-stay ICU population and hypothesized that tight glycemic control with intensive insulin therapy (IIT) reduces cholestasis and biliary sludge., Methods: This study was a preplanned subanalysis of 658 long-stay (at least a fifth day) ICU patients out of a large randomized controlled trial (n = 1200), studying the effects of IIT on the outcome of medical critical illness. Patients were allocated to either IIT (glycemia 80-110 mg/dl) or conventional insulin therapy (CIT) requiring insulin above a glycemia of 215 mg/dl. Different patterns of liver dysfunction were studied based on daily blood sample analysis, and biliary sludge was evaluated by ultrasonography., Results: On admission, cholestasis was present in 17% of patients (n = 649), increasing to 20% on d 10 (n = 347), whereas ischemic hepatitis decreased from 3.4% (n = 588) to less than 1% (n = 328). IIT significantly decreased biliary sludge on d 5 (50.4 vs. 66.4%, P = 0.01; n = 250). The difference did not remain significant on d 10 (57.4 vs. 66.2%, P = 0.29; n = 136). IIT also lowered the cumulative risk of cholestasis (P = 0.03)., Conclusions: Cholestatic liver dysfunction and biliary sludge are very common during prolonged critical illness but are significantly reduced by IIT.

Critical illness is generally hallmarked by activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. The development of very high levels of cortisol has been associated with severe illness and a raised risk of death. Likewise, a response that is inadequate relative to the degree of stress, termed relative adrenal insufficiency (also known as critical-illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency) has been associated with increased mortality. Much controversy exists with regard to the definition and biochemical testing of an adequate adrenal response to critical illness, which hampers diagnosis. High doses of glucocorticoids have been shown to have no effect in this setting and might be harmful. Moderate doses have been advocated, however, for critically ill patients with inflammatory conditions, such as acute respiratory distress syndrome and septic shock syndrome. Initial results from proof-of-concept studies were promising but thus far have not been reproduced in large, multicenter trials, although the latter were underpowered to yield definite conclusions. The role of glucocorticoid therapy in intensive care, therefore, remains uncertain. Until the debate has been settled, we recommend that use of glucocorticoid therapy in critically ill patients should continue to be based on the clinician's judgment and that routine adjuvant use should be avoided.

Interest in the somatotropic axis,with its complex network of interactions, during critical illness arose only a few decades ago. Te distinguishing neuroendocrine features of prolonged critical illness were not differentiated from those during the acute phase until the early 1990s. This incomplete understanding of the somatotropic axis contributed to some disastrous results, such as the multicenter growth hormone trial. The goal of stimulating the somatotropic axis without a proper preceding neuroendocrine diagnosis should be held obsolete. Moreover, the fascinating link between regulators of carbohydrate metabolism, such as insulin and insulin-like growth factor I, and the somatotropic axis may lead to future therapeutic possibilities.

Interest in the somatotropic axis, with its complex network of interactions, during critical illness started only a few decades ago. The distinguished neuroendocrine features of prolonged critically ill patients were not differentiated from those during the acute phase until the 1990s. This incomplete understanding of the somatotropic axis has contributed to some disastrous results. Aiming to stimulate the somatotropic axis without a proper preceding neuroendocrine diagnosis should be held obsolete, because recent data indicate that the patient with the best anabolic parameters may not necessarily be the most favored to survive the ICU stay. Moreover, the fascinating link between regulators of carbohydrate metabolism, such as insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1, and the somatotropic axis may lead to future therapeutic possibilities.

The catabolic state of critical illness has been linked to the suppressed somatotropic GH-IGF-binding protein (IGFBP) axis. In critically ill patients it has been demonstrated that, compared with the conventional approach, which only recommended insulin therapy when blood glucose levels exceeded 12 mmol/liter, strict maintenance of blood glucose levels below 6.1 mmol/liter with intensive insulin therapy almost halved intensive care mortality, acute renal failure, critical illness polyneuropathy, and bloodstream infections. Poor blood glucose control in diabetes mellitus has also been associated with low serum IGF-I levels, which can be increased by insulin therapy. We hypothesized that intensive insulin therapy would improve the IGF-I axis, possibly contributing to the clinical correlates of anabolism. Therefore, this study of 363 patients, requiring intensive care for more than 7 d and randomly assigned to either conventional or intensive insulin therapy, examines the effects of intensive insulin therapy on the somatotropic axis. Contrary to expectation, intensive insulin therapy suppressed serum IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and acid-labile subunit concentrations. This effect was independent of survival of the critically ill patient. Concomitantly, serum GH levels were increased by intensive insulin therapy. The suppression of IGF-I in association with the increased GH levels suggests GH resistance induced by intensive insulin therapy, which was reflected by the decreased serum GH-binding protein levels. Intensive insulin therapy did not affect IGFBP-3 proteolysis, which was markedly higher in protracted critically ill patients compared with healthy controls. Also, intensive insulin therapy did not suppress the urea/creatinine ratio, a clinical correlate of catabolism. In conclusion, our data suggest that intensive insulin therapy surprisingly suppressed the somatotropic axis despite its beneficial effects on patient outcome. GH resistance accompanied this suppression of the IGF-I axis. To what extent and through which mechanisms the changes in the GH-IGF-IGFBP axis contributed to the survival benefit under intensive insulin therapy remain elusive.

Compared with the conventional approach, which recommended only insulin therapy when blood glucose levels exceeded 12 mmol/liter, strict maintenance of blood glucose levels less than 6.1 mmol/liter with intensive insulin therapy has shown to reduce intensive care mortality, acute renal failure, critical illness polyneuropathy, and bloodstream infections in critically ill patients by about 40%. This study of 363 patients, requiring intensive care for more than 7 d and randomly assigned to either conventional or intensive insulin therapy, examines the effects of intensive insulin therapy on glucose and lipid homeostasis and their respective impact on the improved outcome. Intensive insulin therapy effectively normalized blood glucose levels within 24 h, both in survivors and nonsurvivors. Intensive insulin therapy also increased serum levels of low-density lipoprotein (P = 0.007) and high-density lipoprotein (P = 0.005), whereas it suppressed the elevated serum triglyceride concentrations (P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis, corrected for baseline univariate risk factors and the effect on inflammation, indicated that lipid rather than glucose control independently determined the beneficial effects of intensive insulin therapy on morbidity and mortality. In postmortem biopsies obtained from 74 patients who died in the intensive care unit, intensive insulin therapy increased mRNA levels of skeletal muscle glucose transporter 4 (P = 0.02) and hexokinase (P = 0.03), unlike those of hepatic glucokinase. In conclusion, our data suggest that intensive insulin therapy normalizes blood glucose levels through stimulation of peripheral glucose uptake and concomitantly partially restores the abnormalities in the serum lipid profile, which may have contributed significantly to the improved outcome of protracted critical illness.

Stress of critical illness is often accompanied by hyperglycaemia, whether or not the patient has a history of diabetes mellitus. This has been considered to be part of the adaptive metabolic response to stress. The level of hyperglycaemia in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke upon admission to the hospital has been related to the risk of adverse outcome. However, until recently, there was no evidence of a causal relationship and thus stress-induced hyperglycaemia was only treated with exogenous insulin when it exceeded 12 mmol/L (220 mg/dL). In patients with known diabetes, even higher levels were often tolerated. Recently, new data became available in support of another approach. In this review, we focus on the new evidence and the clinical aspects of managing hyperglycaemia with insulin in critically ill patients, drawing a parallel with diabetes management. Particularly, the 'Diabetes and Insulin-Glucose infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DIGAMI) study' and the 'insulin in intensive care study' have provided novel insights. The DIGAMI study showed that in patients with diabetes, controlling blood glucose levels below 12 mmol/L for 3 months after acute MI improves long-term outcome. In the recent study of predominantly surgical intensive care patients, the majority of whom did not previously have diabetes, it was shown that an even tighter control of blood glucose with exogenous insulin, aiming for normoglycaemia, dramatically improved outcome. Indeed, in this large prospective, randomised, controlled study, 1548 intensive care patients had been randomly allocated to either the conventional approach, with insulin infusion started only when blood glucose levels exceeded 12 mmol/L, or intensive insulin therapy, with insulin infused to maintain blood glucose at a level of 4.5-6.1 mmol/L (80-110 mg/dL). Intensive insulin therapy reduced intensive care mortality by more than 40% and also decreased a number of morbidity factors including acute renal failure, polyneuropathy, ventilator-dependency and septicaemia. Future studies will be needed to further unravel the mechanisms that explain the beneficial effects of this simple and cost-saving intervention. Although available evidence supports implementation of intensive insulin therapy in surgical intensive care, the benefit for other patient populations, such as patients on medical intensive care units or hospitalised patients who do not require intensive care but who do present with stress-induced hyperglycaemia, remains to be investigated.

IGF binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), an important regulator of IGF bioavailability, has been shown to correlate with mortality in critically ill patients. In the liver, IGFBP-1 is transcriptionally repressed by insulin, and it is therefore a potential marker of hepatic insulin sensitivity. We have recently shown that, compared with conventional treatment, maintenance of normoglycemia with intensive insulin therapy decreased morbidity and mortality of continuously fed critically ill patients. This study compares the effect of conventional and intensive insulin therapy on IGFBP-1 and assesses its predictive value for mortality. In 363 patients who were dependent on intensive care for more than 7 d and were randomly assigned to either conventional or intensive insulin therapy, serum IGFBP-1 levels were measured on admission, on d 1, 8, 15, 22, and 29, and on the day of intensive care unit discharge or death. In addition, IGFBP-1 and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase mRNA levels were measured by real-time RT-PCR in postmortem liver biopsies obtained from 74 patients who died in the intensive care unit. Although intensive insulin treatment lowered glycemia, it had no effect on IGFBP-1 serum levels. Instead, serum IGFBP-1 concentration was significantly higher in patients who ultimately died, and it differentiated nonsurvivors from survivors 3 wk before death. The predictive value of serum IGFBP-1 for mortality was similar to that of the APACHE-II score. Like circulating IGFBP-1, hepatic mRNA levels of IGFBP-1 and the similarly insulin-regulated gene, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, were not significantly different between conventional and intensive insulin therapy groups. These data suggest that hepatic insulin resistance in prolonged critically ill patients, reflected by high serum IGFBP-1 levels, is not overcome by intensive insulin therapy, and that this may affect patient outcome.