Search

In order to fulfill the principle of the constitutional state, Republic of Indonesia in its constitution admit and guarantee that every people have rights of recognition, guarantee, protection, fair legal certainty and equality before the law. Discretionary power or freies ermessen attached to administrative power even according to the principle of constitutional state every authority should be based on law, but in certain situation and condition in which the law has not or does not clearly regulated, the officials or administration agencies should make an action or decision based on policy or discretionary of power. Although freies ermessen is created in the form of regulation that is known as policy rule or beleid regel but the act of administration agencies that is freies ermessen that is most potential for abuse of power. Therefore, in sentence of Corruption Crime it is based on the purpose of sentence namely improving and protecting society thus the criminal responsibility who is always asked for the convict in the criminal act while it is still based on purpose of sentence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Criminal Disparity in a corruption case is unacceptable in philosophical reasoning, sociologically, or even from the perspective of legal objectives, which in theory and factual facts lead to judicial caprise and the presumption of judicial corruption in the verdict, where it will adversely affect the fair justice of the convicted or for the Indonesian people as victims of corruption. Criminal Law gives alternative in order to give pressure the criminal disparity through straftoemetingsleiddraad or guidance of sentencing of the judges in prosecuting without violating the principle of freedom of judges, either through the Indonesian Supreme Court Regulations for now as ius constitutum, or through the legislation process of the Anti-Corruption Act for the future as ius constituendium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]