1. On cyclic yield strength in definition of limits for characterisation of fatigue and creep behaviour
- Author
-
Yevgen Gorash and Donald Mackenzie
- Subjects
fatigue life ,Environmental Engineering ,Materials science ,yield strength ,cyclic plasticity ,Aerospace Engineering ,02 engineering and technology ,Plasticity ,Upper and lower bounds ,creep ,Stress (mechanics) ,Brittleness ,0203 mechanical engineering ,General Materials Science ,steel ,Electrical and Electronic Engineering ,Civil and Structural Engineering ,business.industry ,Mechanical Engineering ,Structural engineering ,Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Fatigue limit ,failure ,fatigue limit ,020303 mechanical engineering & transports ,Creep ,plasticity ,Fracture (geology) ,TJ ,TA1-2040 ,0210 nano-technology ,business ,Failure mode and effects analysis - Abstract
This study proposes cyclic yield strength as a potential characteristic of safe design for structures operating under fatigue and creep conditions. Cyclic yield strength is defined on a cyclic stress-strain curve, while monotonic yield strength is defined on a monotonic curve. Both values of strengths are identified using a two-step procedure of the experimental stress-strain curves fitting with application of Ramberg-Osgood and Chaboche material models. A typical S-N curve in stress-life approach for fatigue analysis has a distinctive minimum stress lower bound, the fatigue endurance limit. Comparison of cyclic strength and fatigue limit reveals that they are approximately equal. Thus, safe fatigue design is guaranteed in the purely elastic domain defined by the cyclic yielding. A typical long-term strength curve in time-to-failure approach for creep analysis has two inflections corresponding to the cyclic and monotonic strengths. These inflections separate three domains on the long-term strength curve, which are characterised by different creep fracture modes and creep deformation mechanisms. Therefore, safe creep design is guaranteed in the linear creep domain with brittle failure mode defined by the cyclic yielding. These assumptions are confirmed using three structural steels for normal and high-temperature applications. The advantage of using cyclic yield strength for characterisation of fatigue and creep strength is a relatively quick experimental identification. The total duration of cyclic tests for a cyclic stress-strain curve identification is much less than the typical durations of fatigue and creep rupture tests at the stress levels around the cyclic yield strength.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF