Search

Purpose: To assess the accuracy of freehand cervical C1 C2 screws placement by knock and drill (K and D) technique in craniovertebral anomalous bony anatomy. Materials and Methods: From January 2017 to December 2022, 682 consecutive C1 C2 screws in 215 patients with craniovertebral junction (CVJ) anomalies were enrolled. All patients underwent posterior fixation with K and D technique without any fluoroscopic guidance. The patient's demographic details, clinical details, radiological details, major intraoperative events, and postoperative complications were noted. The screws malposition grades and direction on CT images in the axial and sagittal plane were defined as new per proposed "SGPGI accuracy criteria." All patients had a clinical evaluation at 3-month follow-up. Results: Total 682 C1, C2 screws were placed in 215 patients for CVJ anomalies using K and D technique. The accuracy of screws placement by freehand technique was 84.46% (576/682). So with technique explained the rate of malplacement in simple (16.35%) and complex (15.19%) groups were almost comparable and comparison difference was not significant (P = 0.7005). Conclusion: The freehand technique, as described, is effective in cases of anomalous bony anatomy, and it is mandatory in complex CVJ anomalies. The accuracy of screw placement and VA injury is comparable with major studies. This technique is supposedly cost-effective and less hazardous to both health-care workers and patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A spectrum of vertebral artery (VA) anomalies have been described with or without an associated congenital craniovertebral junction (CVJ) anomalies. C3 segmental VA, where the VA enters the dura at the level of C2/3 intervertebral foramen is an extremely rare anomaly. We report two cases of congenital CVJ anomaly (irreducible in one with C2/3 fusion and reducible in the other; without any subaxial fusion but with articular agenesis at C2/3 joint on the anomalous artery side). Computed tomographic angiography revealed intraspinal intradural entry of VA through the C2/3 intervertebral foramen on the right side with the contralateral artery found crossing the atlanto-axial joint. Both the patients underwent posterior approach and C2 was spared from instrumentation in both cases. Postoperatively, the patient with irreducible dislocation recovered well while the patient with reducible dislocation expired, possibly secondary to the thrombosis of the dominant VA from C2/3 foraminal encroachment. C3 segmental VA may be advantageous in aggressively exposing the C1/2 joint but instrumentation of C2 or C3 needs caution in view of the possibility of VA injury. Our experience shows that VA may be endangered even while exposing and protecting the artery. For such cases, we recommend posterior decompression of the C2/3 neural foramen during instrumentation in the absence of associated C2/3 fusion, as an abnormal joint morphology of C2/3 indicates a C2/3 instability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tuberculosis of the craniovertebral junction is rare as well as intriguing. We present a unique amalgamation of three rare entities: craniovertebral tuberculosis, occipital condyle syndrome, and nontraumatic type II rotatory atlantoaxial dislocation in one patient. We reviewed the limited literature available and the underlying pathophysiology to highlight the pattern of the disease presentation, progression, and response to management options. A 13-year-old girl presented with neck pain, torticollis, and right hypoglossal weakness following a fall from stairs 10 months back. Radiological investigation suggested right occipital condylar destruction with right-sided neck tilt and rotatory atlantoaxial dislocation. The contrast magnetic resonance imaging was suggestive of craniovertebral tuberculosis with primary foci in the right lung (apical cavitary lesion). In view of an intact neurological condition, she was started on antitubercular treatment and she continues to do well during the follow-up. It remains debatable if an anticipation of this problem calls for a surgical addressal at the acute stage of the disease as a delayed correction is likely to be more complex. While a halo device is preferable in these cases, it remains cumbersome and less preferred in comparison to the Philadelphia collar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]