Search

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Unsatisfactory adherence to CPAP is an important clinical issue to resolve. Cluster analysis is a powerful tool to distinguish subgroups in a multidimensional fashion. This study aimed to investigate the use of cluster analysis for predicting CPAP adherence using clinical polysomnographic (PSG) parameters and patient characteristics. Participants of this multicenter observational study were 1133 patients with OSA who were newly diagnosed and implemented CPAP. Ward's method of cluster analysis was applied to in-laboratory diagnostic PSG parameters and patient characteristics. CPAP adherence was assessed during 90- and 365-day periods after CPAP initiation in each cluster. We adopted the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services criterion for CPAP adherence, i.e., CPAP use ≥4 h per night for 70 % or more of the observation period. Logistic regression analysis was performed to stratify clusters according to CPAP adherence. Five clusters were identified through cluster analysis. Clustering was significantly associated with CPAP adherence at 90- and 365-day periods after CPAP initiation. Logistic regression revealed that the cluster with features including apnea predominant sleep-disordered breathing, high apnea-hypopnea index, and relatively older age demonstrated the highest CPAP adherence. Cluster analysis revealed hidden connections using patient characteristics and PSG parameters to successfully identify patients more likely to adhere to CPAP for 90 days and up to 365 days. When prescribing CPAP, it is possible to identify patients with OSA who are more likely to be non-adherent. • Cluster analysis predicts CPAP adherence with characteristics and PSG parameters. • Five distinct clusters identified, each displaying varying levels of adherence. • High AHI and older age are linked with better CPAP adherence in specific clusters. • Adherence assessments over 90 and 365 days show consistent trends across clusters. • Cluster analysis illuminates the multidimensional nature of CPAP adherence factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder associated with major cardiovascular and neurocognitive sequelae. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the standard treatment for OSA. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence and associations of long-term CPAP adherence in newly diagnosed OSA patients. Methods: We enrolled patients who were diagnosed with OSA during the COVID-19 pandemic. Adherence was defined as CPAP use ≥4 h per night on ≥70% of nights over 30 consecutive days. Patient demographics were retrieved from medical records, and CPAP adherence at 6 months and 1 year after initiation was monitored. Results: Overall, 107 patients were included in the analysis. A number of 73 (68%) and 63 (59%) patients were adherent to CPAP treatment at 6 months and 12 months accordingly. Among the factors examined and analyzed (age, gender, BMI, Apnea–Hypopnea Index (AHI)), no significant correlation was found. Further analysis revealed the potential role of comorbidities. CPAP compliance at 6 months was shown to be associated with better CPAP adherence at 12 months. Conclusions: CPAP adherence at 6 months is correlated to long-term adherence to treatment. Therefore, early close follow-up is important. Further prospective studies are needed to identify other potential predictors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Studies have shown that a significant percentage of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) do not tolerate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and long-term use may be as low as 30%. Given the lower levels of symptoms and health-related risks, patients with mild sleep apnea may be at even higher risk for non-adherence to long term CPAP. The purpose of our study was to investigate the prevalence and associations of long-term CPAP adherence in first time users with mild sleep apnea diagnosed by home sleep apnea testing (HSAT). Methods We identified all the patients who were diagnosed with mild sleep apnea (5 =

Purpose: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is associated with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and nasal obstruction causes decreased adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). The purpose is to evaluate the effects of antiallergic agents on CPAP adherence and sleep quality. Methods: A longitudinal study was made of patients who use CPAP for OSA and treated with antiallergy agents for spring pollinosis. We compared the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), nasal symptoms scores (NSS), and data from CPAP before and after treatment. Then, we classified the subjects into two groups based on the baseline PSQI score: one group without a decreased sleep quality (PSQI < 6) and the other group with decreased sleep quality (PSQI ≥ 6). Results: Of 28 subjects enrolled, 13 had good sleep quality and 15 had poor sleep quality. PSQI showed significant improvements after medication (p = 0.046). ESS showed no significant differences after AR medication (p = 0.565). Significant improvement was observed after the prescription of antiallergy agents in all items of NSS (sneezing, p < 0.05; rhinorrhea, p < 0.01; nasal obstruction, p < 0.01; QOL, p < 0.01). The percentage of days with CPAP use more than 4 h increased significantly after the administration of rhinitis medication (p = 0.022). In the intragroup comparisons of PSQI ≥ 6 group, PSQI decreased significantly (p < 0.05). For the NSS in intragroup comparisons of PSQI ≥ 6 group, all parameters showed significant improvement (sneezing, p = 0.016; rhinorrhea, p = 0.005; nasal obstruction, p < 0.005; QOL, p < 0.005). Conclusion: The use of antiallergy agents can improve CPAP adherence and sleep quality in patients with OSA on CPAP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Studies have shown that a significant percentage of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) do not tolerate continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy and long-term use may be as low as 30%. Given the lower levels of symptoms and health-related risks, patients with mild sleep apnea may be at even higher risk for non-adherence to long term CPAP. The purpose of our study was to investigate the prevalence and associations of long-term CPAP adherence in first time users with mild sleep apnea diagnosed by home sleep apnea testing (HSAT). Methods: We identified all the patients who were diagnosed with mild sleep apnea (5 = < AHI < 15) by home sleep apnea testing from 01/2013 to 06/2019 at a large, combined community and hospital-based sleep practice. Only first time CPAP users were included. Compliance was defined as CPAP usage ≥ 4 h per night on ≥ 70% of nights over 30 consecutive days. We defined long term adherence as compliance on the 12th month following CPAP set up. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and CPAP compliance at 1st, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th month after therapy initiation were collected. We compared and identified the factors that had significant difference (P < 0.1) between compliant and non-compliant groups at the 12th month. Results: 222 patients were included in the analysis. 57 (25.7%) patients were adherent with long term CPAP treatment. The following factors were associated with a greater likelihood for long-term CPAP adherence: older age, lower body mass index (BMI), presence of a bed partner, non-smoker, presence of Diabetes Mellitus (DM), presence of Heart Failure (CHF), lack of depression, and compliance at 1st, 3rd, 6th and 9th month. Conclusions: Long term CPAP compliance in mild sleep apnea patients is low. Long term adherence to CPAP can be predicted based on CPAP adherence during the first three months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Samuel Genzor,1,&ast; Jan Prasko,2– 4,&ast; Jan Mizera,1,&ast; Petr Jakubec,1,&ast; Milan Sova,1,5,&ast; Jakub Vanek,2,&ast; Nikoleta Šurinová,6,&ast; Katerina Langova7,&ast; 1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc Czech Republic; 2Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital Olomouc and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc Czech Republic; 3Institute for Postgraduate Education in Health Care, Prague Czech Republic; 4Department of Psychology Sciences, Faculty of Social Science and Health Care, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Nitra The Slovak Republic; 5Department of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Masaryk University Brno and University Hospital Brno, Brno Czech Republic; 6Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc Czech Republic; 7Department of Biophysics, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc Czech Republic&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Jan Prasko, Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University Hospital Olomouc, I. P. Pavlova 6, Olomouc, 775 20, Czech Republic, Email praskojan@seznam.czBackground: Patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) are at increased risk of severe course of COVID-19. Vaccination remains to be the most effective prevention of complicated courses of infection. The best contemporary conservative treatment of OSA is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy.Purpose: To compare vaccination acceptance and outcomes of COVID-19 infection between OSA patients adhering to the CPAP therapy and those who rejected CPAP and surgical therapy.Patients and Methods: Subjects were divided into two groups: group A (N = 167) were individuals with sufficient CPAP adherence (more than 4 hours per night on average) over the last 10 years. Group B (N = 106) were individuals who did not use the CPAP therapy at all and had no indications to surgical therapy.Results: Three patients in group B died, and one had a severe course of COVID-19. None of the patients in group A died or experienced a severe course of COVID-19. Group A had a significantly higher proportion of males (77.8% compared to 66% in group B) and all parameters of OSA severity. The vaccination status was similar among both groups, with a complete triple dose vaccination rate of 69.5% and 67.9% in groups A and B, respectively.Conclusion: The results show that the patients with OSA adherent to CPAP therapy were less likely to experience a severe course of COVID-19 or death than the OSA patients non-compliant with therapy, despite the former group having more severe OSA. This result underlines the importance of adherence to CPAP therapy in OSA.Keywords: OSA, COVID-19, vaccination, treatment with CPAP, CPAP adherence

Objectives: To determine factors that are associated with OSA therapy outcomes with auto-titrating positive airway pressure (APAP). Methods: We sequentially grouped patients from a retrospective cohort based on APAP efficacy (sufficiently vs. insufficiently treated; insufficiently treatment defined as residual AHI of ≥ 5), therapy adherence (adherent vs. non-adherent, non-adherence defined as < 70% usage for ≥ 4 h/night), and therapy outcomes (optimal vs. non-optimal and non-optimal outcomes defined as non-adherent and/or insufficiently treated). We subsequently compared each group. Results: The insufficiently treated were older (68.4 ± 12.5 vs. 60.4 ± 13.1 years, p < 0.01) and had lower BMI (31.9 ± 6.3 vs. 37.9 ± 9.1 kg/m2, p < 0.01). They had higher baseline central apnea indices (CAI), longer leaks, higher peak pressures, and were less compliant. The non-adherent were younger (61.1 ± 12.6 vs. 65.5 ± 13.2 years, p = 0.03) and comprised more females (56.1 vs. 43.9%, p = 0.04). The leak duration per usage hour was higher in the non-compliant (median: 1.5; IQR 7.9 vs. median: 0.3; IQR 1.9 min/h; p < 0.01). The non-optimally treated had lower BMI, longer leaks, and less nightly usage. Multivariate analyses showed that leak duration was the common factor associated with treatment effectiveness and optimal therapy outcomes. Conclusions: Various demographic and clinical factors were associated with treatment efficacy and adherence. However, leak duration was the common factor related to treatment efficacy and overall optimal therapy outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective:Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a common sleep-related breathing disorder. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy is the most effective OSAS treatment; however, adherence to CPAP therapy is problematic with psychological symptoms and other sleep disorders. We investigated whether a difference existed between device compatibility of patients with OSAS who applied to the sleep outpatient clinic during the Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and normalization process and those who applied during preepidemic period.Materials and Methods:This study was a retrospective study. Patients with OSAS who applied to the sleep disorders center for device control between March 27, 2020 and July 1, 2020 and who used a device for at least one year were included. CPAP adherence time during this period and the same period in 2019 were compared.Results:This study included 190 patients. Regarding the usage times of the device, the average usage time before the pandemic was 5.3±0.6 hours, whereas after the pandemic, it was 4.5±0.9 hours. The device usage time of 54 patients was over four hours before the pandemic; however, it decreased to under four hours after the pandemic. Regarding insomnia, anxiety, and circadian rhythm disorder, there was a significant difference between patients with adequate device use times and patients with inadequate device use times.Conclusion:During the COVID-19 pandemic period, additional sleep disorders, such as insomnia, circadian rhythm disorder, nightmare disorder, and psychological problems, like anxiety symptoms, were expeienced by patients with OSAS. These added sleep and psychological problems affected the device compatibility of patients with OSAS. Knowing the problems that may arise during the COVID-19 pandemic process and conducting studies on these issues will help patients with OSAS, a risky group, improve device compliance.

See relatedarticle [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Indra Narang,1,2,&ast; Tetyana Kendzerska,3,4,&ast; Austin Heffernan,5 Uzair Malik,6 Carolina G Carvalho,7 Clodagh M Ryan8,9 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; 2The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; 3Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; 4The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; 5UBC, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, Canada; 6RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland; 7University Health Network; 8Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; 9Sleep Research laboratory, KITE-UHN&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Clodagh M Ryan, 9N-967 Toronto General Hospital, 585 University Ave., Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2N2, Canada, Email clodagh.ryan@uhn.caBackground: There is increasing prevalence of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in adolescents, the majority of whom receive treatment with positive airway pressure (PAP). Adherence to PAP is sub-optimal in adolescents with OSA. Moreover, the impact of transition from pediatric to adult healthcare system on PAP adherence is unknown. This is relevant as the transition period is a time of increased stress for youth with chronic illnesses.Research Question: Does PAP adherence decrease during the 1-year transition period from pediatric to adult healthcare system in those with OSA?Study Design and Methods: Youth previously diagnosed with persistent OSA and treated with PAP in a large academic center (Toronto, Canada) between 2017 and 2019 were enrolled on transfer from the pediatric to adult sleep clinic and followed at 12 months. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used to investigate the effect of time since the transfer on objective PAP adherence with adjustment for confounders.Results: Among the 45 enrolled participants, 42.2% were female, the median age was 18 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 17– 18), median BMI was 30.3 (IQR: 24.0– 37.1), and the median apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 17.8 events/hour (11.8– 30.7). In univariate analysis, we observed a significant reduction in the 12-month average PAP usage in days used at follow-up compared to PAP use at the time of enrolment: median of 5.0 hours/day (IQR: 1.3– 8.0) vs 2.6 hours/day (0.0– 6.4), p < 0.0001. Following adjustment for age, level of education, employment status and living arrangement, the 12-month average PAP usage in days remained significantly decreased at follow-up compared to at the time of enrolment: change in hours of − 1.14; 95% CI − 2.27 to − 0.01.Interpretation: Among youth with OSA treated with PAP, there is a clinically significant reduction in PAP adherence over the first year during the transition from pediatric to adult health care.Keywords: CPAP adherence, transition care, obstructive sleep apnea, young adults, CPAP compliance

Sijana Demirovic,1,2 Linda Lusic Kalcina,1,2 Ivana Pavlinac Dodig,1,2 Renata Pecotic,1,2 Maja Valic,1,2 Natalija Ivkovic,2 Zoran Dogas1,2 1Department of Neuroscience, University of Split School of Medicine, Split, Croatia; 2Split Sleep Medicine Center, University Hospital Center Split, Split, CroatiaCorrespondence: Zoran DogasDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Split School of Medicine, Soltanska 2, Split, 21000, CroatiaTel + 385 21 557 858Fax + 385 21 557 955Email zoran.dogas@mefst.hrPurpose: Due to the possible interplay of factors predisposing to severe COVID-19 outcomes and negative health consequences of poorly controlled OSA, adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy among OSA patients might be crucial during COVID-19 pandemics. Lockdown-related changes in CPAP adherence were investigated in CPAP users willing to participate in this study. Pre-lockdown adherence, age, gender, comorbidities and anxiety were analyzed as predictors of COVID-19 lockdown adherence.Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study performed at Split Sleep Medicine Center included 101 severe OSA patients (78.2% male). CPAP memory cards were assessed during 6 months of pre-lockdown and 40 days of lockdown (March/April 2020) period. A total of 81 patients in pre-lockdown met good CPAP adherence criteria (≥ 4 hours/night on 70% nights).Results: CPAP adherence improved during COVID-19 lockdown in the total sample of severe OSA patients. The percentage of adherent nights and CPAP usage hours per night increased during lockdown in good pre-lockdown CPAP adherers (p=0.011 and p=0.001, respectively), women (p=0.003 and p=0.001, respectively) and respondents younger than 58 years (p=0.007 and p< 0.001, respectively). Out of 20/101 poor pre-lockdown CPAP adherers, 9 have shifted to good lockdown adherence. When comorbidities, BMI and anxiety were taken into account, older and male respondents were recognized as less likely to improve CPAP usage hours during lockdown (R2=9.4%; p=0.032).Conclusion: The lockdown-related CPAP adherence improved in severe OSA patients, with a shift in almost half of poor pre-lockdown adherers towards good lockdown CPAP adherence. Women, younger and good pre-lockdown CPAP adherers were more adherent during lockdown. Despite being vulnerable groups for both OSA and COVID-19, no expected adherence improvements were observed in men and older patients.Keywords: OSA, CPAP, CPAP adherence, COVID-19, lockdown

Treatment of OSA with CPAP is currently the recommended treatment and has the greatest evidence of efficacy on AHI, symptoms and comorbidities. Symptomatic patients with moderate-severe OSA generally have good adherence to CPAP therapy, while those with mild OSA, female, young and generally paucisymptomatic, have lower CPAP adherence, especially in the medium and long term. The recent identification of different clinical and pathophysiological phenotypes of OSA has paved the way for alternative treatments to CPAP, leading to an increasingly personalized therapy. Weight loss and lifestyle modifications are highly recommended in all obese or overweight patients. Mandibular advancement devices (MAD), positional therapy (PT) and hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HSN) are recent and personalized alternative therapies on which there is promising and encouraging data but with still little strong scientific evidence. The purpose of this review is to compare the efficacy, adherence and costs of various therapeutic options for OSA patients in the light of recent evidence and to provide useful guidance for specialists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Positive airway pressure treatment (CPAP) is the gold standard for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). CPAP is highly effective, but its issue lays in poor adherence rates mainly caused by its invasive nature and related stigma. In accordance with a biopsychosocial model of CPAP adherence, psychosocial interventions have been implemented to alleviate low rates of adherence with promising results. The increase in the number of psychosocial interventions has highlighted the need to systematically evaluate their effectiveness. This review aims to identify psychosocial interventions used to increase CPAP adherence, to compile available data on their effectiveness, and the reasons why they are effective. Moreover, the review evaluates the impact of the interventions on sleep quality. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies testing psychosocial interventions (excluding educational only interventions) that aimed to increase CPAP adherence in adults with obstructive sleep apnea vs. no intervention or control group were included. A literature search in PsycINFO, MEDLINE, COCHRANE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Web of Science was performed for studies published in English and French between 1980 and January 2020. Risk of bias and methodological quality were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. Fourteen studies were included involving 1923 participants, six trials tested a motivational intervention, three trials tested a cognitive behavioral intervention and five others tested one of the following: relaxation, exposition therapy, phone coaching, audiotape or stage-matched intervention. Thirteen studies reported a positive effect of the intervention on CPAP adherence, while one reported no effect. Psychosocial interventions for CPAP adherence appear effective at increasing sleep quality, but more studies are needed to test this hypothesis. Reasons for the effectiveness of the interventions were pooled into five categories: time related, the intervention's adaptability, the patient's characteristics, the intervention's nature and characteristics and the intervention's specifics and target. The current review raises a significant gap between the biomedical and psychosocial domains. In fact, even in a psychosocial intervention study, the interpretation of the results revolves around biomedical models and very little consideration is given to biopsychosocial models. Our findings demonstrate the importance of examining the relationship between psychosocial variables and CPAP adherence to better tailor interventions to increase CPAP adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Turkish Sleep Medicine is the property of Galenos Yayinevi Tic. LTD. STI and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

ObjectivesThe treatment outcomes of pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are affected by positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy adherence, which may be affected by the type of device used. Continuous PAP (CPAP) devices deliver a continuous and fixed air pressure level, whereas automatic PAP (APAP) devices automatically adjust the pressure to meet changing needs during sleep. The adherence, tolerance and consistency of OSA-children's use of CPAP and APAP devices were compared.Study designOne-year, observational cohort study.MethodsTwenty-seven OSA-children were enrolled. Fourteen (52%) used CPAP, and 13 (48%) used APAP. The adherence, tolerance, and consistency of the PAP usage by the two groups were compared.ResultsOverall, 11 of the 27 children (41%) showed good PAP adherence. The CPAP patients averaged 4.9 h of device usage on the days used, for 60% of days, with 6 of 14 (43%) demonstrating good adherence. In comparison, the APAP patients averaged 3.2 h for 55% of days, with 5 of 13 (38%) exhibiting good adherence. The 2 groups showed no differences in their adherence, tolerance, or consistency of device usage (P values, 0.816, 0.609, and 0.720, respectively). Although the adherence of both groups improved in the second 6 months, it was without statistical significance (P values, 0.400 and 0.724). Age, sex, baseline apnea-hypopnea index, comorbidities, prescribed period, device type, mask type, and caregiver education-level were not risk factors for poor PAP adherence.ConclusionsNo differences in the adherence, tolerance, or consistency of the children's use of CPAP and APAP were revealed in this small inhomogeneous cohort study with limited resources.

Background: Many factors contribute to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) nonadherence, affecting health care burden. The original CPAP-SAVER study enrolled 66 CPAP-naive participants and showed high 1-month adherence and significantly higher apnea beliefs and CPAP attitude for the intervention group. Purpose and methods: Thirty-three participants from the original CPAP-SAVER study were recruited for a 3-year follow-up to determine adherence, examine the intervention effect, and identify adherence-associated factors. Results: Adherence rates dropped to 54.5% at 3 years, with a significant decrease in CPAP use hours (t = -2.37, p =.024) and nights (t = -4.05, p <.001). Group differences in beliefs and attitude were not sustained; however, beliefs (r = 0.57) and attitude (r = 0.44) were significant factors associated with adherence. Life satisfaction was significantly higher at present compared with before wearing CPAP (t = 5.17, p <.001). Implications for practice: The authors recommend intervention with a focus on apnea beliefs, CPAP attitude, and long-term support to promote CPAP adherence. Focus on CPAP attitude and beliefs and enhanced support early in the obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment trajectory may promote long-term adherence and subsequently reduce the health care burden of OSA disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a symptom of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) that resolves under treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). In some patients, sleepiness persists despite CPAP treatment. We retrospectively analyzed data on subjective residual EDS, assessed as an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (ESS) >10, in patients from the European Sleep Apnea Database (n = 4,853, mean age ± SD 54.8 ± 11.8 years, 26.1% females), at baseline and at the first visit (median follow-up: 5 months, interquartile range 3–13). An ESS > 10 occurred in 56% of patients at baseline and in 28.2% of patients at follow-up. Residual EDS was analyzed in 2,190 patients (age: 55.1 ± 12.0 years, 26.1% females) with sleep monitoring data (median follow-up: 3 months, interquartile range 1–15). Sleep studies during CPAP use were obtained in 58% of these patients; EDS was reported by 47.2% of patients at baseline and by 30.3% at follow-up. Residual OSA, defined as an apnea–hypopnea index >10/h, and insufficient CPAP adherence, defined as nightly use 10 at the first follow-up visit was associated directly with ESS at baseline and inversely with duration of follow-up, and CPAP use (R2 of the model: 0.417). EDS showed heterogeneity in different European countries both at baseline and at the first follow-up visit, suggesting modulation by cultural and lifestyle factors. In conclusion, residual EDS in CPAP-treated OSA occurred in approximately one in four patients at follow-up; its prevalence was highest (40%) in the first 3 months of treatment and subsequently decreased. The finding of residual EDS in a significant percentage of optimally treated OSA patients suggests that wake-promoting agents may be useful, but their indication should be evaluated after at least 3 months of treatment.

ObjectiveObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and insomnia are the two most common sleep disorders. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered first-line treatment for OSA. In the present study, we assess the effect of CPAP on symptoms and prevalence of insomnia in patients with OSA. We hypothesized a decrease in insomnia symptoms from CPAP initiation to follow-up, and that this decrease would depend on CPAP adherence.Materials and methodsThe sample included 442 patients diagnosed with OSA [mean age 54.9 years (SD = 12.1), 74.4% males] who started treatment with CPAP at a university hospital. OSA was diagnosed according to standard respiratory polygraphy. Mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 30.1 (SD = 21.1) at baseline. Insomnia was assessed prior to CPAP treatment (baseline) and at follow-up after a median of 19.9 weeks (range 6–52 weeks) with the Bergen Insomnia Scale (BIS). CPAP adherence was defined as an average use of ≥ 4 h per night, whereas non-adherence was defined as < 4 h per night.ResultsThere was a significant decrease in BIS scores from baseline (mean = 18.8, SD = 9.8) to follow-up (mean = 12.9, SD = 9.9), p < 0.001. Cohen’s d(0.65) indicated a moderate effect size. The reduction in BIS scores was depending on CPAP adherence (interaction effect F(1,440) = 12.4, p < 0.001), with larger reduction in the adherent group than in the non-adherent group. The proportion of patients with chronic insomnia was significantly reduced from 51.1% at baseline to 33.0% at follow-up (p < 0.001).ConclusionOverall, there was a significant reduction in insomnia symptoms from baseline to follow-up. The improvement was significant in both adherence groups, but the degree of improvement was larger among patients who were adherent to CPAP. Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in the prevalence of chronic insomnia at follow-up compared to baseline. This suggests that CPAP effectively reduces both the presence of insomnia and the severity of insomnia symptoms in some patients with OSA.

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a symptom of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) that resolves under treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). In some patients, sleepiness persists despite CPAP treatment. We retrospectively analyzed data on subjective residual EDS, assessed as an Epworth Sleepiness Scale score (ESS) >10, in patients from the European Sleep Apnea Database (n = 4,853, mean age ± SD 54.8 ± 11.8 years, 26.1% females), at baseline and at the first visit (median follow-up: 5 months, interquartile range 3–13). An ESS > 10 occurred in 56% of patients at baseline and in 28.2% of patients at follow-up. Residual EDS was analyzed in 2,190 patients (age: 55.1 ± 12.0 years, 26.1% females) with sleep monitoring data (median follow-up: 3 months, interquartile range 1–15). Sleep studies during CPAP use were obtained in 58% of these patients; EDS was reported by 47.2% of patients at baseline and by 30.3% at follow-up. Residual OSA, defined as an apnea–hypopnea index >10/h, and insufficient CPAP adherence, defined as nightly use <4 h, occurred with similar frequency in patients with and without EDS at follow-up. Prevalence of residual EDS was highest (40%) in patients with a first follow-up visit at 0–3 months, then it was 13–19% in patients with a first follow-up visit after 4 months to 2 years. The change in ESS (n = 2,190) was weakly correlated with CPAP use (R2 = 0.023, p < 0.0001). Logistic regression showed that an ESS score >10 at the first follow-up visit was associated directly with ESS at baseline and inversely with duration of follow-up, and CPAP use (R2 of the model: 0.417). EDS showed heterogeneity in different European countries both at baseline and at the first follow-up visit, suggesting modulation by cultural and lifestyle factors. In conclusion, residual EDS in CPAP-treated OSA occurred in approximately one in four patients at follow-up; its prevalence was highest (40%) in the first 3 months of treatment and subsequently decreased. The finding of residual EDS in a significant percentage of optimally treated OSA patients suggests that wake-promoting agents may be useful, but their indication should be evaluated after at least 3 months of treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Limited data suggest racial disparities in continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence exist.Objectives: To assess whether CPAP adherence varies by neighborhood racial composition at a national scale.Methods: Telemonitoring data from a CPAP manufacturer database were used to assess adherence in adult patients initiating CPAP therapy between November 2015 and October 2018. Mapping ZIP code to ZIP code tabulation areas, age- and sex-adjusted CPAP adherence data at a neighborhood level was computed as a function of neighborhood racial composition. Secondary analyses adjusted for neighborhood education and poverty.Measurements and Main Results: Among 787,236 patients living in 26,180 ZIP code tabulation areas, the prevalence of CPAP adherence was 1.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.6%) lower in neighborhoods with high (⩾25%) versus low (<1%) percentages of Black residents and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.9-1.5%) lower in neighborhoods with high versus low percentages of Hispanic residents (P < 0.001 for both), even after adjusting for neighborhood differences in poverty and education. Mean CPAP usage was similar across neighborhoods for the first 2 days, but by 90 days, differences in CPAP usage increased to 22 minutes (95% CI, 18-27 min) between neighborhoods with high versus low percentages of Black residents and 22 minutes (95% CI 17-27 min) between neighborhoods with high versus low percentages of Hispanic residents (P < 0.001 for both).Conclusions: CPAP adherence is lower in neighborhoods with greater proportions of Black and Hispanic residents, independent of education or poverty. These differences lead to a lower likelihood of meeting insurance coverage requirements for CPAP therapy, potentially exacerbating sleep health disparities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and insomnia are the two most common sleep disorders. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered first-line treatment for OSA. In the present study, we assess the effect of CPAP on symptoms and prevalence of insomnia in patients with OSA. We hypothesized a decrease in insomnia symptoms from CPAP initiation to follow-up, and that this decrease would depend on CPAP adherence. Materials and methods: The sample included 442 patients diagnosed with OSA [mean age 54.9 years (SD = 12.1), 74.4% males] who started treatment with CPAP at a university hospital. OSA was diagnosed according to standard respiratory polygraphy. Mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 30.1 (SD = 21.1) at baseline. Insomnia was assessed prior to CPAP treatment (baseline) and at follow-up after a median of 19.9 weeks (range 6–52 weeks) with the Bergen Insomnia Scale (BIS). CPAP adherence was defined as an average use of ≥ 4 h per night, whereas non-adherence was defined as < 4 h per night. Results: There was a significant decrease in BIS scores from baseline (mean = 18.8, SD = 9.8) to follow-up (mean = 12.9, SD = 9.9), p < 0.001. Cohen's d (0.65) indicated a moderate effect size. The reduction in BIS scores was depending on CPAP adherence (interaction effect F (1,440) = 12.4, p < 0.001), with larger reduction in the adherent group than in the non-adherent group. The proportion of patients with chronic insomnia was significantly reduced from 51.1% at baseline to 33.0% at follow-up (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Overall, there was a significant reduction in insomnia symptoms from baseline to follow-up. The improvement was significant in both adherence groups, but the degree of improvement was larger among patients who were adherent to CPAP. Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in the prevalence of chronic insomnia at follow-up compared to baseline. This suggests that CPAP effectively reduces both the presence of insomnia and the severity of insomnia symptoms in some patients with OSA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Increasingly compelling data link chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) to cardiovascular complications independent of known comorbidities. It remains unclear whether the association is amplified in the presence of both conditions. The aims of this study are to assess the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in overlap syndrome (OS) and to identify risk factors predisposing to this atrial arrhythmia. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 268 adults without past or current AF who were referred for an initial diagnostic polysomnogram from 2012 to 2019. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for incident AF. Incident AF occurred in 64 subjects [cumulative probability 24%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 19-29]. Independent predictors of incident AF were age-adjusted Charlson index [Odds ratio (OR) 1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3-2.0], percentage of time spent with O2 saturation below 90% (CT90) (OR 3.72, 95% CI 1.18-11.71), and CPAP adherence (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.71). OS patients with AF experienced higher hospitalization rates (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.03-2.37) and worse mortality rates (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.04-3.54). In multivariate Cox proportional regression, age-adjusted Charlson Index, severity of airflow obstruction, and CPAP adherence were independent predictors of mortality. The burden of hypoxemia and severity of comorbidities are independent factors for incident AF in individuals with OS. CPAP adherence may mitigate the risk of AF and reduce the rate of mortality in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is the most common form of sleep-disordered breathing. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the treatment of choice, but adherence is poor, contributing to a myriad of comorbidities that increase health burden. The study purpose was to examine the effect of the CPAP-SAVER intervention on adherence among adults with newly diagnosed OSA. Sixty-six participants were randomly assigned to intervention or standard care groups. Data were analyzed using chi-square, t -tests, and correlations. At one month, there was no significant difference in adherence between groups; CPAP beliefs and attitude were significantly higher and attitude significantly increased for the intervention group. Focus on CPAP beliefs and attitude by practitioners may impact CPAP adherence. With further research and replication of this study in larger samples to determine generalizability, the CPAP-SAVER intervention may provide underpinnings for the eventual development of an OSA-CPAP adherence management protocol. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic disease with significant health implications and adequate adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is essential for effective treatment. In many chronic diseases, health literacy has been found to predict treatment adherence and outcomes. In this study, the aim was to determine the health literacy of a sleep clinic population and evaluate the association between health literacy and CPAP adherence. Methods: A prospective cohort study was undertaken, recruiting 104 consecutive patients with a variety of sleep diagnoses. The Short Form Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM-SF), a validated questionnaire, was administered to measure health literacy. In a sub-group of 91 patients prescribed CPAP for OSA, CPAP usage was measured, with adequate usage defined as greater than 4 h/night CPAP therapy. Results: Seventy-one percent of the sleep clinic cohort was found to have adequate health literacy, as measured by the REALM-SF. In those prescribed CPAP for OSA, inadequate health literacy was associated with a twofold increased risk for inadequate CPAP usage (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.9, 95% CI: 1.1 to 8.22, p = 0.045). There was a 1.7 h/night difference in median CPAP usage comparing those with adequate to inadequate health literacy (4.6 h vs. 6.3 h/night). Conclusions: The majority of this sleep disorders cohort had adequate health literacy as measured by the REALM-SF questionnaire. However, inadequate health literacy appears to be an independent predictor of treatment adherence and may represent a modifiable risk factor of poor treatment outcomes in OSA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Objectives: Although the full-night continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration (fnPT) has been recognized as the gold standard for determining an optimal therapeutic pressure for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment, it is labor-intensive, time-consuming because it requires overnight polysomnography attended by well-experienced sleep technologists. The aim of this study is to develop a practical and feasible alternative titration method. Methods: We assessed demographic data and diagnostic polysomnographic parameters, time spent in CPAP titration, CPAP efficacy and long-term adherence of the two groups of our OSA patients who had received CPAP titration either by fnPT (n = 46) or by afternoon CPAP titration (aPT, n = 22). Main results: Mean total recording time of aPT was significantly shorter than that by fnPT (p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in mean residual apnea hypopnea index (AHI) on treatment, percent days with device usage, cumulative device usage hours during the 360 days, average device usage hours per day (360 days, days used), and percent of days with device usage = 4 hours during the 360 days after starting CPAP treatment between the two groups. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that aPT was feasible procedure as an alternative to fnPT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: One of the major challenges in treating OSA is to achieve adequate CPAP adherence. Telemonitoring has the potential to provide individualized management and early recognition of problems during treatment.Research Question: What is the effect of a multimodal telemonitoring intervention on treatment adherence, quality of life, and functional status in symptomatic patients with OSA and low cardiovascular risk?Study Design and Methods: In a multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients newly diagnosed with OSA were randomly assigned to multimodal telemonitoring for 6 months vs usual care (UC). Telemonitoring consisted of built-in electronic alert algorithms for early adjustment of CPAP treatment in case of side effects, leaks, or persistent residual events. The primary outcome was CPAP adherence (in hours per night). Secondary outcomes included daily symptoms such as fatigue and sleepiness, and quality of life measured by using self-reported questionnaires.Results: A total of 206 patients with OSA and a median age of 50.6 years (interquartile range [IQR], 42.1; 58.1 years) were included in the study; they were predominantly male (63%) with a median BMI of 30.6 kg/m2 (IQR, 26.8; 35.1 kg/m2) and a median apnea-hypopnea index of 45.2 events/h (IQR, 34.0; 60.0 events/h). Of these, 102 received UC and 104 received telemonitoring. After 6 months of treatment, CPAP adherence was similar in the two groups when assessed either by mean duration of usage (4.73 ± 2.48 h per night in the telemonitoring group and 5.08 ± 2.44 h per night in the UC group; P = .30) or in percentage of patients adherent to treatment (> 4 h usage per night, > 70% nights; 64% in the telemonitoring group vs 72% in the UC group; P = .24). There was no significant difference between the groups in effect size of improvement in fatigue and sleepiness.Interpretation: In patients with severe OSA and low cardiovascular risk, multimodal telemonitoring did not increase CPAP adherence. For both the telemonitoring and UC groups, similar improvements in daytime symptoms were achieved.Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: 01796769; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Positive airway pressure (PAP) adherence is poor in comorbid OSA/PTSD. SensAwake™ (SA) is a wake-sensing PAP algorithm that lowers pressure when wake is detected. We compared auto-PAP (aPAP) with and without SA for comorbid OSA/PTSD. Methods: Prospective, randomized crossover study comparing aPAP to aPAP + SA. We enrolled patients with OSA/PTSD who were PAP naïve. Four weeks after randomization, the patients were crossed over to the alternate treatment group, with final follow-up at eight weeks. Sleep questionnaires (ESS, ISI, FSS, and FOSQ-10) were assessed at baseline and follow-up. Results: We enrolled 85 patients with OSA/PTSD. aPAP reduced AHI to < 5/h in both groups. Our primary endpoint, average hours of aPAP adherence (total) after 4 weeks, was significantly increased in the SA group in our intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis (ß = 1.13 (95% CI 0.16–2.1); p = 0.02), after adjustment for ESS differences at baseline. After adjustment for ESS, SA (ITT analysis) also showed significant improvement in percentage of nights used for ≥ 4 h (ß = 14.9 (95% CI 1.02–28.9); p = 0.04). There were trends toward an increase in percentage nights used total (ß = 17.4 (95% CI − 0.1 to 34.9); p = 0.05), average hours of aPAP adherence (nights used) (ß = 1.04 (95% CI − 0.07 to 2.1); p = 0.07), and regular use (OR = 7.5 (95% CI 0.9–64.7); p = 0.07) after adjustment for ESS at baseline. After adjustment for ESS and days to cross over, SA by actual assignment did not show any effect on adherence variables. The ESS, ISI, FSS, and FOSQ-10 all showed significant improvements with PAP, but there were no differences in the magnitude of improvement in any score between groups. Conclusions: Adherence to aPAP may be improved with the addition of SA and deserves further study. SA is as effective as standard aPAP for normalizing the AHI and improving sleep-related symptoms. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02549508 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02549508?term=NCT02549508&rank=1 "Comparison Study Using APAP With and Without SensAwake in Patients With OSA and PTSD". [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) often has a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with social and psychological implications. For most OSA patients, a reduction in their HRQoL is due to symptoms such as poor sleep quality, excessive daytime somnolence, and fatigue with differences between gender. Purpose: This study explores the CPAP treatment effect on self-perceived HRQoL related to gender, somnolence, and CPAP adherence. Methods: Out of 1082 consecutive Italian outpatients, 125 (82 M) (60.3 ± 9.6 years) completed the prospective observational study and were evaluated at the first visit (T0), and the follow-up visit (T1). Two self-reported HRQoL questionnaires were administered: six subscales Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI) and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12). Results: Scores of PGWBI and SF-12 MCS improved from T0 to T1. Patients with CPAP use ≥ 4 h/night showed a significant improvement in all dimensions evaluated, except for SF-12 PCS. At T1, participants with ESS > 10 improved in all scores, except SF-12 PCS. Gender comparison shows better-perceived HRQoL in males at first visit and CPAP follow-up visit. Variation of PGWBI was significantly correlated with CPAP use, ESS at T0 and T1 (p < 0.0001; r2 = 0.26). Conclusions: This study provides evidence on the effectiveness of CPAP treatment on perceived HRQoL. Participants with greater adherence to therapy, greater sleepiness, and greater improvement of daytime sleepiness with CPAP therapy, reported a higher quality of life improvement. Gender comparison shows better-perceived HRQoL in males at first visit and CPAP follow-up, despite a more considerable improvement in females. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has become a major worldwide health concern and affects 2-4% of males and 1-2% females. In subjects diagnosed with mild or severe OSA, CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) is highly efficacious in improving the specific quality of life and the cardiovascular outcome but adherence to treatment limits its overall effectiveness. Factors that influence the adherence to CPAP therapy include patients' individual characteristics, disease severity, titration procedures, the presents of side effects and the psychosocial factors. The management of this pathology is multidimensional and is based on some interventions such as lifestyle modifications, physical training, oral appliance and educational, pharmacological, technological strategies. These measures are implemented to limit the adverse effects of CPAP therapy in order to maximize the CPAP usage and to obtain a decrease of symptomatology and an optimum quality of life in OSA patients [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The role of nasal symptoms in continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) tolerance is not completely clear. This study aimed to investigate the association between CPAP usage and nasal symptoms, either prior to, or developing during, CPAP use in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Two hundred thirty patients were studied and divided into high-, low-, and non-CPAP users. Nasal symptoms and related quality of life parameters were evaluated prior to CPAP initiation and after three months. We also investigated predictive factors for CPAP usage. Non-CPAP users had significantly worse baseline scores for runny nose compared with high and low users (1.34 vs. 0.68 and 0.75, respectively, p = 0.006). There were no other significant differences between the groups. Runny nose was an independent predictive factor for lower CPAP usage (p = 0.036). An evaluation after three months showed worsening in runny nose score in high-CPAP users (p = 0.025) but not in low- and non-users. There were no significant changes in other nasal symptoms. Our study demonstrates that nasal symptoms were very common in this population but rhinorrhoea was the only symptom associated with poorer CPAP adherence. Moreover, rhinorrhoea worsened after a three-month trial of high-CPAP usage.

Purpose: In children, the usual indications for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) are residual OSA after adenotonsillectomy and/or persistent OSA due to obesity. Data concerning adherence (hours/night) following ambulatory CPAP initiation are scarce. Methods: An observational cohort of 78 children was followed over 2 years. All exhibited sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) symptoms, were assessed by polysomnography, and prescribed CPAP. CPAP was initiated at hospital for 10 children. Results: OSA children, mean age 10.4 ± 3.2 years, were mostly males (75.6%), with a mean body mass index of 21.2 ± 7.3 kg/m2, and mean apnea+hypopnea index of 12.2 ± 10.6 events/hour. Seventy-two children were still on CPAP at 3 months, 63 at 6 months, 55 at 1 year, and 34 at 2 years. CPAP was discontinued thanks to rehabilitation programs, dento-facial orthopedics, and/or weight loss. Mean CPAP adherence at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months was respectively 6.1 ± 2.8, 6.2 ± 2.6, 6.2 ± 2.8, 6.3 ± 2.8, and 7.0 ± 2.7 h/night. There was a trend towards higher CPAP adherence and younger age, primary versus middle/high school attendance, higher baseline apnea+hypopnea index, and neurocognitive disorders. Conclusion: In our population, mean CPAP adherence defined in hours per night was high and did not decrease during the 24-month follow-up. These findings support the feasibility of ambulatory CPAP initiation in non-syndromic OSA. The high CPAP adherence is expected to be associated with improvements in neurocognition, and in metabolic and cardiovascular parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease which impacts quality of life, mood, cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first-line treatment for patients with moderate to severe OSA. CPAP ameliorates respiratory disturbances, leading to improvements in daytime sleepiness, quality of life, blood pressure, and cognition. However, despite the high efficacy of this device, CPAP adherence is often sub-optimal. Factors including: socio-demographic/economic characteristics, disease severity, psychological factors, and side-effects are thought to affect CPAP adherence in OSA patients. Intervention studies have suggested that augmented support/education, behavioral therapy, telemedicine and technological interventions may improve CPAP adherence. In this paper, we will extensively review the most common factors including age, gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, smoking status, severity of OSA, severity of OSA symptoms, psychological variables, social support, marital status/bed partner involvement, dry nose and mouth, mask leak, and nasal congestion that may predict CPAP adherence. We will also extensively review interventions that may increase adherence to CPAP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the first line therapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) but its effectiveness requires high adherence. We aimed to assess the impacts of the spouse's/partner's involvement and the quality of the couple's relationship on CPAP adherence.Methods: In a multicenter prospective study conducted in France, patients reported their subjective views regarding their partner's engagement in their CPAP treatment and the quality of their marital relationship using the Quality of Marriage Index. A hierarchical linear model was built to assess the predictors of CPAP adherence at day 120. Structural equation modeling was performed to evaluate the direct and indirect effects of the spouse's/partner's engagement and the quality of the couple's relationship on CPAP adherence.Results: The 290 OSA patients were predominantly male (77%), with a median age of 53 years IQR: [46; 62], median BMI: 32 kg/m2 [28.6; 35.9] and median apnea + hypopnea index: 43/per hour [33; 58]. Independent factors for CPAP adherence at day 120 were the partner's encouragement of CPAP usage and a stable relationship exceeding 30 years, although emotional support or collaboration were not associated with CPAP adherence. Structural equation modeling demonstrated that spouse's/partner's engagement is directly related to CPAP adherence and improvement of symptoms, and that CPAP adherence is a mediator of disease-specific health-related quality of life. Marital quality was a significant moderator of these interactions meaning that a spouse's/partner's engagement improved adherence only when the quality of marriage index was high.Conclusion: Future research and integrated OSA management should systematically include and document the role of the spouse/partner in CPAP adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The Self-Efficacy Measure for Sleep Apnea (SEMSA) is a 26-item self-questionnaire composed of three factors: risk perception of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), benefit of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and self-efficacy (the confidence to engage in CPAP use). It is used to evaluate health beliefs about OSAS and CPAP in order to optimize CPAP use. The purpose of this study was to design and validate a French version of the SEMSA.Methods: A forward-backward translation of the SEMSA was performed. Subjects with OSAS treated by CPAP and followed by our sleep clinic were invited to complete the questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the French SEMSA version were analyzed in terms of its construct validity (with confirmatory factor analysis, CFA), internal structural validity (Cronbach's alpha coefficient), and external validity (Pearson's correlation between SEMSA score and duration of CPAP use).Results: Two hundred eighty-eight subjects filled in the questionnaire. The mean age was 63.16 ± 12.73 years. The number of years since the beginning of CPAP treatment was 6.58 ± 6.03 years. The mean CPAP use duration was 6.19 ± 2.03 h/night. CFA was unsatisfactory (RMSEA = 0.066 and CFI = 0.88). The exploratory factor analysis revealed a fourth factor named "cardiovascular risk" factor. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.886. The correlation between the "self-efficacy" factor and the duration of CPAP use was significant (r = 0.26, p ≤ 0.001).Conclusions: The French version of the SEMSA is a psychometrically acceptable self-report questionnaire for measuring health beliefs and behavior in French patients with OSAS treated with CPAP. Such translation and validation should lead to the adoption of validated psychosocial methods for improving CPAP use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents the discussion on health inequities avoidable differences in health status arising from unequal distribution of finances, power, and resources. Topics include disadvantaged populations, Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) suffering a greater burden of sleep health disparities; and disparities in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) recognition, diagnosis, and treatment being identified by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES).

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder in Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients further increasing their already high cardiovascular risk. As T2D patients typically not report OSA symptoms, systematic screening for OSA in this population is warranted. We aimed to determine the readiness of T2D patients to undergo screening and to compare their adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy with “regular” sleep clinic patients who typically seek medical advice on their own initiative. We therefore recruited 494 consecutive T2D patients and offered them OSA screening using home sleep monitoring (type IV device). All participants in high risk of moderate-to-severe OSA were recommended home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) followed by CPAP therapy. Patients were followed-up for 12 months and outcomes compared to 228 consecutive sleep clinic patients undergoing HSAT. Among 307 screened T2D patients, 94 (31%) were identified at high risk of moderate-to-severe OSA. Subsequently, 54 patients underwent HSAT, 51 were recommended, and 38 patients initiated CPAP (acceptance 75%). Among 228 sleep clinic patients, 92 (40%) were recommended and 74 patients initiated CPAP (acceptance 80%). After 1 year, 15 (39%) T2D and 29 (39%) sleep clinic patients showed good CPAP adherence (use ≥ 4 h/night ≥ 70% nights). In conclusion, 20 T2D patients needed to be screened in order to obtain one successfully treated patient. OSA screening in T2D patients identified 31% with moderate-to-severe OSA. Once diagnosed, their CPAP acceptance and adherence did not differ from sleep clinic patients. However, the reasons for the high dropout during the screening-diagnostic process impacting the overall success of the screening program need to be identified and addressed.

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder in Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients further increasing their already high cardiovascular risk. As T2D patients typically not report OSA symptoms, systematic screening for OSA in this population is warranted. We aimed to determine the readiness of T2D patients to undergo screening and to compare their adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy with "regular" sleep clinic patients who typically seek medical advice on their own initiative. We therefore recruited 494 consecutive T2D patients and offered them OSA screening using home sleep monitoring (type IV device). All participants in high risk of moderate-to-severe OSA were recommended home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) followed by CPAP therapy. Patients were followed-up for 12 months and outcomes compared to 228 consecutive sleep clinic patients undergoing HSAT. Among 307 screened T2D patients, 94 (31%) were identified at high risk of moderate-to-severe OSA. Subsequently, 54 patients underwent HSAT, 51 were recommended, and 38 patients initiated CPAP (acceptance 75%). Among 228 sleep clinic patients, 92 (40%) were recommended and 74 patients initiated CPAP (acceptance 80%). After 1 year, 15 (39%) T2D and 29 (39%) sleep clinic patients showed good CPAP adherence (use ≥ 4 h/night ≥ 70% nights). In conclusion, 20 T2D patients needed to be screened in order to obtain one successfully treated patient. OSA screening in T2D patients identified 31% with moderate-to-severe OSA. Once diagnosed, their CPAP acceptance and adherence did not differ from sleep clinic patients. However, the reasons for the high dropout during the screening-diagnostic process impacting the overall success of the screening program need to be identified and addressed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]