Search

The protection from COVID-19 vaccination wanes a few months post-administration of the primary vaccination series or booster doses. New COVID-19 vaccine candidates aiming to help control COVID-19 should show long-term efficacy, allowing a possible annual administration. Until correlates of protection are strongly associated with long-term protection, it has been suggested that any new COVID-19 vaccine candidate must demonstrate at least 75% efficacy (although a 40%-60% efficacy would be sufficient) at 12 months in preventing illness in all age groups within a large randomized controlled efficacy trial. This article discusses four of the many scientific, ethical, and operational challenges that these trials will face in developed countries, focusing on a pivotal trial in adults. These challenges are (1) the comparator and trial population; (2) how to enroll sufficient numbers of adult participants of all age groups considering that countries will recommend COVID-19 booster doses to different populations; (3) whether having access to a comparator booster for the trial is actually feasible; and (4) the changing epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 across countries involved in the trial. It is desirable that regulatory agencies publish guidance on the requirements that a trial like the one discussed should comply with to be acceptable from a regulatory standpoint. Ideally, this should happen even before there is a vaccine candidate that could fulfill the requirements mentioned above, as it would allow an open discussion among all stakeholders on its appropriateness and feasibility., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: O.L. declared payments for educational events from Sanofi, Pfizer, MSD, and GSK; consulting fees from MSD, Sanofi, and GSK; support for attending meetings from AstraZeneca; being a member of DSMBs of MSD and Sanofi; and co-leader of vaccine group of the French Society of Infectious Diseases—Spilf—(unpaid), outside the submitted work. The remaining authors had nothing to disclose.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, have profoundly affected human health. Booster COVID-19 vaccines have demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing infection and severe cases. However, the effects of booster COVID-19 vaccines on key immune cell subsets and their responses in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are not well understood. By using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) combined with scTCR/BCR-seq analysis, a total of 8 major and 27 minor cell clusters were identified from paired peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) which were collected 1 week before and 4 weeks after booster vaccination in stable RA patients. Booster vaccination only had limited impact on the composition and proportions of PBMCs cell clusters. CD8+ cytotoxic T cells (CD8+T_CTL) showed a trend toward an increase after vaccination, while naive B cells and conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) showed a trend toward a decrease. Transcriptomic changes were observed after booster vaccination, primarily involving T/B cell receptor signaling pathways, phagosome, antigen processing and presenting, and viral myocarditis pathways. Interferon (IFN) and pro-inflammatory response gene sets were slightly upregulated across most major cell subpopulations in COVID-19 booster-vaccinated RA individuals. Plasma neutralizing antibody titers significantly increased after booster COVID-19 vaccination (p = 0.037). Single-cell TCR/BCR analysis revealed increased B cell clone expansion and repertoire diversity postvaccination, with no consistent alterations in T cells. Several clonotypes of BCRs and TCRs were identified to be significantly over-represented after vaccination, such as IGHV3-15 and TRBV28. Our study provided a comprehensive single-cell atlas of the peripheral immune response and TCR/BCR immune repertoire profiles to inactivated SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination in RA patients, which helps us to understand vaccine-induced immune responses better., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

A large amount of real-world data suggests that the emergence of variants of concern (VOCs) has brought new challenges to the fight against SARS-CoV-2 because the immune protection elicited by the existing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines was weakened. In response to the VOCs, it is necessary to advocate for the administration of booster vaccine doses to extend the effectiveness of vaccines and enhance neutralization titers. In this study, the immune effects of mRNA vaccines based on the WT (prototypic strain) and omicron (B1.1.529) strains for use as booster vaccines were investigated in mice. It was determined that with two-dose inactivated vaccine priming, boosting with mRNA vaccines could elevate IgG titers, enhance cell-mediated immunity, and provide immune protection against the corresponding variants, but cross-protection against distinct strains was inferior. This study comprehensively describes the differences in the mice boosted with mRNA vaccines based on the WT strain and the omicron strain, a harmful VOC that has resulted in a sharp rise in the number of infections, and reveals the most efficacious vaccination strategy against omicron and future SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Background: Understanding the immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination will enable accurate counseling and inform evolving vaccination strategies. Little is known about antibody response following booster vaccination in people living with HIV (PLWH)., Methods: We enrolled SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated PLWH and controls without HIV in similar proportions based on age and comorbidities. Participants completed surveys on prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination, and comorbidities, and provided self-collected dried blood spots (DBS). Quantitative anti-spike IgG and surrogate viral neutralization assays targeted wild-type (WT), Delta, and Omicron variants. We also measured quantitative anti-nucleocapsid IgG. The analysis population had received full SARS-CoV-2 vaccination plus one booster dose. Bivariate analyses for continuous outcomes utilized Wilcoxon tests and multivariate analysis used linear models., Results: The analysis population comprised 140 PLWH and 75 controls with median age 58 and 55 years, males 95% and 43%, and DBS collection on 112 and 109 days after the last booster dose, respectively. Median CD4 count among PLWH was 760 cells/mm 3 and 91% had an undetectable HIV-1 viral load. Considering WT, Delta, and Omicron variants, there was no significant difference in mean quantitative anti-spike IgG between PLWH (3.3, 2.9, 1.8) and controls (3.3, 2.9, 1.8), respectively ( p -values=0. 771, 0.920, 0.708). Surrogate viral neutralization responses were similar in PLWH (1.0, 0.9, and 0.4) and controls (1.0, 0.9, 0.5), respectively ( p -values=0.594, 0.436, 0.706)., Conclusions: PLWH whose CD4 counts are well preserved and persons without HIV have similar anti-spike IgG antibody levels and viral neutralization responses after a single SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination., Competing Interests: BT and KK were investigators in the clinical trials of the Johnson and Johnson adenovirus vaccine. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Kling, Janulis, Demonbreun, Sancilio, Berzins, Krueger, Achenbach, Price, Sullivan, Caputo, Hockney, Zembower, McDade and Taiwo.)

The primary goal of vaccines that protect against respiratory viruses appears to be the induction of neutralizing antibodies for a long period. Although this goal need not be changed, recent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants have drawn strong attention to another arm of acquired immunity, CD8 + T cells, which are also called killer T cells. Recent evidence accumulated during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has revealed that even variants of SARS-CoV-2 that escaped from neutralizing-antibodies that were induced by either infection or vaccination could not escape from CD8 + T cell-mediated immunity. In addition, although traditional vaccine platforms, such as inactivated virus and subunit vaccines, are less efficient in inducing CD8 + T cells, newly introduced platforms for SARS-CoV-2, namely, mRNA and adenoviral vector vaccines, can induce strong CD8 + T cell-mediated immunity in addition to inducing neutralizing antibodies. However, CD8 + T cells function locally and need to be at the site of infection to control it. To fully utilize the protective performance of CD8 + T cells, it would be insufficient to induce only memory cells circulating in blood, using injectable vaccines; mucosal immunization could be required to set up CD8 + T cells for the optimal protection. CD8 + T cells might also contribute to the pathology of the infection, change their function with age and respond differently to booster vaccines in comparison with antibodies. Herein, we overview cutting-edge ideas on CD8 + T cell-mediated immunity that can enable the rational design of vaccines for respiratory viruses., Competing Interests: YY is employed by the Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University. The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Hirai and Yoshioka.)

The purpose of this study was to assess the psychological experience of COVID-19 basic vaccination, the willingness to receive booster vaccines, and to determine their relationships among Chinese people. Between 6 August 2021 and 9 August 2021, a research firm performed a national cross-sectional online survey among Chinese individuals (aged over 18), using the snowball sampling approach, with 26,755 participants. Factor analysis and binary logistic regression were used to evaluate the existing associations. The overall COVID-19 vaccination psychological experience score of the participants was 25.83 (25.78~25.89; scores ranged from 7-35). A total of 93.83% (95%CI = 93.54~94.12) of respondents indicated a willingness to receive booster vaccines. After classifying psychological experiences associated with COVID-19 vaccination into positive and negative experiences and adjusting for confounding factors, for the former, the willingness to receive booster vaccines for participants with the highest scores of 13-15 was 3.933 times higher (OR = 3.933, 95%CI = 3.176~4.871) than participants who obtained scores of 3-9, and for the latter, the willingness to receive booster vaccines for participants with the highest scores of 19-20 was 8.871 times higher (OR = 8.871, 95%CI = 6.240~12.612) than participants who obtained scores of 4-13. Our study suggests that a good psychological experience with vaccination is positively associated with an increased willingness to receive booster vaccines.

Background: Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in Australia commenced in February 2021. The first vaccines recommended for use were AZD1222 and BNT162b2, both delivered as a two-dose primary schedule. In the absence of sustained immunity following immunisation, recommendations for booster vaccination have followed. It is likely that periodic boosting will be necessary for at least some Australians, but it is unknown what the optimal booster vaccines and schedules are or for whom vaccination should be recommended. Methods: The Platform Trial In COVID-19 priming and BOOsting (PICOBOO) is a multi-site, multi-arm, randomised, Bayesian adaptive platform trial evaluating different booster vaccine interventions in immunocompetent children and adults, stratified by their primary vaccination schedule and age. Participants are randomised to receive one of three licensed COVID-19 booster vaccines available for use in Australia. PICOBOO aims to generate evidence about the immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and cross-protection of different booster vaccine strategies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and its variants/subvariants. The protocol structure specifying PICOBOO is modular and hierarchical. We have previously published the PICOBOO core (master) protocol. Here, we detail the substudy protocol which outlines the study processes which are specific to PICOBOO participants enrolled in the booster vaccination substudy. Discussion: PICOBOO is an adaptive platform trial evaluating different COVID-19 booster vaccination strategies to generate evidence to inform immunisation practice and policy. The modular and flexible protocol structure is intended to enable investigators to respond with agility to new research questions as they arise, such as immunogenicity targeting emergent virus variants, and the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of new vaccines as they become available for use. Trial registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12622000238774; registered on 10/02/2022. Protocol V8.0_23112023. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lung transplant recipients (LTRs) are susceptible to severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and had lower immune responses to primary severe acute respiratory syndrome-related to coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination as compared to the general population and to other solid organ transplant recipients. As immunity induced by booster vaccination and natural infection has increased since the beginning of the pandemic in the general population, immunity acquired by LTRs is not well documented. Humoral and cellular immunity to SARS-CoV-2 was monitored in February and May 2023 in 30 LTRs and compared to that of health care workers (HCWs) and nursing home residents (NHRs). LTRs had significantly lower levels of SARS-CoV-2 binding and neutralizing antibodies and lower interferon-gamma responses to Wuhan, Delta, and XBB1.5 variants as compared to HCWs and NHRs. Humoral immunity decreased between the 2 visits, whereas cellular immunity remained more stable. The persistent defect in SARS-CoV-2 immunity in LTRs should encourage continued monitoring and preventive measures for this vulnerable population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommend COVID-19 vaccines for all immunocompromised individuals. Certain disease groups are at increased risk of comorbidity and death for which disease-specific recommendations should be considered. The objective of the Delphi panel of experts was to summarize expert consensus on COVID-19 vaccinations for patients with rheumatologic disease, renal disease, hematologic malignancy and solid organ transplant (SOT) in the US. Methods: A two-stage Delphi panel method was employed, starting with qualitative interviews with key opinion leaders (KOLs) in the four disease areas (n = 4 KOLs, n = 16 total) followed by three rounds of iterative revision of disease-specific COVID-19 vaccine recommendations. Final consensus was rated after the third round. Statements addressed primary and booster dosing (e.g., number and frequency) and other considerations such as vaccine type or heterologous messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccination. Following the Delphi Panel, an online survey was conducted to assess physician agreement within the disease areas (n = 50 each, n = 200 total) with the consensus statements. Results: Moderate to strong consensus was achieved for all primary series vaccination statements across disease groups, except one in hematology. Similarly, moderate to strong consensus was achieved for all booster series statements in all disease areas. However, statements on antibody titer measurements for re-vaccination considerations and higher dosages for immunocompromised patients did not reach agreement. Overall, approximately 62%–96% of physicians strongly agreed with the primary and booster vaccine recommendations. However, low agreement (29%–69%) was found among physicians for time interval between disease-specific treatment and vaccination, recommendations for mRNA vaccines, heterologous mRNA vaccination, antibody titer measurement and higher vaccine dosage for immunocompromised groups. Conclusion: Consensus was achieved for disease-specific COVID-19 vaccine recommendations concerning primary and booster series vaccines and was generally well accepted by practicing physicians. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused unprecedented pressure on healthcare systems globally. The lack of quality guidelines on the management of COVID-19 in rheumatologic disease, renal disease, hematological malignancy, and solid organ transplant recipients has resulted in a wide variation in clinical practice. Methods: Using a Delphi process, a panel of 16 key opinion leaders developed clinical practice statements regarding vaccine recommendations in areas where standards are absent or limited. Agreement among practicing physicians with consensus statements was also assessed via an online physician survey. The strength of the consensus was determined by the following rating system: a strong rating was defined as all four key opinion leaders (KOLs) rating the statement ≥ 8, a moderate rating was defined as three out of four KOLs rating the statement ≥ 8, and no consensus was defined as less than three out of four KOLs provided a rating of ≤ 8. Specialists voted on agreement with each consensus statement for their disease area using the same ten-point scoring system. Results: Key opinion leaders in rheumatology, nephrology, and hematology achieved consensuses for all nine statements pertaining to the primary and booster series with transplant physicians reaching consensus on eight of nine statements. Experts agreed that COVID-19 vaccines are safe, effective, and well tolerated by patients with rheumatological conditions, renal disease, hematologic malignancy, and recipients of solid organ transplants. The Delphi process yielded strong to moderate suggestions for the use of COVID-19 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccines and the necessity of the COVID-19 booster for the immunocompromised population. The expert panel had mixed feelings concerning the measurement of antibody titers, higher-dose mRNA vaccines, and the development of disease-specific COVID-19 guidance. Conclusions: These results confirmed the necessity of COVID-19 vaccines and boosters in immunocompromised patients with rheumatologic disease, renal disease, hematological malignancy, and solid organ transplant recipients. Statements where consensus was not achieved were due to absent or limited evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Longitudinal analysis of antibody responses following three-dose COVID-19 vaccination in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) has been limited. From August 2021 to February 2023, sequential anti -SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG titers were determined in 45 patients with CLD who received two or three doses of COVID-19 vaccine. The geometric mean of anti-spike IgG at four weeks after the second and third doses were 1313.16 BAU/mL and 3042.29 BAU/mL, respectively, and it decreased significantly from four to 24 weeks after the second (1313.16 vs. 198.42 BAU/mL, p = 0.002) and the third (3042.29 vs. 636.71 BAU/mL, p < 0.001) dose. The anti-spike IgG titers in participants receiving prime-boost homologous mRNA vaccines (BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273) were comparable between participants with and those without significant liver fibrosis at each follow-up time point. This study demonstrated a notable decrease in anti-spike IgG after completion of the vaccination schedule in patients with CLD, highlighting the importance of additional booster doses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Netherton syndrome (NS) is a rare, severe genetic skin disorder, currently classified as an inborn error of immunity (IEI) due to previously reported immune dysregulation. We recently reported the results of an immunological evaluation showing no evidence for a relevant B- and/or T-cell mediated immunodeficiency, but immune responses after vaccination were not evaluated in that study. Therefore, we evaluated immune responses to three vaccine platforms in adult NS patients to further investigate the presence of a clinically relevant B- and/or T-cell immunodeficiency. Methods: Vaccination responses in eight adult NS patients were assessed in a cross-sectional study performed between January and August 2022. Clinical patient data were retrospectively retrieved from electronic patient files. Immune responses to a polysaccharide Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccine (PPV23) and conjugate Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (ActHiB) were measured. SARS-CoV-2-specific (functional) antibody and T-cell responses following booster vaccination with an mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine were compared to controls. Results: None of the included patients suffered from recurrent and/or severe infections that could be attributed to a B- and/or T-cell immunodeficiency. ActHiB induced immune responses were normal in 7/7 NS patients. PPV23 induced responses were absent in 1/7, diminished in 2/7, and normal in 4/7 patients. Levels of SARS-CoV-2-specific binding and neutralizing antibodies after mRNA-based COVID-19 booster vaccination in NS patients were comparable to controls. SARS-CoV-2-specific CD4 + T-cell responses were detectable in all NS patients. In contrast, SARS-CoV-2-specific CD8 + T-cell responses were detectable in only 2/6 NS patients. T-cell responses to a positive control antigen pool were comparable to controls. Conclusions: Vaccine-induced immune responses were detectable after polysaccharide, conjugate and mRNA-based vaccination in our cohort of NS patients. A spectrum of responsiveness to vaccine challenges was found, with the ranges of vaccine responses overlapping those demonstrated in healthy control populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The outbreaks of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1), Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV), and SARS-CoV-2 highlight the need for countermeasures to prevent future coronavirus pandemics. Given the unpredictable nature of spillover events, preparing antibodies with broad coronavirus-neutralizing activity is an ideal proactive strategy. Here, we investigated whether SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination could provide cross-neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against zoonotic sarbecoviruses. We evaluated the cross-neutralizing profiles of plasma and monoclonal antibodies constructed from B cells from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) convalescents and vaccine recipients; against sarbecoviruses originating from bats, civets, and pangolins; and against SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2. We found that the majority of individuals with natural infection and vaccination elicited broad nAb responses to most tested sarbecoviruses, particularly to clade 1b viruses, but exhibited very low cross-neutralization to SARS-CoV-1 in both natural infection and vaccination, and vaccination boosters significantly augmented the magnitude and breadth of nAbs to sarbecoviruses. Of the nAbs, several exhibited neutralization activity against multiple sarbecoviruses by targeting the spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) and competing with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) binding. SCM12-61 demonstrated exceptional potency, with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of 0.001–0.091 μg/mL against tested sarbecoviruses; while VSM9-12 exhibited remarkable cross-neutralizing breadth against sarbecoviruses and SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants, highlighting the potential of these two nAbs in combating sarbecoviruses and SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants. Collectively, our findings suggest that vaccination with an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, in combination with broad nAbs against sarbecoviruses, may provide a countermeasure for preventing further sarbecovirus outbreaks in humans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients display weak seroconversion and neutralizing antibody (NAb) responses after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination and remain at risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). While B-cell memory is the hallmark of serological immunity, its role in driving successful vaccine responses and providing immune protection in SOT patients remains unclear. Methods: We investigated the function and interplay of SARS-CoV-2-specific memory B cells (mBc), different cytokineproducing T cells, and cross-reactive NAb in driving seroconversion and protection against COVID-19 in two cohorts. First, we studied a large cohort of 148 SOT recipients and 32 immunocompetent individuals who underwent several vaccinations. Subsequently, we assessed 25 SOT patients participating in a randomized controlled trial to compare two different immunosuppressive strategies for allowing successful seroconversion and memory-cell responses after booster vaccination. Results: We corroborate previous findings that B- and T-cell memory responses are weaker and more delayed in SOT patients than in immunocompetent (IC) individuals; however, within the SOT cohort, we found that these responses are relatively stronger and more robust in patients not receiving mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)-based therapies. Anti-spike IgG titers strongly correlated with RBD-specific IgG-producing mBc, with both displaying broad viral cross reactivity. Prebooster SARS-CoV-2-specific mBc and IL-2-producing T cells accurately predicted Nab seroconversion (AUC, 0.828) and protection against severe COVID-19. While switching unresponsive SOT patients from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)/MMF to a low-exposure CNI/mTOR-i regimen favored wider SARS-CoV-2-specific immune responses after a fourth booster vaccination, preformed RBD-specific mBc predicted NAb seroconversion. Discussion: Our study adds new insights into the pathobiology of immune memory and highlights the pivotal role of SARS-CoV-2-specific mBc in promoting immune protection inSOT patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Residents in nursing homes face heightened COVID-19 risks. We aimed to assess the adverse events (AEs) rates and antibody responses after the first to the fifth dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in a nursing home cohort. Ninety-five SARS-CoV-2 naïve participants consisted of 26 staff (median age, 51 years) and 69 residents (median age, 88 years). Life-threatening AEs were reported in neither residents nor staff. The severity of non-life-threatening AEs was graded, and severe AEs were reported only in staff. The AEs rates were considerably lower in residents, compared to those in staff. Anti-RBD IgG and the neutralizing titers (NTs) against Wuhan and Omicron BA.4/BA.5 did not differ significantly between those with 'any AE' and 'no AE' among both staff and residents two months after the second, third and fifth doses, while the anti-RBD IgG significantly differed between two groups after third dose in residents. These findings suggest that the anti-RBD IgG and the NTs increase regardless of the occurrence of AEs. Our study underscores a robust antibody response in both in staff and residents, and fewer AEs following COVID-19 vaccination in SARS-CoV-2 naïve residents than staff, supporting the recommendation for mRNA booster doses in older adults at high-risk care facilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to understand the temporal dynamics of SARS‐CoV‐2 reinfection risk and assess the impact of inactivated vaccination on the occurrence of reinfection. We investigated the reinfection risk of SARS‐CoV‐2 from November 1, 2022, to February 12, 2023, when China rapidly lifted the zero‐COVID policy. The study subjects were those who were first infected during the zero‐COVID period between January 1, 2020, and October 31, 2022, in Dalian city, China. Among the 1961 previous infections, 126 (6.4%, 95% CI: 5.4, 7.5) were reinfected. The risk of reinfection increased over time since initial infection. Compared with those who did not receive or received one dose of inactivated vaccine, receiving two or three doses was associated with additional protection against reinfection among individuals who were infected with pre‐Omicron more than a year earlier, with the OR ranged from 0.33 (95% CI: 0.03, 1.83) to 0.91 (95% CI: 0.22, 3.27). In contrast, no protective effect from two or three doses of vaccines against reinfection was observed among those who were first infected with Omicron variants within a year. Primary or booster vaccination contributed to limited protection against reinfection or symptomatic reinfection among individuals infected with Omicron SARS‐CoV‐2 within a year. However, a booster dose after 1 year of natural infection may provide additional protection against reinfection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study provides a head‐to‐head comparison of the protection provided by the BNT162b2 and mRNA‐1273 vaccines against SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and against severe COVID‐19, covering primary series and third dose/booster vaccinations over up to 3 years of follow‐up, both before and after the emergence of the omicron variant. Methods: Two national, matched, retrospective cohort studies were conducted on Qatar's vaccinated population from December 16, 2020, to February 18, 2024. Subgroup analyses by pre‐vaccination SARS‐CoV‐2 infection history, as well as sensitivity analyses, were also conducted. Results: The adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) comparing infection incidence in those vaccinated with BNT162b2 versus mRNA‐1273 was 1.03 (95% CI: 1.02–1.05) after the primary series and 1.11 (95% CI: 1.09–1.13) after the third (booster) dose. The corresponding AHRs for any severe, critical, or fatal COVID‐19 were 1.31 (95% CI: 0.81–2.11) and 1.00 (95% CI: 0.20–4.94), respectively. Subgroup analyses by prior infection status hinted at a dose‐dependent immune imprinting effect, where a combination of two types of immunity, pre‐omicron and omicron, offered greater protection against infection than one type alone, with this effect being amplified by the higher antigen dose of mRNA‐1273 compared to BNT162b2. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the study findings. Conclusions: BNT162b2 provided slightly less protection against infection than mRNA‐1273 following both primary series and booster vaccinations while offering comparable protection against severe COVID‐19 outcomes. The findings suggested that the vaccine antigen dose in interaction with infection history may determine the extent of immune protection against infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 16-year-old patient, while an infant, incurred right-sided hemiparesis and had difficulty breast feeding. She was later diagnosed with a neonatal stroke and her genetic testing showed a missense mutation in her PROS1 (Protein S) gene. Both her grandfather and father, but not her mother, had hereditary Protein S (PS) deficiency. The patient was not prescribed any mediation due to her young age but was frequently checked by her physician. The patient's plasma was first collected at the age of 13, and the isolated plasma from the patient and her father were analyzed by aPTT, thrombin generation, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. These analyses showed low PS activity and clotting time associated with the missense mutation in the PROS1 gene. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the patient received her first Pfizer vaccination dose in 2021, followed by a booster dose in 2022. The plasma samples were collected 8 weeks post-immunization, after which her clotting parameters had improved for up to 6 months following vaccination. The patient's plasma showed a significant reduction in thrombin generation and an improved aPTT clotting time. Mass spectrometry analysis revealed that her antithrombin-III level was significantly higher post-vaccination, and both thrombin and FXII levels were significantly lowered compared with her father. To our knowledge, this is the first report to document that COVID-19 vaccination can lower the risk of thrombosis in a patient with inherited thrombophilia. Although the effect was observed on a single mutation, it would be interesting to investigate the effect of COVID-19 vaccinations on other thrombophilia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic posed significant challenges worldwide, with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines critical in reducing morbidity and mortality. This study evaluates the immunogenicity and antibody persistence of the BNT162b2 vaccine in people living with HIV (PLWH). Methods: We monitored anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG concentration in a cohort of PLWH at five time points (T0–T4) using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassays (CMIAs) at the baselined both during and after vaccination. In severely immunocompromised individuals, a boosting dose was recommended, and participants and IgG concentration were measured in the two subgroups (boosted and not boosted). Results: In total, 165 PLWH were included, and 83% were male with a median age of 55 years (IQR: 47–62). At T1, 161 participants (97.6%) showed seroconversion with a median of IgG values of 468.8 AU/mL (IQR: 200.4–774.3 AU/mL). By T2, all subjects maintained a positive result, with the median anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG concentration increasing to 6191.6 AU/mL (IQR: 3666.7–10,800.8 AU/mL). At T3, all participants kept their antibody levels above the positivity threshold with a median of 1694.3 AU/mL (IQR: 926.3–2966.4 AU/mL). At T4, those without a booster dose exhibited a marked decrease to a median of 649.1 AU/mL (IQR: 425.5–1299.8 AU/mL), whereas those with a booster experienced a significant increase to a median of 13,105.2 AU/mL (IQR: 9187.5–18,552.1 AU/mL). The immune response was negatively influenced by the presence of dyslipidaemia at T1 (aOR 4.75, 95% CI: 1.39–16.20) and diabetes at T3 (aOR 7.11, 95% CI: 1.10–46.1), while the use of protease inhibitors (aORs 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01–0.91) and being female (aOR 0.02, 95% CI: 0.01–0.32) at T3 were protective factors. Conclusions: The immunogenicity of the BNT162b2 vaccine in PLWH has been confirmed, with booster doses necessary to maintain high levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG antibodies, especially in patients with comorbidities. These findings underline the importance of a personalized vaccination strategy in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: As the COVID-19 pandemic becomes an endemic state, still many questions remain regarding the risks and impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) who were excluded from the phase 3 COVID-19 vaccination trials. Methods: The BELCOMID study collected patient data and serological samples from a large, multicentric IMID patient cohort that was prospectively followed during sequential stages of the pandemic. Patients were stratified according to vaccination status into five groups across three sampling periods. Interactions between SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 vaccination status, IMID-treatment modalities and IMID course were explored. Results: In total, 2165 patients with IBD, a dermatological or rheumatological IMID participated. SARS-CoV-2 infection rates increased over the course of the pandemic and were highest in IMID patients that had refused every vaccine. After baseline COVID-19 vaccination, serologic spike (S)-antibody responses were attenuated by particular types of immune-modulating treatment: anti-TNF, rituximab, JAKi, systemic steroids, combined biologic/immunomodulator treatment. Nonetheless, S-antibody concentration increased progressively in patients who received a booster vaccination, reaching 100% seroconversion rate in patients who had received two booster vaccines. Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was found as a predictor of higher S-antibody response. Patients who had refused every vaccine showed the lowest rates of S-seroconversion (53.8%). Multiple logistic regression did not identify previous SARS-CoV-2 infection as a risk factor for IMID flare-up. Furthermore, no increased risk of IMID flare-up was found with booster vaccination. Conclusions: Altogether, the BELCOMID study provides evidence for the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccination and confirms the importance of repeated booster vaccination in IMID patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic induced a major health crisis worldwide, notably among end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, especially with messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines, is highly effective and reduces hospitalization and mortality in both the general and ESKD populations. Age and previous COVID-19 infection have been identified as major determinants of the vaccine response in both the general population and ESKD patients. Methods: To determine the specific phenotype of ESKD patients in relation to their vaccine response, a clustering approach was used in a cohort of 117 fully vaccinated patients. Results: Clustering revealed three distinct clinical phenotypes among hemodialysis patients in terms of immunological response. Two clusters, consisting of either women with a long dialysis history or male subjects with diabetes with a moderate history of dialysis, exhibited low levels of IgG anti-spike antibodies. The third cluster consisted of non-diabetic middle-aged men with a moderate dialysis vintage and a very good serological response to vaccination. Conclusions: These vaccinal phenotypes of dialysis patients are easily identifiable in current practice, allowing for differential serological follow-up and tailored booster SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Understanding variables that influence antibody responses to COVID-19 vaccination within a population can provide valuable information on future vaccination strategies. In this population-based study, we examined the antibody responses to COVID-19 vaccination in Manitoba using residual serum specimens collected between January 2021 and March 2022 (n = 20,365). Samples were tested for spike and nucleocapsid IgG against SARS-CoV-2 using clinically validated assays. We assessed the impacts of multiple factors on post-vaccination antibody titres including type of vaccine, age, sex, geographic location, number of doses received, and timing of vaccination. Our investigation demonstrated that vaccination with one dose of Moderna mRNA-1273 elicited higher anti-spike IgG titres overall compared to Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccination, while one dose of Pfizer BNT162b2 followed by a second dose of Moderna mRNA-1273 exhibited higher titres than two doses of Pfizer BNT162b2 or Moderna mRNA-1273, irrespective of age. Age and time post-vaccination had considerable effects on antibody responses, with older age groups exhibiting lower anti-spike IgG titres than younger ages, and titres of those vaccinated with Pfizer BNT162b2 waning faster than those vaccinated with Moderna mRNA-1273 or a combination of Pfizer BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273. Antibody titres did not appear to be affected by sex or geographic location. Our results identify how factors such as age and type of vaccine can influence antibody responses to vaccination, and how antibody titres wane over time. This information highlights the importance of tailoring vaccine regimens to specific populations, especially those at increased risk of severe COVID-19 and can be used to inform future vaccination strategies, scheduling of booster doses, and public health measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Understanding the facilitators, barriers and hesitancy to accepting COVID-19 booster doses is important for encouraging recommended vaccination. This evidence brief summarizes literature on the intention to accept or reject COVID-19 vaccine booster doses and the factors associated with intention/uptake among individuals in Canada. Methods: A database of COVID-19 literature established at the Public Health Agency of Canada was searched for articles referencing vaccination and knowledge, attitudes and behaviours towards COVID-19 boosters. A grey literature search of Canadian governmental and academic institutions was also conducted. Primary research conducted in Canada (n=21) and relevant systematic reviews of the global literature (n=8) were included in this evidence brief. Results: Intentions to get a booster dose in the general population have decreased between 2021--2023, with intentions varying across subpopulations. In Canada and within the global systematic reviews, facilitators, barriers and hesitancy were similar. Older age was the most common factor positively associated with intention/uptake of a booster, and the most common motivators were government/healthcare provider recommendations and helping to protect others. The main reasons for hesitancy were concerns about vaccine side effects and a lack of belief in the vaccine's efficacy. Conclusion: Intentions to get a booster dose have decreased in Canada. Understanding the reasons for vaccine hesitancy and motivators for obtaining a booster can help guide future public health COVID-19 booster vaccination programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Decision-makers in middle-income countries need evidence on the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 booster doses and oral antivirals to appropriately prioritise these healthcare interventions. Methods: We used a dynamic transmission model to assess the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 booster doses and oral antivirals in Fiji, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and Timor-Leste. We conducted cost-effectiveness analysis from both healthcare and societal perspectives using data collated from publicly available sources. We developed an interactive R Shiny which allows the user to vary key model assumptions, such as the choice of discounting rate, and view how these assumptions affect model results. Findings: Booster doses were cost saving and therefore cost-effective in all four middle-income settings from both healthcare and societal perspectives using 3% discounting. Providing oral antivirals was cost-effective from a healthcare perspective if procured at a low generic price (US$25) or middle-income reference price (US$250); however, their cost-effectiveness was strongly influenced by rates of wastage or misuse, and the ongoing costs of care for patients hospitalised with COVID-19. The cost or wastage of rapid antigen tests did not appear strongly influential over the cost-effectiveness of oral antivirals in any of the four study settings. Conclusions: Our results support that COVID-19 booster programs are cost-effective in middle-income settings. Oral antivirals demonstrate the potential to be cost-effective if procured at or below a middle-income reference price of US$250 per schedule. Further research should quantify the rates of wastage or misuse of oral COVID-19 antivirals in middle-income settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pacific Islanders are underrepresented in vaccine efficacy trials. Few studies describe their immune response to COVID-19 vaccination. Yet, this characterization is crucial to re-enforce vaccination strategies adapted to Pacific Islanders singularities. Methods and findings: We evaluated the humoral immune response of 585 adults, self-declaring as Melanesians, Europeans, Polynesians, or belonging to other communities, to the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine. Anti-spike and anti-nucleoprotein IgG levels, and their capacity to neutralize SARS-CoV-2 variants and to mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) were assessed across communities at 1 and 3 months post-second dose or 1 and 6 months post-third dose. All sera tested contained anti-spike antibodies and 61.3% contained anti-nucleoprotein antibodies, evidencing mostly a hybrid immunity resulting from vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection. At 1-month postimmunization, the 4 ethnic communities exhibited no significant differences in their anti-spike IgG levels (p value = 0.17, in an univariate linear regression model), in their capacity to mediate omicron neutralization (p value = 0.59 and 0.60, in an univariate logistic regression model at 1-month after the second and third dose, respectively) and in their capacity to mediate ADCC (p value = 0.069 in a multivariate linear regression model), regardless of the infection status. Anti-spike IgG levels and functionalities of the hybrid humoral immune response remained equivalent across the 4 ethnic communities during follow-up and at 6 months post-third dose. Conclusions: Our study evidenced Pacific Islander's robust humoral immune response to Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine, which is pivotal to re-enforce vaccination deployment in a population at risk for severe COVID-19 (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05135585). Trial registration: This trial has been register in ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05135585). Catherine Camille Inizan and colleagues evaluate the hybrid humoral immune response to COVID-19 infection and vaccination across a variety of Pacific Islander communities, and present data on a poorly studied population. Author summary: Why was this study done?: Pacific Islanders are at risk for severe COVID-19, in part owing to lifestyle and high rate of comorbidities. In a few studies, ethnicity had no impact on antibody levels following Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine in Pacific Islanders; in these studies, however, follow-up was reduced and no distinction was made between the different Pacific ethnic communities. Characterizing the levels and functionality of Pacific Islanders humoral immune response to Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine is pivotal to adapt vaccination regimens to regional singularities. What did the researchers do and find?: The current study enrolled 585 participants from New Caledonia self-declaring as Melanesians, Polynesians, Europeans, or belonging to other communities. Antibody levels and their functionality were characterized at the following time points: (1) 1 and/or 3 months after a second dose of the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine was administered; or (2) 1 and/or 6 months after the third dose of the vaccine. Approximately 61.3% of all sera contained traces of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection; the cohort's immune response was thus mostly hybrid, resulting from both vaccination and infection. At all time points analyzed, the hybrid humoral immune response remained equivalent across the Melanesian, Polynesian, European, and other communities: anti-spike antibody levels, which mirror the strength of the immune response, but also the capacity to mediate omicron neutralization and the capacity to mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) were not significantly different across communities (p values >0.05). What do these findings mean?: The lack of community effect, despite different prevalence of obesity, suggests that SARS-CoV-2 hybrid humoral response does not differ between communities. Such robust and prototypical humoral immune response to Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine and SARS-CoV-2 in Pacific Islanders is of prime importance to foster booster doses roll-out, with the aim to better protect this understudied population which is vulnerable to severe COVID-19. Biological confirmation of ethnicity and a larger sample size in the Polynesian community would enhance the resolution of our findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Heterologous booster vaccines are more effective than homologous booster vaccines in combating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. However, our understanding of homologous and heterologous booster vaccines for COVID-19 remains limited. Methods: We recruited 34 healthy participants from two cohorts who were primed with two-dose inactivated COVID-19 vaccine before, vaccinated with COVID-19 inactivated vaccine and adenovirus-vectored vaccine (intramuscular and aerosol inhalation of Ad5-nCoV) as a third booster dose. We assessed the immune responses of participants before and 14 days after vaccination, including levels of neutralizing antibodies, IgG, and cytokines, and quantified the transcriptional profile of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Results: The Ad5-nCoV group showed a significantly higher neutralizing antibody geometric mean titer (GMT) compared to the ICV group after 14 days of heterologous boosting. The intramuscular Ad5-nCoV group had a GMT of 191.8 (95% CI 129.0, 285.1) compared to 38.1 (95% CI 23.1, 62.8) in the ICV1 group (p<0.0001). The aerosolized Ad5-nCoV group had a GMT of 738.4 (95% CI 250.9-2173.0) compared to 244.0 (95% CI 135.0, 441.2) in the ICV2 group (p=0.0434). Participants in the aerosolized Ad5-nCoV group had median IFN-g+ spot counts of 36.5 (IQR 15.3-58.8) per 106 PBMCs, whereas, both intramuscular Ad5-nCoV and CoronaVac immunization as the third dose showed lower responses. This suggests that a third dose of booster Ad5-nCoV vaccine (especially aerosolized inhalation) as a heterologous vaccine booster induces stronger humoral and cellular immune responses, which may be more potent against VOCs than the use of inactivated vaccine homologs. In transcriptomic analyses, both aerosolized inhalation/intramuscular injection of the Ad5-nCoV vaccine and inactivated vaccine induced a large number of differentially expressed genes that were significantly associated with several important innate immune pathways including inflammatory responses, regulation of the defense response, and regulation of cytokine production. In addition, we identified crucial molecular modules of protective immunity that are significantly correlated with vaccine type and neutralizing antibodies level. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that inhalation/intramuscular injection of the Ad5-nCoV vaccine-mediated stronger humoral and cellular immune responses compared with the inactivated vaccine, and correlated significantly with innate immune function modules, supporting a heterologous booster immunization strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AbstractBackgroundMethodsResultsConclusionsData on the outcomes of COVID-19 in people living with HIV (PLHIV), specifically in relation to vaccination status, are lacking during the Omicron era.This nationwide registry-based study included all resident in Sweden ≥18 years with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test during January 2021–February 2023. We estimated adjusted odds ratios (adjOR) for COVID-19 hospitalisation and severe COVID-19 (ICU admission and 90-day mortality), categorised by SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status (0–1, 2, and ≥3 doses), and HIV-status. Analyses were then categorised by time periods of pre-Omicron, Omicron during public testing, and Omicron after public testing.1348 PLHIV and 1 669 389 people without HIV (PWoH) were included. PLHIV were older, more migrant (65 vs. 22%) and male (59 vs. 46%). Of PLHIV, 96% were on antiretroviral treatment and 94% virally suppressed. AdjORs of COVID-19 hospitalisation were similar irrespective of HIV-status, controlled for demographics, calendar month of infection, comorbidities, and income. PLHIV were more likely to be hospitalised than PWoH during Omicron and public testing (adjOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1–4.2), but not after public testing. The odds of severe COVID-19 were three times higher in PLHIV compared to PWoH vaccinated with 2 doses (adjOR 3.2, 95% CI 1.3–6.9), but not when vaccinated with ≥3 doses (adjOR 0.7, 95% CI 0.2–1.6). Migrant and low nadir CD4+ T-cells were associated with higher odds of hospitalisation in unvaccinated PLHIV.This nationwide study, including mostly well-treated PLHIV, highlights the importance of vaccination with booster dose/s for effective protection against severe COVID-19 in PLHIV.KEY POINTPeople living with HIV compared to people without HIV did not have higher odds of COVID-19 hospitalisation irrespective of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status (0–1 dose, 2 doses, ≥3 doses) when adjusting for known risk factors including comorbidities and socioeconomic status.People living with HIV compared to people without HIV did not have higher odds of COVID-19 hospitalisation irrespective of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination status (0–1 dose, 2 doses, ≥3 doses) when adjusting for known risk factors including comorbidities and socioeconomic status. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Vaccines and vaccine boosting have blunted excess morbidity and mortality from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in older nursing home residents (NHR). However, the impact of repeated vaccination on the T-cell response based on biological sex and prior infection of NHR remain understudied. Methods We examined T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in a cohort of NHR and healthcare workers (HCW) over 2 years. We used interferon-γ ELIspot and flow cytometry to assess T-cell response before, 2 weeks, and 6 months after the initial series and each of 2 booster vaccines. We analyzed these data longitudinally with mixed-effect modeling and also examined subsets of our cohorts for additional changes in T-cell effector function. Results Prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and female sex contributed to higher T-cell response in NHR but not HCW. When looking across time points, NHR but not HCW with prior infection had significantly higher T-cell responses than infection-naive subjects. These patterns of response were maintained across multiple booster vaccinations. Conclusions These results suggest that the age, multimorbidity, and/or frailty of the NHR cohort may accentuate sex and infection status differences in T-cell response to mRNA vaccination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Within a year of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic, vaccines inducing a robust humoral and cellular immune response were implemented worldwide. However, emergence of novel variants and waning vaccine-induced immunity led to implementation of additional vaccine boosters. Methods This prospective study evaluated the temporal profile of cellular and serological responses in a cohort of 639 SARS-CoV-2–vaccinated participants, of whom a large proportion experienced a SARS-CoV-2 infection. All participants were infection naïve at the time of their first vaccine dose. Proportions of SARS-CoV-2 spike–specific T cells were determined after each vaccine dose using the activation-induced marker assay, while levels of circulating SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were determined by the Meso Scale serology assay. Results We found a significant increase in SARS-CoV-2 spike–specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses following the third dose of a SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccine as well as enhanced CD8+ T-cell responses after the fourth dose. Furthermore, increased age was associated with a poorer response. Finally, we observed that SARS-CoV-2 infection boosts both the cellular and humoral immune response, relative to vaccine-induced immunity alone. Conclusions Our findings highlight the boosting effect on T-cell immunity of repeated vaccine administration. The combination of multiple vaccine doses and SARS-CoV-2 infections maintains population T-cell immunity, although with reduced levels in the elderly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: DS-5670 is a messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) vaccine platform targeting the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein derived from severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Booster vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with monovalent DS-5670a (incorporating mRNA encoding the RBD from the original SARS-CoV-2 strain) or bivalent DS-5670a/b (original and omicron BA.4-5 RBD antigens) is effective and safe in adults. Data from a phase 2/3 active-controlled, noninferiority, pediatric study evaluating a third booster dose of DS-5670a/b are reported here. Methods: Children aged 5-11 years who had completed the two-dose primary vaccination series with monovalent BNT162b2 (original strain) at least 3 months prior to enrolment were randomly assigned to receive DS-5670a/b (20 µg of mRNA) or bivalent BNT1 62b2 (original/omicron BA.4-5; 10 µg of mRNA) on Day 1. The primary efficacy endpoint was blood neutralization geometric mean titer (GMT) against SARS-CoV-2 (omicron variant BA.5.2.1) and immune response rate (≥ 4-fold increase in post-vaccination circulating anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity) on Day 29. Results: Among evaluable participants (DS-5670a/b, n = 74; bivalent BNT162b2, n = 75), the adjusted GMT ratio of DS-5670a/b to bivalent BNT162b2 on Day 29 was 1.636 (95% CI, 1.221, 2.190). Immune response rates were ≥ 89% with both study vaccines; adjusted difference 2.6% (95% CI, -7.8, 13.8). The prespecified non-inferiority margins were exceeded, and the study met the primary endpoint. DS-5670a/b also demonstrated broad neutralization activity across recent omicron sublineages and no cases of COVID-19 between Days 8-29 post-administration were reported. There were no novel safety concerns in the pediatric population at data cut-off. Conclusions: Bivalent DS-5670a/b was non-inferior to bivalent BNT162b2 in terms of immunogenicity, and had a manageable safety profile, when administered as a heterologous booster in children aged 5-11 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Pre-existent pools of coronavirus-specific or cross-reactive T cells were shown to shape the development of cellular and humoral immune responses after primary mRNA vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. However, the cellular determinants of responses to booster vaccination remain incompletely understood. Therefore, we phenotypically and functionally characterized spike antigen-specific T helper (Th) cells in healthy, immunocompetent individuals and correlated the results with cellular and humoral immune responses to BNT162b2 booster vaccination over a six-month period. Methods: Blood of 30 healthy healthcare workers was collected before, 1, 3, and 6 months after their 3rd BNT162b2 vaccination. Whole blood was stimulated with spike peptides and analyzed using flow cytometry, a 13-plex cytokine assay, and n Counter-based transcriptomics. Results: Spike-specific IgG levels at 1 month after booster vaccination correlated with pre-existing CD154+CD69+IFN-γ+CD4+ effector memory cells as well as spike-induced IL-2 and IL-17A secretion. Early post-booster (1-month) spike IgG levels (r=0.49), spike-induced IL‑2 (r=0.58), and spike-induced IFN‑γ release (r=0.43) correlated moderately with their respective long-term (6-month) responses. Sustained robust IgG responses were significantly associated with S-specific (CD69+±CD154+±IFN-γ+) Th-cell frequencies before booster vaccination (p=0.038), especially double/triple-positive type-1 Th cells. Furthermore, spike IgG levels, spike-induced IL‑2 release, and spike-induced IFN‑γ release after 6 months were significantly associated with increased IL‑2 & IL‑4, IP‑10 & MCP1, and IFN‑γ & IP‑10 levels at 1 month post-booster, respectively. On the transcriptional level, induction of pathways associated with both T-cell proliferation and antigen presentation was indicative of sustained spike-induced cytokine release and spike-specific IgG production 6 months post-booster. Using support vector machine models, pre-booster spike-specific T-cell frequencies and early post-booster cytokine responses predicted sustained (6-month) responses with F1 scores of 0.80-1.00.Discussion: In summary, spike-specific Th cells and T-cellular cytokine signatures present before BNT162b2 booster vaccination shape sustained adaptive cellular and humoral responses post-booster. Functional T-cell assays might facilitate early identification of potential non-responders. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND. There is uncertainty about the timing of booster vaccination against COVID-19 in highly vaccinated populations during the present endemic phase of COVID-19. Studies focused on primary vaccination have previously suggested improved immunity with a longer interval between the first and second vaccine doses. METHODS. We conducted a randomized, controlled trial (November 2022-August 2023) and assigned 52 fully vaccinated adults to an immediate or a 3-month delayed bivalent Spikevax mRNA booster vaccine. Follow-up visits were completed for 48 participants (n = 24 per arm), with collection of saliva and plasma samples following each visit. RESULTS. The rise in neutralizing antibody responses to ancestral and Omicron strains were almost identical between the immediate and delayed vaccination arms. Analyses of plasma and salivary antibody responses (IgG, IgA), plasma antibody-dependent phagocytic activity, and the decay kinetics of antibody responses were similar between the 2 arms. Symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred in 49% (21 of 49) participants over the median 11.5 months of follow-up and were also similar between the 2 arms. CONCLUSIONS. Our data suggest that there was no benefit in delaying COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccination in preimmune populations during the present endemic phase of COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes more deaths in older adults than in younger adults. Older adults are a vulnerable group with a high need for coronavirus vaccines to decrease the severity of the disease. The aim of this analytical cross-sectional study was to determine the factors influencing third COVID-19 vaccine booster dose acceptance among older adults in northern Thailand. Methods: The study samples were composed of 2,155 older adults living in Kamphaeng Phet Province, northern Thailand. They were randomly selected by multistage random sampling. Data were collected in a self-administered questionnaire consisting of 7 parts: (1) personal factors, (2) knowledge about COVID-19, (3) perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 infection, (4) perceived severity of COVID-19, (5) perceived benefits of the third COVID-19 vaccine booster dose, (6) perceived barriers to the third COVID-19 vaccine booster dose vaccination, and (7) the third COVID-19 vaccine booster dose acceptance. Data were analyzed via frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and binary logistic regression. All the significance levels were set to 0.05. Results: The results indicated that only 28.5% of older adults accepted the third COVID-19 vaccine booster dose. The factors influencing third COVID-19 vaccine booster dose acceptance among older adults included 5 variables. The participants aged ≥ 70 years was 1.37 times (95%CI = 1.12–1.69) greater than those aged < 70 years who accepted the vaccine. Participants who were married were more likely to accept the vaccine by 1.39 times (95%CI = 1.09–1.79) compared with single individuals. Those with underlying diseases tended to accept the vaccine by 1.56 times (95%CI = 1.26–1.92) more than those without underlying diseases. Those who had high perceived benefit from the COVID-19 vaccine possibly accepted the vaccine by 1.50 times (95%CI = 1.10–2.04) more than those with low perceived benefit, and those who had a low perceived barrier to the third COVID-19 booster dose vaccination seemed to accept the vaccine by 1.29 times (95%CI = 1.01–1.52) more than those with a high perceived benefit. Conclusion: Older adults should receive health education regarding the perceived benefit of the COVID-19 vaccine and the perceived barrier to COVID-19 vaccination, especially older adults aged < 70 years, those who are single, and those who are free of underlying diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study measures the COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness (CVE) against hospital admission and severe COVID-19. Methods: This study is a test-negative case-control design using data from eight provinces in April, 2021 until March, 2022. The individuals were classified as cases and controls based on the results of the RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2 and matched based on the timing of the test being conducted as well as the timing of hospital admission. The measure of association was an odds ratio (OR) by univariate and multiple logistic regression. The multiple logistic regression has been carried out to take confounding factors and potential effect modifiers into account. The CVE was computed as CVE = (1 – OR)*100 with 95% confidence interval. Results: Among 19314 admitted patients, of whom 13216 (68.4%) were cases and 6098 (31.6%) were controls, 1313 (6.8%) died. From total, 5959 (30.8%) patients had received the vaccine in which one, two, and booster doses were 2443 (12.6%), 2796 (14.5٪), and 720 (3.7٪), respectively. The estimated adjusted effectiveness of only one dose, two doses and booter vaccination were 22% (95% CI: 14%-29%), 35% (95% CI: 29%-41%) and 33% (95% CI: 16%-47%), respectively. In addition, the adjusted vaccine effectiveness against severe outcome was 33% (95% CI: 19%- 44%), 34% (95% CI: 20%- 45%) and 20% (95% CI: -29%- 50%) for those who received one, two and booster vaccinations, respectively. Conclusion: Our study concluded that full vaccination, though less effective compared to similar studies elsewhere, decreased hospital admissions and deaths from COVID-19 in Iran, particularly during the Delta variant period, with an observed decline during the Omicron variant dominance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Despite people with haematological malignancies being particularly vulnerable to severe COVID-19 infection and complications, vaccine hesitancy may be a barrier to optimal vaccination. This study explored attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in people with haematological malignancies. Methods: People with haematological malignancies at nine Australian health services were surveyed between June and October 2021. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination were explored using the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Scale, the Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence and Complacency Scale, and the Disease Influenced Vaccine Acceptance Scale-Six. Open-ended comments were qualitatively analysed. Results: A total of 869 people with haematological malignancies (mean age 64.2 years, 43.6% female) participated. Most participants (85.3%) reported that they had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. Participants who were younger, spoke English as a non-dominant language, and had a shorter time since diagnosis were less likely to be vaccinated. Those who were female or spoke English as their non-dominant language reported greater vaccine side-effect concerns. Younger participants reported greater concerns about the vaccine impacting their treatment. Conclusion: People with haematological malignancies reported high vaccine uptake; however, targeted education for specific participant groups may address vaccine hesitancy concerns, given the need for COVID-19 vaccine boosters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aims to examine the serological and infectious characteristics of the Xokós indigenous community in Brazil, both prior to and following COVID-19 immunization; Methods: Immunofluorescence assays were employed to identify the SARS-CoV-2 viral antigen, while IgM and IgG antibody tests for COVID-19 were utilized to assess the participants' infectious and serological profiles in July 2020, before the commencement of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, and in March 2022, during the booster dose vaccination campaign; Results: The majority of participants (n = 22) were female, with an average age of 42.20 years. The most prevalent comorbidity was hypertension (60%; n = 9), followed by hypertension associated with diabetes (20%; n = 3). No statistically significant correlation was found between the timing of vaccination and the levels of antigens or IgM. However, the prevalence of reactive antigens and IgM was 13.3% (n = 4) in the pre-vaccination group and 3.3% (n = 1) in the post-vaccination group. A statistically significant difference in IgG production was observed before and after vaccination (χ2(1) = 39.095, p < 0.01), as well as differences in IgG antibody detection before and after vaccination and in the vaccines used. Participants showed a higher probability of reactive IgG antibodies following vaccination; Conclusions: Our data demonstrate the beneficial effects of vaccination on the indigenous community, highlighting that continued immunization is a crucial step in protecting indigenous health and preventing severe outbreaks and deaths associated with the disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the spring of 2020, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic presented a formidable challenge to national and global healthcare systems. Immunocompromised individuals or those with relevant pre-existing conditions were particularly at risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Thus, understanding the immunological processes in these patient groups is crucial for current research. This study aimed to investigate humoral immunity following vaccination and infection in liver transplant recipients. Humoral immunity analysis involved measuring IgG against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (anti-S IgG) and employing a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) for assessing the hACE2 receptor-binding inhibitory capacity of antibodies. The study revealed that humoral immunity post-vaccination is well established, with positive results for anti-S IgG in 92.9% of the total study cohort. Vaccinated and SARS-CoV-2-infected patients exhibited significantly higher anti-S IgG levels compared to vaccinated, non-infected patients (18,590 AU/mL vs. 2320 AU/mL, p < 0.001). Additionally, a significantly elevated receptor-binding inhibitory capacity was observed in the cPassTMTM sVNT (96.4% vs. 91.8%, p = 0.004). Furthermore, a substantial enhancement of anti-S IgG levels (p = 0.034) and receptor-binding inhibition capacity (p < 0.001) was observed with an increasing interval post-transplantation (up to 30 years), calculated by generalized linear model analysis. In summary, fully vaccinated liver transplant recipients exhibit robust humoral immunity against SARS-CoV-2, which significantly intensifies following infection and with increasing time after transplantation. These findings should be considered for booster vaccination schemes for liver transplant recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The inactivated COVID-19 vaccine has demonstrated high efficacy in the general population through extensive clinical and real-world studies. However, its effectiveness in immunocompromised individuals, particularly those living with HIV (PLWH), remains limited. In this study, 20 PLWH and 15 HIV-seronegative individuals were recruited to evaluate the immunogenicity of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine in PLWH through a prospective cohort study. The median age of the 20 PLWH and 15 HIV-seronegative individuals was 42 years and 31 years, respectively. Of the PLWH, nine had been on ART for over five years. The median anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD IgG antibody level on d224 was higher than that on d42 (8188.7 ng/mL vs. 3200.9 ng/mL, P < 0.05). Following COVID-19 infection, the antibody level increased to 29,872.5 ng/mL on dre+90, 12.19 times higher than that on d300. Compared with HIV-seronegative individuals, the antibody level in PLWH was lower on d210 (183.3 ng/mL vs. 509.3 ng/mL, P < 0.01), while there was no difference after d224. The symptoms of COVID-19 infection in PLWH were comparable to those in HIV-seronegative individuals. In this study, the inactivated COVID-19 vaccine demonstrated good immunogenicity in PLWH. The protective benefit of booster vaccinations for PLWH cannot be ignored. Implementing a booster vaccination policy for PLWH is an effective approach to providing better protection against the COVID-19 pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study is aimed at providing information about the timing of booster doses and antibody kinetics in healthcare workers. Methods: This research extends a prospective cohort study conducted at Dokuz Eylul University Hospital in Turkey, covering the period from March 2021 to December 2021. During this timeframe, the antibody levels of the health workers were measured at four different time points. The associations of antibody levels with gender, age, occupation, body mass index (BMI), chronic disease, and smoking were analyzed. Results: There was a significant difference between antibody levels in all four blood draws (p < 0.001). Antibody levels decreased in both those vaccinated with BNT162b2 (p < 0.001) and those vaccinated with CoronaVac (p = 0.002) until the fourth blood draw. There was a significant difference between those vaccinated with one and two doses of booster BNT162b2 before the third blood draw (p < 0.001), which continued at the fourth blood draw (p < 0.001). The antibody levels of those with an interval of 41–50 days between two vaccinations decreased significantly at the fourth blood draw (p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study provides insight into the dynamics and persistence of antibody response after additional COVID‐19 vaccine doses among healthcare workers. The longer the interval between booster doses may result in greater antibody levels being maintained over time, allowing for longer durations of protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Globally, 767 million people have been affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection and nearly a population of 6.94 million were deceased as per the World Health Organization (WHO) as of June 7, 2023. In India, the spreading of infections is now being restricted by the use of BBV-152 (CovaxinTM) and ChAdOx1-nCOV (CovishieldTM) vaccines. The present study comprises 327 candidates and Chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) was used as a quantitative analytical tool to detect IgG and IgM antibodies. Out of 327 candidates, 177 (54.1%) were vaccinated and 150 (45.9%) were non-vaccinated. Among vaccinated and non-vaccinated candidates, 49 (27.7%%) and 44 (29.3%) had a history of infection, respectively; meanwhile, most of the study participants were immunized with CovishieldTM (n=145, 81.9%) and 18.1% (n=32) were immunized with CovaxinTM. There were insignificant differences observed among immunized as well as non-immunized study participants in considering median age, gender, age categories, IgM levels, or IgM seropositivity. Predictably, there was an important variation in IgG median values and IgG positivity noticed among the immunized and non-immunized categories as well as between populations with and without preceding infections. Our research is hence coherent with prospective requirements for booster shots to assist in controlling the rate of infections and fatality rates together throughout the pandemic conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the predictors of acceptance and hesitancy of additional doses of any SARS‐CoV‐2 (COVID‐19) vaccine among pregnant or recently pregnant and non‐pregnant people of reproductive age and partners in Brazil. Methods: We conducted an online cross‐sectional study from June 2022 to April 2023 and invited women and partners between 18 and 49 years old to participate. We employed a snowball strategy to reach all potential eligible participants. Our primary outcome was the acceptance rate of the COVID‐19 booster vaccine. We estimated the frequency and percentage for the three groups and compared categorical variables using the Chi‐square test. Moreover, bivariate, backward stepwise regression, and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors and predictors of COVID‐19 vaccine booster hesitancy. We reported the effect size as OR with a 95% CI. Results: We included 1487 participants, and among them, 334 (22.5%) were pregnant or recently pregnant people, 905 (60.8%) were non‐pregnant people, and 247 (16.6%) were male partners. Pregnant and recently pregnant people showed greater hesitancy for the COVID‐19 vaccine booster than non‐pregnant people (28% vs 15%, P < 0.001) and male partners (28% vs 16%, P < 0.001). Non‐pregnant women accepted the COVID‐19 vaccine more often than pregnant or recently pregnant people (OR 1.75; 95% CI: 1.13–2.70). The associated factors to the reduced COVID‐19 vaccine booster acceptance were family income between US$ 566–945.00 (54%), evangelic religion (65%), concern about vaccine safety (80%) and perceived common vaccine importance (93%). Conclusion: Pregnant people were more hesitant than non‐pregnant people to accept the COVID‐19 booster vaccine. Family income, religious beliefs, vaccine safety concerns, and perceived common vaccine importance were significant barriers to accepting COVID‐19 booster vaccines. The impact of these factors was more evident among pregnant or recently pregnant people, emphasizing the harmful effect of misinformation among this vulnerable population. Synopsis: Pregnant people are more hesitant about COVID‐19 vaccine uptake compared to their counterparts, with social determinants and vaccine safety concerns being the key barriers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In this post hoc exploratory study of the APHP-COVIBOOST trial (NCT05124171), we used statistical modeling to describe the evolution of neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers over time, asses its impact on SARS-CoV-2 infection, and explore potential differences between three booster vaccine formulations (D614, B.1.351, and BNT162b2). Methods: Antibody titers were measured for 208 adult participants at day 28, 3 months, and 6 months using a microneutralization assay against different Omicron subvariants. We developed four specific Bayesian statistical models based on a core model, accounting for vaccine-specific antibody decline, boosting of nAb for breakthrough infection, and risk of infection according to nAb levels. The model findings were cross-verified using another validated microneutralization assay. Results: The decrease in nAb titers was significantly lower for the B.1.351 vaccine than for the other booster formulations. An inverse relationship was found between risk of infection upon exposure and nAb levels. With Omicron BA.1 data, these results translated into a positive relative vaccine efficacy against any infection over 6 months for the B.1.351 vaccine compared to the BNT162b2 (31%) and D614 (21%) vaccines. Conclusions: Risk of infection decreased with increasing nAb titers for all vaccines. Statistical models predicted significantly better antibody persistence for the B.1.351 booster formulation compared to the other evaluated vaccines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Breakthrough COVID-19 (occurring in fully vaccinated people) has been described. Data on its characteristics among immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) patients are scarce. This study describes breakthrough COVID-19 occurring in IMRD patients participating in the SAFER-study, a Brazilian multicentric cohort evaluating the safety, effectiveness, and immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with autoimmune diseases. A descriptive analysis of the population and a binary logistic regression model were performed to evaluate the predictors of COVID-19-related hospitalization. A p-value < 0.05 was significant. The included 160 patients were predominantly females (83.1%), with a mean (SD) age of 40.23 (13.19) years. The patients received two (19%), three (70%), or four (11%) vaccine doses. The initial two-dose series was mainly with ChAdOx1 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) (58%) or BBIBP-CorV (Sinopharm-Beijing) (34%). The first booster (n = 150) was with BNT162b2 (BioNtech/Fosun Pharma/Pfizer) (63%) or ChAdOx1 (29%). The second booster (n = 112) was with BNT162b2 (40%) or ChAdOx1 (26%). The COVID-19 hospitalization rate was 17.5%. IMRD moderate/high activity (OR: 5.84; CI: 1.9–18.5; p = 0.002) and treatment with corticosteroids (OR: 2.94; CI: 1.02–8.49; p = 0.0043) were associated with higher odds of hospitalization, while increasing the number of vaccine doses was protective (OR: 0.37; CI: 0.15–0.9; p = 0.032). These findings, along with previous reassuring results about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines, argue in favor of booster vaccination in IMRD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to assess the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of various SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and compare their protective effects against COVID-19 among healthcare workers (HCWs) during the Omicron outbreak in Taiwan. Methods: Conducted from March 2021 to July 2023, this prospective observational study included healthy HCWs without prior COVID-19 immunization. Participants chose between adenovirus-vectored (AstraZeneca), mRNA (Moderna, BioNTech-Pfizer), and protein-based (Medigen, Novavax) vaccines. Blood samples were taken at multiple points to measure neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded via questionnaires. Results: Of 710 HCWs, 668 (94.1%) completed three doses, and 290 (40.8%) received a fourth dose during the Omicron outbreak. AEs were more common with AstraZeneca and Moderna vaccines, while Medigen caused fewer AEs. Initial nAb titers were highest with Moderna but waned over time regardless of the vaccine. Booster doses significantly increased nAb titers, with the highest levels observed in Moderna BA1 recipients. The fourth dose significantly reduced COVID-19 incidence, with Moderna BA1 being the most effective. Conclusions: Regular booster doses, especially with mRNA and adjuvant-protein vaccines, effectively enhance nAb levels and reduce infection rates, providing critical protection for frontline HCWs during variant outbreaks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This is a retrospective observational study including all COVID-19 patients admitted at our Institute throughout three successive pandemic waves, from January 2021 to June 2023. The main in-hospital outcomes (clinical progression [CP], defined as admission to Intensive Care Unit [ICU]/death, and death within 28 days) were compared among participants unvaccinated (NV), fully vaccinated (FV), with one (FV&B1) and two (FV&B2) booster doses. Vaccinated participants were stratified into recently and waned FV/FV&B1/FV&B2, depending on the time elapsed from last dose (≤ and >120 days, respectively). There were 4488 participants: 2224 NV, 674 FV, 1207 FV&B1, and 383 FV&B2. Within 28 days, there were 604 ICU admissions, 396 deaths, and 737 CP. After adjusting for the main confounders, the risk of both in-hospital outcomes was reduced in vaccinated individuals, especially in those who received the booster dose (approximately by 36% for FV and >50% for FV&B1 and FV&B2 compared to NV). Similarly, after restricting the analysis to vaccinated participants only, we observed a risk reduction of approximately 40% for FV&B1 and 50% for FV&B2, compared to FV, regardless of the distance since the last dose. Our data confirm the vaccine's effectiveness in preventing severe COVID-19 and support the efforts to increase the uptake of booster doses, mainly among older and frailer individuals, still at a greater risk of clinical progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. Incidence and manifestations of postacute sequelae of coronavirus disease 2019 (PASC) are poorly defined among immunosuppressed populations. We reported, phenotyped, and assessed risk factors for PASC in adults with systemic autoimmune diseases. Methods. Persons aged = 18 years with systemic autoimmune diseases were recruited into a national, prospective observational cohort of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and infection between December 2020 and April 2021. Serial surveys assessed vaccination status, SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence, and disease flares. Participants reporting SARS-CoV-2 infection received a questionnaire assessing symptom duration, severity, and quality of life (QOL) effect; PASC was defined as = 1 symptom persisting for > 12 weeks. PASC syndromes were mapped by overlapping symptom domains. Characteristics were compared between participants who did vs did not report PASC. Results. Among 1615 participants, 590 (36.5%) reported SARS-CoV-2 infection and were sent PASC surveys, 299 (50.7%) of whom responded > 12 weeks following the reported infection. Respondents were 91.6% female, 91.2% White, median (IQR) age was 48 (40-60) years with median (IQR) 3 (2-3) vaccine doses at time of first infection. Common diagnoses included inflammatory arthritis (38.5%) and inflammatory bowel disease (14.4%). Eighty-nine of 299 (29.8%) reported PASC, with the most reported symptom domain being neurological/psychological (83.1%); 84% reported an effect on QOL. Participants with PASC reported lower number of preceding vaccines (median [IQR] 2 [2-3] vs 3 [2-3]; P < 0.001) and more reinfections (16.9% vs 5.7%; P = 0.004). Conclusion. In a large, real-world cohort, 29.8% of persons with systemic autoimmune disease reported PASC, often affecting QOL. Preceding vaccination may reduce PASC, whereas multiple infections may increase risk, supporting ongoing booster vaccine campaigns and efforts to limit breakthrough infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Real-world data are required to provide a greater understanding of the impact of ofatumumab on the ability to mount an effective immune response following the receipt of approved COVID-19 vaccinations. This retrospective real-world analysis aimed to describe the humoral immune response to COVID-19 vaccination during ofatumumab treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: Data from patients with MS treated with ofatumumab who were fully vaccinated against COVID-19 infection were abstracted from medical charts at four clinical sites in the USA. Patient characteristics and humoral response were summarized descriptively. Differences in humoral response were documented on the basis of vaccination status during ofatumumab treatment (i.e., after full vaccination and after booster vaccination) and prior disease-modifying treatment (DMT) exposure (i.e., DMT naïve, prior anti-CD20/sphingosine 1-phosphate [S1P] therapy, prior non-anti-CD20/S1P therapy). The sample size precluded formal statistical analysis. Results: Thirty-eight patients were included. The mean (standard deviation) duration of ofatumumab treatment upon data collection was 20.4 (4.6) months (treatment ongoing for 35 [92%] patients). Definitive humoral response after full vaccination was documented for 34 patients, of whom 20 (60%) were seropositive. Definitive humoral response after booster vaccination was documented among five patients, of whom three (60%) were seropositive. Among patients who were DMT naïve prior to ofatumumab (n = 15), 73% were seropositive; among patients exposed to prior anti-CD20/S1P therapy (n = 14), 33% were seropositive; and among patients exposed to prior non-anti-CD20/S1P therapy (n = 9), 56% were seropositive. Patients naïve to DMT had been living with an MS diagnosis for a shorter duration than those experienced with DMTs. Conclusion: Patients with MS receiving ongoing treatment with ofatumumab can mount a positive humoral response to a COVID-19 vaccination. Prior treatment with anti-CD20 or S1P DMTs may be a risk factor for lower humoral response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite the widespread administration of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines, the impact on patients with asymptomatic to mild illness remains unclear. Here, we aimed to assess the efficacy of various vaccine doses and types on the duration of isolation duration and discharge rates, the viral shedding duration, and negative rates in asymptomatic to mild COVID-19 patients. Methods: We included adult patients at the Fangcang isolation centres in Pazhou or Yongning between November and December 2022. We analysed data on basic demographics, admission details, laboratory indicators and vaccination information. Results: A total of 6560 infected patients were included (3584 from Pazhou and 2976 from Yongning). Of these, 90.6% received inactivated vaccines, 3.66% received recombinant SARS-CoV-2 spike protein subunit vaccines and 0.91% received adenovirus vaccines. Among the 6173 vaccinated individuals, 71.9% received a booster dose. By day 9, the isolation rate reached 50% among vaccinated patients. On day 7.5, the positive rate among vaccinated individuals reached 50%. Conclusions: Full vaccination was effective, with heterologous vaccines showing greater efficacy than inactivated vaccines alone. However, there was no significant difference in the vaccine protective effect 12 months after vaccination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The vaccination drive for the COVID-19 pandemic was initiated globally more than a year ago, with booster shots being the new addition currently. There are some setbacks regarding the acceptance of the vaccine that the government needs to tackle to achieve a fully vaccinated ecosystem. Vaccine hesitancy is not a new concept and has been witnessed by people for decades. In simple terms, vaccine hesitancy refers to a situation where people are reluctant to get vaccinated despite its availability. This is due to technological retrogression, superstitions, doubt towards the government and misinformation. This paper is a systematic literature review to analyse the behavioural economics theories shown by people towards vaccines in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We aim to connect psychological and economic factors that lead to this hesitancy through behavioural economics. Availability bias, omission bias, confirmation bias, incentives, anticipated regret, illusory correlation, recency effect, tailoring and framing are the biases that influence decision-making under the behavioural economics framework. This paper is an attempt to analyse these principles and explain potential barriers to vaccine acceptance and intervention strategies for medical professionals and the state. JEL Classifications : D03, D70, I18 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]