1. Effectiveness and Durability of mRNA Vaccine-Induced SARS-CoV-2-Specific Humoral and Cellular Immunity in Severe Asthma Patients on Biological Therapy.
- Author
-
Podrazil M, Taborska P, Stakheev D, Rataj M, Lastovicka J, Vlachova A, Pohunek P, Bartunkova J, and Smrz D
- Subjects
- Antibodies, Viral, BNT162 Vaccine, COVID-19 Vaccines, Humans, Immunity, Cellular, Immunity, Humoral, SARS-CoV-2, Vaccination, Vaccines, Synthetic, mRNA Vaccines, Asthma therapy, COVID-19 prevention & control
- Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines effectively elicit humoral and cellular immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in healthy populations. This immunity decreases several months after vaccination. However, the efficacy of vaccine-induced immunity and its durability in patients with severe asthma on biological therapy are unknown. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and durability of mRNA vaccine-induced SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immunity in severe asthma patients on biological therapy. The study included 34 patients with severe asthma treated with anti-IgE (omalizumab, n=17), anti-IL5 (mepolizumab, n=13; reslizumab, n=3), or anti-IL5R (benralizumab, n=1) biological therapy. All patients were vaccinated with two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine with a 6-week interval between the doses. We found that this COVID-19 vaccination regimen elicited SARS-CoV-2-specific humoral and cellular immunity, which had significantly declined 6 months after receipt of the second dose of the vaccine. The type of biological treatment did not affect vaccine-elicited immunity. However, patient age negatively impacted the vaccine-induced humoral response. On the other hand, no such age-related impact on vaccine-elicited cellular immunity was observed. Our findings show that treatment of patients with severe asthma with biological therapy does not compromise the effectiveness or durability of COVID-19 vaccine-induced immunity., Competing Interests: JB is a part-time employee and a minority shareholder of Sotio, a.s. PP is a member of the advisory board of GSK and received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, and Chiesi and speaker fees from GSK and Novartis. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Podrazil, Taborska, Stakheev, Rataj, Lastovicka, Vlachova, Pohunek, Bartunkova and Smrz.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF