Search

Background and Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated pain and joint mobility outcomes in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD), being that effective treatments are of clinical interest. We aimed to evaluate the effects of manual therapy (MT) and dry needling (DN), compared to cognitive-behavioral therapy/control (CO), on pain, articular mobility, and fear of COVID-19 in patients with TMD., Materials and Methods: Sixty participants with myofascial TMD were randomly assigned to three groups: MT, DN, and CO. Participants received four weeks of treatment (30 min per week). The participants completed the Fear of COVID- 19 Scale, the Visual Analog Scale, and mandibular mobility was assessed. Data were collected before the intervention (T1), after the last treatment session (T2), and 30 days after the end of treatment (T3). The data were analyzed using two-way Mixed-Design ANOVA, considering the group effect (DN x MT x CO), time (T1, T2, and T3), and the interaction time × group in the observed variance of outcomes., Results: We observed an interaction effect of time × group for maximum mouth opening, protrusion, and pain. The maximum mouth opening increased in the DN and MT groups (p = 0.005), while protrusion increased in the DN group (p = 0.007; test power = 97%, large effect size). A decrease in pain scores over time was observed in the DN and MT groups (p < 0.001; test power>99%, large effect size). The fear of COVID-19 score decreased in the DN and MT groups after 30 days (p = 0.033)., Conclusion: DN and MT improve pain, joint mobility, and fear of COVID-19 in patients with TMD., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

"Basic Concepts in Neurophysiology" was a 3-wk online course developed during six synchronous meetings combined with asynchronous activities. We proposed an active learning course that used free online platforms to teach physiology during a period in which undergraduates were not in classrooms or taking online classes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Herein, we report the course organization and the students' involvement in, acceptance of, and evaluation of the course. To address the students' perceptions about these points, we sent a questionnaire to 49 participants who finished the course. We found that although most students (52.5%) had never taken a course with similar methods before, almost all of them (95%) liked the flipped class model. Additionally, a majority of the students (92.5%) said that the method increased their study frequency during the social distancing period, which is an important aspect to consider during this challenging time for both students and professors.