4 results on '"Karadeniz, Pınar Günel"'
Search Results
2. Could ischemia-modified albumin levels predict the severity of disease in SARS-CoV-2 infection?
- Author
-
Tanrıverdi, Mustafa, Gündoğdu, Nevhiz, Benlier, Necla, Yıldırım, Mustafa, Çeliktürk, Hale, Özkur, Hanifi Ayhan, Karadeniz, Pınar Günel, Tanrıverdi, Gülşen Özkan, and Çiçek, Hülya
- Subjects
- *
CORONAVIRUS diseases , *COVID-19 , *SARS-CoV-2 , *TYPE 2 diabetes , *ALBUMINS , *CORONARY artery disease - Abstract
Introduction: Ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) level increases in inflammatory conditions. We aimed to investigate the association between IMA levels and the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in adult patients. Methodology: We grouped adult patients with COVID-19 infection: Group A - mild symptoms, but normal computed tomography (CT), Group B - mild/moderate illness, and Group C - severe or critical illness. We measured IMA levels at the time of diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. Results: Mean age of the total number of patients (n = 90) was 54.43 (± 8.11) year, and 46.7% (n = 42) were female. IMA levels were highest in Group C and lowest in A (p < 0.001). The most important factor predicting COVID-19 disease severity was IMA. Type 2 diabetes was more frequent in Group C (n = 31) than in Group B (n = 30) (p = 0.042). Asthma was less frequent, and coronary artery disease was more frequent in Group C than in Group A (n = 29) and B (p = 0.009). Duration of hospitalization was highest in Group C (p < 0.001). Conclusions: We analyzed a sample of patients with COVID-19 infection and found that IMA predicted severe COVID-19 disease. Disease severity grouping was based on patients' clinical and radiological features. IMA level measured when SARS-CoV-2 infection is diagnosed may be a useful marker in predicting likely disease severity or intensive care need. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Neurological manifestations of COVID-19 infection in acute and late phases: A case-control study.
- Author
-
Fırat, Yasemin Ekmekyapar, Cengiz, Emine Kılıçparlar, Neyal, Abdurrahman, Karadeniz, Pınar Günel, Yılmaz, Demet Arı, Demirbakan, Hadiye, and Neyal, Ayşe Münife
- Subjects
- *
COVID-19 , *NEUROLOGIC manifestations of general diseases , *CASE-control method , *COVID-19 pandemic , *RECOLLECTION (Psychology) , *VERTIGO - Abstract
Background & Objective: The late-term neurological effects of COVID-19 are not fully understood yet. Herein, we aimed to determine if COVID-19-related acute and late-term neurological symptoms exist in the patient group that differs from the general population during the pandemic period. Methods: Two hundred fifty patients with a history of COVID-19, whose treatments were completed at least one month before enrollment, were examined together with a control group consisting of 150 individuals that lived in the same socio-cultural environment during the same period. A survey that included questions about possible neurological symptoms that might be related to the COVID-19 infection was completed in both groups. Results: The patient and control groups were mostly similar regarding the neurological symptoms in the pre-pandemic period. The control group did not report any new symptoms except ageusia during the pandemic period. Whereas a number of neurological symptoms such as headache, ageusia and anosmia, difficulty in thinking and planning, forgetfulness, clumsiness of one or both hands, dizziness, unsteadiness, numbness in both hands and feet, and neuropathic pain occurred during the infection. Neurological symptoms, except headache and unsteadiness, prolonged to the late-term with a decreased prevalence. Conclusion: The emergence of new neurological symptoms during the pandemic in those with COVID-19 disease, unlike the control group, suggested that these symptoms are related to the infection itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Survey of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Ophthalmology Clinical Practice in Turkey
- Author
-
Cem Kesim, Ayse Yildiz Tas, Melisa Zisan Karslioglu, Cem Ozturkmen, Afsun Sahin, Pinar Gunel Karadeniz, Karslıoğlu, Melisa Zişan, Kesim, Cem, Taş, Ayşe Yıldız (ORCID 0000-0003-1716-5488 & YÖK ID 200905), Şahin, Afsun (ORCID 0000-0002-5083-5618 & YÖK ID 171267), Karadeniz, Pınar Günel, Öztürkmen, Cem, Koç University Hospital, and School of Medicine
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Telemedicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) ,Turkey ,Hospitals, Private ,Ophthalmology ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Pandemic ,ophthalmology clinical practice ,Medicine ,Outpatient clinic ,Humans ,survey ,Practice Patterns, Physicians' ,Personal protective equipment ,Personal Protective Equipment ,Aged ,Ophthalmologists ,business.industry ,Hospitals, Public ,SARS-CoV-2 ,covid-19 pandemic ,COVID-19 ,COVID-19 pandemic ,Ophthalmology clinical practice ,Survey ,Middle Aged ,RE1-994 ,Triage ,Health Surveys ,Clinical Practice ,Private practice ,Elective Surgical Procedures ,Female ,Original Article ,Patient Care ,business ,Delivery of Health Care - Abstract
Objectives: to investigate the effect of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the clinical practice of ophthalmologists in our country. Materials and methods: a questionnaire consisting of 22 questions was delivered to 250 ophthalmologists via e-mail and a smartphone messaging application. A total of 113 ophthalmologists completed the survey. The questions included the participants’ demographic data (age, years in practice, institution, and city), changes in their working conditions and institutional preventive measures implemented during the pandemic, their personal COVID-19 experiences, the prevalence of telemedicine applications, and their attitudes toward these practices. Results: nearly half (47.8%) of the 113 ophthalmologists were 36 to 45 years old. In terms of years in practice, the largest proportion of respondents (28.3%) had 6-10 years of experience. Most of the participants worked in private/foundation universities (37.2%), while 22.1% worked in education and research clinics. Participants working at public universities most often reported that they or a close contact had to work in COVID wards (89.5%). Triage was performed in 51.5% of ophthalmology outpatient clinics, with 88.0% of these participants reporting that patients with fever, cough, or dyspnea were directed to the pandemic clinic without ophthalmological examination. All participants working in public hospitals, education and research clinics, and public university hospitals had postponed elective surgeries, whereas 12.5% of those working in private practice and 20.5% of those working in private/foundation universities reported that they continued elective surgeries. While 80.8% of the participants did not conduct online interviews or examinations, 40.4% stated that they considered telemedicine applications beneficial. Seventy-seven percent of participants expressed concern about a decrease in their income during the pandemic, with this being especially common among participants working in private practice (87.5%) and private/foundation university hospitals (85.7%). Conclusion: ophthalmologists across our country have been affected by this pandemic at a level that will change their clinical approach. We think that ophthalmologists impacted by the difficulty of providing personal protective equipment and economic concerns should be supported more during the pandemic., NA
- Published
- 2021
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.