Search

In-center maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients are at high risk of acquiring coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) by cross-contamination inside the unit. The aim of this study was to assess retrospectively the dynamics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission during the very first pandemic phase (March-July 2020) in a cohort of in-center maintenance HD patients and in nurses the same HD facility, using a phylogenetic approach. All SARS-CoV-2 quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction positive patients and nurses from our HD unit-respectively 10 out of 98, and 8 out of 58- and two other positive patients dialyzed in our self-care unit were included. Whole-genome viral sequencing and phylogenetic analysis supported the cluster investigation. Five positive patients were usually dialyzed in the same room and same shift before their COVID-19 diagnosis was made. Viral sequencing performed on 4/5 patients' swabs showed no phylogenetic link between their viruses. The fifth patient (whose virus could not be sequenced) was dialyzed at the end of the dialysis room and was treated by a different nurse than the one in charge of the other patients. Three nurses shared the same virus detected in both self-care patients (one of them had been transferred to our in-center facility). The epidemiologically strongly suspected intra-unit cluster could be ruled out by viral genome sequencing. The infection control policy did not allow inter-patient contamination within the HD facility, in contrast to evidence of moderate dissemination within the nursing staff and in the satellite unit. Epidemiologic data without phylogenetic confirmation might mislead the interpretation of the dynamics of viral spreading within congregate settings.

The kinetics of IgG antibodies after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) remain poorly understood. We investigated factors influencing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) IgG antibody levels and time to seronegativation during the follow‐up of severe and critically ill patients. We retrospectively reviewed serological evaluations drawn during the follow‐up of severe or critical laboratory‐proven COVID‐19 patients hospitalized at a large academic hospital. Specific IgG titers were measured using a chemiluminescent assay targeting anti‐spike and anti‐nucleocapsid protein IgG. The influence of time, demographic factors, clinical and paraclinical characteristics, and COVID‐19 therapeutics on IgG levels were assessed through linear regression using a mixed‐effect model, and delay until IgG negativation through a Weibull regression model. The cohort included 116 patients with a total of 154 IgG measurements drawn at a median of 79 days after diagnosis. IgG antibodies were increased with age (p = 0.005) and decreased significantly over time (p = 0.0002). Using elapsed time and age as covariates, we demonstrated higher IgG levels in patients with a higher body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.0026) and lower IgG levels in immunocompromised patients (p = 0.032). A high BMI was further found to delay and immunodeficiency to hasten significantly seronegativation, whereas no significant effect was observed with corticosteroids. These data highlight the waning over time of IgG antibodies after severe or critical COVID‐19. Age, BMI, and immunosuppression also appear to influence the IgG kinetics, while short‐term corticotherapy does not. Those data improve the understanding of SARS‐CoV‐2 serology while further research should determine the determinants of long‐term seroprotection., Highlights Anti‐SARS‐CoV‐2 IgG antibody levels measured during follow‐up of severe and critical COVID‐19 were studied. We analyzed the influence of time, demographics, clinical and paraclinical characteristics and COVID‐19 treatments on specific IgG levels and time to seronegativation. Time and immunodepression were associated to reduced IgG levels at follow‐up, while age and BMI were associated to increased levels. Corticosteroids given as short‐term treatment for COVID‐19 did not show influence. BMI and immunodepression were respectively associated with decreased and increased rates of seronegativation.

Background and Objective: In the absence of characterization on pharmacokinetics and reference concentrations for hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients, the dose and treatment duration for hydrochloroquine are currently empirical, mainly based on in vitro data, and may vary across national guidelines and clinical study protocols. The aim of this paper is to describe the pharmacokinetics of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients, considered to be a key step toward its dosing optimization. Methods: We have developed a population pharmacokinetic model for hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients using prospectively collected pharmacokinetic data from patients either enrolled in a clinical trial or treated with hydroxychloroquine as part of standard of care in two tertiary Belgian hospitals. Results: The final population pharmacokinetic model was a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. The estimated parameter values were 9.3/h, 860.8 L, and 15.7 L/h for the absorption rate constant, the central compartment volume, and the clearance, respectively. The bioavailability factor was fixed to 0.74 based on previously published models. Model validations by bootstraps, prediction corrected visual predictive checks, and normalized prediction distribution errors gave satisfactory results. Simulations were performed to compare the exposure obtained with alternative dosing regimens. Conclusion: The developed models provide useful insight for the dosing optimization of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 patients. The present results should be used in conjunction with exposure-efficacy and exposure-safety data to inform optimal dosing of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

SARS-CoV-2 causes major disturbances in serum metabolite levels, associated with severity of the immune response. Despite the numerous advantages of urine for biomarker discovery, the potential association between urine metabolites and disease severity has not been investigated in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In a proof-of-concept study, we performed quantitative urine metabolomics in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and controls using LC–MS/MS. We assessed whether metabolites alterations were associated with COVID-19, disease severity, and inflammation. The study included 56 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 (26 non-critical and 30 critical disease); 16 healthy controls; and 3 controls with proximal tubule dysfunction unrelated to SARS-CoV-2. Metabolomic profiling revealed a major urinary increase of tryptophan metabolites kynurenine (P P P r 0.43, P = 0.001; 3-hydroxykynurenine, r 0.44, P

Neutralizing monoclonal antibody treatments have shown promising preliminary results in kidney transplant recipients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. However, their efficacy in kidney transplant recipients infected with the Omicron variant has not been reported yet.Single-center retrospective study.We included all consecutive kidney transplant recipients treated with monoclonal antibodies for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections (positive polymerase chain reaction on nasopharyngeal swab) between June 10, 2021, and January 14, 2022. Forty-seven kidney transplant recipients were included. All patients had symptoms evolving for ≤7 days and no oxygen therapy need at monoclonal antibody infusion.Symptoms at diagnosis were mainly cough (n = 25; 53%) and fever (n = 15; 32%). Eighty-three percent of the cohort (n = 39) had been vaccinated with at least 2 doses before infection, of whom 30 (77%) had demonstrated a vaccine-induced humoral response. They were treated with either casirivimab-imdevimab (n = 16; 34%) or sotrovimab (n = 31; 66%) a median of 2 days (range, 0-6 days) after the onset of symptoms. Except for 1 mild allergic reaction during casirivimab-imdevimab infusion, no side effects were reported. The median viral loads at admission (day 0) and 7 days after monoclonal antibody infusion were 2,110,027 copies/mL (range, 1,000-153,798,962 copies/mL) and 1,000 copies/mL (range, 0-10,000,000 copies/mL), respectively. Genotypes were available for 22 kidney transplant recipients (47%). Omicron, Delta, and Gamma variants were identified in 13 (59%), 8 (36%), and 1 (5%) patients, respectively. In kidney transplant recipients infected with the Omicron variant, the median viral loads at day 0 and day 7 were 752,789 copies/mL (range, 4,000-12,859,300 copies/mL) and 1,353 copies/mL (range, 0-1,211,163 copies/mL), respectively. 2 kidney transplant recipients required hospitalization immediately after sotrovimab perfusion for oxygen therapy that was weaned in 3 days, allowing patients' discharge. None were admitted to the intensive care unit or died.Small sample size, no control group.Neutralizing monoclonal antibody therapy is associated with positive outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with mild coronavirus disease 2019, including those infected with the Omicron variant.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccines offered great hope in controlling the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic. At present, SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have shown excellent efficacy to prevent COVID-19 but immunocompromised patients were left-off most vaccine clinical trials albeit their extreme vulnerability. Indeed, immunosuppression is associated with a higher risk of developing severe COVID-19 with mortality rates over 30% reported in patients with hematologic malignancies (HM). [...]

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has emerged as a global health problem, associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 or with seasonal influenza in a teaching hospital in Belgium. METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, 1384 patients with COVID-19 and 226 patients with influenza were matched using a propensity score with a ratio of 3:1. Primary outcomes included admission to intensive care unit (ICU), intubation rates, hospital length of stay, readmissions within 30 days and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included pulmonary bacterial superinfection, cardiovascular complications and ECMO. RESULTS: Based on the analysis of the matched sample, patients with influenza had an increased risk of readmission within 30 days (Risk Difference (RD): 0.07, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.11) and admission to intensive care unit (RD: 0.09, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.15) compared with those with COVID-19. Patients with influenza had also more pulmonary bacterial superinfections (46.2% vs 7.4%) and more cardiovascular complications (32% vs 3.9%) than patients with COVID-19.However, a two-fold increased risk of mortality (RD: -0.10, 95% CI: 0.15 to -0.05) was observed in COVID-19 compared to influenza. ECMO was also more required among the COVID-19 patients who died than among influenza patients (5% vs 0%). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 is associated with a higher in-hospital mortality compared to influenza infection, despite a high rate of ICU admission in the influenza group. These findings highlighted that the severity of hospitalized patients with influenza should not be underestimated.

BACKGROUND: Treating hypoxemia while meeting the soaring demands of oxygen can be a challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of the surgical facemask and the double-trunk mask on top of the low-flow oxygen nasal cannula on arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) in hypoxemic COVID-19 patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized adults with COVID-19 and hypoxemia treated with the low-flow nasal cannula were enrolled between November 13, 2020, and March 05, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either the nasal cannula alone (control) or the nasal cannula covered by the surgical facemask or the double-trunk mask. Arterial blood gases were collected at baseline and 30 min after the use of each system. The oxygen output was adapted afterwards to retrieve the baseline pulse oxygen saturation. The final oxygen output value was recorded after another 30-min period. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the absolute change in PaO2. Secondary outcomes included changes in oxygen output, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), vital parameters, and breathlessness. KEY RESULTS: Arterial blood samples were successfully collected in 24/27 (8 per group) randomized patients. Compared to the nasal cannula alone, PaO2 increased with the surgical facemask (mean change: 20 mmHg, 95% CI: 0.7-38.8; P = .04) and with the double-trunk mask (mean change: 40 mmHg; 95% CI: 21-59; P < .001). Oxygen output was reduced when adding the surgical facemask (median reduction: 1.5 L/min [95% CI: 0.5-4.5], P < .001) or the double-trunk mask (median reduction: 3.3 L/min [95% CI: 2-5], P < .001). The double-trunk mask was associated with a PaCO2 increase of 2.4 mmHg ([95% CI: 0-4.7], P = .049). Neither mask influenced vital parameters or breathlessness. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of the surgical facemask or the double-trunk mask above the nasal cannula improves arterial oxygenation and reduces oxygen consumption.

This study aims to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among health care workers (HCWs) and to assess self-reported risk factors for seropositivity. A total of 3255 HCWs were included and the overall seroprevalence was 7.8%. The likelihood of seropositivity was higher in participants reporting any COVID-19 symptoms within the last 4 months (OR 8.32, 95% CI 5.83-11.88, P < 0.001). Being a female HCW (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.11-2.32, P < 0.01), having a cohabitant who was infected with SARS-CoV-2 (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.78-3.66 P < 0.001) or a cohabitant who was a nursing home caregiver (OR 3.71, 95% CI 1.59-8.65, P = 0.002) were independently associated with an increased risk of seropositivity. Working in a COVID-19 unit (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.21-2.23, P < 0.001) and being exposed to a SARS-CoV-2 infected co-worker (OR 1.30,95% CI 0.97-1.74, P = 0.016) resulted in higher seropositivity rate. Even if in-hospital exposure may play a significant role, increased infection risk is most likely attributable to household contact.

BACKGROUND: The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on functional exercise capacity seemed quickly clinically evident. The objective of this study was to assess the functional exercise capacity of patients with severe COVID-19 and to evaluate the effect of a telerehabilitation program in the specific context of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: Patients hospitalized for severe or critical COVID-19 were recruited. The functional exercise capacity (1-min sit-to-stand test (STST)) was prospectively quantified at discharge. A telerehabilitation program was then proposed. A control group was composed with the patients refusing the program. RESULTS: At discharge, none of the 48 recruited patients had a STST higher than the 50th percentile and 77% of them were below the 2.5th percentile. SpO2 was 92.6 ± 3.0% after STST and 15 patients had oxygen desaturation. After 3-months of follow-up, the number of repetitions during STST significantly increased either in telerehabilitation (n = 14) (p < 0.001) or in control groups (n = 13) (p = 0.002) but only one patient had a result higher than the 50th percentile (in Telerehabilitation group) and 37% of them were still under the 2.5th percentile for this result. The improvement was significantly and clinically greater after the telerehabilitation program (p = 0.005). No adverse events were reported by the patients during the program. CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 have a low functional exercise capacity at discharge and the recovery after three months is poor. The feasibility and the effect of a simple telerehabilitation program were verified, this program being able to substantially improve the functional recovery after three months.

The first wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was particularly dramatic for kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) around the world.1 A recent European registry study showed 28-day mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates at 22% and 21%, respectively.2 In the United States, a multicenter cohort study revealed a 28-day mortality rate at 18%.3 Fortunately, patients from our tertiary KT center were less impacted with mortality and ICU admission rates at 11% and 11%, respectively. [...]

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is particularly life threatening in patients with kidney failure under dialysis, with mortality rate at 28 days of 21.2% in the ERA-EDTA registry and 25% in the ERACODA (European Renal Association COVID-19 Database) database. [...]

Patients on in-center maintenance hemodialysis (HD) are at potentially high risk of acquiring severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]) inside the HD unit, due to social contacts during the frequent HD sessions. Data concerning the dynamics of anti–SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in patients on HD are scarce. [...]

Background Evidence of immune-mediated neurological syndromes associated with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection is limited. We therefore investigated clinical, serological and CSF features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with neurological manifestations. Methods Consecutive COVID-19 patients with neurological manifestations other than isolated anosmia and/or non-severe headache, and with no previous neurological or psychiatric disorders were prospectively included. Neurological examination was performed in all patients and lumbar puncture with CSF examination was performed when not contraindicated. Serum anti-gangliosides antibodies were tested when clinically indicated. Results Of the 349 COVID-19 admitted to our center between March 23rd and April 24th 2020, 15 patients (4.3%) had neurological manifestations and fulfilled the study inclusion/exclusion criteria. CSF examination was available in 13 patients and showed lymphocytic pleocytosis in 2 patients: 1 with anti-contactin-associated protein 2 (anti-Caspr2) antibody encephalitis and 1 with meningo-polyradiculitis. Increased serum titer of anti-GD1b antibodies was found in three patients and was associated with variable clinical presentations, including cranial neuropathy with meningo-polyradiculitis, brainstem encephalitis and delirium. CSF PCR for SARS-CoV-2 was negative in all patients. Conclusions In SARS-Cov-2 infected patients with neurological manifestations, CSF pleocytosis is associated with para- or post-infectious encephalitis and polyradiculitis. Anti-GD1b and anti-Caspr2 autoantibodies can be identified in certain cases, raising the question of SARS-CoV-2-induced secondary autoimmunity.

Halil Yildiz,1,&ast; Diego Castanares-Zapatero,2,&ast; Guillaume Pierman,1 Lucie Pothen,1 Julien De Greef,1 Frank Aboubakar Nana,3 Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos,4 Leila Belkhir,1 Jean Cyr Yombi1 1Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium; 2Department of Intensive Care Unit, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; 3Department of Pneumology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium; 4Department of Microbiology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Halil YildizDepartment of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, 10 avenue hippocrate, Brussels, BelgiumTel +3227641902Fax +3227641046Email halil.yildiz@uclouvain.beIntroduction: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could be a predictive factor of severe COVID-19. However, most relevant studies are retrospective, and the optimal NLR cut-off point has not been determined. The objective of our research was identification and validation of the best NLR cut-off value on admission that could predict high in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients.Methods: Medical files of all patients admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia in our dedicated COVID-units between March and April 2020 (derivation cohort) and between October and December 2020 (validation cohort) were reviewed.Results: Two hundred ninety-nine patients were included in the study (198 in the derivation and 101 in the validation cohort, respectively). Youden’s J statistic in the derivation cohort determined the optimal cut-off value for the performance of NLR at admission to predict mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The NLR cut-off value of 5.94 had a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 64%. In ROC curve analysis, the AUC was 0.665 [95% CI 0.530– 0.801, p= 0.025]. In the validation cohort, the best predictive cut-off value of NLR was 6.4, which corresponded to a sensitivity of 63% and a specificity of 64% with AUC 0.766 [95% CI 0.651– 0.881, p < 0.001]. When the NLR cut-off value of 5.94 was applied in the validation cohort, there was no significant difference in death and survival in comparison with the derivation NLR cut-off. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) analysis showed no significant classification change in outcome between both NLR cut-off values (NRI:0.012, p=0.31).Conclusion: In prospective analysis, an NLR value of 5.94 predicted high in-hospital mortality upon admission in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia.Keywords: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, coronavirus disease, SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19, risk factors, laboratory markers

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is commonly associated with kidney damage, and the angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor for SARS-CoV-2 is highly expressed in the proximal tubule cells. Whether patients with COVID-19 present specific manifestations of proximal tubule dysfunction remains unknown. To test this, we examined a cohort of 49 patients requiring hospitalization in a large academic hospital in Brussels, Belgium. There was evidence of proximal tubule dysfunction in a subset of patients with COVID-19, as attested by low-molecular-weight proteinuria (70-80%), neutral aminoaciduria (46%), and defective handling of uric acid (46%) or phosphate (19%). None of the patients had normoglycemic glucosuria. Proximal tubule dysfunction was independent of pre-existing comorbidities, glomerular proteinuria, nephrotoxic medications or viral load. At the structural level, kidneys from patients with COVID-19 showed prominent tubular injury, including in the initial part of the proximal tubule, with brush border loss, acute tubular necrosis, intraluminal debris, and a marked decrease in the expression of megalin in the brush border. Transmission electron microscopy identified particles resembling coronaviruses in vacuoles or cisternae of the endoplasmic reticulum in proximal tubule cells. Among features of proximal tubule dysfunction, hypouricemia with inappropriate uricosuria was independently associated with disease severity and with a significant increase in the risk of respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation using Cox (adjusted hazard ratio 6.2, 95% CI 1.9-20.1) or competing risks (adjusted sub-distribution hazard ratio 12.1, 95% CI 2.7-55.4) survival models. Thus, our data establish that SARS-CoV-2 causes specific manifestations of proximal tubule dysfunction and provide novel insights into COVID-19 severity and outcome., Graphical abstract

To the Editor, Recently Herraiz et al. [1] found that the percentage of positive tests in asymptomatic women admitted to delivery was only 0.5% during the post-peak period in Madrid(1). Their results was Concordant with those of Gagliardi et al. [2] but discordant with those found in others cities such as New York [3], [4], [5]. Bianco et al. showed that more than 15% of asymptomatic maternity patients tested positive for Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection despite having screened negative with the use of a telephone screening tool. [...]

Rationale & Objective The world is facing a global pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although kidney transplant recipients are at increased risk for viral infections, the impact of their chronic immunosuppressed status on the risk for acquiring coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and disease severity is unknown. Study Design All cases of COVID-19 infection in our cohort of kidney transplant recipients were prospectively monitored. Clinical features, management, and outcomes were recorded. A standard strategy of immunosuppression minimization was applied: discontinue the antimetabolite drug and reduce trough levels of calcineurin or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors. Unless contraindicated, hydroxychloroquine was administered only to hospitalized patients. Setting & Participants 22 COVID-19 infections were diagnosed in our cohort of 1,200 kidney transplant recipients. Results Most common initial symptoms included fever, cough, or dyspnea. 18 (82%) patients required hospitalization. Of those patients, 3 had everolimus-based immunosuppression. Computed tomography of the chest at admission (performed in 15 patients) showed mild (n=3), moderate (n=8), extensive (n=1), severe (n=2), and critical (n=1) involvement. Immunosuppression reduction was initiated in all patients. Hydroxychloroquine was administered to 15 patients. 11 patients required supplemental oxygen; 2 of them were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) with mechanical ventilation. After a median of 10 days, 13 kidney transplant recipients were discharged, 2 were hospitalized in non-ICU units, 1 was in the ICU, and 2 patients had died. Limitations Small sample size and short follow-up. Conclusions The clinical presentation of COVID-19 infection was similar to that reported in the general population. A standard strategy of immunosuppression minimization and treatment was applied, with 11% mortality among kidney transplant recipients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background COVID-19 pandemic resulted in an unprecedented number of hospitalizations in general wards and intensive care units (ICU). Severe and critical COVID-19 patients suffer from extensive pneumonia; therefore, long-term respiratory sequelae may be expected. Research question We conducted a cohort study to determine respiratory sequelae in patients with severe and critical COVID-19. We aimed at evaluating the proportion of patients with persisting respiratory symptoms and/or abnormalities in pulmonary function tests (PFT) or in lung imaging. Study design and methods: This is a single center cohort study including COVID-19 survivors who underwent a three-month follow-up with clinical evaluation, PFT and lung high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). All clinical, functional, and radiological data were centrally reviewed. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with residual lesions on HRCT. Results Full clinical evaluation, PFT and lung HRCT were available for central review in 126, 122 and 107 patients, respectively. At follow-up, 25% of patients complained from dyspnea and 35% from fatigue, lung diffusion capacity (DLCO) was decreased in 45%, 17% had HRCT abnormalities affecting more than 5% of their lung parenchyma while signs of fibrosis were found in 21%. In multiple linear regression model, number of days in ICU were related to the extent of persisting lesions on HRCT, while intubation was associated with signs of fibrosis at follow-up (P = 0.0005, Fisher's exact test). In contrast, the severity of lung imaging or PFT changes were not predictive of fatigue and dyspnea. Interpretation Although most hospitalized COVID-19 patients recover, a substantial proportion complains from persisting dyspnea and fatigue. Impairment of DLCO and signs suggestive of fibrosis are common but are not strictly related to long-lasting symptoms.

Le monde est confronté à une grave pandémie nommée COVID-19 due au nouveau virus SARS-CoV-2, qui a commencé en Chine en décembre 2019. Le COVID-19 peut être particulièrement grave et mortel dans certains groupes tels que les personnes âgées ou présentant certaines comorbidités (maladies cardiovasculaires, BPCO, diabète, maladies rénales chroniques et cancer). Chez les sujets symptomatiques, la présentation clinique est légère dans environ 80% des cas, modérée à sévère dans 15% des cas et critique dans 5% des cas. Les symptômes les plus courants du COVID-19 sont la fièvre, la fatigue, les douleurs musculaires, la toux sèche. Certains patients peuvent présenter une congestion nasale, une anosmie, un mal de gorge ou une diarrhée. Les patients atteints d'une maladie grave peuvent développer un syndrome de détresse respiratoire aiguë (SDRA), un choc, des manifestations thrombo-emboliques, une défaillance multiple d'organes et sont à risque de décès. Les patients COVID-19 atteints de SDRA ont un mauvais pronostic avec une mortalité estimée à plus de 10%. La transmission du SARS-CoV-2 se fait principalement par les gouttelettes respiratoires ; l’hygiène des voies aériennes et des mains est donc capitale. Le diagnostic est réalisé par RT-PCR sur frottis naso-pharyngé ou oro-pharyngé et, dans les cas suggestifs, par CT-scanner, grâce à sa sensibilité élevée. Il n’existe pas à l’heure actuelle de traitement spécifique bénéficiant d’une évidence robuste d’efficacité clinique. De nombreuses molécules sont encore en cours d’étude ; le traitement est donc principalement supportif. [COVID-19: SARS-CoV-2 infection] The world is facing a serious pandemic. The disease called COVID-19 is caused by a new coronavirus, SARSCoV-2, which started to spread in China in December 2019. COVID-19 is a condition that may be particularly serious and even fatal in elderly people, as well as in patients with comorbidities such as high blood pressure, cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and cancer. The clinical presentation is mild in approximately 80% of cases, moderate to severe in 15% of cases, and critical in 5% of cases. The most common symptoms of COVID-19 are fever, fatigue, muscle aches, and dry cough. Some patients may exhibit nasal congestion, chills, sore throat, or diarrhea. Severely ill patients can develop an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), shock, thrombosis, and multiple organ failure, and they are at risk of death. COVID-19 patients with ARDS have a poor prognosis, with an estimated mortality rate of more than 10%. SARS-CoV-2 is primarily transmitted through respiratory droplets. Airway and hand hygiene is therefore essential. The diagnosis is made by reverse transcriptionpolymerase chain reaction on a nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swab and, in suggestive cases, by chest computed tomography, which has a high sensitivity. There is currently no effective specific treatment for COVID-19. Many molecules have been tried or are under investigation. The treatment currently remains supportive.