Search

Antibodies against the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (RBD S-protein) contribute significantly to the humoral immune response during coronavirus infection (COVID-19) and after vaccination. The main focus of the studies of the RBD epitope composition is usually concentrated on the epitopes recognized by the virus-neutralizing antibodies. The role of antibodies that bind to RBD but do not neutralize SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear. In this study, immunochemical properties of the two mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), RS17 and S11, against the RBD were examined. Both mAbs exhibited high affinity to RBD, but they did not neutralize the virus. The epitopes of these mAbs were mapped using phage display: the epitope recognized by the mAb RS17 is located at the N-terminal site of RBD (348-SVYAVNRKRIS-358); the mAb S11 epitope is inside the receptor-binding motif of RBD (452-YRLFRKSN-459). Three groups of sera were tested for presence of antibodies competing with the non-neutralizing mAbs S11 and RS17: (i) sera from the vaccinated healthy volunteers without history of COVID-19; (ii) sera from the persons who had a mild form of COVID-19; (iii) sera from the persons who had severe COVID-19. Antibodies competing with the mAb S11 were found in each group of sera with equal frequency, whereas presence of the antibodies competing with the mAb RS17 in the sera was significantly more frequent in the group of sera obtained from the patients recovered from severe COVID-19 indicating that such antibodies are associated with the severity of COVID-19. In conclusion, despite the clear significance of anti-RBD antibodies in the effective immune response against SARS-CoV-2, it is important to analyze their virus-neutralizing activity and to confirm absence of the antibody-mediated enhancement of infection by the anti-RBD antibodies.

The effectiveness of the antiviral immune response largely depends on the activation of cytotoxic T cells. The heterogeneous group of functionally active T cells expressing the CD56 molecule (NKT-like cells), that combines the properties of T lymphocytes and NK cells, is poorly studied in COVID-19. This work aimed to analyze the activation and differentiation of both circulating NKT-like cells and CD56 - T cells during COVID-19 among intensive care unit (ICU) patients, moderate severity (MS) patients, and convalescents. A decreased proportion of CD56 + T cells was found in ICU patients with fatal outcome. Severe COVID-19 was accompanied by a decrease in the proportion of CD8 + T cells, mainly due to the CD56 - cell death, and a redistribution of the NKT-like cell subset composition with a predominance of more differentiated cytotoxic CD8 + T cells. The differentiation process was accompanied by an increase in the proportions of KIR2DL2/3 + and NKp30 + cells in the CD56 + T cell subset of COVID-19 patients and convalescents. Decreased percentages of NKG2D + and NKG2A + cells and increased PD-1 and HLA-DR expression levels were found in both CD56 - and CD56 + T cells, and can be considered as indicators of COVID-19 progression. In the CD56 - T cell fraction, increased CD16 levels were observed in MS patients and in ICU patients with lethal outcome, suggesting a negative role for CD56 - CD16 + T cells in COVID-19. Overall, our findings suggest an antiviral role of CD56 + T cells in COVID-19.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, is accompanied by a dysregulated immune response. In particular, NK cells, involved in the antiviral response, are affected by the infection. This study aimed to investigate circulating NK cells with a focus on their activation, depletion, changes in the surface expression of key receptors, and functional activity during COVID-19, among intensive care unit (ICU) patients, moderately ill patients, and convalescents (CCP). Our data confirmed that NK cell activation in patients with COVID-19 is accompanied by changes in circulating cytokines. The progression of COVID-19 was associated with a coordinated decrease in the proportion of NKG2D + and CD16 + NK cells, and an increase in PD-1, which indicated their exhaustion. A higher content of NKG2D + NK cells distinguished surviving patients from non-survivors in the ICU group. NK cell exhaustion in ICU patients was additionally confirmed by a strong negative correlation of PD-1 and natural cytotoxicity levels. In moderately ill patients and convalescents, correlations were found between the levels of CD57, NKG2C, and NKp30, which may indicate the formation of adaptive NK cells. A reduced NKp30 level was observed in patients with a lethal outcome. Altogether, the phenotypic changes in circulating NK cells of COVID-19 patients suggest that the intense activation of NK cells during SARS-CoV-2 infection, most likely induced by cytokines, is accompanied by NK cell exhaustion, the extent of which may be critical for the disease outcome.

Vitamin D as an immunomodulator has not been studied in patients with severe COVID-19. This study aimed to estimate the efficacy of vitamin D3 supplementation on cellular immunity and inflammatory markers in patients with COVID-19 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). A single-center, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial was conducted (N = 110). Patients were randomly assigned to receive a weekly oral dose of 60,000 IU of vitamin D3 followed by daily maintenance doses of 5000 IU (n = 55) or placebo (n = 55). Primary outcomes were lymphocyte counts, natural killer (NK) and natural killer T (NKT) cell counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and serum levels of inflammatory markers on 7th day of treatment. On day 7, patients in the vitamin D3 group displayed significantly higher NK and NKT cell counts and NLR than those in the placebo group did. The mortality rate (37% vs 50%, P = 0.16), need for mechanical ventilation (63% vs 69%, P = 0.58), incidence of nosocomial infection (60% vs 41%, P = 0.05) did not significantly differ between groups. Vitamin D3 supplementation, compared with placebo, significantly increased lymphocyte counts, but did not translate into reduced mortality in ICU.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05092698., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Both SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination have previously been demonstrated to elicit robust, yet somewhat limited immunity against the evolving variants of SARS-CoV-2. Nevertheless, reports performing side-by-side comparison of immune responses following infection vs. vaccination have been relatively scarce. The aim of this study was to compare B-cell response to adenovirus-vectored vaccination in SARS-CoV-2-naive individuals with that observed in the COVID-19 convalescent patients six months after the first encounter with the viral antigens. We set out to use a single analytical platform and performed comprehensive analysis of serum levels of receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific and virus-neutralizing antibodies, frequencies of RBD-binding circulating memory B cells (MBCs), MBC-derived antibody-secreting cells, as well as RBD-specific and virus-neutralizing activity of MBC-derived antibodies after Gam-COVID-Vac (Sputnik V) vaccination and/or natural SARS-CoV-2 infection. Overall, natural immunity was superior to Gam-COVID-Vac vaccination. The levels of neutralizing MBC-derived antibodies in the convalescent patients turned out to be significantly higher than those found following vaccination. Our results suggest that after six months, SARS-CoV-2-specific MBC immunity is more robust in COVID-19 convalescent patients than in Gam-COVID-Vac recipients. Collectively, our data unambiguously indicate that natural immunity outperforms Gam-COVID-Vac-induced immunity six months following recovery/vaccination, which should inform healthcare and vaccination decisions.

Background: Convalescent plasma has been widely used to treat COVID-19 and is under investigation in numerous randomized clinical trials, but results are publicly available only for a small number of trials. The objective of this study was to assess the benefits of convalescent plasma treatment compared to placebo or no treatment and all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19, using data from all available randomized clinical trials, including unpublished and ongoing trials (Open Science Framework, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/GEHFX )., Methods: In this collaborative systematic review and meta-analysis, clinical trial registries (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform), the Cochrane COVID-19 register, the LOVE database, and PubMed were searched until April 8, 2021. Investigators of trials registered by March 1, 2021, without published results were contacted via email. Eligible were ongoing, discontinued and completed randomized clinical trials that compared convalescent plasma with placebo or no treatment in COVID-19 patients, regardless of setting or treatment schedule. Aggregated mortality data were extracted from publications or provided by investigators of unpublished trials and combined using the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random effects model. We investigated the contribution of unpublished trials to the overall evidence., Results: A total of 16,477 patients were included in 33 trials (20 unpublished with 3190 patients, 13 published with 13,287 patients). 32 trials enrolled only hospitalized patients (including 3 with only intensive care unit patients). Risk of bias was low for 29/33 trials. Of 8495 patients who received convalescent plasma, 1997 died (23%), and of 7982 control patients, 1952 died (24%). The combined risk ratio for all-cause mortality was 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.92; 1.02) with between-study heterogeneity not beyond chance (I 2  = 0%). The RECOVERY trial had 69.8% and the unpublished evidence 25.3% of the weight in the meta-analysis., Conclusions: Convalescent plasma treatment of patients with COVID-19 did not reduce all-cause mortality. These results provide strong evidence that convalescent plasma treatment for patients with COVID-19 should not be used outside of randomized trials. Evidence synthesis from collaborations among trial investigators can inform both evidence generation and evidence application in patient care., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with an increased risk of respiratory infections., Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) as a predictor of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality., Methods: A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted. Forty adult patients (50% men) with confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted to the ICU were enrolled. The primary endpoint was mortality at day 60. Serum 25(OH)D concentration was measured on the day of admission to the ICU. We used the Mann-Whitney test, Fisher's exact test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis to assess serum 25(OH)D concentration as a predictor of COVID-19 mortality., Results: All 40 patients had a low median (IQR) serum 25(OH)D concentration at admission [12 (9-15) ng/mL]. The median (IQR) serum 25(OH)D concentration was greater in survivors [13.3 (10.0-17.1) ng/mL, n = 22] than in nonsurvivors [9.6 (7.9-14.2) ng/mL; n = 18], P = 0.044. The area under the ROC curve was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.86; P = 0.044). The 60-d mortality rate of those with serum 25(OH)D concentrations ≤9.9 ng/mL (n = 14, 71%) tended to be greater than that of those with concentrations >9.9 ng/mL (n = 26, 31%) (P = 0.065), and they had a 5.6-fold higher risk of death (OR: 5.63; 95% CI: 1.35, 23.45; P = 0.018)., Conclusions: The ICU patients had a low serum 25(OH)D concentration. Serum 25(OH)D concentrations ≤9.9 ng/mL on admission can be used to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04450017., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.)

Antibodies against the receptor-binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (RBD S-protein) contribute significantly to the humoral immune response during coronavirus infection (COVID-19) and after vaccination. The main focus of the studies of the RBD epitope composition is usually concentrated on the epitopes recognized by the virus-neutralizing antibodies. The role of antibodies that bind to RBD but do not neutralize SARS-CoV-2 remains unclear. In this study, immunochemical properties of the two mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), RS17 and S11, against the RBD were examined. Both mAbs exhibited high affinity to RBD, but they did not neutralize the virus. The epitopes of these mAbs were mapped using phage display: the epitope recognized by the mAb RS17 is located at the N-terminal site of RBD (348-SVYAVNRKRIS-358); the mAb S11 epitope is inside the receptor-binding motif of RBD (452-YRLFRKSN-459). Three groups of sera were tested for presence of antibodies competing with the non-neutralizing mAbs S11 and RS17: (i) sera from the vaccinated healthy volunteers without history of COVID-19; (ii) sera from the persons who had a mild form of COVID-19; (iii) sera from the persons who had severe COVID-19. Antibodies competing with the mAb S11 were found in each group of sera with equal frequency, whereas presence of the antibodies competing with the mAb RS17 in the sera was significantly more frequent in the group of sera obtained from the patients recovered from severe COVID-19 indicating that such antibodies are associated with the severity of COVID-19. In conclusion, despite the clear significance of anti-RBD antibodies in the effective immune response against SARS-CoV-2, it is important to analyze their virus-neutralizing activity and to confirm absence of the antibody-mediated enhancement of infection by the anti-RBD antibodies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The effectiveness of the antiviral immune response largely depends on the activation of cytotoxic T cells. The heterogeneous group of functionally active T cells expressing the CD56 molecule (NKT-like cells), that combines the properties of T lymphocytes and NK cells, is poorly studied in COVID-19. This work aimed to analyze the activation and differentiation of both circulating NKT-like cells and CD56− T cells during COVID-19 among intensive care unit (ICU) patients, moderate severity (MS) patients, and convalescents. A decreased proportion of CD56+ T cells was found in ICU patients with fatal outcome. Severe COVID-19 was accompanied by a decrease in the proportion of CD8+ T cells, mainly due to the CD56− cell death, and a redistribution of the NKT-like cell subset composition with a predominance of more differentiated cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. The differentiation process was accompanied by an increase in the proportions of KIR2DL2/3+ and NKp30+ cells in the CD56+ T cell subset of COVID-19 patients and convalescents. Decreased percentages of NKG2D+ and NKG2A+ cells and increased PD-1 and HLA-DR expression levels were found in both CD56− and CD56+ T cells, and can be considered as indicators of COVID-19 progression. In the CD56− T cell fraction, increased CD16 levels were observed in MS patients and in ICU patients with lethal outcome, suggesting a negative role for CD56−CD16+ T cells in COVID-19. Overall, our findings suggest an antiviral role of CD56+ T cells in COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: A novel coronavirus that causes a worldwide pandemic poses a significant threat to patients. The virus can induce not only a cytokine storm and thrombosis but also various extra-respiratory diseases such as liver dysfunction, strong headaches, loss of smell and even psychiatric disorders. However, information on whether SARS-CoV-2 can infect liver or brain tissues is still contradictory. Here, we show that the coronavirus efficiently infects liver cancer cells but does not replicate in non-tumor hepatocyte-like cells. SARS-CoV-2 was also found to infect some glioblastoma cells, which is the most common type of brain tumor. In conclusion, we show that SARS-CoV-2 can infect tumor tissues. Severe acute respiratory syndrome associated coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged at the end of 2019 and rapidly caused a pandemic that led to the death of >6 million people due to hypercoagulation and cytokine storm. In addition, SARS-CoV-2 triggers a wide array of pathologies, including liver dysfunction and neurological disorders. It remains unclear if these events are due to direct infection of the respective tissues or result from systemic inflammation. Here, we explored the possible infection of hepatic and CNS cell lines by SARS-CoV-2. We show that even moderate expression levels of the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) are sufficient for productive infection. SARS-CoV-2 infects hepatoma Huh7.5 and HepG2 cells but not non-transformed liver progenitor or hepatocyte/cholangiocyte-like HepaRG cells. However, exposure to the virus causes partial dedifferentiation of HepaRG cells. SARS-CoV-2 can also establish efficient replication in some low-passage, high-grade glioblastoma cell lines. In contrast, embryonal primary astrocytes or neuroblastoma cells did not support replication of the virus. Glioblastoma cell permissiveness is associated with defects in interferon production. Overall, these results suggest that liver dysfunction during COVID-19 is not due to infection of these tissues by SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, tumors may potentially serve as reservoirs for the virus during infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]