9 results on '"Wagner, Abram L."'
Search Results
2. Spillover of Vaccine Hesitancy into Adult COVID-19 and Influenza: The Role of Race, Religion, and Political Affiliation in the United States.
- Author
-
Zhang V, Zhu P, and Wagner AL
- Subjects
- Adult, Humans, United States, COVID-19 Vaccines, Vaccination Hesitancy, Cross-Sectional Studies, Pandemics, Religion, Influenza Vaccines, Influenza, Human, COVID-19
- Abstract
Background: Due to its potential to lead to vaccine delays and refusals, vaccine hesitancy has attracted increased attention throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. It is crucial to investigate whether demographic patterns differ between adult general vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 and flu vaccine non-receipt., Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted online in August 2022. In response to questions about vaccine hesitancy, participants indicated whether they would receive the vaccine given various safety and efficacy profiles. Through logistic regression models, we examined variations between general vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 non-vaccination., Results: Among the 700 participants, 49% of the respondents were classified as having general vaccine hesitancy, 17% had not received the COVID-19 vaccine, and 36% had not had flu vaccinations. In the multivariable analysis, general vaccine hesitancy and the non-receipt of COVID-19 vaccines were significantly higher in Non-Hispanic Black participants, those with no religious affiliation, and Republicans and Independents., Conclusions: Patterns of vaccine hesitancy and the non-receipt of the COVID-19 vaccination did not vary, indicating a substantial overlap and potential spillover in vaccine hesitancy over the course of the pandemic. Because changing people's opinions regarding vaccinations is generally a challenge, different interventions specific to demographic subgroups may be necessary.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. COVID-19 vaccination and mask wearing behaviors in the United States, August 2020 - June 2021.
- Author
-
Floyd CJ, Joachim GE, Boulton ML, Zelner J, and Wagner AL
- Subjects
- COVID-19 Vaccines, Humans, Masks, Schools, United States epidemiology, Vaccination, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 prevention & control
- Abstract
Background: During the rollout of COVID-19 vaccination, many states relaxed mask wearing guidance for those vaccinated. The aim of this study was to examine the association between vaccination status and mask wearing behaviors., Methods: Seven waves of surveys (n = 6721) were conducted between August 2020 and June 2021. Participants were asked about initiation of COVID-19 vaccination and mask wearing behavior at work/school or a grocery store. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from logistic regression were used to estimate associations between vaccination status and mask wearing at work/school and at the grocery store., Results: Between April and June 2021, mask wearing at work or school declined among both those vaccinated (74% to 49%) and unvaccinated (46% to 35%). There was a similar decline for mask wearing at grocery stores. The odds of wearing a mask were 2.35 times higher at work/school (95% CI: 1.82, 3.04) and 1.65 times at a grocery store (95% CI: 1.29, 2.11) among the vaccinated compared to unvaccinated., Conclusion: Mask wearing decreased after mask guidelines were relaxed, with consistently lower mask wearing among the unvaccinated, indicating a reluctance among the unvaccinated to adopt COVID-19 risk reduction behaviors.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Changes in COVID-19 risk perceptions: methods of an internet survey conducted in six countries.
- Author
-
Zhang F, Shih SF, Harapan H, Rajamoorthy Y, Chang HY, Singh A, Lu Y, and Wagner AL
- Subjects
- COVID-19 Vaccines, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Internet, Perception, SARS-CoV-2, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States epidemiology, COVID-19
- Abstract
Objectives: This study assessed changes in behaviors/attitudes related to the COVID-19. With the understanding that behaviors and vaccine decision-making could contribute to global spread of infectious diseases, this study collected several waves of internet-based surveys from individuals in the United States, mainland China, Taiwan, Malaysia, Indonesia, and India. The aims of this study were to (1) characterize the relationship between the epidemiology of disease and changes over time in risk perceptions, knowledge, and attitudes towards hygienic behaviors; (2) examine if risk perceptions affect acceptance of less-than-ideal vaccines; and (3) contrast adherence to public health recommendations across countries which have had different governmental responses to the outbreak., Data Description: We conducted cross-sectional online surveys in six countries from March 2020 to April 2021. By the end of June 2021, there will be six waves of surveys for the United States and China, and four waves for the rest of countries. There are common sets of questions for all countries, however, some questions were adapted to reflect local situations and some questions were designed intentionally for specific countries to capture different COVID-19 mitigation actions. Participants were asked about their adherence towards countermeasures, risk perceptions, and acceptance of a hypothetical vaccine for COVID-19., (© 2021. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among reproductive-aged female tier 1A healthcare workers in a United States Medical Center.
- Author
-
Townsel C, Moniz MH, Wagner AL, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Hawley S, Jiang L, and Stout MJ
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, SARS-CoV-2, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, COVID-19, COVID-19 Vaccines
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Modification of a vaccine hesitancy scale for use in adult vaccinations in the United States and China.
- Author
-
Akel KB, Masters NB, Shih SF, Lu Y, and Wagner AL
- Subjects
- Adult, COVID-19 Vaccines, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Reproducibility of Results, SARS-CoV-2, Surveys and Questionnaires, United States, Vaccination, COVID-19, Influenza Vaccines
- Abstract
Most research on vaccine hesitancy has focused on parental attitudes toward childhood vaccination, but it will be important to understand dimensions of vaccine hesitancy in the adult population as more adult vaccines are introduced in the future. We modified the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale to target adult vaccines and provide measures of its reliability and validity relative to influenza vaccine uptake and COVID-19 vaccination acceptance in cross-sectional internet surveys in the United States and in China. We assessed the impact of vaccine hesitancy on influenza and COVID-19 vaccination using multivariable regression modeling, which informed concurrent validity of the adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (aVHS). Among 1103 participants in the March 2020 China survey, 5.4% would not accept a COVID-19 vaccine, whereas this figure was 18.8% for the March 2020 US survey and 27.3% for the June 2020 US survey. The aVHS exhibits good internal consistency in all three surveys. Models adjusted for age, gender and income level show that prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was a fraction as high in those who scored higher on the VHS than those who scored lower on all three surveys. Prevalence of past and future flu vaccine acceptance was a fraction as high in those with higher aVHS scores than those with lower scores. Prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance is lower in those with higher vaccine hesitancy scores, which supports the scale's concurrent validity. The aVHS exhibits good internal consistency, making it a valid and reliable tool for measuring vaccination uptake.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Social distancing in response to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in the United States.
- Author
-
Masters NB, Shih SF, Bukoff A, Akel KB, Kobayashi LC, Miller AL, Harapan H, Lu Y, and Wagner AL
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Attitude, COVID-19 prevention & control, COVID-19 psychology, Coronavirus Infections prevention & control, Coronavirus Infections psychology, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pandemics prevention & control, Pneumonia, Viral prevention & control, Pneumonia, Viral psychology, Quarantine methods, Risk-Taking, United States, COVID-19 epidemiology, Coronavirus Infections epidemiology, Physical Distancing, Pneumonia, Viral epidemiology, Quarantine psychology
- Abstract
In order to reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2, much of the US was placed under social distancing guidelines during March 2020. We characterized risk perceptions and adherence to social distancing recommendations in March 2020 among US adults aged 18+ in an online survey with age and gender quotas to match the general US population (N = 713). We used multivariable logistic and linear regression to estimate associations between age (by generational cohort) and these outcomes. The median perceived risk of infection with COVID-19 within the next month was 32%, and 65% of individuals were practicing more social distancing than before the outbreak. Baby Boomers had lower perceived risk than Millennials (-10.6%, 95% CI: -16.2%, -5.0%), yet were more frequently social distancing (OR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.56). Public health outreach should focus on raising compliance with social distancing recommendations, especially among high risk groups. Efforts to address risk perceptions alone may be inadequate., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Vaccine Hesitancy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Latent Class Analysis of Middle-Aged and Older US Adults.
- Author
-
Wagner, Abram L., Porth, Julia M., Wu, Zhenke, Boulton, Matthew L., Finlay, Jessica M., and Kobayashi, Lindsay C.
- Subjects
- *
COVID-19 vaccines , *MEMBERSHIP , *VACCINE hesitancy , *CHI-squared test , *SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC factors , *SOCIAL distancing , *COVID-19 pandemic , *LATENT structure analysis , *LONGITUDINAL method - Abstract
It is important to distinguish between apprehensions that lead to vaccine rejection and those that do not. In this study, we (1) identifed latent classes of individuals by vaccination attitudes, and (2) compared classes of individuals by sociodemographic characteristics COVID-19 vaccination, and risk reduction behaviors. The COVID-19 Coping Study is a longitudinal cohort of US adults aged ≥ 55 years (n = 2358). We categorized individuals into three classes based on the adult Vaccine Hesitancy Scale using latent class analysis (LCA). The associations between class membership and sociodemographic characteristics, COVID-19 vaccination, and other behaviors were assessed using chi-square tests. In total, 88.9% were Vaccine Acceptors, 8.6% were Vaccine Ambivalent, and 2.5% Vaccine Rejectors. At the end, 90.7% of Acceptors, 62.4% of the Ambivalent, and 30.7% of the Rejectors had been vaccinated. The Ambivalent were more likely to be Black or Hispanic, and adopted social distancing and mask wearing behaviors intermediate to that of the Acceptors and Rejectors. Targeting the Vaccine Ambivalent may be an efficient way of increasing vaccination coverage. Controlling the spread of disease during a pandemic requires tailoring vaccine messaging to their concerns, e.g., through working with trusted community leaders, while promoting other risk reduction behaviors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Vaccine Hesitancy and Rejection of a Vaccine for the Novel Coronavirus in the United States.
- Author
-
Shih, Shu-Fang, Wagner, Abram L., Masters, Nina B., Prosser, Lisa A., Lu, Yihan, and Zikmund-Fisher, Brian J.
- Subjects
VACCINE refusal ,SARS-CoV-2 ,COVID-19 vaccines ,COVID-19 pandemic ,COVID-19 - Abstract
The arrival of the COVID-19 vaccine has been accompanied by increased discussion of vaccine hesitancy. However, it is unclear if there are shared patterns between general vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 vaccine rejection, or if these are two different concepts. This study characterized rejection of a hypothetical COVID-19 vaccine, and compared patterns of association between general vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 vaccine rejection. The survey was conducted online March 20-22, 2020. Participants answered questions on vaccine hesitancy and responded if they would accept the vaccine given different safety and effectiveness profiles. We assessed differences in COVID-19 rejection and general vaccine hesitancy through logistic regressions. Among 713 participants, 33.0% were vaccine hesitant, and 18.4% would reject a COVID-19 vaccine. Acceptance varied by effectiveness profile: 10.2% would reject a 95% effective COVID-19 vaccine, but 32.4% would reject a 50% effective vaccine. Those vaccine hesitant were significantly more likely to reject COVID-19 vaccination [odds ratio (OR): 5.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.39, 9.11]. In multivariable logistic regression models, there were similar patterns for vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 vaccine rejection by gender, race/ethnicity, family income, and political affiliation. But the direction of association flipped by urbanicity (P=0.0146, with rural dwellers less likely to be COVID-19 vaccine rejecters but more likely to be vaccine hesitant in general), and age (P=0.0037, with fewer pronounced differences across age for COVID-19 vaccine rejection, but a gradient of stronger vaccine hesitancy in general among younger ages). During the COVID-19 epidemic's early phase, patterns of vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 vaccine rejection were relatively similar. A significant minority would reject a COVID-19 vaccine, especially one with less-than-ideal effectiveness. Preparations for introducing the COVID-19 vaccine should anticipate substantial hesitation and target concerns, especially among younger adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.