Search

Abstract: Understanding salinity and fertilizer interaction is of great economic importance to improving crop yield and fertilizer use efficiency. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of nitrogen (N) rate on cotton yield and N use efficiency (NUE), and relate this to the optimum N fertilizer rate under saline field conditions. To achieve this goal, we conducted a two-year experiment in two nearby fields with similar fertility but varying salinity, using a split-plot design in the Yellow River Delta of China. The main plots were assigned to moderate (electrical conductivity of soil saturated paste extract, ECe=6.3dS/m) and high (ECe=12.5dS/m) salinity levels, while N-free (0kg/ha), low (120kg/ha), moderate (210kg/ha) and high (300kgN/ha) nitrogen rates were assigned to the subplots. The high-salinity soil produced 35% lower biological yield but 8.9% higher harvest index than the moderate-salinity soil. Biological yields were increased by 30% at low N rate, 35% at moderate N rate and 37% at high N rate. Under moderate salinity, moderate N rate produced more lint than other N rates; under the high salinity field, the low N rate produced lint yield comparable to the high- and moderate-N rates, being about 33% greater than that from 0-N rate. Moderate N rate was superior to high N rate but comparable to low rate based on agronomic NUE (aNUE), physiological NUE (pNUE), internal NUE (iNUE) and N recovery efficiency (NRE) under moderate salinity; under high salinity, the low N rate produced the greatest aNUE and NRE, and higher pNUE and iNUE than high N rate. Our overall results supported the use of moderate N rate for moderate salinity cotton fields and low N rate for high salinity fields in the saline Yellow River Delta and other cotton-growing areas with similar ecologies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Basal and topdressing split application of nitrogen (N) fertilizer is widely used in cotton in many cotton-growing countries, including China. Recently, in the Yellow River valley of China, one-off basal application of N fertilizer has been applied to meet the challenge of increasing labor costs. However, how one-off basal application of N fertilizer affects cotton yields and N use efficiency and by what mechanisms are not clear. Therefore, an experiment was conducted using full-season (K836) and short-season (LM532) cotton cultivars in a moderate fertility field in the Yellow River valley in 2019 and 2020. A split-plot design was established for each variety with the main plots assigned to a mulching pattern (with or without plastic film mulching) and the subplots assigned to an N rate (0 or 195 kg N ha−1, abbreviated as N0 and N195). Cotton yield and yield components, biomass accumulation and distribution, and total N and 15N absorption and utilization were determined each year. Compared with N0, one-off basal application of N fertilizer (N195) did not increase boll density, boll weight, lint percentage or seedcotton yield regardless of cultivar or mulching. Biomass and total N uptake of cotton increased significantly in N195 compared with N0, but the increases occurred primarily in vegetative organs, leading to reductions in the harvest index and N yield efficiency index. With one-off basal application of N fertilizer, more than 80 % of the N in cotton plants derived from soil. Approximately 28 % of 15N-labeled urea was absorbed by cotton plants, of which only approximately 35 % was used in forming seedcotton yield. Therefore, cotton plants with one-off basal application of N fertilizer only recovered a small amount of fertilizer N, and even less of the fertilizer N was used in yield formation. As a result, the harvest index of cotton decreased, and thus, one-off basal application of N fertilizer failed to increase seedcotton yield. Cultivar and plastic film mulching did not alter the effects of one-off basal application of N fertilizer. Therefore, although one-off basal application of N fertilizer in cotton is a labor-saving approach, it should not be encouraged in moderate fertility soil in the Yellow River valley or other areas with similar ecology. • One-off basal N application did not increase the seedcotton yield compared with no-N fertilization. • One-off N application led to a low proportion of plant N derived from 15N and even less for yield formation. • Both N uptake and N distribution to vegetative organs was improved by one-off basal N application. • Cultivar and plastic mulching did not alter the effects of one-off basal application of N fertilizer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plastic film mulching has been widely applied to improve crop productivity of full-season cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). However, in a previous study, plastic mulching did not increase seed cotton yield of short-season cotton compared with non-mulching. The aim of this study was to determine why plastic mulching fails to increase seed cotton yield of short-season cotton. A short-season cultivar Lumian 532 was planted with or without plastic mulching at an experimental station in Linqing in the Yellow River valley of China in 2020 and 2021. Yield, yield components, leaf senescence, photoassimilate accumulation and partitioning, photohormone contents, expression of senescence-related genes, and root traits were examined each year. Seed cotton yield produced with plastic mulching was not significantly different from that produced with non-mulching in short-season cotton. Although number and size of early- and mid-season bolls were significantly greater with plastic mulching than with non-mulching, plastic mulching decreased number and size of late-season bolls by 34.0% and 8.8%, respectively. At the initial boll opening stage, photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content in main-stem functional leaves were 36.2% and 24.1% lower, respectively, with plastic mulching than with non-mulching, but malondialdehyde content was 34.2% higher, suggesting that plastic mulching accelerated late-season leaf senescence. Canopy photosynthesis and photoassimilate partitioning to reproductive organs at the initial boll-opening stage were 68.1% and 9.4% lower, respectively, with plastic mulching than with non-mulching. Compared with non-mulching, plastic mulching increased abscisic acid and methyl jasmonate contents but decreased those of cytokinins content because of differential expression of hormone metabolism-related genes in late-season main-stem leaves. Plastic mulching also increased root distribution in the shallow soil layer and lowered root vigor in the late season, compared with non-mulching. Overall, plastic mulching negatively affected root distribution and function and altered expression of senescence-related genes and hormone metabolism-related genes to affect hormone balance, which led to accelerated late-season leaf senescence. Because of late-season leaf senescence, canopy photosynthesis and photoassimilate partitioning to cotton bolls were suppressed with plastic mulching, which led to fewer and smaller late-season bolls than those with non-mulching. Thus, plastic mulching failed to improve the seed cotton yield. This study provides a clear explanation of how plastic mulching causes late-season leaf senescence and further demonstrates that plastic film mulching is not required for planting short-season cotton in the Yellow River valley of China or in other cotton growing areas with similar ecology. • Plastic mulching did not increase yield compared with non-mulching because of fewer and smaller late-season bolls in short-season cotton. • Reduced number and size of late-season cotton bolls was attributed to accelerated late-season leaf senescence in short-season cotton. • Accelerated leaf senescence was due to shallow root distribution and weak root vigor, and differential expression of senescence-related genes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Manual removal of the main-stem growth tip is traditionally used to break the apical dominance of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Chemical topping with plant growth regulators also effectively inhibits apical dominance. However, the effect of chemical topping on yield increases and whether plant density or ecological conditions affect its efficacy are unclear. Therefore, a three-year field experiment with a split-plot design was conducted to determine the effects of plant topping, plant density, and their interactions on cotton yield and related physiological and agronomical parameters at three sites with different ecological conditions in China. In each site, the main plots were assigned low, moderate, or high plant density and the subplots were assigned no topping, manual topping, or chemical topping. Growth, yield, yield components, earliness, and late-season leaf photosynthesis as well as labor and material inputs were examined each year. Compared with no topping, both chemical and manual topping greatly reduced plant height at all sites. Manual topping increased seed cotton yield and earliness in all tested plant densities and sites. However, plant density but not ecological condition greatly mediated the effect of chemical topping on yield. At low plant density, the yields with chemical topping were 4–6% lower than those with no topping and 5.5–10.8% lower than those with manual topping at the three sites. Although yields with chemical topping were comparable with those of manual topping at moderate and high plant densities, they were 8.6–12.8% higher at moderate density and 13.8–16.4% higher at high plant density than those with no topping across years and sites. Averaged across the sites, chemical topping reduced biological yield by 12.7% at low plant density. Although biological yield decreased slightly, chemical and manual topping increased the harvest index by 12.4% and 13.3% at moderate density and by 15.6% and 17.4% at high density, respectively. In comparison with no topping, the reduction in seed cotton yield with chemical topping at low plant density was attributed to insufficient biological yield, whereas the increase in yield at moderate and high plant densities was mainly due to greater partitioning of assimilates to reproductive tissues. Compared with manual topping, chemical topping produced 23.2% lower net returns as a result of lower seed cotton yield at low plant density but produced 8.1% and 20.9% higher net returns at moderate and high plant densities, respectively, because of savings in labor inputs and comparable seed cotton yields. In addition, chemical topping increased the earliness percentage compared with that of no topping. Overall, this study demonstrates that chemical topping is a promising alternative to traditional manual topping under moderate or high cotton plant density. • Manual topping increased cotton yield regardless of plant densities and ecological conditions relative to non-topping. • Chemical topping decreased yield at low plant density relative to non-topping because of greater biomass reduction. • Chemical topping increased cotton yield at moderate and high plant densities via greater assimilates partitioning to fruits. • Chemical topping could replace manual topping at moderate and high plant densities without ecological dependence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Row covering with polyethylene film (plastic mulching) is a common practice for improving emergence, plant growth and yield of cotton in China. This is usually applied after sowing (conventional mulching, CM), but pre-sowing evaporation in spring would cause accumulation of salts and moisture loss in the surface layer of saline soils. Two experiments were conducted in Yellow River delta from 2004 to 2005 and during 2006, respectively to determine if row covering with plastic film 30d before sowing (early mulching, EM) supports better productivity of cotton than CM in saline fields. In the first experiment, we studied the effects of EM versus CM and no-mulching (NM), on soil microclimate, seedling physiology, cotton yield and earliness. The second experiment was conducted in seven sites to compare cotton yield between the two mulching systems. Results from the first experiment showed that both EM and CM could effectively improve stand establishment, plant growth, earliness and lint yield of cotton relative to NM control. However, compared with CM, EM increased stand establishment rate by 11.4% and plant biomass by 9.9% and lint yield by 7.1%. EM, relative to CM and NM, increased the photosynthesis (Pn) rate 6.8% and decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration 7.4% and Na+ level 8%. These improvements were due mainly to delayed accumulation of salts, elevation of soil temperature and reduction of moisture loss with EM. The revenue from EM was higher than that from CM and NM, suggesting the increased yield by EM was enough compensate for additional costs. The multi-site experiment in 2006 showed that the yield advantage of EM over CM was not significant in two sites with lower salinity (ECe=∼6dS/m), but substantial (from 9 to 14%) in five sites with higher salinity (ECe=10–12dS/m). The overall results suggest that EM is a promising cotton production technique in the saline Yellow River Delta and other cotton-growing areas with similar ecologies. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

• Non-mulched short-season cotton produced less fiber but greater returns than mulched full-season cotton as it consumed less inputs. • Non-mulched short-season cotton delayed leaf senescence due to reduced boll load and produced comparable cotton yields to the mulched. • Non-mulched short-season cotton reduced the residual film pollution, thus offering an alternative to mulched full-season cotton. The early planting of full-season cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at a moderate plant density under plastic mulching is a traditional means of growing cotton in the Yellow River valley of China. However, it is labor intensive, consumes a large amount of materials, and also results in residual plastic pollution in the soil. While our previous studies indicated that late planted short-season cotton under plastic mulching greatly reduces labor and material inputs and increases net revenue, the residual plastic pollution remains an issue. It is unclear if short-season cotton can be managed without yield loss in the absence of plastic mulching. A field experiment was therefore conducted using a random complete block design with four treatments, including the early planting of full-season cotton with (FCM) and without plastic mulching (FC), and the late planting of short-season cotton with (SCM) and without plastic mulching (SC), in the Yellow River valley from 2017 to 2019. The yield, yield components, input and output values, earliness, dynamics of flowering and boll setting, and late-season leaf senescence in cotton were examined. The results showed that early planted full-season cotton under mulching (FCM) produced a 21.1 and 20.4 % higher seedcotton yield and boll density, respectively, and improved earliness over the non-mulched treatment, while the boll weight did not differ significantly. Short-season cotton without plastic mulching produced comparable seedcotton yields to that with mulching (SCM), and there was no significant difference in average boll weight, boll density, or earliness between the mulching and non-mulching treatments. However, SC had a 7.0 and 12.1 % smaller boll density and boll weight, respectively, than FCM and thus produced a 17.9 % lower seedcotton yield. Therefore, SC produced 14.9 and 14.4 % greater net returns than SCM and FCM, respectively, because it consumed less labor and material inputs. Short-season cotton without plastic mulching delayed leaf senescence due to reduced boll load and thus increased boll weight in the late season compared with SCM. In addition, SC exhibited improved earliness as a result of a higher flowering rate, faster fruiting, and more concentrated boll opening than FCM. Short-season cotton without plastic mulching also avoided the residual film pollution in the soil. The overall results demonstrated that the late planting of short-season cotton without mulching is a promising alternative for sustainable cotton production in the Yellow River valley region of China as well as other cotton growing areas with similar ecology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]