1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.
- Author
-
Clements KM, Skornicki M, and O'Sullivan AK
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Anticonvulsants therapeutic use, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Intellectual Disability drug therapy, Lennox Gastaut Syndrome, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Economic, Probability, Sensitivity and Specificity, Spasms, Infantile drug therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Anticonvulsants economics, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Intellectual Disability economics, Spasms, Infantile economics
- Abstract
An economic model evaluated the costs and outcomes of adjunctive clobazam therapy for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) compared with adjunctive lamotrigine, rufinamide, and topiramate. Clinical data were used to estimate baseline frequency and the percentage of drop-seizure reductions over 3 months (all comparators) and 2 years (rufinamide). Claims data from a large US health care plan were employed to estimate costs. After 3 months, 21.5% of those receiving clobazam were drop-seizure-free. Over a 3-month horizon, clobazam was more effective and less expensive than comparators, with the assumption that >0.77% of drop seizures required medical care. Below this threshold, topiramate was less costly than clobazam. With the base-case assumption that 2.3% of drop seizures were medically attended, costs for patients receiving clobazam totaled $30,147 versus $34,223-$35,378 for comparators. Clobazam was more efficacious and less costly than rufinamide over a 2-year horizon. The percentage of medically attended drop seizures was a driver of results. Clobazam treatment may be cost-saving., (© 2013. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF