1. Early psychological impact of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic and lockdown in a large Spanish sample.
- Author
-
García-Álvarez L, de la Fuente-Tomás L, García-Portilla MP, Sáiz PA, Lacasa CM, Dal Santo F, González-Blanco L, Bobes-Bascarán MT, García MV, Vázquez CÁ, Iglesias ÁV, Cao CM, Fernández AG, Bascarán Fernández MT, Fernández AP, Revuelta JR, Zazo ES, Madera PZ, Álvarez MS, Sánchez ÁP, Delgado CF, Suárez SC, Miranda IM, Treviño LJ, Calzón GP, Abad I, Duque CP, Riera L, González PM, Pedrero EF, and Bobes J
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety etiology, Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, Coronavirus Infections prevention & control, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression etiology, Female, Humans, Logistic Models, Male, Mental Disorders etiology, Middle Aged, Pandemics prevention & control, Pneumonia, Viral prevention & control, Prevalence, SARS-CoV-2, Spain epidemiology, Surveys and Questionnaires, Anxiety epidemiology, Coronavirus Infections psychology, Depression epidemiology, Mental Disorders epidemiology, Pneumonia, Viral psychology, Quarantine psychology
- Abstract
Background: Epidemic outbreaks have significant impact on psychological well-being, increasing psychiatric morbidity among the population. We aimed to describe the early psychological impact of COVID-19 and its contributing factors in a large Spanish sample, globally and according to mental status (never mental disorder NMD, past mental disorder PMD, current mental disorder CMD)., Methods: An online questionnaire was conducted between 19 and 26 March, five days after the official declaration of alarm and the lockdown order. Data included sociodemographic and clinical information and the DASS-21 and IES questionnaires. We analysed 21 207 responses using the appropriate descriptive and univariate tests as well as binary logistic regression to identify psychological risk and protective factors., Results: We found a statistically significant gradient in the psychological impact experienced in five domains according to mental status, with the NMD group being the least affected and the CMD group being the most affected. In the three groups, the depressive response was the most prevalent (NMD = 40.9%, PMD = 51.9%, CMD = 74.4%, F = 1011.459, P < 0.001). Risk factors were female sex and classification as a case in any psychological domain. Protective factors were younger age and ability to enjoy free time. Variables related to COVID-19 had almost no impact except for having COVID-19 symptoms, which was a risk factor for anxiety in all three groups., Conclusions: Our results can help develop coping strategies addressing modifiable risk and protective factors for each mental status for early implementation in future outbreaks., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The authors completed the ICMJE Unified Competing Interest form (available upon request from the corresponding author), and declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF