Search

Restenosis after coronary angioplasty is the single complication that most limits this revascularization procedure in clinical practice. The process is largely unpredictable and the lesion-related factors predisposing to restenosis are poorly understood, with little consensus in published reports. In this study using detailed quantitative angiographic measurements to assess 490 lesions, the simple lesion characteristics associated with restenosis were defined and the relation to the restenosis process documented. Restenosis was defined as an absolute deterioration in the minimal lumen diameter by greater than or equal to 0.72 mm, a criterion based on the 95% confidence intervals for repeat angiographic measurements. This was chosen in an attempt to separate spurious changes due to a poor angiographic result and the variability of angiographic measurements from significant changes due to the restenosis process. The principal determinants of restenosis were found to be a large improvement in the minimal lumen diameter at the time of dilation (1.13 mm for the restenosis group compared with 0.86 mm for the no restenosis group [p less than 0.0001]) and an optimal postangioplasty result (minimal lumen diameter 2.28 mm in the restenosis group compared with 2.05 mm [p less than 0.001] in the no restenosis group, corresponding to a 25% and a 30% diameter stenosis, respectively [p less than 0.0001]). These observations reported for the first time suggest that the distinction needs to be made between a "clinical restenosis" of greater than or equal to 50% diameter stenosis and the "restenosis process" as measured by the absolute changes occurring during and after angioplasty.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The vasodilatory action of molsidomine was studied by intracoronary injection of its active metabolite, Sin 1. In 10 patients repeat coronary angiography in multiple projections was performed before and 2 minutes after administration of 1 mg of Sin 1, and before and after a second injection 60 minutes later. Contours of obstructed and non-obstructed segments of the left coronary artery were quantitatively analysed with a computer-based angiography analysis system. Immediately after its administration, Sin 1 increased the mean diameters of 44 normal coronary segments by 12% (P less than 0.001). Significant vasodilation (8%) was still observed after 60 minutes. At that time, repeated administration of Sin 1 increased the vasodilation by an additional 14% with respect to the control situation. An increase in obstruction diameter was observed in 6 out of 8 obstructed segments. Mean increase in the minimal obstruction diameter was still 10% after 60 minutes.