Search

Background: The purpose of our research was to evaluate the functional recovery and homeostasis of myocardium during simultaneous continuous retrograde and antegrade cardioplegia versus continuous retrograde cardioplegia., Methods: Forty patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were prospectively assigned to two clinically matched groups and analyzed in respect to cardioplegia protocol. Group I consisted of 24 patients who received continuous retrograde blood cardioplegia; Group II consisted of 16 patients who received simultaneous continuous ante- and retrograde cardioplegia. Hydrogen ion release, carbon dioxide, lactate concentration oxygen content, and oxygen extraction were measured from coronary sinus effluent and from the arterial line before and after cross-clamping of the aorta. Median changes of these parameters were reported. Cardiac output was measured and left and right ventricle stroke works were calculated. Incidence of low cardiac output, ventricular fibrillation, raised cardiac enzymes, and ischemic changes on electrocardiogram (ECG) were noted., Results: In the simultaneous group, oxygen content and oxygen extraction recovered well after cross-clamping. The same parameters did not recover to the same extent in the retrograde group. These changes were notable between groups. Hydrogen ion, carbon dioxide, and lactate releases were comparable between groups. Trend toward better recovery of left ventricle stroke work index was encountered in the simultaneous group., Conclusions: Viability of myocardium measured with oxygen utilization and functional recovery is better preserved with simultaneous antegrade and retrograde cardioplegia. However, there is no difference in anaerobic metabolism markers. Thus simultaneous ante- and retrograde cardioplegia is probably advantageous over retrograde alone.

Objective: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations, occurring in 5 to 40% of cases. A number of studies have implicated atrial ischaemia in the genesis of this arrhythmia. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between atrial coronary anatomy and the incidence of post operative atrial fibrillation., Method: To investigate a possible anatomical explanation to the onset of AF after CABG, 25 patients with documented AF after CABG were matched and compared to 25 patients which remained in sinus rhythm (SR). All coronary angiograms were reported blindly by a cardiac radiologist with reference to the blood supply of the sino-atrial (SA) node and atrio-ventricular (AV) node before and after surgery., Results: Univariate analysis of risk factors did not identify any significant difference (Fisher exact test, P > 0.05) between the two groups in age, gender, left ventricular function, ischaemic time, number of vessels diseased or grafted, renal dysfunction and withdrawal of beta-blockade. However, significant disease in the SA nodal artery was present in 2 patients of the SR group when compared to 9 in the AF group. Significant disease of AV nodal artery was present in only 4 patients of the SR group when compared to 18 in the AF group. Comparison between the two groups showed a significantly increased incidence of SA or AV nodal artery disease in the AF group, (SA: P = 0.018, AV: P = 0.0001). Mean hospital stay was 8.1 days for the SR group and 9.1 days in the AF group (P = 0.175)., Conclusion: Obstructive disease in the SA nodal and AV nodal arteries is more common in patients developing atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass surgery than those who remain in sinus rhythm. If the incidence of AF could be predicted by the anatomical distribution of arterial disease then targeting prophylaxis to this group may be possible.

The management of patients with carotid artery disease who require coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remains controversial. Several published series from the USA (including one with prospective randomization) advocate a combined approach of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) followed immediately by coronary artery bypass surgery. However, experience of combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary bypass grafting has not been previously reported by a centre from the United Kingdom. Between 1986 and 1991 we performed this combined procedure on 18 patients who required myocardial revascularization and had co-existing severe (> 70%) carotid stenosis. Sixteen patients (89%) had angina and 11 patients (61%) had symptomatic carotid artery disease. The perioperative mortality was 5.5% and the ipsilateral perioperative stroke rate was 5.5%. These early results are encouraging and suggest that further evaluation of combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass surgery is warranted.