1. Multi-center validation of the Response Biomedical Corporation RAMP NT-proBNP assay with comparison to the Roche Diagnostics GmbH Elecsys proBNP assay.
- Author
-
Lee-Lewandrowski E, Januzzi JL, Green SM, Tannous B, Wu AH, Smith A, Wong A, Murakami MM, Kaczmarek J, Apple FS, Miller WL, Hartman K, and Jaffe AS
- Subjects
- Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biomarkers analysis, Coronary Disease diagnosis, Female, Heart Failure blood, Heart Failure diagnosis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Reproducibility of Results, Sample Size, Sensitivity and Specificity, Time Factors, Biological Assay methods, Coronary Disease blood, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain blood, Peptide Fragments blood, Point-of-Care Systems, Reagent Kits, Diagnostic
- Abstract
Background: NT-proBNP measurements aid in the evaluation of patients with suspected heart failure (HF) and may facilitate risk stratification in patients with HF and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Point-of-care (POC) assays may provide more timely results and potentially improve patient outcomes., Methods: We evaluated the analytical performance of the Response Biomedical Corporation whole blood RAMP amino-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) POC assay compared to the Roche Elecsys proBNP (NT-proBNP) assay., Results: Intra-day and total imprecision (% CV) ranged from 5.5% to 10.3% at 140, 449 and 1675 ng/L. The lowest concentration that yields a 20% CV was 57 ng/L. The lower limit of detection was 18 ng/L. The upper limit of linearity was validated to 23,428 ng/L with an average recovery of 95%. Correlation by Passing and Bablok regression yielded RAMP=1.01 Elecsys+14.6, r=0.98 (n=540; range of Elecsys values <5 to >35,000). Concordance of RAMP versus Elecsys using cut-offs of 125 ng/L for subjects <75 years and 450 ng/L for subjects > or =75 was 92% (95% CI 89-94%) for a group consisting of 127 apparently healthy individuals and 208 non-healthy subjects without HF, and 99% (95% CI 97-100%) for patients with HF, using the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification. Overall, 80%, 87%, 97% and 100% of the RAMP results and 77%, 85%, 96% and 100% of the Elecsys results were greater than the age appropriate cut-off for NYHA I, II, III or IV groups. For both the RAMP and Elecsys results, the median NT-proBNP value was statistically correlated (increasing) with NYHA I, II, III or IV groups, respectively (p<0.0001), with no significant difference between the two methods., Conclusions: The POC Response Biomedical RAMP NT-proBNP assay provides comparable results that measured on the FDA cleared Roche Elecsys central laboratory platform.
- Published
- 2007
- Full Text
- View/download PDF