Search

Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate whether individuals with a positive family history for premature coronary artery disease (CAD) and coronary calcium scoring (CCS) above the 80th percentile might benefit from preventive treatment. Background: First-degree relatives of patients with premature CAD have an increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), whereas events are poorly predicted in these individuals. Surrogate markers, such as CCS, might refine risk scoring. Nevertheless, the outcome of the St. Francis Heart trial, which investigated the effect of atorvastatin 20 mg/day in asymptomatic individuals with CCS above the 80th percentile, did not reach statistical significance. Methods: We performed a post hoc analysis on the database of the St. Francis trial to assess efficacy of treatment with atorvastatin 20 mg/day in those with CCS above the 80th percentile and presence (n = 543) or absence (n = 462) of a positive family history for premature CAD. All participants received aspirin 81 mg/day. Primary outcome included coronary death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, and arterial surgery. Results: A total of 1,005 individuals, with a mean age of 59.0 ± 5.9 years and a median absolute CCS of 370 Agatston units (interquartile range: 183 to 662) participated in the trial. After a follow-up of 4.3 (interquartile range: 3.5 to 4.5) years, 7.2% of the treated individuals with a positive family history had a cardiovascular event versus 12.5% of the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.31 to 0.97; p = 0.040). This is comparable with a number needed to treat of 18.9. In individuals without a family history, events were minimally reduced: 6.6% in the treated versus 6.8% in the placebo group (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.51 to 2.13; p = 0.912). Conclusions: The combination of a positive family history and CCS above the 80th percentile identifies a subgroup within the primary prevention population that receives greater benefit from statin treatment than the population at large. These results have important implications for future guidelines concerning individuals with a positive family history for premature CAD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Statins are essential for the reduction of risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). One of many genes influenced by statin treatment is the ATP-binding cassette transporter A1 (ABCA1) gene, which plays an important role in metabolism of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). The present aim was to test if the ABCA1 C69T polymorphism influences CHD risk and response to statin treatment. Methods and results In a large cohort of 1686 FH patients without a history of CHD before 1 January 1990, we analysed statin-ABCA1 C69T polymorphism interaction by comparing treated and untreated patients. We used a Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for sex, birth year, and smoking. In analyses restricted to untreated patients, the TT genotype was associated with 1.7 times higher CHD risk than the CC genotype (hazard ratio (HR) =1.65, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.08–2.53; P = 0.02). Conversely, in statin-treated FH patients, CHD risk in TT individuals was not increased (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.35–1.24; P = 0.2). Formal testing confirmed this interaction (P = 0.03). HDL-cholesterol levels were significantly more raised in statin-treated patients with the TT than with the CC genotype (two-way ANOVA, P = 0.045). Conclusion In untreated FH patients, the TT genotype of the ABCA1 C69T polymorphism was associated with increased CHD risk. However, in statin-treated patients, CHD risk was no longer significantly different between genotypes, at least partially explained by a higher rise in HDL-cholesterol levels during statin treatment in TT individuals. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The article investigates whether prolactin levels are associated with the occurrence of coronary artery disease (CAD). The method involves a nested case control study among healthy individuals aged 45 to 79 who developed fatal or non fatal CAD. Results suggest that elevated systemic prolactin levels do not predict CAD in the general population although prolactin receptors were found in human atherosclerotic plaques that may indicate a role for prolactin in atherosclerotic plaque development.

Objectives: This subanalysis of the TNT (Treating to New Targets) study investigates the effects of intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) with and without pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD). Background: Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with CKD. Methods: A total of 10,001 patients with CHD were randomized to double-blind therapy with atorvastatin 80 mg/day or 10 mg/day. Patients with CKD were identified at baseline on the basis of an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation. The primary efficacy outcome was time to first major cardiovascular event. Results: Of 9,656 patients with complete renal data, 3,107 had CKD at baseline and demonstrated greater cardiovascular comorbidity than those with normal eGFR (n = 6,549). After a median follow-up of 5.0 years, 351 patients with CKD (11.3%) experienced a major cardiovascular event, compared with 561 patients with normal eGFR (8.6%) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18 to 1.54; p < 0.0001). Compared with atorvastatin 10 mg, atorvastatin 80 mg reduced the relative risk of major cardiovascular events by 32% in patients with CKD (HR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.55 to 0.84; p = 0.0003) and 15% in patients with normal eGFR (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.72 to 1.00; p = 0.049). Both doses of atorvastatin were well tolerated in patients with CKD. Conclusions: Aggressive lipid lowering with atorvastatin 80 mg was both safe and effective in reducing the excess of cardiovascular events in a high-risk population with CKD and CHD. (Treating to New Targets Study; NCT00327691) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

This article reports on a study that examined coronary disease in patients with abdominal obesity and the effect of the selective cannabinoid type 1 receptor antagonist rimonabant on slowing the progression of heart disease. Through a randomized controlled trial patients received either rimonabant or a placebo and underwent coronary intravascular ultrasonography at the beginning and end of the trial. The article discusses the results of the trial and the conclusion that rimonabant had a favorable effect on patients at the secondary endpoint of the study. The article also notes that more imaging and outcomes trials are necessary.

Epidemiologic studies have shown that the concentration of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is a strong, independent, inverse predictor of coronary heart disease risk. This identifies HDL-C as a potential therapeutic target. Compared with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering agents, however, currently available HDL-raising drugs are relatively ineffective. Consequently, recent years have seen considerable efforts expended on identifying new drugs that can raise HDL-C. Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) plays an important role in cholesterol metabolism, being responsible for the transfer of cholesteryl esters from HDL to very low-density lipoproteins and LDLs. The observation that Japanese populations with CETP deficiency exhibited high levels of HDL-C has led to the concept that drugs targeting CETP activity may elevate HDL-C levels and potentially decrease cardiovascular risk. Support of this proposition has been obtained in rabbits where inhibition of CETP activity is markedly antiatherogenic. Two CETP inhibitors—torcetrapib and JTT-705—are currently in the preliminary stages of clinical development. Initial studies with these drugs in humans show that they substantially increase HDL-C levels and modestly decrease LDL-C levels. Larger, long-term, randomized, clinical end point trials are required to determine whether the beneficial effects of CETP inhibitors on lipoprotein metabolism can translate into reductions in cardiovascular events. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

High plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis and subsequently, cardiovascular disease (CVD). This epidemiological relationship is highlighted by the early expression of coronary disease in patients with inherited dyslipidemia. In the general population, pharmacological reductions in plasma LDL-C reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality significantly. Our understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms in inherited hypercholesterolemia is leading the way to the discovery of new targets for the management of hypercholesterolemia per se. In fact, new options for lipid management are currently being developed for clinical use. Several new key therapies are presented in this review. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) measured by ultrasound has been shown to be correlated with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) and predictive of CVD in individuals without clinically evident disease. Carotid IMT is now widely used as a surrogate marker for atherosclerotic disease. A number of studies have shown that lipid-lowering therapy with a statin can reduce or reverse carotid IMT progression. The METEOR trial (Measuring Effects on Intima-Media Thickness: an Evaluation Of Rosuvastatin) will examine the effects of aggressive lipid-lowering treatment with rosuvastatin on IMT in mildly hypercholesterolemic low-risk subjects with relatively high IMT values. The results will provide important information on the ability to achieve regression of abnormal IMT with robust reductions in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels to below current target levels. Another study will examine the effects of potent LDL cholesterol reduction with rosuvastatin in young patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). Patients with FH are at increased risk of premature coronary heart disease in association with marked LDL cholesterol elevations, exhibiting a rate of progression of IMT 5× greater than that of low-risk controls without the disorder and early intervention may be the optimal approach to modifying atherosclerosis progression in these patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background Plasma apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) levels are associated with coronary artery disease (CAD) risk. Objective To assess whether lipoprotein-associated apoC-III levels predict risk of CAD events. Methods apoC-III associated with apoB, apoAI, and Lp(a) (apoCIII-apoB, apoCIII-apoAI, and apoCIII-Lp(a), respectively) were measured using high-throughput chemiluminescent enzyme-linked immunoassays in 2711 subjects (1879 controls and 832 cases with CAD) in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Norfolk prospective population study with 7.4 years of follow-up. These measures were correlated with a variety of lipid measurements and the presence of CAD. The indices of "total apoCIII-apoB" and "total apoCIII-apoAI" were derived by multiplying plasma apoB and apoAI, respectively. Results apoCIII-apoB (P =.001), apoCIII-Lp(a) (P <.001), apoCIII-apoAI (P =.005) were higher in cases vs controls; tended to correlate positively with body mass index, hsCRP, apoC-III, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, remnant cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein, LDL and high-density lipoprotein particle number and very low density lipoprotein size; but negatively with LDL and high-density lipoprotein particle size (P <.001 for all). apoCIII-apoB, apoCIII-apoAI, apoCIII-Lp(a), total apoCIII-Lp(a), and total apoCIII-apoB were predictors of CAD after adjustment of age, sex, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, hypertensive and lipid-lowering drug use, but they lost their significance after further adjustment of lipid and lipoprotein variables. Conclusions This study suggests that enzyme-linked immunoassay–measured lipoprotein-associated apoC-III markers reflect atherogenic lipid particles but do not independently predict risk of CAD events. Highlights • High-throughput enzyme-linked immunoassays were developed to measure lipoprotein-associated apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) levels. • apoCIII-apoB, apoCIII-Lp(a), and apoCIII-apoAI were measured in EPIC-Norfolk. • apoCIII-apoB, apoCIII-Lp(a), and apoCIII-apoAI reflect atherogenic lipid particles. • apoCIII-apoB, apoCIII-Lp(a), and apoCIII-apoAI do not independently predict risk of coronary artery disease events. • Their role in patients with prior history of coronary artery disease needs to be evaluated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background A large proportion of patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (heFH) do not reach low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) levels advocated by international guidelines (<70 mg/dL or <100 mg/dL). Objective We set out to model which proportion of patients reach targets using conventional and novel therapies. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis in a large cohort of genetically identified heFH patients and calculated the proportion reaching treatment targets in four scenarios: (1) after 50% LDL-c reduction (representing maximal dose statin); (2) after 70% LDL-c reduction (maximal dose statin + ezetimibe); (3) additional 40% LDL-c reduction representing cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor (CETPi); and (4) 60% LDL-c reduction (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors [PCSK9i]), on top of scenario 2. We applied 100% adherence rates and literature-based adherence rates from 62% to 80%. Results We included 1,059 heFH patients with and 9,420 heFH patients without coronary heart disease (CHD). With maximal dose statin, 8.3% and 48.1% of patients with and without CHD would reach their recommended LDL-c targets, respectively. This increases to 54.3% and 93.2% when ezetimibe is added. Addition of CETPi increases these numbers to 95.7% and 99.7%, whereas adding PCSK9i would result in 99.8% and 100% goal attainment. Using literature-based adherence rates, these numbers decrease to 3.8% and 27.3% for maximal dose statin, 5.8% and 38.9% combined with ezetimibe, 31.4% and 81.2% when adding CETPi, and 40.3% and 87.1% for addition of PCSK9i. Conclusions Less than 10% with and 50% of heFH patients without CHD would reach treatment targets with maximal dose statin, but this substantially increases on addition of ezetimibe, CETPi, or PCSK9i. However, considering recently published adherence data, this might be lower in real life, especially in heFH patients with CHD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this review, we discuss the screening and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), an autosomal dominant inherited disease, characterized by severely increased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and increased risk for premature coronary heart disease (CHD). Genetic family based cascade screening for FH was shown to be cost-effective and a screening program with such an approach was carried out in the Netherlands from 1994 to 2014. Over 64,000 persons have participated in this program of whom 40.3% were found to carry an FH causing mutation. We will discuss the results of this screening program, as well as the scientific opportunities it has provided. Currently, statins and ezetimibe are the only registered LDL-C lowering treatment options for FH patients. Many of them do not attain the treatment goals that are recommended by treatment guidelines. In this review, we will also provide a comprehensive overview of promising new modalities that could lower LDL-C in FH patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High-dose statin therapy has been demonstrated to provide incremental benefit when low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol concentrations are lowered well below recommended target levels. This secondary analysis of the Treating to New Targets (TNT) study was conducted to investigate whether the attainment of very low LDL cholesterol levels was associated with a further reduction in major cardiovascular events compared with higher LDL cholesterol concentrations and whether any incremental benefit was achieved without additional safety risk. Patients with coronary heart disease and LDL cholesterol levels <130 mg/dl (3.4 mmol/L) were randomized to therapy with atorvastatin 10 mg/day (n = 5,006) or 80 mg/day (n = 4,995). The primary end point was the occurrence of a first major cardiovascular event. Clinical outcomes and safety data were compared across on-treatment LDL cholesterol quintiles. There was a highly significant reduction in the rate of major cardiovascular events with descending achieved levels of on-treatment LDL cholesterol (p <0.0001 for trend across LDL cholesterol). Analysis of individual components of the primary end point demonstrated similar results. Death from any cause and from noncardiovascular causes was lowest in patients with the lowest on-treatment LDL cholesterol levels. Cardiovascular deaths were also reduced with lower levels of on-treatment LDL cholesterol. There were no clinically important differences in adverse event rates across quintiles. Specifically, no increase in muscle complaints, suicide, hemorrhagic stroke, or cancer deaths was observed at the lowest LDL cholesterol levels. In conclusion, the present analysis adds support to the concept that for patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, a further risk reduction without sacrifice of safety can be achieved by reducing LDL cholesterol to very low levels. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The aim of this research was to estimate the efficacy and safety of current high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)-increasing drugs. Background: Epidemiologic evidence has shown that HDL-C is inversely related to coronary heart disease (CHD) risk. However, the evidence for reducing CHD risk by raising HDL-C is thin, predominantly due to the paucity of effective and safe HDL-increasing drugs. Methods: Randomized controlled trials with fibrates and niacin, published between 1966 through February 2004 (MEDLINE), were retrieved. Information on treatment, baseline characteristics, serum lipids, end points, and side-effects were independently abstracted by two authors using a standardized protocol. Results: Data from 53 trials (16,802 subjects) using fibrates and 30 trials (4,749 subjects) using niacin were included. Random-effects model showed 11% versus 10% reduction in total cholesterol, 36% versus 20% reduction in triglycerides, 8% versus 14% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and 10% versus 16% increase in HDL-C for fibrates and niacin, respectively. Apart from flushes in the niacin group, both fibrates and niacin were shown to be well-tolerated and safe. Fibrates reduced the risk for major coronary events by 25% (95% confidence interval 10% to 38%), whereas current available data for niacin indicate a 27% reduction. Conclusions: Fibrates reduce major coronary events and increase HDL-C levels without significant toxicity. Niacin has a more potent effect on HDL-C levels, whereas data on cardiovascular event rate reduction are limited. Future studies need to evaluate whether additional HDL increase by fibrates or particularly newer niacin formulations on top of statin therapy translates into further event reduction in high-risk subjects, without significant toxicity. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The Incremental Decrease in End Points through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) study is an investigator-initiated trial designed to determine whether additional clinical benefit might be gained through a strategy that decreases levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels better than those currently achieved with established statin therapy in patients who have coronary heart disease. IDEAL is a multicenter prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded, end point classification study. Patients who had myocardial infarction were randomized to prescription treatment with 80 mg/day of atorvastatin or 20 mg/day of simvastatin (the dose was increased to 40 mg/day at week 24 in those patients whose plasma total cholesterol remained >5.0 mmol/L, or 190 mg/dl, or whose low-density lipoprotein cholesterol remained >3.0 mmol/L, or 115 mg/dl). The primary clinical outcome variable is the time to initial occurrence of a major coronary event, which is defined as nonfatal acute myocardial infarction, coronary death, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. The study is designed to have a power of 90% to detect a relative decrease of 20% in the atorvastatin-group compared with the simvastatin-group in the number of major events caused by coronary heart disease over ∼5.5 years. The 8,888 randomized patients had the following characteristics: mean age 61.7 ± 9.5 years, 19.1% women (mean age 64.0 ± 9.5 years), baseline total cholesterol 5.1 ± 1.0 mmol/L (197 mg/dl), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 3.2 ± 0.9 mmol/L (124 mg/dl), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol 1.2 ± 0.3 mmol/L (46 mg/dl). Drug treatment before randomization consisted of statins in 77% of patients, aspirin in 78.9%, β blockers in 75.1%, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in 30%. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: A statin-induced reduction of coronary artery disease (CAD) events and mortality has not been adequately quantified in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH).Objectives: This study estimated the relative risk reduction for CAD and mortality by statins in heterozygous FH patients.Methods: The authors included all adult heterozygous FH patients, identified by the Dutch screening program for FH between 1994 and 2013, who were free of CAD at baseline. Hospital, pharmacy, and mortality records between 1995 and 2015 were linked to these patients. The primary outcome was the composite of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, and death from any cause. The effect of statins (time-varying) was determined using a Cox proportional hazard model, while correcting for the use of other lipid-lowering therapy, thrombocyte aggregation inhibitors, and antihypertensive and antidiabetic medication. The authors applied inverse-probability-for-treatment weighting (IPTW) to account for differences at baseline between statin users and never-users.Results: The authors obtained medical records of 2,447 patients, of whom 888 were excluded on the basis of age <18 years or previous CAD. Simvastatin 40 mg and atorvastatin 40 mg accounted for 23.1% and 22.8% of all prescriptions, respectively. Statin users (n = 1,041) experienced 89 CAD events and 17 deaths during 11,674 person-years of follow-up versus statin never-users (n = 518), who had 22 CAD events and 9 deaths during 4,892 person-years (combined rates 8.8 vs. 5.3 per 1,000 person-years, respectively; p < 0.001). After applying IPTW and adjusting for other medications, the hazard ratio of statin use for CAD and all-cause mortality was 0.56 (95% confidence interval: 0.33 to 0.96).Conclusions: In patients with heterozygous FH, moderate- to high-intensity statin therapy lowered the risk for CAD and mortality by 44%. This is essential information in all cost-effectiveness studies of this disorder, such as when evaluating reimbursement of new lipid-lowering therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Aliskiren previously was found to have potentially harmful effects in diabetic individuals prescribed concomitant angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotenisn receptor antagonists (ARB). We explored potential effects of aliskiren on coronary atheroma progression and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: death/non-fatal MI/non-fatal stroke/hospitalization for heart failure/hospitalization for ACS/arterial revascularization) in patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods AQUARIUS employed serial intravascular ultrasound measures of coronary atheroma volume in coronary artery disease patients randomized to receive daily aliskiren 300 mg or placebo for 104 weeks. This post hoc analysis compared changes in plaque volume [percent atheroma volume (PAV) and total atheroma volume (TAV)] and MACE in patients with (n = 115) and without (n = 343) DM stratified by treatment allocation. Results In multivariable propensity-weighted analyses, which included controlling for baseline and concomitant ACEI/ARB therapy and duration of aliskiren therapy, aliskiren-treated non-DM patients demonstrated the greatest PAV and TAV regression, whereas aliskiren-treated DM patients demonstrated the greatest TAV progression and greater PAV. Aliskiren-treated non-DM patients appeared at significantly lower risk of MACE compared with their aliskiren-treated DM counterparts [HR 95% CI 0.28 (0.10, 0.80)]. Statistical interactions were noted between DM status and treatment allocation for both changes in PAV (p < 0.001), TAV (p = 0.010) and MACE (p = 0.057). Conclusions Aliskiren appears to be relatively anti-atherosclerotic in non-diabetic patients. Due to the limited number MACE and low numbers of diabetic patients in AQUARIUS, the pro-atherosclerotic effects of aliskiren in this population are inconclusive, and these results should be thus considered hypothesis generating. Further outcome studies are required in non-diabetic patients to confirm the possible favorable effects of aliskiren. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a hereditary disorder predisposing to premature coronary heart disease (CHD) and is until now mainly diagnosed clinically on the basis of a classical phenotype. Its prevalence varies and is estimated around 1 in 200–500; in patients with established CHD the prevalence is less well documented. Methods and results In EUROASPIRE IV data were collected in coronary patients from 24 European countries by means of a standardized interview, bioclinical examination and venous blood sampling. Potential FH was estimated using an adapted version of the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria. Among the 7044 patients eligible for analysis, the prevalence of potential FH was 8.3%; 7.5% in men and 11.1% in women. The prevalence was inversely related to age with a putative prevalence of 1:5 in those with CHD <50 yrs of age in both sexes. Even among women aged 70 the prevalence was 1:10. Irrespective of age and gender, prevalence differed substantially between European regions; potential FH patients were more likely to smoke, had higher triglycerides levels and their blood pressure was less well controlled. The use of cardioprotective drugs and the prevalences of diabetes, obesity and central obesity were similar. Conclusions The prevalence of potential FH in coronary patients is high; the results underscore the need to promote identification of FH in CHD patients and to improve their risk factor profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether high levels of circulating proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) would increase cardiovascular risk in statin-treated patients. Background: Statins activate low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene expression, thus lowering plasma LDL levels. But statins also activate the expression of PCSK9, a secreted inhibitor of the LDL receptor, thereby limiting their beneficial effects. Methods: We have measured the plasma PCSK9 levels of 1,613 patients with stable coronary heart disease enrolled in the Treating to New Targets study, a randomized trial that compared the efficacy of high- versus low-dose atorvastatin. After a run-in period with atorvastatin 10 mg daily, patients were randomized to either continue with 10 mg or be up-titrated to 80 mg of atorvastatin, and followed during 5 years for major cardiovascular events (MCVEs). Results: Circulating PCSK9 levels measured at randomization were predictive of clinical outcomes in the group randomized to remain on atorvastatin 10 mg (p = 0.039), but not in the group that intensified atorvastatin treatment to 80 mg (p = 0.24). Further, PCSK9 levels measured 1 year post-randomization did not change upon increase of the statin dose. Conclusions: PCSK9 levels predict cardiovascular events in patients treated with low-dose atorvastatin. (A Study to Determine the Degree of Additional Reduction in CV Risk in Lowering LDL Below Minimum Target Levels [TNT]; NCT00327691) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Mutations in ABCA1, APOA1, and LCAT reduce HDL cholesterol (HDLc) in humans. However, the prevalence of these mutations and their relative effects on HDLc reduction and risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) are less clear. Here we searched for ABCA1, APOA1, and LCAT mutations in 178 unrelated probands with HDLc <10th percentile but no other major lipid abnormalities, including 89 with ≥1 first-degree relative with low HDLc (familial probands) and 89 where familial status of low HDLc is uncertain (unknown probands). Mutations were most frequent in LCAT (15.7%), followed by ABCA1 (9.0%) and APOA1 (4.5%), and were found in 42.7% of familial but only 14.6% of unknown probands (p=2.44∗10−5). Interestingly, only 16 of 24 (66.7%) mutations assessed in families conferred an average HDLc <10th percentile. Furthermore, only mutation carriers with HDLc <5th percentile had elevated risk of CAD (odds ratio (OR)=2.26 for 34 ABCA1 mutation carriers vs. 149 total first-degree relative controls, p=0.05; OR=2.50 for 26 APOA1 mutation carriers, p=0.04; OR=3.44 for 38 LCAT mutation carriers, p=1.1∗10−3). These observations show that mutations in ABCA1, APOA1, and LCAT are sufficient to explain >40% of familial hypoalphalipoproteinemia in this cohort. Moreover, individuals with mutations and large reductions in HDLc have increased risk of CAD. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Advances in High Density Lipoprotein Formation and Metabolism: A Tribute to John F. Oram (1945–2010). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objectives: We prospectively investigated the effects of ATP-binding cassette protein-1 (ABCA1) variants on long-term clinical outcome in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Background: ABCA1 is implicated in the etiology of atherothrombosis and may offer a target to reduce cardiovascular risk. However, the impact of ABCA1 on recurrent cardiovascular disease in a secondary prevention setting is as of yet unknown. Methods: We studied cause-specific 10-year mortality and quantitative coronary angiography data from the Regression GRowth Evaluation Statin Study (REGRESS), comprising 884 male CAD patients genotyped for promoter variants encompassing a proximal regulatory region (rs2422493, rs1800976, rs2740483 and rs1800977). Kaplan–Meier, proportional hazards and haplotype analyses were used to ascertain single-variant and multi-marker effects on absolute risk and extent of CAD. Results: Protection from 10-year vascular death could be attributed to the rs2422493 genotype (available in 639 patients) T allele with absolute risk decreasing stepwise from 12.2% to 8.6% to 4.7% per each added allele copy, HR 0.64, p =0.03 and HR 0.53, p =0.04 in the TGCC haplotype context. The TGCC (p =0.04) and TCCT (p =0.003) haplotypes exhibited less extensive CAD. Conclusions: On a background of contemporary secondary prevention, variation in the ABCA1 promoter influences 10-year risk of vascular death and angiographic extent of CAD in men. These insights contribute to identification of patients sharing a specific prognosis, understanding of its etiological basis and development of strategies of risk reduction in CAD. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of RVX-208, the first oral agent designed to enhance apolipoprotein (apo) A-I synthesis. Background: No agent that selectively induces synthesis of apoA-I has reached an advanced stage of clinical development. Methods: A total of 299 statin-treated patients with coronary artery disease were treated with placebo or with RVX-208 at a dose of 50, 100, or 150 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. Changes in lipid-related biomarkers, in addition to safety and tolerability, of RVX-208 were investigated. Results: For each dose of RVX-208, individual pairwise comparisons of apoA-I changes with placebo, the primary end point, did not achieve statistical significance. However, treatment with RVX-208 was associated with a dose-dependent increase in apoA-I levels by up to 5.6% (p = 0.035 for trend). Administration of RVX-208 resulted in significant increases in levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ranging from 3.2% to 8.3% (p = 0.02), and large HDL particles increased by 11.1% to 21.1% (p = 0.003). ApoA-I levels increased rapidly from 8 to 12 weeks, suggesting that peak pharmacological effect has not been achieved by the end of the 12-week study. Transient and reversible elevations in liver transaminases >3 times the upper limit of normal were observed in 18 patients treated with RVX-208, with no associated increase in bilirubin levels. Conclusions: Administration of RVX-208 for 12 weeks was associated with increases in apoA-I, HDL-C, and concentration of large HDL particles, consistent with facilitation of cholesterol mobilization. Maximal increases in apoA-I may require longer exposure. An increase in liver enzymes was observed with active treatment. (Clinical Trial for Dose Finding and Safety of RVX000222 in Subjects With Stable Coronary Artery Disease; NCT01058018) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We investigated whether intensive cholesterol lowering could more effectively prevent heart failure (HF) in secondary prevention. The IDEAL study was a 4.8-year prospective, randomized trial comparing “usual” simvastatin treatment (20 to 40 mg/day, n = 4,449) with high-dose atorvastatin (80 mg/day, n = 4,439) in patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI). At baseline, 94% of patients (n = 8,351) had no history of HF. During the course of the trial, there were 222 new or recurrent hospitalizations for HF (57 and 165 in those with and without HF at baseline, respectively), 123 (2.8%) in the simvastatin group and 99 (2.2%) in the atorvastatin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.62 to 1.05, p = 0.11). After adjustments, atorvastatin 80 mg was associated with a 26% decrease of new HF events compared with simvastatin 20 to 40 mg (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.97, p = 0.03). Atorvastatin tended to be associated with fewer HF events in those with HF at baseline (n = 537, HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.11, p = 0.11) and those without HF at baseline (n = 8,351, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.09, p = 0.15). Also, HF without preceding MI (n = 187) was decreased (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.97, p = 0.03). In conclusion, atorvastatin 80 mg was more efficient than simvastatin 20 to 40 mg in preventing development of HF in patients with previous MI. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) and hepatic lipase (HL) are two HDL modifying proteins that have both pro- and anti-atherogenic properties. We hypothesized that CETP and HL synergistically affect HDL cholesterol and atherosclerotic risk. To test our hypothesis, we analysed the genotype frequencies of CETP Taq1B (rs708272) and LIPC-514C/T (rs1800588) polymorphisms in male coronary artery disease patients (CAD; n =792) and non-symptomatic controls (n =539). Cases and controls had similar allele frequencies, but the occurrence of the combined genotypes differed (p =0.027). In CAD patients, 1.3% had the CETP-B2B2/LIPC-TT genotype, with only 0.2% in controls (p =0.033). The presence of the CETP lowering B2 allele and the HL lowering LIPC-T allele synergistically increased HDL cholesterol from 0.87±0.19mmol/L in the B1B1/CC (n =183) to 1.21±0.25mmol/L in the B2B2/TT carriers (n =10). The B1B1/CC carriers had an increased CAD risk (OR 1.4; p =0.025). Despite their high HDL cholesterol, the B2B2/TT individuals also had an increased CAD risk (OR 3.7; p =0.033). In a 2-year follow up, the loss of coronary artery lumen diameter in these patients was higher than in all other patients combined (0.34±0.70 versus 0.10±0.29mm; p =0.044). We conclude that a high HDL cholesterol does not protect against coronary artery disease when associated with combined CETP- and HL-lowering gene variants. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: The aim of this post hoc analysis from the TNT (Treating to New Targets) trial is to determine whether patients with previous coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery achieved clinical benefit from intensive low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol lowering. Background: The development and progression of atherosclerosis is accelerated in coronary venous bypass grafts. Methods: A total of 10,001 patients with documented coronary disease, including 4,654 with previous CABG, were randomized to atorvastatin 80 or 10 mg/day and were followed for a median of 4.9 years. The primary end point was the occurrence of a first major cardiovascular event (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or stroke). Results: A first major cardiovascular event occurred in 11.4% of the patients with prior CABG and 8.5% of those without prior CABG (p < 0.001). In CABG patients, mean LDL-cholesterol levels at study end were 79 mg/dl in the 80-mg arm and 101 mg/dl in the 10-mg arm, and the primary event rate was 9.7% in the 80-mg arm and 13.0% in the 10-mg arm (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.87, p = 0.0004). Repeat revascularization during follow-up, either CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention, was performed in 11.3% of the CABG patients in the 80-mg arm and 15.9% in the 10-mg arm (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.82, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Intensive LDL-cholesterol lowering to a mean of 79 mg/dl with atorvastatin 80 mg/day in patients with previous CABG reduces major cardiovascular events by 27% and the need for repeat coronary revascularization by 30%, compared with less intensive cholesterol-lowering to a mean of 101 mg/dl with atorvastatin 10 mg/day. (A Study to Determine the Degree of Additional Reduction in CV Risk in Lowering LDL Below Minimum Target Levels [TNT]; NCT00327691) [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The discontinuation of statin therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes has been associated with an increase of adverse coronary events. Patients who undergo major surgery frequently are not able to take oral medication shortly after surgery. Because there is no intravenous formula for statins, the interruption of statins in the postoperative period is a serious concern. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of perioperative statin withdrawal on postoperative cardiac outcome. Also, the association between outcome and type of statin was studied. In 298 consecutive statin users who underwent major vascular surgery, detailed cardiac histories were obtained, and medication use was noted. Postoperatively, troponin levels were measured on days 1, 3, 7, and 30 and whenever clinically indicated by electrocardiographic changes. End points were postoperative troponin release, myocardial infarction, and a combination of nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death. Multivariate analyses and propensity score analyses were performed to assess the influence of type of statin and the discontinuation of statins for these end points. Statin discontinuation was associated with an increased risk for postoperative troponin release (hazard ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 9.6) and the combination of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 7.5, 95% confidence interval 2.8 to 20.1). Extended-release fluvastatin was associated with fewer perioperative cardiac events compared with atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin. In conclusion, the present study showed that statin withdrawal in the perioperative period is associated with an increased risk for perioperative adverse cardiac events. Furthermore, there seemed to be better outcomes in patients who received statins with extended-release formulas. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objectives: We assessed relations of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle number (LDL-P) and LDL particle size as measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy with LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and the risk of future coronary artery disease (CAD). Background: Whereas LDL-C is an established risk factor for CAD, its discriminative power is limited. Measuring LDL-P and size may have stronger associations with CAD than LDL-C. Methods: A nested case-control study was performed in the prospective EPIC (European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition)-Norfolk study, which comprises 25,663 subjects. Cases (n = 1,003) were individuals who developed CAD during 6 year follow-up. Control subjects (n = 1,885) were matched for age, gender, and enrollment time. Odds ratios (ORs) for future CAD were calculated, and we also evaluated whether LDL-P could improve the Framingham risk score (FRS) to predict CAD. Results: In univariate analyses, LDL-P (OR 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58 to 2.59) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C) (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.69) were more closely associated with CAD than LDL-C (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.37 to 2.18). The additional value of LDL-P was lost after adjustment for HDL-C and triglyceride levels. Whereas LDL size was inversely related to CAD (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.76), this relation was abolished upon adjustment for LDL-P. In a model adjusted for the FRS, LDL-P retained its association with CAD (p for trend 0.02). Conclusions: In this large study of individuals with moderately elevated LDL-C, LDL-P was related to CAD on top of FRS as well as after adjusting for LDL-C. The additional value of LDL-P was comparable to non–HDL-C, and it was abolished after adjusting for triglycerides and HDL-C. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: We sought to assess the effects on cerebrovascular events of treating patients with stable coronary disease with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels substantially below 100 mg/dl. Background: Lowering LDL-C with statins has been shown to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with stable coronary disease. In observational studies, naturally low cholesterol levels have been associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke. The cerebrovascular benefits of treating patients with stable coronary disease to LDL-C levels substantially below 100 mg/dl have not been previously investigated. Methods: We describe an analysis of cerebrovascular events in the Treating to New Targets study, a trial where 10,001 patients with documented coronary disease were randomized to treatment with atorvastatin at 10 mg/day or 80 mg/day and followed for a median of 4.9 years. Results: Mean LDL-C levels were 101 mg/dl on 10 mg atorvastatin and 77 mg/dl on 80 mg. In addition to the reduction in major cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69 to 0.89; p = 0.0002), the primary end point of the trial, patients in the 80-mg arm experienced a reduction in cerebrovascular events (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.93; p = 0.007) and stroke (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.96; p = 0.02). Each 1-mg/dl reduction in LDL-C with treatment was associated with a 0.6% relative risk reduction in cerebrovascular events (p = 0.002) and a 0.5% relative risk reduction in stroke (p = 0.041). The incidence of hemorrhagic stroke was similar in the 80-mg and 10-mg groups, 16 and 18 respectively, and the hemorrhagic strokes were distributed evenly across quintiles of achieved LDL-C during treatment. Conclusions: Among patients with established coronary disease, treating to an LDL-cholesterol substantially below 100 mg/dl with 80 mg/day atorvastatin reduces both stroke and cerebrovascular events by an additional 20% to 25% compared with the 10 mg/day dose. An increase in hemorrhagic stroke was not seen at low LDL-C levels. (Treating to New Targets; http://www.clinicaltrials.gov; NCT00327691). [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Introduction: Measurement of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels has been proposed as a useful marker to improve the prediction of future coronary artery disease (CAD) risk, but this notion has been challenged recently. Methods and results: We performed a prospective case–control study among apparently healthy men and women. The odds ratio (OR) for future CAD incidence was 2.49 (95% CI=2.02–3.08, p for linearity <0.0001) unadjusted, and 1.66 (95% CI=1.31–2.12, p for linearity <0.0001), after adjustment for classical cardiovascular risk factors, for top versus bottom quartile of the CRP distribution. Notably, the risk factor adjusted predictive value was substantially stronger for fatal CAD (OR=2.92, 95% CI=1.83–4.67, p for linearity <0.0001) than for non-fatal CAD (OR=1.25, 95% CI=0.93–1.66, p for linearity=0.06). CRP levels were among the strongest predictors of CAD incidence and mortality. CRP levels remained a statistically significant predictor of future CAD, even after adjustment for the Framingham risk score. Conclusions: In this British cohort with risk factor levels representative of a contemporary Western population, CRP concentration was among the strongest predictors of CAD incidence and mortality. We suggest that current guidelines on CRP measurement in clinical practice should be based on contemporary and representative populations. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Background: Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE) is an inherited disorder of elastic tissue. We recently found that heterozygosity for the frequent (0.8% prevalence in Dutch population) R1141X mutation in the PXE gene coding for the ABCC6 transporter, is associated with a fourfold risk of premature coronary artery disease. Yet, it is not clear whether or not heterozygosity for this mutation results in a mild PXE phenotype. The objective of our study was to determine if skin and/or eye abnormalities related to a PXE phenotype could be found in patients with premature coronary artery disease, with and without the R1141X mutation. Methods: R1141X mutation carriers with premature coronary artery disease (cases) and patients with premature coronary artery disease with no–or not known–mutation (controls) were studied. Cases and controls were examined for PXE-like skin changes and retinal angioid streaks, peau d''orange or pigment epithelium changes. Results: 7 cases and 31 controls were analysed. In both the mutation-positive and the control group, skin inspection and eye fundus examination did not reveal any dermatological or ocular signs of PXE. Conclusions: Carriers for the ABCC6 R1141X mutation, which is frequent and confers a high risk of premature coronary artery disease, do not commonly have skin or eye abnormalities consistent with a mild PXE phenotype. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

We investigated the consequences of an apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) gene defect with regard to lipid metabolism, endothelial function, arterial wall thickness, and coronary artery disease (CAD) risk.Due to limited numbers of carriers of the apoA-I defects, data on the consequences of such defects have remained inconclusive.Lipids and lipoproteins were measured in 54 apoA-I (L178P) carriers and 147 nonaffected siblings. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was assessed in 29 carriers and 45 noncarriers, and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) could be determined in 33 heterozygotes and 40 controls. Moreover, CAD risk was evaluated for all apoA-I mutation carriers.Heterozygotes exhibited lower plasma levels of apoA-I (−50%; p < 0.0001) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (−63%; p < 0.0001). In addition, carriers had impaired FMD (p = 0.012) and increased carotid IMT (p < 0.001), whereas multivariate analysis revealed that heterozygotes had a striking 24-fold increase in CAD risk (p = 0.003).Heterozygosity for a novel apoA-I mutation underlies a detrimental lipoprotein profile that is associated with endothelial dysfunction, accelerated carotid arterial wall thickening, and severely enhanced CAD risk. Importantly, the extent of atherosclerosis in these subjects was similar to the burden of premature arterial wall abnormalities seen in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. These data illustrate the pivotal role in humans of apoA-I in the protection against CAD. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Coronary artery disease is among the leading causes of death worldwide. Clinical trials show a protective effect of statins against the sequelae of coronary artery disease. The mean risk reductions for subjects using statins compared with placebo found in these trials is about 30%. These are average reductions for all patients included in the trials. Important factors in interpreting the variability in the outcome of drug therapy include the patient''s health profile, prognosis, disease severity, quality of drug prescribing, compliance with prescribed pharmacotherapy and the genetic profile of the patient. This review aims to give an overview of the known polymorphisms (Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein polymorphism, Stromelysin-1 polymorphism, -455G/A and TaqI polymorphisms of the beta-fibrinogen gene, apoE4, Asp9Asn mutation in the lipoprotein lipase gene, the -514 CT polymorphism in the hepatic lipase gene and the ACE deletion type gene) that have an influence on the effects of statins in the general population. The expectation is that in the future a subject''s genotype may determine whether he will be treated with statins or not. Determining the genotype will not deny therapy to a subject, but will help in deciding the therapy that will suit the patient best. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Previous trials have demonstrated that lowering low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels below currently recommended levels is beneficial in patients with acute coronary syndromes. We prospectively assessed the efficacy and safety of lowering LDL cholesterol levels below 100 mg per deciliter (2.6 mmol per liter) in patients with stable coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods: A total of 10,001 patients with clinically evident CHD and LDL cholesterol levels of less than 130 mg per deciliter (3.4 mmol per liter) were randomly assigned to double-blind therapy and received either 10 mg or 80 mg of atorvastatin per day. Patients were followed for a median of 4.9 years. The primary end point was the occurrence of a first major cardiovascular event, defined as death from CHD, nonfatal non–procedure-related myocardial infarction, resuscitation after cardiac arrest, or fatal or nonfatal stroke. Results: The mean LDL cholesterol levels were 77 mg per deciliter (2.0 mmol per liter) during treatment with 80 mg of atorvastatin and 101 mg per deciliter (2.6 mmol per liter) during treatment with 10 mg of atorvastatin. The incidence of persistent elevations in liver aminotransferase levels was 0.2 percent in the group given 10 mg of atorvastatin and 1.2 percent in the group given 80 mg of atorvastatin (P<0.001). A primary event occurred in 434 patients (8.7 percent) receiving 80 mg of atorvastatin, as compared with 548 patients (10.9 percent) receiving 10 mg of atorvastatin, representing an absolute reduction in the rate of major cardiovascular events of 2.2 percent and a 22 percent relative reduction in risk (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.69 to 0.89; P<0.001). There was no difference between the two treatment groups in overall mortality. Conclusions: Intensive lipid-lowering therapy with 80 mg of atorvastatin per day in patients with stable CHD provides significant clinical benefit beyond that afforded by treatment with 10 mg of atorvastatin per day. This occurred with a greater incidence of elevated aminotransferase levels. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1425-35. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]