Search

Background: The incidence of coronary heart disease (CHD) in youth is rapidly increasing but difficultly recognized in the early stage., Methods and Results: In this retrospective study, 194 CHD patients under the age of 45 who previously experienced chest pain symptoms and 170 non-CHD patients were included and demographic data were collected. Systemic inflammation index (SII) and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) were increased in young CHD patients (p < 001). Spearman's correlation analysis showed that both SII and SIRI were negatively correlated with HDL and positively correlated with hypertension, Gensini score, and hsTnI. Logistic regression analysis indicated that SII and SIRI were independently associated with the presence of CHD in youth with chest pain symptoms. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the SII model for young CHD patients was 0.805 (0.728-0.869), and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.65 and 0.823, respectively. Meanwhile, the AUC for the SIRI model was 0.812 (0.739-0.872), and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.673 and 0.8022. The calibration curves of both SII and SIRI models are in good agreement with the actual curves. And the decision curves of both models indicated their clinical practicality., Conclusion: SII and SIRI are independent risk factors for CHD in young adults, which can quickly and effectively identify CHD patients among young adults who have previously experienced chest pain symptoms., (© 2024 The Author(s). Immunity, Inflammation and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The Geleijnse score, which was proposed to assess for coronary ischemia, has practical limitations., Objectives: Our aim was to design and evaluate a simplified version of the Geleijnse score., Methods: We enrolled patients with suspected coronary heart disease but negative troponin T or absence of enzymatic curve, and a non-diagnostic 12-lead ECG. The initial study was performed in a retrospective derivation cohort and the results were subsequently validated in a prospective cohort., Results: From 109 patients included in the derivation cohort, 33 (30.3%) received a diagnosis of coronary heart disease. Chest pain with both arms radiation (OR 3.54), severe intensity (OR 2.41), improvement by nitroglycerin (OR 1.61), associated dyspnea (OR 1.97) and prior exertional angina history (OR 2.91) were independently associated with an ischemic origin on multivariate logistic regression analysis. ROC curves comparison demonstrated both the original and simplified scores presented modest predictive ability with significant difference when analyzed using dichotomous cut-offs (0.647 [simplified] vs. 0.544 [original], p = 0.042) but not as a continuous variable (0.670 [simplified] vs. 0.621 [original], p = 0.396). In 305 patients from the validation cohort, the simplified score presented extensively increased predictive accuracy than the Geleijnse, in the continuous (c-indexes = 0.735 vs. 0.685, p = 0.040) and the dichotomic (c-indexes = 0.682 vs. 0.514, p<0.001) forms., Conclusions: A simplified version of the Geleijnse score, including some routine clinical manifestations associated with coronary heart disease, presented significantly better predictive ability compared to the original score., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest WYD, AIR-A, AT-M, PG-P, CL-G, AV-M, MQ-G: None declared. GYHL: Consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim and Daiichi-Sankyo. No fees are received personally. JMR-C: Consultant for Idorsia Pharmaceuticals LTD. FM: Speaker from BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim; research grants from Bayer and Ferrer., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Chest pain is a common symptom that creates significant anxiety for patients until a diagnosis can be offered. However, hospital cardiology services can struggle to cope with referral demands from primary care. The aim of this paper is to describe the development and implementation of a nurse-led chest pain service, its care processes and clinical outcomes to show feasibility, safety and sustainability., Method: We retrospectively analysed referral, demographic, cardiovascular risk, management and clinical outcome data relating to patients assessed in the nurse-led chest pain clinic in a large metropolitan district health board., Results: Between January 2010 to December 2016, 3,587 patients attended the clinic, median 2.6 weeks (IQR 2-3) from referral to attendance. 1,921 (54%) were male and 2,059 (57%) were less than 60 years old. Most patients, 3,059 (85%), had an exercise tolerance test (ETT) and of those, 294 (10%) were positive, 572 (18%) non-diagnostic and 2,193 (72%) negative. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention medication was added or modified for 1,150 (32%) patients, all patients who smoked were offered cessation support and all patients were provided with tailored lifestyle advice depending on their absolute CVD risk. Of the 319 (9%) referred for a diagnostic coronary angiogram, 205 (64%) had important coronary disease. The majority of patients, 2,088 (58%) were able to be discharged without any further investigation planned. Over a median follow-up period of 3.6 years, we identified 14 (0.4%) cardiac-related deaths, median (IQR) 2 (1-4) years from review to death., Conclusion: The nurse-led clinic offers an enhanced prevention focus that is sustainably managing large numbers of patients with outcomes similar to international studies and within recommended local timeframes., Competing Interests: Dr Kerr reports grants from HRC during the conduct of the study.

Objective: Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the main cause of death worldwide and despite a higher prevalence in men, mortality from CVD is higher among women. Few studies have assessed sex differences in chest pain management in ambulatory care. The objective of this post hoc analysis of data from a prospective cohort study was to assess sex differences in the management of chest pain in ambulatory care., Setting: We used data from the Thoracic Pain in Community cohort study that was realized in 58 primary care practices and one university ambulatory clinic in Switzerland., Participants: In total, 672 consecutive patients aged over 16 years attending a primary care practice or ambulatory care clinic with a complaint of chest pain were included between February and June 2001. Their mean age was 55.2 years and 52.5% were women., Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome was the proportion of patients referred to a cardiologist at 12 months follow-up. A panel of primary care physicians assessed the final diagnosis retained for chest pain at 12 months., Results: The prevalence of chest pain of cardiovascular origin (n = 108, 16.1%) was similar for men and women (17.5% vs 14.8%, respectively, p = 0.4). Men with chest pain were 2.5 times more likely to be referred to a cardiologist than women (16.6% vs 7.4%, odds ratio: 2.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.52-4.09). After adjustment for the patients' age and cardiovascular disease risk factors, the estimates did not significantly change (odds ratio: 2.30, 95% confidence interval: 1.30-3.78)., Conclusion: Although the same proportion of women and men present with a chest pain of cardiovascular origin in ambulatory care, there is a strong sex bias in their management. These data suggest that effort must be made to assure equity between men and women in medical care.

Introduction: Despite having higher sensitivity as compared to conventional troponins, sensitive troponins have lower specificity, mainly in patients with renal failure., Objective: Study aimed at assessing the sensitive troponin I levels in patients with chest pain, and relating them to the existence of significant coronary lesions., Methods: Retrospective, single-center, observational. This study included 991 patients divided into two groups: with (N = 681) and without (N = 310) significant coronary lesion. For posterior analysis, the patients were divided into two other groups: with (N = 184) and without (N = 807) chronic renal failure. The commercial ADVIA Centaur® TnI-Ultra assay (Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics) was used. The ROC curve analysis was performed to identify the sensitivity and specificity of the best cutoff point of troponin as a discriminator of the probability of significant coronary lesion. The associations were considered significant when p < 0.05., Results: The median age was 63 years, and 52% of the patients were of the male sex. The area under the ROC curve between the troponin levels and significant coronary lesions was 0.685 (95% CI: 0.65 - 0.72). In patients with or without renal failure, the areas under the ROC curve were 0.703 (95% CI: 0.66 - 0.74) and 0.608 (95% CI: 0.52 - 0.70), respectively. The best cutoff points to discriminate the presence of significant coronary lesion were: in the general population, 0.605 ng/dL (sensitivity, 63.4%; specificity, 67%); in patients without renal failure, 0.605 ng/dL (sensitivity, 62.7%; specificity, 71%); and in patients with chronic renal failure, 0.515 ng/dL (sensitivity, 80.6%; specificity, 42%)., Conclusion: In patients with chest pain, sensitive troponin I showed a good correlation with significant coronary lesions when its level was greater than 0.605 ng/dL. In patients with chronic renal failure, a significant decrease in specificity was observed in the correlation of troponin levels and severe coronary lesions.

Objective: The objectives of this study were to investigate factors that correlate to cardiac events within 30 days in Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians who present to ED with chest pain and to describe the predictive ability of the HEART Score in these groups., Methods: Patients who presented with chest pain between 1 January 2013 and 16 May 2013 in a university hospital were retrospectively enrolled in the study. HEART Scores were retrospectively assigned to participants. The study's end-point was Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) within 30 days., Results: Participants (678) were enrolled in the study, of which 148 were Indigenous Australian. Twenty-eight percent of Indigenous Australian participants and 19% of non-Indigenous Australian participants were diagnosed with MACE within 30 days. Within the Indigenous Australian participant cohort, 1.6% of those with HEART Scores 0-3, 29% of those with HEART Scores 4-6 and 96% of those with HEART Scores 7-10 were diagnosed with MACE within 30 days. Within the non-Indigenous Australian participant cohort, 0.58% of those with HEART Scores 0-3, 17% of those with HEART Scores 4-6 and 79% of those with HEART Scores 7-10 were diagnosed with MACE within 30 days. The negative predictive value of HEART Scores 0-3 for ruling out MACE within 30 days was 98% for Indigenous participants and 99% for non-Indigenous participants., Conclusion: The HEART Score is a reliable predictor of patient outcome in both Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians. Modification of the HEART Score may not be required for use in the Indigenous Australian population who present to the ED with chest pain., (© 2016 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine.)

Background: In patients with chronic angina-like chest pain, the probability of coronary artery disease (CAD) is estimated by symptoms, age, and sex according to the Genders clinical model. We investigated the incremental value of circulating biomarkers over the Genders model to predict functionally significant CAD in patients with chronic chest pain., Methods: In 527 patients (60.4 years, standard deviation, 8.9 years; 61.3% male participants) enrolled in the European Evaluation of Integrated Cardiac Imaging (EVINCI) study, clinical and biohumoral data were collected., Results: Functionally significant CAD-ie, obstructive coronary disease seen at invasive angiography causing myocardial ischemia at stress imaging or associated with reduced fractional flow reserve (FFR < 0.8), or both-was present in 15.2% of patients. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were the only independent predictors of disease among 31 biomarkers analyzed. The model integrating these biohumoral markers with clinical variables outperformed the Genders model by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) (area under the curve [AUC], 0.70 [standard error (SE), 0.03] vs 0.58 [SE, 0.03], respectively, P < 0.001) and reclassification analysis (net reclassification improvement, 0.15 [SE, 0.07]; P = 0.04). Cross-validation of the ROC analysis confirmed the discrimination ability of the new model (AUC, 0.66). As many as 56% of patients who were assigned to a higher pretest probability by the Genders model were correctly reassigned to a low probability class (< 15%) by the new integrated model., Conclusions: The Genders model has a low accuracy for predicting functionally significant CAD. A new model integrating HDL cholesterol, AST, and hs-CRP levels with common clinical variables has a higher predictive accuracy for functionally significant CAD and allows the reclassification of patients from an intermediate/high to a low pretest likelihood of CAD., (Copyright © 2015 Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Coronary heart disease (CHD) places a major burden on the Australian health care system. Determining the likelihood of CHD in a patient presenting with chest pain can be particularly difficult in a remote setting where access to transportation and specialised investigations including myocardial stress studies and coronary angiography can be difficult and delayed. The objective is to develop a predictive model for determining the risk of CHD, including the value of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), in patients presenting with chest pain with a particular emphasis on resources and information likely to be available in a remote primary health care setting., Methods: A prospective, cross-sectional observational study of patients with no prior diagnosis of CHD presenting to a specialist chest pain assessment clinic at Cairns Hospital from November 2012 to May 2013., Results: Out of the 163 participants included in the study analyses, a total of 38 were classified as CHD likely (23.3% (95% CI 17.1-30.6)). Logistic regression modelling identified two factors that were independently associated with likely CHD, namely the presence of typical chest pain (OR 83.7 (95% CI 21.7-322.1)) and an abnormal baseline ECG (OR 12.8 (95% CI 1.9-86.0))., Conclusion: In this study, it was demonstrated that the presence of typical chest pain and an abnormal resting ECG, remain the cornerstone of predicting a subsequent diagnosis of CHD. This information is easily accessible in remote primary health care and should be utilised to expedite assessment in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of CHD., (Copyright © 2014 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To compare the utility and efficacy of stress cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and stress echocardiography in an emergency setting in patients with acute chest pain (CP) and intermediate risk of coronary artery disease (CAD)., Materials and Methods: Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board for research ethics. Sixty patients without history of CAD presented to the emergency department with intermediate-risk acute CP and were prospectively enrolled. Patients underwent both stress cardiac MR imaging and stress echocardiography in random order within 12 hours of presentation. Stress imaging results were interpreted clinically immediately (blinded interpretation was performed months later), and coronary angiography was performed if either result was abnormal. CAD was considered significant if it was identified at angiography (narrowing >50% ) or if a cardiac event (death or myocardial infarction) occurred during follow-up (mean, 14 months ± 5 [standard deviation]). McNemar test was used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of techniques., Results: Stress cardiac MR imaging and stress echocardiography had similar specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values (92% vs 96%, 93% vs 88%, 67% vs 60%, and 100% vs 91%, respectively, for clinical interpretation; 90% vs 92%, 90% vs 88%, 58% vs 56%, and 98% vs 94%, respectively, for blinded interpretation). Stress cardiac MR imaging had higher sensitivity at clinical interpretation (100% vs 38%, P = .025), which did not reach significance at blinded interpretation (88% vs 63%, P = .31). However, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed stress cardiac MR imaging to be the strongest independent predictor of significant CAD (P = .002)., Conclusion: In patients presenting to the emergency department with intermediate-risk CP, adenosine stress cardiac MR imaging performed within 12 hours of presentation is safe and potentially has improved performance characteristics compared with stress echocardiography. Online supplemental material is available for this article., (RSNA, 2013)

Chronic chest pain can arise from a variety of etiologies. However, of those potential causes, the most life-threatening include cardiac disease. Chronic cardiac chest pain may be caused either by ischemia or atherosclerotic coronary artery disease or by other cardiac-related etiologies, such as pericardial disease. To consider in patients, especially those who are at low risk for coronary artery disease, are etiologies of chronic noncardiac chest pain. Noncardiac chest pain is most commonly related to gastroesophageal reflux disease or other esophageal diseases. Alternatively, it may be related to costochondritis, arthritic or degenerative diseases, old trauma, primary or metastatic tumors, or pleural disease. Rarely, noncardiac chest pain may be referred pain from organ systems below the diaphragm, such as the gallbladder. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment., (Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Several risk scores are available for prognostic purpose in patients presenting with chest pain., Aim: The aim of this study was to compare Grace, Pursuit, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), Goldman, Sanchis, and Florence Prediction Rule (FPR) to exercise electrocardiogram (ECG), decision making, and outcome in the emergency setting., Methods: Patients with nondiagnostic ECGs and normal troponins and without history of coronary disease underwent exercise ECG. Patients with positive testing underwent coronary angiography; otherwise, they were discharged. End point was the composite of coronary stenosis at angiography or cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, angina, and revascularization at 12-month follow-up., Results: Of 508 patients considered, 320 had no history of coronary disease: 29 were unable to perform exercise testing, and finally, 291 were enrolled. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for Grace, Pursuit, TIMI, Goldman, Sanchis, and FPR were 0.59, 0.68, 0.69, 0.543, 0.66, and 0.74, respectively (P < .05 FPR vs Goldman and Grace). In patients with negative exercise ECG and overall low risk score, only the FPR effectively succeeded in recognizing those who achieved the end point; in patients with high risk score, the additional presence of carotid stenosis and recurrent angina predicted the end point (odds ratio, 12 and 5, respectively). Overall, logistic regression analysis including exercise ECG, coronary risk factors, and risk scores showed that exercise ECG was an independent predictor of coronary events (P < .001)., Conclusions: The FPR effectively succeeds in ruling out coronary events in patients categorized with overall low risk score. Exercise ECG, nonetheless being an independent predictor of coronary events could be considered questionable in this subset of patients., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Current clinical practice for patients presenting to the emergency department with a resolved episode of chest pain and no electrographic or biomarker abnormalities is to conduct routine noninvasive testing, in accordance with American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines. The rationale is to further reduce the risk of missing a myocardial infarction, a major source of suits filed against emergency department physicians. Patients with negative stress test results may be reassured, with low event rates in the subsequent 30 days. Patients with positive stress test results have higher 30-day event rates, and a small fraction undergo revascularization procedures. Despite this endorsement, open questions remain. Does our current practice lead to the stenting of asymptomatic patients in the inevitable cases where the inciting pain was noncardiac? And, most importantly, does our practice improve outcomes? Randomized trials evaluating routine stress testing in other contexts have yielded negative results, despite diagnosing significant coronary artery disease. Population data suggest that our current practice may be increasing the diagnosis of coronary artery disease and the rate of intervention while failing to decrease rates of myocardial infarction. We propose that randomized trials be conducted to evaluate whether any testing is better than no further intervention. Data from such an evidence-based approach has the potential to reverse our current practice.

Background: Chest pain is a common complaint in primary care, with coronary heart disease (CHD) being the most concerning of many potential causes. Systematic reviews on the sensitivity and specificity of symptoms and signs summarize the evidence about which of them are most useful in making a diagnosis. Previous meta-analyses are dominated by studies of patients referred to specialists. Moreover, as the analysis is typically based on study-level data, the statistical analyses in these reviews are limited while meta-analyses based on individual patient data can provide additional information. Our patient-level meta-analysis has three unique aims. First, we strive to determine the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs for myocardial ischemia in primary care. Second, we investigate associations between study- or patient-level characteristics and measures of diagnostic accuracy. Third, we aim to validate existing clinical prediction rules for diagnosing myocardial ischemia in primary care. This article describes the methods of our study and six prospective studies of primary care patients with chest pain. Later articles will describe the main results., Methods/design: We will conduct a systematic review and IPD meta-analysis of studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs for diagnosing coronary heart disease in primary care. We will perform bivariate analyses to determine the sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios of individual symptoms and signs and multivariate analyses to explore the diagnostic value of an optimal combination of all symptoms and signs based on all data of all studies. We will validate existing clinical prediction rules from each of the included studies by calculating measures of diagnostic accuracy separately by study., Discussion: Our study will face several methodological challenges. First, the number of studies will be limited. Second, the investigators of original studies defined some outcomes and predictors differently. Third, the studies did not collect the same standard clinical data set. Fourth, missing data, varying from partly missing to fully missing, will have to be dealt with.Despite these limitations, we aim to summarize the available evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of symptoms and signs for diagnosing CHD in patients presenting with chest pain in primary care., Review Registration: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (University of York): CRD42011001170.

Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm is a rare complication of myocardial infarction, cardiovascular surgery, trauma, or infection. Untreated left ventricular pseudoaneurysm can have significant morbidity and mortality. Surgical treatment has generally been the standard of care. However, with a sicker and older population, surgical risks can sometimes be significant. We report a case of successful percutaneous closure of left ventricular pseudoaneurysm using coils and a vascular plug. We emphasize the role and importance of multimodality imaging for accurate diagnosis and therapy, and briefly review the literature on the various approaches used for percutaneous closure of left ventricular pseudoaneurysms.

Accurate and efficient evaluation of acute chest pain remains clinically challenging because traditional diagnostic modalities have many limitations. Recent improvement in non-invasive imaging technologies could potentially improve both diagnostic efficiency and clinical outcomes of patients with acute chest pain while reducing unnecessary hospitalizations. However, there is still controversy regarding much of the evidence for these technologies. This article reviews the role of coronary artery calcium score and the coronary computed tomography in the assessment of individual coronary risk and their usefulness in the emergency department in facilitating appropriate disposition decisions. The evidence base and clinical applications for both techniques are also described, together with cost- effectiveness and radiation exposure considerations.

Emergency room evaluations of patients presenting with chest pain continue to rise, and these evaluations which often include cardiac imaging, are an increasing area of resource utilization in the current health system. Myocardial perfusion imaging from the emergency department remains a vital component of the diagnosis or exclusion of coronary artery disease as the etiology of chest pain. Recent advances in camera technology, and changes to the imaging protocols have allowed MPI to become a more efficient way of providing this diagnostic information. Compared with conventional SPECT, new high-efficiency CZT cameras provide a 3-5 fold increase in photon sensitivity, 1.65-fold improvement in energy resolution and a 1.7-2.5-fold increase in spatial resolution. With stress-only imaging, rest images are eliminated if stress images are normal, as they provide no additional prognostic or diagnostic value and cancelling the rest images would shorten the length of the test which is of particular importance to the ED population. The rapid but accurate triage of patients in an ED CPU is essential to their care, and stress-only imaging and new CZT cameras allow for shorter test time, lower radiation doses and lower costs while demonstrating good clinical outcomes. These changes to nuclear stress testing can allow for faster throughput of patients through the emergency department while providing a safe and efficient evaluation of chest pain.

Background: Driven by the need for rapid assessment, treatment and appropriate disposition of patients in the emergency department (ED), blood tests are often performed in a protocolised fashion before full clinical assessment. The cardiologists at this institution currently insist upon a coagulation profile in each patient referred with a possible acute coronary syndrome., Methods: A retrospective cohort of 1000 consecutive patients presenting to the ED with chest pain was identified. If performed, the international normalised ratio (INR) and the activated partial thromboplastin time ratio (APTR) were retrieved for each patient. If no coagulation sample was sent from the ED, a search was performed to determine whether a sample was sent within the subsequent 24-h period by the admitting hospital team. A cause of a raised INR or APTR that could have been identified easily at initial patient assessment in the ED was sought., Results: 640 patients were identified who had coagulation tests sent from the ED as part of their assessment. Of the 592 coagulation samples successfully processed 79 were abnormal. All of these abnormal tests could have been predicted on the basis of a history of warfarin or heparin use or a history of liver disease, or were trivial enough to not preclude coronary angiography or the therapeutic use of heparin., Conclusion: Routine coagulation testing in adults presenting to ED with chest pain is unnecessary. This practice should be replaced by a coagulation testing policy based on an increased risk of coagulopathy due to warfarin or heparin use or a history of liver disease.

The review is devoted to exercise tests (ET) potential in patients with different forms of coronary heart disease (CHD) exacerbation and suspected unstable angina. It is well known that unstable angina untreated pharmacologically is a contraindication for ET. Of interest in clinical practice is diagnosis, risk assessment and treatment policy in patients with chest pain. The main focus is on ET conduction in unstable angina suspects with low and intermediate risk, on safety and validity of ET conduction in these patients.

Background: Subjects with chest pain and a negative diagnostic workup constitute a problem for emergency physicians. We tested the usefulness of clinical variables in predicting 30-day and 6-month outcome in subjects with chest pain of undifferentiated origin after a negative workup., Methods: Chest pain of undifferentiated origin was diagnosed by negative first-line (serial electrocardiograms, troponins assays, and 12- to 24-hour observation) and second-line evaluation (echocardiography, exercise tolerance test, stress scintigraphy, stress echocardiography, coronary angiography). Thirty-day and 6-month outcomes were considered unfavorable in the presence of any of the following: death, acute coronary syndrome, need for urgent coronary revascularization. The variables considered for risk stratification were age, sex, smoking, family history of coronary artery disease, presence of hypertension, high cholesterol levels, diabetes, chronic renal failure, cerebral vascular disease, and history of acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), coronary artery by pass graft, and heart failure., Findings: Five items (diabetes, chronic renal failure, history of PTA or bypass, history of heart failure) were associated with 30-day unfavorable outcome (31 events/1262 cases; 2.5%). The receiver operating characteristic area of the selected items was 0.726 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.654-0.798); sensitivity was 90.3% (73.1-95.8) and specificity was 54.8% (52.0-57.6). A similar panel of items (older age, diabetes, chronic renal failure, history of PTA) predicted an unfavorable 6-month outcome (90 subjects [7.1%], with lower accuracy (receiver operating characteristic area, 0.610 [95% CI, 0.594-0.627, P < .05]; sensitivity, 98.9% [95% CI, 93.1-99.6]; specificity, 21.6% [95% CI, 19.4-23.9])., Interpretation: In subjects with chest pain of undifferentiated origin, the risk of unfavorable outcome cannot be accurately predicted by the selected clinical items., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The management of coronary disease has moved forward with the application of more sensitive blood biomarkers for early detection alongside more structured symptom assessment, examination and serial ECG measures. However every episode of exertional chest pain isn't symptomatic coronary disease and given massive public awareness campaigns we now face a different management issue with undiagnosed chest pain sent as a 'rule-out' activity. These urgent referrals are often justified based on the management of the minority with unstable coronary disease without preliminary medical review or examination. Avoiding delay which is valuable in coronary patients may be irrelevant to the majority. The overall effectiveness of this pathway is unclear where the patient does not have coronary disease but also where superficial interpretation can be misleading through non-specificity. Do biomarker assays become the answer to every chest pain patient and has the basic assessment of the individual patient and a prior probability of disease no role to play? Does this activity represent a burden or an irrelevant dead end for non-coronary patients? We have asked for comment from two leading authorities on the evolving role and application of cardiac biomarker technologies in managing this considerable and common clinical dilemma.

It has been suggested that internists and family practitioners have somewhat different "disease" perspectives, which may be generated by use of different explanatory models during medical training (pathophysiological vs. biopsychosocial, respectively). This article explores differences between internists and family practitioners in their suggested diagnoses, level of diagnostic certainty, test and prescription ordering, when encountering exactly the same "patient" with coronary heart disease (CHD). Internists were more certain of a CHD diagnosis than family practitioners and were more likely to act on this diagnosis. Family practitioners were more likely to diagnose (and were more certain of) a mental health condition. While many physicians simultaneously entertain several alternate diagnoses, diagnostic certainty has shown to have an important influence on subsequent clinical actions, such as stress testing and prescription of beta blockers. These results may inform future educational strategies designed to reduce diagnostic uncertainty in the face of life-threatening conditions, such as CHD.

Background: In chest pain, physicians are confronted with numerous interrelationships between symptoms and with evidence for or against classifying a patient into different diagnostic categories. The aim of our study was to find natural groups of patients on the basis of risk factors, history and clinical examination data which should then be validated with patients' final diagnoses., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional diagnostic study in 74 primary care practices to establish the validity of symptoms and findings for the diagnosis of coronary heart disease. A total of 1199 patients above age 35 presenting with chest pain were included in the study. General practitioners took a standardized history and performed a physical examination. They also recorded their preliminary diagnoses, investigations and management related to the patient's chest pain. We used multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) to examine associations on variable level, and multidimensional scaling (MDS), k-means and fuzzy cluster analyses to search for subgroups on patient level. We further used heatmaps to graphically illustrate the results., Results: A multiple correspondence analysis supported our data collection strategy on variable level. Six factors emerged from this analysis: "chest wall syndrome", "vital threat", "stomach and bowel pain", "angina pectoris", "chest infection syndrome", and " self-limiting chest pain". MDS, k-means and fuzzy cluster analysis on patient level were not able to find distinct groups. The resulting cluster solutions were not interpretable and had insufficient statistical quality criteria., Conclusions: Chest pain is a heterogeneous clinical category with no coherent associations between signs and symptoms on patient level.

Background: Chest pain is a common complaint and reason for consultation in primary care. Few data exist from a primary care setting whether male patients are treated differently than female patients. We examined whether there are gender differences in general physicians' (GPs) initial assessment and subsequent management of patients with chest pain, and how these differences can be explained, Methods: We conducted a prospective study with 1212 consecutive chest pain patients. The study was conducted in 74 primary care offices in Germany from October 2005 to July 2006. After a follow up period of 6 months, an independent interdisciplinary reference panel reviewed clinical data of every patient and decided about the etiology of chest pain at the time of patient recruitment (delayed type-reference standard). We adjusted gender differences of six process indicators for different models., Results: GPs tended to assume that CHD is the cause of chest pain more often in male patients and referred more men for an exercise test (women 4.1%, men 7.3%, p = 0.02) and to the hospital (women 2.9%, men 6.6%, p < 0.01). These differences remained when adjusting for age and cardiac risk factors but ceased to exist after adjusting for the typicality of chest pain., Conclusions: While observed gender differences can not be explained by differences in age, CHD prevalence, and underlying risk factors, the less typical symptom presentation in women might be an underlying factor. However this does not seem to result in suboptimal management in women but rather in overuse of services for men. We consider our conclusions rather hypothesis generating and larger studies will be necessary to prove our proposed model.

A 51-year-old female undergoing an outpatient stress echocardiogram to evaluate atypical chest pain developed acute ST elevation in the anterior precordial leads on electrocardiogram following exercise. Echocardiography revealed a severe rise in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) with marked right ventricular (RV) enlargement and interventricular septum flattening. Subsequently, cardiac catherization confirmed an exercise-induced elevation in PASP and diagnosed pulmonary arterial hypertension without evidence of coronary artery disease. This case suggests that an acute elevation in pulmonary artery pressure with RV dilation may be a potential cause of acute ST elevation during stress testing.

Background: patients presenting with chest pain have a 5% chance of experiencing a coronary event. These patients are at risk of mortality and should be recognized and referred to secondary care. Aim. To determine the relationship between referral type and mortality in patients with chest pain., Methods: the design of the study is an observational study. The setting of the study is a sentinel network of general practices in Belgium, covering 1.6% of the total population. The subjects are 1558 consecutive patients consulting with chest pain in 2003. Descriptive analyses report the standardized mortality ratios. We used the Belgian population of 1999 as the reference population and as the standard population., Results: the standardized mortality ratios of 3 days were 151.0 [95% confidence interval (CI): 82.3-250.3] for the urgent referred group, 45.5 (95% CI: 12.4-116.0) for non-urgent and 13.6 (95% CI: 1.7-49.4) for the non-referred group. The standardized ratios of 1 month were, respectively, 27.6 (95% CI: 18.0-40.4), 6.7 (95% CI: 2.5-14.6) and 4.7 (95% CI: 1.9-9.7). The standardized ratios of 2-12 months were normal for the urgent referral group (1.3; 95% CI: 0.7-2.2) and for the non-urgent referral group (1.0; 95% CI: 0.5-1.9) and even less in the non-referred group (0.4; 95% CI: 0.2-0.9)., Conclusions: mortality in the first 3 days and first month after consulting for chest pain is very high. There is a marked trend in mortality according to the referral type-urgently referred, non-urgently referred and not referred-suggesting risk stratification by the GP. After 1 month, mortality normalizes for all groups, suggesting that the surviving patients are well treated and the condition causing the chest pain no longer influences survival compared to the general population.

Study Objective: Coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS) is a simple and readily available test for identifying coronary artery disease. Our objective is to evaluate whether a CACS of zero will identify chest pain patients who can be safely discharged home, without need for further cardiac testing., Methods: This was a prospective observational cohort study conducted at an urban tertiary care hospital of stable patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain of uncertain cardiac cause. Patients with a normal initial troponin level, nonischemic ECG, and no history of coronary artery disease had stress myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT) and CACS within 24 hours of ED admission. Cardiac events were defined as an acute coronary syndrome during the index hospitalization or in follow-up. CACS results were assessed in relation to SPECT findings and cardiac events., Results: The 1,031 patients enrolled (mean [SD] age 54 [13] years) had a median CACS of 0 (61% with CACS of 0). The frequency of an abnormal SPECT ranged from 0.8% (CACS of 0) to17% (CACS>400). Cardiac events occurred in 32 patients (3.1%) during the index hospitalization (N=28) or after hospital discharge (N=4) (mean 7.4 [3.3] months). Only 2 events occurred in 625 patients with a CACS of 0 (0.3%; 95% confidence interval 0.04% to 1.1%). Thus, 2 of 32 patients with a cardiac event had a CACS of 0 (6%; 95% confidence interval 0.8% to 21%). Both of these patients developed increased troponin levels during their index visit but had normal serial ECG and SPECT study results and no cardiac events at 6-month follow-up., Conclusion: A majority of patients (61% in our sample) evaluated for chest pain of uncertain cardiac cause have a CACS of 0, which predicts both a normal SPECT result and an excellent short-term outcome. Our results suggest that patients with a CACS of 0 can be discharged home, without further cardiac testing., (Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Coronary artery calcium (CAC) is an integral part of atherosclerotic coronary heart disease (CHD). CHD is the leading cause of death in industrialized nations and there is a constant effort to develop preventative strategies. The emphasis is on risk stratification and primary risk prevention in asymptomatic patients to decrease cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. The Framingham Risk Score predicts CHD events only moderately well where family history is not included as a risk factor. There has been an exploration for new tests for better risk stratification and risk factor modification. While the Framingham Risk Score, European Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation Project, and European Prospective Cardiovascular Munster study remain excellent tools for risk factor modification, the CAC score may have additional benefit in risk assessment. There have been several studies supporting the role of CAC score for prediction of myocardial infarction and cardiovascular mortality. It has been shown to have great scope in risk stratification of asymptomatic patients in the emergency room. Additionally, it may help in assessment of progression or regression of coronary artery disease. Furthermore, the CAC score may help differentiate ischemic from nonischemic cardiomyopathy.

Objectives: We investigated whether coronary microvascular dysfunction predicts major adverse outcomes during follow-up among women with signs and symptoms of ischemia., Background: Altered coronary reactivity occurs frequently in women evaluated for suspected ischemia, and the endothelium-dependent component is linked with adverse outcomes. Possible links between endothelium-independent microvascular coronary reactivity and adverse outcomes remain uncertain., Methods: As part of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute-sponsored WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation), we investigated relationships between major adverse outcomes and baseline coronary flow reserve (CFR) after intracoronary adenosine in 189 women referred to evaluate suspected ischemia., Results: At a mean of 5.4 years, we observed significant associations between CFR and major adverse outcomes (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospital stay for heart failure). An exploratory receiver-operator characteristic analysis identified CFR <2.32 as the best discriminating threshold for adverse outcomes (event rate 26.7%; and >or=2.32 event rate 12.2%; p = 0.01). Lower CFR was associated with increased risk for major adverse outcomes (hazard ratio: 1.16, 95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 1.30; p = 0.009). This held true among the 152 women without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (hazard ratio: 1.20, 95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 1.38; p = 0.008). The CFR significantly improved prediction of adverse outcomes over angiographic CAD severity and other risk conditions., Conclusions: Among women with suspected ischemia and atherosclerosis risk factors, coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine significantly improves prediction of major adverse outcomes over angiographic CAD severity and CAD risk factors. These findings suggest that coronary microvessels represent novel targets for diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to predict and limit adverse outcomes in women. (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation [WISE]; NCT00000554)., (Copyright (c) 2010 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the long-term outcome of computed tomographic (CT) quantification of coronary artery calcium (CAC) used as a triage tool for patients presenting with chest pain to an emergency department (ED)., Patients and Methods: Patients (men aged 30-62 years and women aged 30-65 years) with chest pain and low-to-moderate probability of coronary artery disease underwent both conventional ED chest pain evaluation and CT CAC assessment prospectively. Patients' physicians were blinded to the CAC results. The results of the conventional evaluation were compared with CAC findings on CT, and the long-term outcome in patients undergoing CT CAC assessment was established. Primary end points (acute coronary syndrome, death, fatal or nonfatal non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, fatal or nonfatal ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) and secondary outcomes (coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary stenting, or a combination thereof) were obtained when the patient was dismissed from the ED or hospital and then at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years., Results: Of the 263 study patients, 133 (51%) had a CAC score of zero. This absence of CAC correlated strongly with the likelihood of noncardiac chest pain. Among 133 patients with a CAC score of zero, only 1 (<1%) had cardiac chest pain. Conversely, of the 31 patients shown to have cardiac chest pain, 30 (97%) had evidence of CAC on CT. When a CAC cutoff score of 36 was used, as suggested by receiver operating characteristic analysis, sensitivity was 90%; specificity, 85%; positive predictive value, 44%; and negative predictive value, 99%. During long-term follow-up, patients without CAC experienced no cardiac events at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years., Conclusion: Findings suggest that CT CAC assessment is a powerful adjunct in chest pain evaluation for the population at low-to-intermediate risk. Absent or minimal CAC in this population makes cardiac chest pain extremely unlikely. The absence of CAC suggests an excellent long-term (5-year) prognosis, with no primary or secondary cardiac outcomes occurring in study patients at 5-year follow-up.

Anginal chest pain is one of the most common complaints in the outpatient setting. While much of the focus has been on identifying obstructive atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) as the cause of anginal chest pain, it is clear that microvascular coronary dysfunction (MCD) can also cause anginal chest pain as a manifestation of ischemic heart disease, and carries an increased cardiovascular risk. Epicardial coronary vasospasm, aortic stenosis, left ventricular hypertrophy, congenital coronary anomalies, mitral valve prolapse, and abnormal cardiac nociception can also present as angina of cardiac origin. For nonacute coronary syndrome (ACS) stable chest pain, exercise treadmill testing (ETT) remains the primary tool for diagnosis of ischemia and cardiac risk stratification; however, in certain subsets of patients, such as women, ETT has a lower sensitivity and specificity for identifying obstructive CAD. When combined with an imaging modality, such as nuclear perfusion or echocardiography testing, the sensitivity and specificity of stress testing for detection of obstructive CAD improves significantly. Advancements in stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging enables detection of perfusion abnormalities in a specific coronary artery territory, as well as subendocardial ischemia associated with MCD. Coronary computed tomography angiography enables visual assessment of obstructive CAD, albeit with a higher radiation dose. Invasive coronary angiography remains the gold standard for diagnosis and treatment of obstructive lesions that cause medically refractory stable angina. Furthermore, in patients with normal coronary angiograms, the addition of coronary reactivity testing can help diagnose endothelial-dependent and -independent microvascular dysfunction. Lifestyle modification and pharmacologic intervention remains the cornerstone of therapy to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with stable angina. This review focuses on the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of stable, non-ACS anginal chest pain.

The objective of the study was to identify clinical characteristics that enable non-cardiac chest pain to be differentiated from coronary artery disease. An observational case-control study was carried out in 40 patients with non-cardiac chest pain and a control group of 40 patients with coronary artery disease. Sociodemographic, medical and psychological variables were assessed. There was no difference in personality except in "emotional control", which was less in patients with non-cardiac chest pain. These patients had greater alexithymia and more frequently used coping strategies, such as religion and seeking medical help. Multivariate analysis showed that a predictive model comprising four variables (i.e., alexithymia, quality of life, and coping based on religion and seeking medical help) had a sensitivity of 85.4% and a specificity of 80.0%. This predictive model could be used as a screening test to discriminate between the two conditions.

Purpose: To compare coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography with first-pass magnetic resonance (MR) myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with chest pain and low to intermediate probability of coronary artery disease (CAD)., Materials and Methods: Local ethics committee approval and patient written informed consent were obtained. Patients with chest pain and low to intermediate pretest probability of CAD underwent both coronary CT angiography and MR myocardial perfusion imaging. Coronary CT angiographic and MR myocardial perfusion images were analyzed qualitatively by blinded observers. Obstructive CAD was defined as more than 50% diameter stenosis at coronary CT angiography. Data were expressed with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) calculated from binomial expression., Results: In 145 (94.2%) of 154 eligible patients, both coronary CT angiography and MR myocardial perfusion imaging were performed successfully. Mean age was 57 years +/- 10 (standard deviation), and 45.5% of patients were male. Mean interval between coronary CT angiography and MR myocardial perfusion imaging was 4.6 days +/- 3.0; median was 5.0 days. CT coronary angiography revealed obstructive CAD in 52 (35.9%) patients and 78 (17.9%) coronary arteries. At MR myocardial perfusion imaging, myocardial ischemia was demonstrated in 33 (22.8%) patients and 59 (13.6%) vessel territories. Of patients without CAD at coronary CT angiography, 90.5% (57 of 63; 95% CI: 82.6%, 95.0%) had normal myocardial perfusion at MR myocardial perfusion imaging. Of patients with nonobstructive CAD, 83.3% (25 of 30; 95% CI: 69.5%, 91.6%) had normal myocardial perfusion at MR myocardial perfusion imaging. Myocardial ischemia was detected at MR myocardial perfusion imaging in 42.3% (22 of 52; 95% CI: 29.5%, 56%) of patients with obstructive CAD at coronary CT angiography., Conclusion: MR myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary CT angiography have complementary roles in evaluation of patients who are suspected of having CAD. Coronary CT angiography can be used to reliably rule out CAD, but its capability to demonstrate hemodynamically significant CAD is limited. The combination of both techniques enables the clinician to evaluate morphology and functional relevance of CAD comprehensively and noninvasively., ((c) RSNA, 2010.)

Background: Chest pain raises concern for the possibility of coronary heart disease. Scoring methods have been developed to identify coronary heart disease in emergency settings, but not in primary care., Methods: Data were collected from a multicenter Swiss clinical cohort study including 672 consecutive patients with chest pain, who had visited one of 59 family practitioners' offices. Using delayed diagnosis we derived a prediction rule to rule out coronary heart disease by means of a logistic regression model. Known cardiovascular risk factors, pain characteristics, and physical signs associated with coronary heart disease were explored to develop a clinical score. Patients diagnosed with angina or acute myocardial infarction within the year following their initial visit comprised the coronary heart disease group., Results: The coronary heart disease score was derived from eight variables: age, gender, duration of chest pain from 1 to 60 minutes, substernal chest pain location, pain increasing with exertion, absence of tenderness point at palpation, cardiovascular risks factors, and personal history of cardiovascular disease. Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was of 0.95 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.92; 0.97. From this score, 413 patients were considered as low risk for values of percentile 5 of the coronary heart disease patients. Internal validity was confirmed by bootstrapping. External validation using data from a German cohort (Marburg, n = 774) revealed a receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.72; 0.81) with a sensitivity of 85.6% and a specificity of 47.2%., Conclusions: This score, based only on history and physical examination, is a complementary tool for ruling out coronary heart disease in primary care patients complaining of chest pain.

Background: Chest pain is a common complaint and reason for consultation in primary care. Research related to gender differences in regard to Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) has been mainly conducted in hospital but not in primary care settings. We aimed to analyse gender differences in aetiology and clinical characteristics of chest pain and to provide gender related symptoms and signs associated with CHD., Methods: We included 1212 consecutive patients with chest pain aged 35 years and older attending 74 general practitioners (GPs). GPs recorded symptoms and findings of each patient and provided follow up information. An independent interdisciplinary reference panel reviewed clinical data of every patient and decided about the aetiology of chest pain at the time of patient recruitment. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify clinical predictors that help to rule in or out CHD in women and men., Results: Women showed more psychogenic disorders (women 11,2%, men 7.3%, p = 0.02), men suffered more from CHD (women 13.0%, men 17.2%, p = 0.04), trauma (women 1.8%, men 5.1%, p < 0.001) and pneumonia/pleurisy (women 1.3%, men 3.0%, p = 0.04) Men showed significantly more often chest pain localised on the right side of the chest (women 9.1%, men 25.0%, p = 0.01). For both genders known clinical vascular disease, pain worse with exercise and age were associated positively with CHD. In women pain duration above one hour was associated positively with CHD, while shorter pain durations showed an association with CHD in men. In women negative associations were found for stinging pain and in men for pain depending on inspiration and localised muscle tension., Conclusions: We found gender differences in regard to aetiology, selected clinical characteristics and association of symptoms and signs with CHD in patients presenting with chest pain in a primary care setting. Further research is necessary to elucidate whether these differences would support recommendations for different diagnostic approaches for CHD according to a patient's gender.

Dizziness, chest discomfort, chest depression and dyspnea are a group of symptoms that are common complaints in clinical practice. Patients with these symptoms are usually informed that while neurosis consequent to coronary heart disease is excluded nonetheless they remain unhealthy with no rational explanation or treatment. 165 cases of these symptoms and 85 control subjects were reviewed and underwent further medical history inquiry, routine EKG test and cardiac ultrasound examination. Thirty-five patients received coronary artery angiography to exclude coronary heart disease. Serum myocardial autoantibodies against beta(1)-adrenoceptor, alpha-myosin heavy chain, M(2)-muscarinic receptor and adenine-nucleotide translocator were tested, and inflammatory cytokines and high sensitivity C-reaction protein were measured and lymphocyte subclass was assayed by flow cytometry. All patients had a complex of four symptoms or tetralogy: (1) persistent throat or upper respiratory tract infection, (2) neck pain, (3) chest pain and (4) chest depression or dyspnea, some of them with anxiety. Anti-myocardial autoantibodies (AMCAs) were present in all patients vs. 8% in controls. TNF-alpha, IL-1 and IL-6 were significantly higher in patients than in controls (P<0.01). CD3(+) and CD4-CD8(+) lymphocytes were significantly higher and CD56(+) lymphocytes lower in patients than those in controls (P<0.01). The ratio of serum pathogen antibodies positive against Coxsackie virus-B, cytomegalovirus, Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae were all markedly higher in patients. These data led to identification of a persistent respiratory infection-related clinical syndrome, including persistent throat infection, neck spinal lesion, rib cartilage inflammation, symptoms of cardiac depression and dyspnea with or without anxiety.

Objective: Observation units may exclude geriatric patients (defined as age >or=65) due to the high rate of observation failure (admission to an inpatient unit) among these patients. We evaluated whether geriatric patients on a chest pain protocol are admitted to an inpatient unit from an emergency department (ED) observation unit at a higher rate than nongeriatric patients., Methods: This was a retrospective chart review of all patients placed in the ED observation unit at the University of Utah Medical Center over a 14-month period from April 2006 to June 2007. The observation unit did not exclude geriatric patients nor did it exclude patients with a history of coronary disease; patients were admitted per the discretion of the attending ED physician. Patient information, including age, date of admission, history of coronary disease (defined as a previous myocardial infarction, stent, or coronary artery bypass graft), and admission to an inpatient unit from the observation unit, was recorded. Decision to admit to an inpatient unit was made by the consulting cardiologist. Results were analyzed using chi2 statistics., Results: One hundred thirty-four geriatric patients were admitted to the observation unit under the chest pain protocol during the study period. Seventeen percent of these patients were admitted to an inpatient unit from the observation unit versus 10.7% of the 394 chest pain patients who were under age 65 (P = 0.048). Geriatric patients were more likely to have coronary disease (31.3%) than nongeriatric patients (20.8%; P = 0.013). We then performed a subanalysis on the 404 patients (92 geriatric, 312 nongeriatric) who had no history of coronary disease. Geriatric patients without a history of coronary disease had a 12% inpatient admission rate from the observation unit versus a 7.7% admission rate for nongeriatric patients without a history of coronary disease (P = 0.2)., Conclusion: Geriatric patients without a history of coronary artery disease were admitted to an inpatient unit at a rate consistent with a generally accepted observation failure rate of 10%. When screened appropriately, these patients may be appropriate for chest pain evaluation in the ED observation unit.

A 34-year-old woman developed chest pain during exercise. She had been treated for Hodgkin lymphoma with irradiation (mantle field) and cytotoxic drugs (ABVD) 15 years earlier, and had risk factors for coronary artery disease (smoker status and family history). An exercise ECG showed significant ST depressions and an echocardiogram was normal. She underwent coronary angiography, which revealed three vessel disease (including stenosis of the left main stem); bypass grafting was successfully performed. This case illustrates the fact that even young women may develop extensive coronary disease and that development of coronary artery disease may be accelerated after irradiation of the thorax.

Aims: The aim was to assess the association between panic disorder (PD) and the long-term outcome of chest pain patients with or without coronary artery disease (CAD)., Methods: Patients (n = 199) consecutively referred to a cardiology outpatient clinic because of chest pain were reassessed after 9 years. At the initial examination 16% suffered from CAD and 38% from PD. Data were collected on mortality, cardiac events, cardiac risk factors, chest pain, anxiety and depression (SCL-90-R), and health-related quality of life (SF-36)., Results: The death rate in the study population was not significantly different from that in the general population and no significant associations were found between PD at baseline and mortality and cardiac morbidity at follow-up. PD was associated with significantly higher follow-up scores of chest pain intensity (p = 0.025), depression (p = 0.005), anxiety (p = 0.039), and poorer health-related quality of life: physical functioning (p = 0.004), role physical (p = 0.001), body pain (p = 0.007), and general health (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: PD has a negative long-term effect on psychological and physical well-being of chest pain patients which emphasizes the necessity of identifying PD patients and offering them adequate treatment.