Search

Coronary angiography (CA) is poorly correlated with non-invasive myocardial stress imaging (NSI) and myocardial ischemia is often observed in patients with unobstructed coronary arteries. Moreover, the diagnostic performance of combined epicardial and microcirculatory angiography-derived physiological assessment and its correlation with NSI remains unknown. A total of 917 coronary vessels in 319 patients who underwent both CA and NSI were included in this multicenter observational retrospective analysis. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) and angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR angio ) analyses were performed to estimate coronary epicardial and microcirculatory function respectively. NSI demonstrated evidence of myocardial ischemia in 76% of the cases. IMR angio (36 [22 to 50] vs 29 [21 to 41], p <0.001) was significantly higher and QFR (0.92 [0.78 to 0.99] vs 0.97 [0.91 to 0.99], p <0.001) was significantly lower in vessels subtending ischemic territories. Overall, the diagnostic accuracy of QFR was moderate (area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic [AUC ROC ] 0.632 [95% confidence interval [CI] 0.589 to 0.674], p <0.0001) but it was higher in patients with normal microcirculatory function (AUC RO C = 0.726 [95% CI 0.669 to 0.784], p <0.0001, p Value for AUC ROC comparison = 0.009). Combined QFR/IMR angio assessment provided incremental diagnostic performance compared with the evaluation of epicardial or microcirculatory districts in isolation (p Value for AUC comparison <0.0001) and it was able to identify the predominant mechanism of myocardial ischemia in 77% of the patients with positive NSI. Our study suggests the value of a combined angiography-derived assessment of epicardial and microvascular function for the definition of the predominant mechanism of myocardial ischemia in patients with suspected coronary artery disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AVS) eligible for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is not supported by clinical evidence, and the role of physiology over anatomy as well as the timing of coronary intervention are not defined. FAITAVI (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03360591) is a nationwide prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled study comparing the angiography-guided versus the physiology-guided coronary revascularisation strategy in patients with combined significant CAD and severe AVS undergoing TAVI. Significant CAD will be defined as coronary stenosis ≥50%, as assessed by visual estimation in vessels ≥2.5 mm. Physiology will be tested by fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). The study will be conducted at 15 sites in Italy. In the angiography arm, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) will be performed either before TAVI, during the TAVI procedure - before or after the valve implantation - or within 1 month±5 days of the valve implantation, left to the operator's decision. In the physiology arm, FFR and iFR will be performed before TAVI, and PCI will be indicated for FFR ≤0.80, otherwise the intervention will be deferred. In case of borderline values (0.81-0.85), FFR and iFR will be repeated after TAVI, with PCI performed when needed. With a sample size of 320 patients, the study is powered to evaluate the primary endpoint (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, major bleeding, or ischaemia-driven target vessel revascularisation). TAVI indication, strategy and medical treatment will be the same in both groups. After discharge, patients will be contacted at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months after the procedure to assess their general clinical status, and at 12 months for the occurrence of events included in the primary and secondary endpoints. FAITAVI is the first randomised clinical trial to investigate "optimal" percutaneous coronary intervention associated with TAVI in patients with severe AVS and CAD.

Background: Bioresorbable scaffolds (BRS) provide the prospect of restoring the anatomic and physiologic characteristics of the vascular wall., Objective: This study sought to examine the long-term outcomes of BRS-based coronary intervention in a young population with diffuse and severe coronary atherosclerotic disease (CAD) and to compare the long-term evolution of treated segments versus the natural progression of untreated non-flow limiting stenoses., Methods: Observational, single-center cohort study that prospectively included patients that underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with implantation of ABSORB BRS (Abbott Vascular). The clinical endpoint was the incidence of device-oriented composite endpoint (DoCE) up to 5 years follow-up. A subgroup of patients with baseline intracoronary imaging assessment of long lesions and/or multivessel disease underwent elective angiographic (70 patients, 129 lesions) and intracoronary imaging (55 patients, 102 lesions) follow-up. Paired intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative flow reserve (QFR) were analyzed., Results: Between 2012 and 2017, 159 patients (mean age 54.0 ± 11.1) with native CAD were treated with BRS on 247 lesions. Patients were mainly at their first cardiac event, mostly acute coronary syndromes (86.5%). At the median follow-up time of 56 months [41-65], DoCE occurred in 15/159 (9.4%) patients, while non-target vessel-oriented composite endpoint occurred in 16 patients (10.4%). A significant atherosclerotic progression was detected on residual non-flow limiting plaques as per IVUS and QFR assessment, while no significant change was detected in the treated segment., Conclusions: Mild-to-moderate asymptomatic CAD progressed significantly at 5-year despite OMT. BRS-treated segments had a less aggressive progression at 5-year despite more severe and symptomatic CAD at baseline., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest ALL the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Angiography-derived computational physiology is an appealing alternative to pressure-wire coronary physiology assessment. However, little is known about its reliability in the setting of severe aortic stenosis. This study sought to provide an integrated assessment of epicardial and microvascular coronary circulation by means of single-view angiography-derived physiology in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)., Methods: Pre-TAVI angiographic projections of 198 stenotic coronary arteries (123 patients) were analyzed by means of Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio and angiography microvascular resistance. Wire-based reference measurements were available for comparison: fractional flow reserve (FFR) in all cases, instantaneous wave-free ratio in 148, and index of microvascular resistance in 42 arteries., Results: No difference in terms of the number of ischemia-causing stenoses was detected between FFR ≤0.80 and Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio ≤0.80 (19.7% versus 19.2%; P =0.899), while this was significantly higher when instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89 (44.6%; P =0.001) was used. The accuracy of Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio ≤0.80 in predicting pre-TAVI FFR ≤0.80 was significantly higher than the accuracy of instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89 (93.4% versus 77.0%; P =0.001), driven by a higher positive predictive value (86.9% versus 50%). Similar findings were observed when considering post-TAVI FFR ≤0.80 as reference. In 82 cases with post-TAVI angiographic projections, Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio values remained stable, with a low rate of reclassification of stenosis significance (9.9%), similar to FFR and instantaneous wave-free ratio. Angiography microvascular resistance demonstrated a significant correlation (Rho=0.458; P =0.002) with index of microvascular resistance, showing an area under the curve of 0.887 (95% CI, 0.752-0.964) in predicting index of microvascular resistance ≥25., Conclusions: Angiography-derived physiology provides a valid, reliable, and systematic assessment of the coronary circulation in a complex scenario, such as severe aortic stenosis., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Tu is the cofounder of Pulse Medical, reports research grants and consultancy from Pulse Medical. Dr Wijns reports grants and consulting fees from MicroPort, outside the submitted work, and medical advisor of Corrib Core Laboratory and Rede Optimus, cofounder of Argonauts, an innovation facilitator. Dr Scarsini reports speaker fees from Abbott Vascular and research grant from Philips and Abbott. Dr Ribichini reports research grant from Philips and Abbott. The other authors report no conflicts.

Objective: The risk of vessel-oriented cardiac adverse events (VOCE) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing intracoronary physiology-guided coronary revascularization is poorly defined. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the risk of VOCE in patients with and without DM in whom percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed or deferred based on pressure-wire functional assessment., Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a multicenter registry of patients evaluated with fractional flow reserve (FFR) and/or non-hyperaemic pressure ratio (NHPR). Primary endpoint was a composite of VOCE including cardiac death, vessel-related myocardial infarction (MI), and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR)., Results: A large cohort of 2828 patients with 3353 coronary lesions was analysed to assess the risk of VOCE at long-term follow-up (23 [14-36] months). Non-insulin-dependent-DM (NIDDM) was not associated with the primary endpoint in the overall cohort (adjusted Hazard Ratio [aHR] 1.18, 95% CI 0.87-1.59, P = 0.276) or in patients with coronary lesions treated with PCI (aHR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.78-2.16, P = 0.314). Conversely, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) demonstrated an increased risk of VOCE in the overall cohort (aHR 1.76, 95% CI 1.07-2.91, P = 0.027), but not in coronary lesions undergoing PCI (aHR 1.26, 95% CI 0.50-3.16, P = 0.621). Importantly, in coronary lesions deferred after functional assessment IDDM (aHR 2.77, 95% CI 1.11-6.93, P = 0.029) but not NIDDM (aHR = 0.94, 95% CI 0.61-1.44, P = 0.776) was significantly associated with the risk of VOCE. IDDM caused a significant effect modification of FFR-based risk stratification (P for interaction < 0.001)., Conclusion: Overall, DM was not associated with an increased risk of VOCE in patients undergoing physiology-guided coronary revascularization. However, IDDM represents a phenotype at high risk of VOCE., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Radial artery occlusion after transradial procedures is a frequent iatrogenic thrombotic process. The impact on prognosis has not been investigated. This study sought to investigate whether radial artery occlusion is related to increased risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, defined as death, myocardial infarction, stroke and coronary revascularization., Methods: Eight hundred thirty-seven consecutive patients who underwent a transradial coronary procedure had patency of radial artery checked at 24 hours. Radial artery occlusion occurred in 41 over 837 patients (4.8%); 764 (91.2%) were available for planned follow-up at 1 year and were included in the analysis. Event-free survival rate between patients with and without radial artery occlusion was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to identify independent risk factors., Results: At a median 370-day follow-up (IQR: 366-375 days), adverse events occurred in 37 patients (4.8%), 2 in patients with radial artery occlusion and 35 in patients without. One-year survival rate was 94.9% vs. 95% (unadjusted HR=1.026, 95% CI: 0.24 to 4.6, P=0.9). After multivariable modeling, age and coronary artery disease extension was associated with increased risk of adverse events., Conclusions: Age and coronary artery disease extension were independent predictors of adverse events at follow-up. RAO had no prognostic impact.

Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Scarsini is on advisory boards for Abbott. Dr Ribichini has received research grants from Philips and Abbott. Drs Bottardi and Pesarini have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

The physiological assessment of coronary lesions is influenced by the pattern and distribution of coronary artery disease (CAD), including focal lesions, serial lesions, diffuse disease, and mixed patterns. These various patterns of CAD impact the accuracy of pressure wire and angiography-derived physiology indexes, and diffuse disease in particular is an important determinant of the anticipated outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention. Therefore, identification of the physiological pattern of disease provides relevant information for the management of CAD and percutaneous coronary intervention procedural planning. At present, the classification of physiological patterns and its implications for the tailored management of a patient with CAD are poorly defined. This state-of-the-art review provides an overview of the available evidence on functional patterns of CAD with a special focus on their diagnostic and therapeutic implications. It also aims to provide clear definitions of physiological patterns of CAD based on the available evidence and expert opinion. A practical algorithm is provided to optimize the use of pressure wire and angiography-derived indexes of coronary physiology in the settings of focal, serial, and diffuse lesions, with the addition of intracoronary imaging in selected cases., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Scarsini has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular; and has received a research grant from Philips and Abbott. Dr Leone is an advisor for Abbott Vascular and Bracco Imaging; and has received speaking honoraria from Abbott Vascular, Bracco Imaging, Medtronic, Abiomed, and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr De Maria has received speaker fees from Miracor and Abbott; and has received a research grant from Abbott, Miracor, Medtronic, Terumo, Philips, and Medis. Dr Banning has received speaker fees from Abbott Vascular; and has received research grant from Boston Scientific. Dr Barbato has received speaker fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott Vascular, General Electric Healthcare and Opsens. Dr Wijns has received research grants and honoraria from MicroPort; is a medical advisor of Rede Optimus Research and Corrib Core Laboratory; and is a cofounder of Argonauts, an innovation facilitator. Dr Ribichini has received research grants from Philips and Abbott. Drs Fezzi and Wijns were supported by a Research Professorship Award from Science Foundation Ireland (15/RP/2765). All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2022 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The best timing to perform percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients undergoing TAVI is unknown. Most PCI are performed before TAVI, because of concerns about potential ischemic complications during valve implantation. In this study we aimed to compare short-and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing PCI before or after TAVI., Methods: Patients undergoing TAVI and PCI from 2010 to 2021 were analyzed. PCI was defined as high-risk when involving unprotected left main, proximal left anterior descending, proximal dominant right coronary artery or 3-vessel disease. The primary endpoint was the cumulative incidence of any TAVI procedural complication and in-hospital adverse events (VARC-3 criteria)., Results: Out of 1162 patients, 144 underwent PCI, 68% after TAVI, 78.4% of which were at high-risk. The primary endpoint occurred in 28.4% of patients in PCI pre-TAVI group vs 21.4% in PCI post-TAVI group (p = 0.403) and in 34.4% vs 17.3% of patients respectively among high-risk patients (p = 0.075). A higher rate of stroke was observed in the PCI pre-TAVI group regardless of the PCI complexity (6.5% vs 0.0%, p = 0.031; 9.3% vs 0.0% p = 0.025 in the high-risk group). At 24 months, MACCE-free survival was lower in patients who underwent PCI before TAVI (84.4% vs 97.9%, adjusted HR 10.16, 95% CI 1.19-86.57, p = 0.019; and 84.4% vs 97.3%, adjusted HR 7.34 95% CI 0.78-62.28 p = 0.082 in the high-risk group)., Conclusions: PCI performed after TAVI does not expose patients to higher risks of peri-procedural hazards and provides a trend towards favourable clinical outcome at mid-to-long term., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: Whether incomplete functional revascularization has an impact on the clinical outcome of patients treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is still unknown. We aim to assess the prognostic value of residual functional SYNTAX score (rFSS) in a cohort of patients undergoing TAVI., Methods and Results: One-hundred-twenty-four patients (229 lesions) with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided revascularization. The primary endpoint of the study was the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization at the last available follow-up after TAVI. Median SYNTAX score (SS) and Functional SYNTAX score (FSS) at baseline were 7 (range 5-12) and 0 (range 0-7) respectively. After revascularization or deferral according to FFR, residual SS (rSS) and rFSS were 5 (range 0-8) and 0 (range 0-0) respectively. Angiographic incomplete revascularization (rSS > 0) was not associated with the primary endpoint (HR 1.2; 95% CI 0.4-3.9; p = 0.69), whereas functional incomplete revascularization (rFSS>0) was associated with worse event-free survival at follow up after adjusting for clinical confounders (HR 3.7; 95% CI 1.0-13.7; p = 0.04)., Conclusion: Incomplete functional revascularization is associated with adverse clinical outcomes after TAVI. Residual functional SYNTAX score may be regarded as a treatment goal for patients with CAD undergoing TAVI. Further studies are warranted to confirm our hypothesis., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None. All authors participated in the research and preparation of the manuscript., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) disagree in about 20% of intermediate coronary lesions. As the physiological pattern of coronary artery disease has a significant influence on FFR-iFR discordance, we sought to assess it may impact on the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow reserve (QFR)., Methods: One hundred and ninety-four patients with 224 intermediate coronary lesions were investigated with iFR, FFR, and QFR. The physiological pattern of disease was assessed with iFR Scout pullback and QFR virtual pullback in all the cases., Results: A predominantly physiologically focal pattern was observed in 81 (36.2%) lesions, whereas a predominantly physiologically diffuse was observed in 143 (63.8%) cases. QFR demonstrated a significant correlation (r = 0.581, p < 0.001) and a substantial agreement with iFR, both in diffuse (AUC = 0.798) and in focal (AUC = 0.812) pattern of disease. Discordance between QFR and iFR was observed in 51 (22.8%) lesions, consisting of iFR+/QFR- (64.7%) and iFR-/QFR+ (35.3%). Notably, the physiological pattern of disease was the only variable significantly associated with iFR/QFR discordance. QFR virtual pullback demonstrated an excellent agreement (83.9%) with iFR Scout pullback in classifying the physiological pattern of disease., Conclusions: QFR has a good diagnostic accuracy in assessing myocardial ischemia independently of the pattern of coronary disease. However, the physiological pattern of disease has an influence on the QFR/iFR discordance, which occurs in ~20% of the cases. The QFR virtual pullback correctly defined the physiological pattern of disease in the majority of the cases using the iFR pullback as reference., (© 2021 The Authors. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background The impact of staged versus concomitant coronary procedures on renal function in patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear. Methods and Results Three-hundred thirty-nine patients undergoing coronary procedures and TAVI as a staged strategy (160, 47.2%) or concomitant strategy (179, 52.8%) were retrospectively analyzed. Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) occurred in 49 patients in the staged strategy group (30.6%) and in 18 patients (10.1%) in the concomitant strategy group ( P <0.001). Among the staged strategy group, 25 (15.6%) patients developed CI-AKI after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention, 17 (10.6%) after TAVI, and 7 (4.3%) after both the procedures. Staged strategy was associated with a higher risk of CI-AKI (odds ratio, 3.948; P <0.001) after adjustment for multiple confounders and regardless of the baseline renal function ( P for interaction=0.4) when compared with the concomitant strategy. At a median follow-up of 24.0 months (3.0-35.3), CI-AKI was not associated with sustained renal injury ( P =0.794), irrespective of the adopted strategy. The concomitant strategy did not impact the overall early safety at 30 days follow-up after TAVI compared to the staged strategy ( P =0.609). Conclusions Performing coronary procedures with a staged strategy before TAVI was associated with a higher risk of CI-AKI compared with a concomitant strategy. Moreover, a concomitant strategy did not increase the risk of procedure-related complications.

Long-term variations of fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free-ratio (iFR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have not been previously assessed. A total of 23 coronary lesions in 14 patients with aortic stenosis (AS) underwent physiology assessment at baseline, immediately after TAVI and at 14(7-29) months of follow-up. The angiographic severity of the lesions did not progress at follow-up (54[45-64] vs 54[49-63], p = .53). Overall, FFR (0.87[0.85-0.92] vs 0.88[0.82-0.92], p = .45) and iFR (0.88[0.85-0.96] vs 0.91[0.86-0.97], p = .30) did not change significantly compared with the baseline. FFR decreased in 3(13%) lesions with abnormal baseline value, whereas it remained stable in lesions with FFR > 0.80. Conversely, iFR did not show a systematic trend at long-term after TAVI. However, iFR demonstrated a higher reclassification rate at follow-up compared with FFR (p = .02). In conclusions, in this exploratory study, only minor variations of coronary physiology indices were observed at long-term after TAVI. Nevertheless, caution should be exercised in the interpretation of borderline FFR and iFR values in severe AS., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background Management of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation is uncertain. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) has never been clinically validated in aortic stenosis. The study aim was to analyze the clinical outcome of FFR-guided revascularization in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods and Results Patients with severe aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease at coronary angiography were included in this retrospective analysis and divided in 2 groups: angiography guided (122/216; 56.5%) versus FFR-guided revascularization (94/216; 43.5%). Patients were clinically followed up and evaluated for the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 2-year follow-up. Most lesions in the FFR group resulted negative according to the conventional 0.80 cutoff value (111/142; 78.2%) and were deferred. The FFR-guided group showed a better major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event-free survival compared with the angio-guided group (92.6% versus 82.0%; hazard ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-1.0; P =0.035). Patients with deferred lesions based on FFR presented better outcome compared with patients who underwent angio-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (91.4% versus 68.1%; hazard ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.6; P =0.001). Conclusions FFR guidance was associated with favorable outcome in this observational study in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Randomized trials are needed to investigate the long-term effects of FFR-guided revascularization against angiographic guidance alone in patients with aortic stenosis.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess long-term-outcomes of patients with concomitant CAD and COD treated with different revascularization strategies., Background: Multisite artery disease is common and patients with combined disease have poor prognosis. The best therapeutic strategy for patients with concomitant carotid obstructive disease (COD) and coronary artery disease (CAD) remains controversial., Methods: This observational registry enrolled, between January 2006 and December 2012, 1022 consecutive patients from high volume institutions with concomitant CAD and COD suitable for endovascular, surgical, or hybrid revascularization in both territories selected by consensus of a multidisciplinary team., Results: The cumulative incidence of 5-year major cardiovascular events (MACCE) including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke in the overall population was 12%. The incidence of 5-year MACCE was not statistically different in the surgical, endovascular, or hybrid patients group (10.1% vs. 13.0% vs. 13.2%, P = .257, respectively). However, the hybrid group exhibited rates of myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease, and cumulative incidence of all clinical events higher than the surgical group. After propensity score matching, the incidence of 5-year MACCE was similar in the three groups (13.0% vs. 15.0% vs. 16.0%, p = .947, respectively)., Conclusions: An individualized revascularization approach of patients with combined CAD and COD yields very good results at long-term follow-up, despite the high risk of this multilevel population even when the baseline clinical features are equalized., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article., (Copyright © 2019 Fabrizio Tomai et al.)

Objective: To investigate the effect of extent of revascularization in complex high-risk indicated patients (CHIP) undergoing Impella-protected percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Background: Complete revascularization has been shown to be associated with improved outcomes. However, the impact of more complete revascularization during Impella-protected PCI in CHIP has not been reported., Methods: A total of 86 CHIP undergoing elective PCI with Impella 2.5 or Impella CP between April 2007 and December 2016 from 2 high volume Italian centers were included. Baseline, procedural, and clinical outcomes data were collected retrospectively. Completeness of coronary revascularization was assessed using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society myocardial jeopardy score (BCIS-JS) derived revascularization index (RI). The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. A multivariate regression model was used to identify independent predictors of mortality., Results: All patients had multivessel disease and were considered unsuitable for surgery. At baseline, 44% had left main disease, 78% had LVEF ≤ 35%, and mean BCIS-JS score was 10±2. The mean BCIS-JS derived RI was 0.7±0.2 and procedural complications were uncommon. At 14-month follow-up, all-cause mortality was 10.5%. At follow-up, 67.4% of CHIP had LVEF ≥ 35% compared to 22.1% before Impella protected-PCI. Higher BCIS-JS RI was significantly associated with LVEF improvement (p=0.002). BCIS-JS RI of ≤ 0.8 (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01- 0.92, and p = 0.042) was an independent predictor of mortality., Conclusions: These results support the practice of percutaneous Impella use for protected PCI in CHIP. A more complete revascularization was associated with significant LVEF improvement and survival., Competing Interests: Dr. Burzotta discloses to have been involved in advisory board meetings or having received speaker's fees from Medtronic, St Jude Medical, Abiomed, Biotronic. Dr. Trani discloses to have been involved in advisory board meetings or having received speaker's fees from St Jude Medical, Abiomed, Biotronic. Dr. Aurigemma has been involved in advisory board activities by Biotronic. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2019 Francesco Burzotta et al.)

Background: Percutaneous ventricular-assistance by Impella (IMP) represents an emerging strategy to manage patients with reduced left-ventricular (LV) ejection-fraction (EF) undergoing percutaneous-coronary-intervention (PCI). The hemodynamic behave during IMP-protected PCI has been scarcely investigated., Methods: We reviewed the IMP console's function and hemodynamic data (which are continuously recorded during assistance) in a consecutive series of 37 patients who underwent elective IMP-protected PCI in two high-volume centers. All patients had multivessel disease and impaired LVEF. Coronary artery disease burden was graded using the British-Cardiovascular-Intervention-Society jeopardy-score (BCIS-JS) score. IMP motor speed and pressure signals (systolic blood pressure, SBP, and mean blood pressure, MBP) were analyzed. Primary hemodynamic end-points were "critical systolic blood pressure (SBP) drop" (SBP decrease ≥ 20 mm Hg reaching ≤90 mm Hg values) and "critical mean blood pressure (MBP) drop" (MBP decrease reaching ≤60 mm Hg)., Results: Over mean assistance duration of 254 ± 549 min, no IMP motor drop occurred. During PCI, SBP and MBP significantly decreased but all patients had SBP values >78 mm Hg. Critical SBP and MBP drops occurred in 10.8% of patients. Among all baseline and procedural characteristics, BCIS-JS was the only significant predictor of SBP drop (p = 0.001) while BCIS-JS and LV end-diastolic volume significantly predicted MBP drop (p = 0.001 for both)., Conclusions: In patients with reduced EF undergoing IMP-protected PCI, a significant pressure decrease occurs during PCI but pressure is systematically maintained at levels warranting vital organ perfusion. Critical pressure drops during PCI occur in some patients with higher jeopardized myocardium and left ventricular diastolic volumes., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The complexity of coronary physiology in presence of severe aortic stenosis (AS) raises concerns about the reliability of pressure-derived indexes in this clinical setting. Furthermore, neither fractional flow reserve (FFR) nor instantaneous wave-free period (iFR) has been validated in AS. Combining iFR and FFR in a tailored decision-making strategy may help to increase simplicity, accuracy and safety of physiology-guided revascularization in AS., Methods: In this prospective observational study iFR and FFR were measured before and after TAVI during the same procedure in patients with severe AS and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD). All decisions about revascularization were based on post-TAVI FFR assessment. The best iFR "defer" and "treatment" values were identified according to their baseline negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) respectively. A post-hoc analysis was then performed to compare the hybrid iFR-FFR approach with the FFR-only strategy., Results: Sixty-two patients underwent pre- and post-TAVI pressure-wire assessment and were included in the analysis. A "defer iFR value" >0.93 yielded a NPV of 98.4% (91.7%-99.9%) to exclude FFR non-significant stenosis (>0.80), and a "treatment iFR value" <0.83 had a PPV of 91.3% (72%-98.9%) to identify FFR-significant stenosis (≤0.80). A hybrid decision-making strategy based on iFR and FFR spared 63% of patients from adenosine, while maintaining 97% overall agreement with FFR lesions classification., Conclusion: A hybrid iFR-FFR diagnostic strategy is feasible and safe in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI and allows to spare the majority of patients from adenosine, while maintaining a high agreement with FFR classification of coronary lesions., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: We sought to assess eventual changes in iFR measurements in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) before and after TAVI in coronary lesions with different degrees of angiographic severity., Methods and Results: The functional relevance of 145 coronary lesions was assessed by online iFR and FFR measurement in 66 patients with severe AS before and after TAVI, during the same procedure. The iFR-FFR classification agreement was calculated for pre-TAVI and post-TAVI measurements. Mean iFR values remained identical before and after TAVI, irrespective of the angiographic severity of the coronary stenosis (0.89±0.12 vs. 0.89±0.12, p=0.66). However, individual iFR values varied widely after TAVI and the 0.89 iFR threshold was crossed by 15% of the investigated coronary lesions. Higher iFR variation was related to a higher transaortic gradient drop after valve intervention. The diagnostic accuracy of iFR in predicting an FFR ≤0.8 was poor (65%) in lesions with severe obstructions, and tended to increase post TAVI., Conclusions: Although overall values did not change after TAVI, iFR presented significant and mostly erratic individual variations after valve replacement. Delta iFR was influenced by the extent of the transaortic gradient drop induced by TAVI. Therefore, caution is advisable in the interpretation of iFR in the presence of AS.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is often present in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis candidates to transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Mild CAD may also worsen and need treatment years after TAVI. The implantation of a transcatheter valve may interfere with the capability of reengaging the coronary arteries. We prospectively assessed the feasibility of performing coronary angiography (CA), fractional flow reserve, and, where indicated, percutaneous coronary intervention after valve implantation in a consecutive series of patients with CAD undergoing TAVI. Valve type and size were decided according to accurate computed tomography scan and angiographic measurement of the aortic root structures. We analyzed 66 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI, 41 with balloon-expandable, and 25 with self-expandable transcatheter valves. Right and left coronary catheterization (132 vessels) was successful in all cases except in 1 left coronary artery after a high implantation of a self-expandable valve (unsuccess rate, 1 in 50 vessels). In 6 of 132 vessels (4%), CA was initially nonselective, but after positioning the 0.014″ intracoronary guidewire, selective injections were obtained in all these cases. Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed successfully in 19 coronary vessels (17 patients) as indicated by fractional flow reserve measurements. In conclusion, catheterization of the coronary ostia after transfemoral TAVI with balloon or self-expandable valves is safe and feasible in almost all cases. Accurate imaging of the aortic root and procedural planning may help to avoid too high implantation of supra-annular self-expandable valves to obviate difficulties in accessing coronary ostia. Use of intracoronary guidewires facilitates selective CA in cases with difficult access., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Aortic valve stenosis may influence fractional flow reserve (FFR) of concomitant coronary artery disease by causing hypertrophy and reducing the vasodilatory reserve of the coronary circulation. We sought to investigate whether FFR values might change after valve replacement., Methods and Results: The functional relevance of 133 coronary lesions was assessed by FFR in 54 patients with severe aortic valve stenosis before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) during the same procedure. A linear mixed model was used to verify the interaction of TAVI effect with the FFR values. No significant overall change in FFR values was found before and after the aortic valve stenosis removal (0.89±0.10 versus 0.89±0.13; P=0.73). A different trend in FFR groups (positive if ≤0.8; negative if >0.8) was found after TAVI (P for interaction <0.001). Positive FFR values worsened after TAVI (0.71±0.11 versus 0.66±0.14). Conversely, negative FFR values improved after TAVI (0.92±0.06 versus 0.93±0.07). Similarly, FFR values in coronary arteries with lesions presenting percent diameter stenosis >50 worsened after TAVI (0.84±0.12 versus 0.82±0.16; P=0.02), whereas FFR values in arteries with mild lesions (percent diameter stenosis <50) tended toward improvement after TAVI (0.90±0.07 versus 0.91±0.09; P=0.69). Functional FFR variations after TAVI changed the indication to treat the coronary stenosis in 8 of 133 (6%) lesions., Conclusions: Coronary hemodynamics are influenced by aortic valve stenosis removal. Nevertheless, FFR variations after TAVI are minor and crossed the diagnostic cutoff of 0.8 in a small number of patients after valve replacement. Borderline coronary lesions might become functionally significant after valve replacement, although FFR-guided interventions were infrequent even in patients with angiographically significant lesions., (© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.)

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) after coronary angiography or interventions is relatively frequent and portends adverse outcomes. The lack of a "universally accepted" definition, however, limits the integration and comparison of available data. We aimed to detect the CI-AKI definition that best correlates with the occurrence of clinical events at long-term in a 3-year follow-up study of patients at intermediate-to-high risk for CI-AKI. Furthermore, we sought to describe the incidence and long-term evolution of persistent renal damage (PRD) after CI-AKI and clarify the role of early (<12 hours) increments of serum creatinine (SCr) in CI-AKI prediction. Among a total of 216 patients enrolled at our center and followed for a median of 37 months, CI-AKI was diagnosed in 18.1% of cases (SCr increment ≥25% of baseline), 7.4% (SCr increment ≥0.5 mg/dl), and in 17.1% (SCr increment ≥0.3 mg/dl), according to 3 different definitions. The third definition was the only one significantly associated with the occurrence of events at 3 years (Cox regression, p = 0.04). PRD at 30 days, as detected by the same cutoff, significantly and independently identified patients at risk of worst outcomes at 3 years (p = 0.04 at multivariate Cox regression). Furthermore, a slight 5% to 10% increment of SCr compared with baseline, occurring as early as 12 hours postprocedure, was confirmed as a strong predictor of inhospital CI-AKI occurrence. In conclusion, an absolute increase in SCr ≥0.3 mg/dl seems to be most clinically informative cutoff for CI-AKI and PRD detection., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Repeat myocardial revascularization procedures are markedly different from de novo interventions, with increased procedural risk and technical-demanding complexity. However the number of patients previously treated with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) that need a repeat revascularization due to graft failure is increasing consistently. Late graft failure, usually caused by saphenous vein grafts (SVG) attrition, is certainly not uncommon. However PCI on degenerated SVG presents higher complication rate and worse clinical outcome compared with native arteries interventions. In acute graft failure setting, PCI represents a valuable option to treat postoperative myocardial infarction., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To assess the 30-day clinical outcome of endovascular and surgical revascularisation procedures in patients with carotid obstructive disease (COD) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD)., Methods and Results: Between January 2006 and December 2009, 659 patients with COD and concomitant CAD were treated. The incidence of the primary endpoint (composite of death, MI and stroke) was 4.25% (0.9%, 1.1% and 2.3%, respectively). Acute renal insufficiency occurred in 2.4% and major bleedings in 4.4% of patients. According to the treatment forms patients were divided into three groups: surgical, 185 patients (28.1%), endovascular, 378 (57.4%), and hybrid, 89 (13.5%). Seven patients (1%) were managed medically only. The primary endpoint of the study occurred in 4.8%, 2.4% and 8.6%, respectively, p=0.01. The secondary endpoint, that included the occurrence of renal or respiratory insufficiency and major bleedings occurred in 10.1%, 6.5% and 23.8%, respectively, p<0.001. At multivariate logistic regression analysis renal insufficiency (OR=2.517; 95%CI=1.077-5.883, p=0.03) and treatment group (endovascular: OR=0.369; 95%CI=0.168-0.813, p=0.01 or hybrid: OR=3.098; 95%CI=1.359-7.060, p=0.007) predicted the primary endpoint., Conclusions: Surgical and endovascular treatments yield very good immediate results; the later being less invasive, may be particularly suited to these fragile and complex patients. Long-term follow-up is under assessment.

Objective: Atherosclerosis and restenosis are largely ruled by inflammation. The aim of this study was to test the effects of a short-course, high-dose oral prednisone on the release of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha from circulating monocytes and on the neointimal growth that follows bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. In a sub-group of patients activated NF-kappaB was also evaluated., Methods: Out of 40 patients with coronary artery disease treated with BMS implantation, 20 were randomly assigned to receive oral prednisone during 40 days according to a standardized protocol. In non-stimulated and stimulated (LPS and PMA) monocytes we evaluated the release of IL-6 and TNF-alpha, and NF-kappaB p50 subunit translocation at baseline, at 10 and 30 days. Late luminal loss (LLL) 9 months after angioplasty was calculated by quantitative coronary angiography., Results: Plasma concentrations of prednisone correlated inversely with IL-6 and TNF-alpha release (R2=0.45, p=0.04 and R2=0.69, p=0.005, respectively) and NF-kappaB activation from monocytes (R2=0.58, p=0.01). The reduction of TNF-alpha release and NF-kappaB activation were significantly related (R2=0.56, p=0.01). Prednisone patients showed a significantly larger reduction of cytokine release and NF-kappaB activation compared to non-treated patients, at 10 days and 30 days. LLL was lower in the prednisone group (0.44+/-0.35 mm versus 0.80+/-0.53 mm, p=0.02) and correlated with reduction of TNF-alpha (R2=0.41, p=0.01)., Conclusions: High doses of oral prednisone reduce NF-kappaB pathway activation and pro-inflammatory cytokine release in circulating activated monocytes of patients treated with coronary stenting. TNF-alpha release reduction correlates with decreased LLL., (Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Steroids have known powerful anti-inflammatory effects. This study was designed to assess the possible antiproliferative action of the Dexamet(R)dexamethasone-loaded stent., Methods: This was a prospective, controlled registry performed in 20 Italian centers that enrolled 332 patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated according to an early-invasive approach with the implantation of 420 dexamethasone-eluting stents in 387 coronary lesions. Six of the enrolling centers participated in the angiographic substudy: elective 6-month follow-up angiography was performed in 140/151 patients (92.7%). Quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) was performed at a centralized core laboratory on 156 lesions treated with the Dexamet stent., Results: One hundred forty patients (156 lesions) underwent elective QCA. Patients presented with either unstable angina (80%) or Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (20%); 70 patients (50%) had ST-T segment changes, 81 (58%) had troponin elevation and 31 (22.1%) were diabetic. One hundred twenty-five patients had a single lesion, 117 of which were treated with a single stent, while 8 received multiple stents. Mean lesion and stent lengths were 11.94 +/- 6.30 and 17.30 +/- 6.08 mm, respectively. In-segment binary restenosis (percent [%] diameter stenosis >/= 50%) was 34.3% per patient (48/140), or 33.3% per lesion (52/156); the mean late lumen loss was 0.95 +/- 0.64 mm in-stent and 1.02 +/- 0.59 mm in-segment. At multivariate analysis, baseline minimum luminal diameter (MLD) (MLD - odds ratio [OR] = 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.04-0.72; p = 0.01) and lesion length (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.04-1.2; p < 0.01) were independent predictors of 6-months binary restenosis, Conclusions: This is the first large, multicenter analysis of the angiographic outcome obtained with Dexamet. Our results do not support any effective antiproliferative action of this device implanted in patients with ACS.