Search

Background: This study investigated the impact of complete revascularization (CR) and incomplete revascularization (IR) on long-term survival in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using multiple arterial graft (MAGs) or a single artery with saphenous vein grafts (SAGs)., Methods: Between January 2006 and December 2020, 12,625 patients underwent CABG and were divided into 4 groups: MAG CR (n = 1066), MAG IR (n = 286), SAG CR (n = 8360), and SAG IR (n = 2913). Inverse probability of treatment weighting based on the generalized propensity score was used to minimize imbalance between the groups., Results: In the weighted cohort, median follow-up time was 8.35 years (interquartile range, 5.01-11.6 years). MAG CR was associated with similar long-term survival compared with MAG IR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.79; 95% CI, 0.60-1.03; P = .084). SAG CR was associated with improved long-term survival compared with SAG IR (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.84; P = .01). MAG CR was associated with better long-term survival compared with SAG CR (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.35-0.57; P < .001). Moreover, MAG IR was protective compared with SAG IR (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45-0.85; P = .033). Additional analysis was performed comparing perfect CR vs imperfect CR vs IR in MAG and SAG patients, separately. In the weighted sample of MAG, there were no differences in the long-term survival between perfect CR, imperfect CR, and IR. However, in the weighted sample of the SAG cohort, SAG perfect CR was associated with improved survival compared with SAG imperfect CR (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.0.72-0.92; P = .001). Whereas, SAG perfect and imperfect CR were both associated with improved survival compared with SAG IR (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.0.35-0.87; P = .006 and HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64-0.82; P < .001), respectively., Conclusions: MAG CR is associated with better survival compared with SAG CR. If IR is inevitable, patients with MAG IR had better long-term survival compared with patients receiving SAG IR. Moreover, similar long-term survival is observed whether perfect CR, imperfect CR, or IR is achieved in the MAG population but not in SAG patients., Competing Interests: Disclosures Sleiman Sebastian Aboul-Hassan reports a relationship with Getinge that includes: speaking and lecture fees and travel reimbursement. Michel Pompeu Sa reports a relationship with The Society of Thoracic Surgeons that includes: funding grants. Mario Gaudino reports a relationship with National Institutes of Health that includes: funding grants. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The objective of this multicenter study aimed to investigate the impact of sex on long-term survival among patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using multiple arterial grafting (MAG) or a single artery with saphenous vein grafts., Materials and Methods: Data were obtained from the Polish National Registry of Cardiac Surgery Procedures database. This study included 81 136 patients who underwent CABG for multivessel disease between January 2012 and December 2020 (22.9 were women and 77.1% were men). MAG was performed in 8.3 and 11.7% of female and male patients, respectively. A 1:1 propensity score (PS)-matching was performed. Long-term mortality was compared between matched groups of men and women. Subgroup analyses of patients aged <70 and ≥70 years, with an ejection fraction (EF) >40% and ≤40%, and with and without diabetes, obesity, peripheral artery disease (PAD), or chronic lung disease (CLD) were performed separately in women and men., Results: MAG was associated with lower long-term mortality than saphenous vein grafts in 1528 PS-matched female pairs [hazard ratio (HR): 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59-0.92; P =0.007) and 7283 PS-matched male pairs (HR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.72-0.88; P <0.001). Subgroup analyses confirmed the results among female patients aged <70 years, with diabetes and EF >40%, and without PAD or CLD, and of male patients aged <70 and ≥70 years; with EF >40%; with or without diabetes, obesity, or PAD; and without CLD., Conclusions: In patients undergoing CABG, MAG was associated with significantly improved survival in both sexes. The long-term benefits of MAG observed across subgroups of men and women support the consideration of a multiarterial revascularization strategy for a broader spectrum of patients., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes in a propensity matched population receiving total arterial grafting (TAG) and multiple arterial grafts (MAG) in addition to saphenous vein graft (SVG) following multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting requiring at least three distal anastomoses., Methods: In this retrospective study, 655 patients from two centers met the inclusion criteria and were divided into two groups: TAG group (n = 231) and MAG + SVG group (n = 424). Propensity score matching was performed resulting in 231 pairs., Results: No significant differences were observed between both groups in terms of early outcomes. Survival probabilities at 5, 10, and 15 y were 89.1% versus 94.2%, 76.2% versus 76.1%, and 66.7% versus 69.8% in the TAG and MAG + SVG groups, respectively (hazard ratio stratified on matched pairs: 0.90; 95% confidence interval [0.45-1.77]; P = 0.754). Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) in the matched cohort did not show any significant difference between both groups. Probabilities at 5, 10, and 15 y were 82.7% versus 85.6%, 62.2% versus 75.3%, and 48.8% versus 59.5% in the TAG and MAG + SVG groups, respectively (hazard ratio stratified on matched pairs: 1.12; 95% confidence interval [0.65-1.92]; P = 0.679). Subgroup analyses of the matched cohort showed no significant difference between TAR with three arterial conduits compared to TAR with two arterial conduits with sequential grafting and MAG + SVG in terms of long-term survival and freedom from MACCE., Conclusions: Multiple arterial revascularizations in addition to SVG may yield comparable long-term outcomes in terms of survival and freedom from MACCE compared to total arterial revascularization., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes and long-term survival in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting in whom second arterial conduit or saphenous vein was used as well as to find out the most optimal second arterial graft., Methods: Between January 2006 and June 2018, 7,857 patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into two groups: single internal thoracic artery (SITA) + Vein group ( n  = 7,140) and second arterial conduit group ( n  = 717), of these 537 patients received right internal thoracic artery (RITA) and 180 patients received radial artery (RA). We obtained 701 propensity-matched pairs for final comparison. Short-term outcomes included: 30-day mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE), reoperation for bleeding, and deep sternal wound infection (DSWI). The long-term outcome was all-cause mortality., Results: No significant differences were observed between second arterial conduit versus SITA + Vein groups and between RITA versus RA groups in terms of 30-day mortality, 30-day MACCE, reoperation for bleeding, and incidence of DSWI in the matched cohort. The use of second arterial conduit was associated with a significant reduction in long-term mortality by 24% in the matched cohort (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-0.96; p  = 0.02). RA and RITA as second arterial conduit had comparable long-term mortality (HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.69-1.82; p  = 0.62)., Conclusion: The use of second arterial conduit, irrespective of type, is safe and associated with improved long-term survival compared with the second venous aortocoronary graft., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to compare the long-term outcomes in propensity matched patients receiving right internal thoracic artery(RITA) or radial artery(RA) as second arterial conduit during coronary artery bypass grafting(CABG) with internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery(LAD)., Methods: In this retrospective study, propensity score matching was performed including 1198 patients from 3 centers resulting in 389-pairs who received either RITA or RA., Results: In the matched cohort, median follow-up time was 7.53 years(interquartile range, 4.35-11.81). Survival probabilities at 5, 10 and 15-years were 93.8% versus 94.5%, 81.2% versus 76.2% and 63.2% vs 62.5% in the RITA and RA groups, respectively(HR: 1.11; 95%CI;0.80-1.53; P = 0.533) Freedom from MACCE in the matched cohort at 5, 10 and 15-years were 92.0% versus 93.7%, 75.0% versus 73.8%, 72.2% and 46.9% vs 47.2% in the RITA and RA groups, respectively(HR: 0.96; 95%CI;0.74-1.26; P = 0.774). Subgroup analyses of the matched cohort showed comparable long-term outcomes in terms of MACCE at follow-up in patients with age older than 65-years, obese patients, diabetics, female patients and with impaired EF. As for target vessel revascularization, RITA and RA had comparable outcomes in terms of MACCE when the conduit was used to graft either the left coronary system or the right coronary system., Conclusions: The use of RITA or RA as second arterial conduit during CABG with internal thoracic artery to the LAD is safe and associated with comparable long-term clinical outcomes. The choice of optimal second arterial conduit should be guided mainly by patients' characteristics and surgeons' preferences., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study was designed to compare short-term and long-term clinical outcomes of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) via median sternotomy in patients with single-vessel left anterior descending (LAD) artery disease., Methods: In this retrospective study, 194-patients met the inclusion criteria and were divided into the MIDCAB group (n = 111) and OPCAB via median sternotomy group (n = 83). Short-term outcomes included: in-hospital mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction (MI), perioperative cerebrovascular adverse events (CAEs), chest drainage, reoperation for bleeding, duration of surgery, ventilation time, deep wound infection, packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion and duration of hospital stay. The long-term outcomes included: all-cause mortality, the incidence of MI and stroke, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and composite of mortality/MI/stroke. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match patients between the groups., Results: Before as well as after the PSM, no significant differences were observed between both groups in terms of in-hospital mortality, incidence of perioperative MI, incidence of CAEs, reoperation for bleeding, pRBC transfusions, deep wound infection and ventilation time. However, MIDCAB group had lower chest tube drainage and shorter hospital stay. On the other hand, OPCAB group had shorter time of surgery before as well as after PS matching. At 7-years, before and after PSM, freedom from all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, TVR as well as composite of mortality/MI/stroke were comparable between both groups., Conclusions: Short-term as well as long-term outcomes of MIDCAB in terms of mortality, MI, stroke, and target vessel revascularization are satisfactory and as safe and effective as OPCAB via sternotomy., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Data are lacking regarding optimal discontinuation time of preoperative aspirin before coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We aimed at assessing the impact of aspirin discontinuation according to time intervals before CABG and its influence on early postoperative outcomes., Methods: In this retrospective study, we enrolled 652 patients who underwent primary isolated nonemergent CABG between October 2014 and December 2017. Patients were assigned into groups according to the time interval between the last aspirin dose administration and the time of surgery. The first group comprised patients who were given aspirin ≤24-h before CABG (n = 304), whereas the second group consisted of patients who took aspirin between 24 and 48 h before CABG (n = 348). Efficacy endpoints included 30-d mortality rate, incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) and composite rates of 30-d mortality/MACCE. Propensity score matching was used for final comparison., Results: Overall, multivariate analysis showed that aspirin administration ≤24 h before CABG was associated with reduced 30-d mortality rate and MACCE by 75% and 57%, respectively. Before as well as after propensity score matching, multivariate analysis showed that aspirin administration ≤24-h before CABG was associated with reduced composite rates of 30-d mortality rate and MACCE by 55% and 59%, respectively. Subgroup analysis stratified by the type of surgery showed that aspirin administration ≤24-h significantly reduced composite rates of 30-d mortality/MACCE in patients after off-pump CABG., Conclusions: Preoperative administration of aspirin ≤24-h before CABG is associated with the reduction of postoperative mortality as well as MACCE. The evidence also suggests that aspirin administration ≤24-h is strongly associated with reduced composite rates of 30-d mortality/MACCE in patients submitted to off-pump CABG., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether continuation of administration of preoperative aspirin until the day of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) could minimize postoperative mortality, prevalence of postoperative myocardial infarction (MI) with or without influence on postoperative bleeding, packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion and reoperation for bleeding. Altogether, 662 papers were found using the reported search, 7 of which represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Seven studies, included in this review, consisted of five meta-analyses and two randomized controlled trials. One meta-analysis, involving 27 533 patients submitted to CABG, showed that the administration of preoperative aspirin decreased postoperative 30-day mortality by 27%. Another meta-analysis, including 1437 patients, showed that preoperative aspirin decreased the incidence of perioperative MI by 44%, the effect being even more pronounced with low-dose aspirin, which reduced the prevalence of perioperative MI by 63%. One RCT showed that preoperative aspirin is associated with reduced long-term hazard of MI or repeated revascularization. Four meta-analyses and two RCTs showed that preoperative aspirin is associated with increased postoperative bleeding, PRBC transfusion and reoperation for bleeding. However, this was not the case with preoperative administration of low-dose aspirin. The results presented in these studies suggest that preoperative aspirin administration in patients undergoing CABG has a significant benefit in reducing the incidence of perioperative MI and 30-day mortality rate, as well as reduced long-term hazard of MI or repeated revascularization. At a higher dose (>100 mg/day), postoperative bleeding, PRBC transfusion and reoperation for bleeding increased. However, with low-dose aspirin (≤100 mg/day), these benefits were not at the expense of increased postoperative bleeding or transfusion., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)