Search

Background: Randomized trials comparing multivessel stenting with coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) have demonstrated similar rates of death and myocardial infarction but higher rates of repeat revascularization after stenting. The impact of these alternative strategies on overall medical care costs is uncertain, particularly within the US health care system., Methods: We performed a retrospective, matched cohort study to compare the clinical and economic outcomes of multivessel stenting and bypass surgery. The stent group consisted of 100 consecutive patients who underwent stenting of >or=2 major native coronary arteries at our institution. The CABG group consisted of 200 patients who underwent nonemergent isolated bypass surgery during the same time frame, matched (2:1) for age, sex, ejection fraction, diabetes mellitus, and extent of coronary disease. Detailed clinical follow-up and resource utilization data were collected for a minimum of 2 years. Total costs were calculated by use of year 2000 unit prices., Results: Over a median follow up period of 2.8 years, there were no significant differences in all-cause mortality rates (3.0% vs 3.0%), Q-wave myocardial infarction (5.1% vs 4.0%), or the composite of death or myocardial infarction (7.1% vs 7.0%) between the stent and CABG groups (P = not significant for all comparisons). However, at 2-year follow up, patients with stents were more likely to require >or=1 repeat revascularization procedure (32.0% vs 4.5%, P <.001). The initial cost of multivessel stenting was 43% less than the cost of CABG (11,810 dollars vs 20,574 dollars, P <.001) and remained 27% less (17,634 dollars vs 24,288 dollars, P =.005) at 2 years., Conclusions: Multivessel stenting and CABG result in comparable risks of death and myocardial infarction. Despite a higher rate of repeat revascularization, multivessel stenting was significantly less costly than CABG through the first 2 years of follow-up.

Background: Atrial fibrillation after cardiac operations is a source of morbidity and resource consumption. Various factors common to cardiac operations have been cited as causal. Comparison of the incidences of atrial fibrillation after conventional cardiac operations and minimally invasive cardiac operations may provide some insight into the mechanisms of this complication., Methods: All patients undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting from January 26, 1996, through September 17, 1997, were evaluated for the occurrence of in-hospital postoperative atrial fibrillation. Data from these 55 patients were compared with data from a control cohort of patients undergoing conventional, solitary coronary artery bypass grafting. Each patient undergoing minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting was matched by age (+/- 3 years) and date of operation (+/- 7 days) with a patient undergoing conventional coronary artery bypass grafting., Results: During the period since the advent of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting at our institution, the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation has been slightly lower among the patients undergoing this form of coronary artery bypass grafting (26%) than among the total population of patients undergoing conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (34%). Comparison of the age-matched groups, however, showed the incidence to be slightly but not significantly greater in the minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting cohort (13/55, 24%) than in the conventional coronary artery bypass grafting cohort (11/55, 20%; P =. 6). The minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting group was less likely to be discharged with antiarrhythmic therapy than was the conventional coronary artery bypass grafting group (6 versus 10; P =.006)., Conclusions: According to these data, mechanisms traditionally implicated in atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting, such as the use of cardiopulmonary bypass, mechanical manipulation of the atrium, and atrial ischemia, are not causal but may be related to the duration of the arrhythmic complication. Strategies directed toward management and reduction of the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation should be focused accordingly.

Objective: To determine the difference in wound complication and infection rates between suture and staple closure techniques applied to clean incisions in coronary bypass patients., Background: The true incidence of postoperative wound complications, and their correlation with closure techniques, has been obscured by study designs incorporating small numbers, retrospective short follow-up, uncontrolled host factors, and narrowly defined complications., Methods: Sternal and leg wounds were studied prospectively, each patient serving as his or her own control. Two hundred forty-two patients with sternal and saphenous vein harvest wounds had half of each wound closed with staples and the other half with intradermal sutures (484 sternal and 516 leg segments). Wound complications were defined as drainage, erythema, separation, necrosis, seroma, or infection. Infections were identified in the subset having purulent drainage, antibiotic therapy, or debridement. Wounds were examined at discharge, at 1 week after discharge, and at 3 to 4 weeks after operation. Patient preferences for closure type were assessed 3 to 4 weeks after operation., Results: Neither leg nor sternal wounds had a statistically significant difference in infection rate according to closure method (leg sutured = 9.3% vs. leg stapled = 8.9%; p = 0.99, and sternal sutured = 0.4% vs. sternal stapled = 2.5%; p = 0.128). There was, however, a greater complication rate in stapled segments (leg stapled = 46.9% vs. leg sutured = 32.6%; p = 0.001, and sternal stapled = 14.9% vs. sternal sutured = 3.7%; p = 0.00005). Sutures were favored over staples among patients who expressed a preference (sternal = 75.6%, leg = 74.6%)., Conclusions: With the host factors controlled by pairing staples and sutures in each patient, we demonstrated a similar incidence of infection but a significantly lower incidence of total wound complications with intradermal suture closure than with staple closure.

Background: We previously have established characteristics predictive of the need for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) over many years after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). In this study, we examined the factors associated with the need for CABG within 1 year of successful PTCA, and the recent impact of newer, catheter-based technologies., Methods: From January 1982 through December 1995, 234 patients underwent CABG within 1 year of a successful "index" PTCA at our hospital. Emergency operations within 12 hours of index PTCA were excluded. These cases were matched with 234 controls who underwent a successful index PTCA but did not require a subsequent CABG during the next year. Cases were matched by the date of their index PTCA, and 1-year follow-up was complete for all patients., Results: Before index PTCA there were no differences between the groups in terms of age, sex, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, ejection fraction, duration of anginal symptoms, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, family history, or obesity (all nonsignificant). At index PTCA the cases had a greater mean number of lesions measuring 70% or greater compared with the controls (2.8 versus 1.8, respectively; p < 0.0001). The cases were more likely to have critical (70% or greater) proximal left anterior descending artery, proximal first obtuse marginal artery, and right posterior descending artery stenoses. The use of stents or atherectomy devices was not significantly more common among the controls (21% of controls versus 17.1% of cases; p = 0.35). Complete revascularization was achieved in significantly fewer of the cases than the controls (91 versus 156, respectively; p < 0.0001). The cases underwent CABG at a mean of 3 months (86% within 6 months) after PTCA. Among those who had a diagnostic catheterization, 52% of the patients had both restenosis of a dilated lesion and progression of other disease. Only 5 of 75 patients who had restenosis of a dilated lesion had a stent or an atherectomy device used at index PTCA. Of note, 13% (30 of 234) required an emergency operation, with an overall operative mortality rate of 3% (7 of 234)., Conclusions: Although the likelihood of local restenosis is decreased by newer interventional techniques, the need for CABG within 1 year after successful PTCA is not diminished. The number of critical lesions and their location are the best predictors of the need for early CABG. If early post-PTCA CABG is to be avoided, patients who cannot be completely revascularized by PTCA should be revascularized by CABG.

We sought characteristics predictive of the need for operative revascularization subsequent to a successful coronary angioplasty. Through June 1993, 128 patients who had successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) between January 1982 and March 1989 required subsequent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) at our hospital. These cases were matched with 128 controls who had a successful PTCA but did not require subsequent CABG. Controls were matched to cases by the date of their initial PTCA. Before initial PTCA there were no differences between the cases and controls in terms of age, sex, prior myocardial infarction, ejection fraction, duration of anginal symptoms, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, family history, or obesity (all not significant). A greater number of cases had diabetes (35 versus 18; p = 0.009). Angiography before initial PTCA revealed that cases had a greater mean number of total lesions (4.1 versus 3.3; p = 0.002) and a higher incidence of left anterior descending and circumflex artery stenoses of 70% or greater (98 versus 75 and 57 versus 34, respectively; p = 0.006). The mean number of lesions successfully dilated was greater in cases (2.4 versus 1.7; p = 0.0001). Cases had CABG at a mean interval of 16.7 +/- 23 months. There were 17 late deaths among cases and 9 among the controls at a mean of 38.6 +/- 30 months. The survival probability at 5 years was 94.5% for controls and 87.9% for cases (p = 0.048). Initial revascularization by PTCA is followed by CABG at a brief interval in a subset of patients who have markers of more severe disease than do patients who do not require early CABG.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Life-threatening ventricular ectopy can occur after cardiac operations. The actual incidence of ventricular ectopy and the ability to prevent it by the routine prophylactic use of lidocaine hydrochloride have not been established. We performed a double-blind, randomized, prospective trial involving 109 patients undergoing elective coronary artery revascularization. Patients received either lidocaine (n = 54) or a placebo (n = 55) after separation from bypass. A Holter monitor was affixed to each patient for subsequent review, and bedside intensive-care monitors with alarms were used for "real-time" surveillance. The code was broken when potentially malignant ventricular ectopy or side effects attributable to the study drug were noted. Three lidocaine patients and 2 placebo patients were dropped from the study because of hemodynamic instability or bleeding. Of the remaining 104 patients, the code was broken in 12 (24%) of the 51 in the lidocaine group (9 for ectopy and 3 for mental status changes) and 10 (19%) of the 53 in the placebo group (all for ectopy) (p = not significant). Twenty-four-hour Holter monitor evaluation demonstrated occasional ventricular ectopy in all patients and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 28% in the lidocaine group and 48% in the placebo group (p = not significant). The mean number of runs of ventricular tachycardia per patient was 0.53 in the lidocaine group and 1.6 in the placebo group (p = 0.035). There were no significant differences in terms of other ventricular ectopy, morbidity, or mortality. No ventricular fibrillation occurred in either group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

We performed a prospective, randomized trial of two different strategies for postoperative packed red blood cell replacement in 39 autologous blood donors undergoing elective myocardial revascularization. The "liberal" group received blood to achieve a hematocrit value of 32%, and the "conservative" group received transfusions for a hematocrit value less than 25%. Although the groups had significantly different mean hematocrit values from the fourth postoperative hour (28.7% versus 31.2%) through the fifth postoperative day (28.4% versus 31.3%), there were no significant differences in fluid requirement, hemodynamic parameters, or hospital complications. Significantly fewer units of packed cells were required in the conservatively transfused group (20 units/20 patients) compared with the liberally transfused group (37 units/18 patients) (p = 0.012). Exercise tests were performed on the fifth and sixth postoperative days, with a transfusion being given to the conservative group between tests. Although a significant improvement in exercise endurance occurred in the conservative group receiving a transfusion (p = 0.008), no significant difference in duration or degree of exercise was demonstrated between the two groups on either day. In comparing these two groups of profoundly anemic patients, we identified no adverse consequence associated with the greater degree of hemodilution and could identify no correlation between hematocrit value and exercise capacity. We conclude that although the limits of hemodilution are still poorly defined, postoperative blood transfusion in revascularized patients should be guided by clinical indications and not by specific hematocrit values.