Search

Introduction: The recommended minimum activated clotting time (ACT) level for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) of 480 seconds originated from investigations with bubble oxygenators and uncoated extracorporeal circulation (ECC) systems. Modern minimal invasive ECC (MiECC) systems are completely closed circuits containing a membrane oxygenator and a tip-to-tip surface coating. We hypothesized that surface coating and the "closed-loop" design allow the MiECC to safely run with lower ACT levels and that an ACT level of 300 seconds can be safely applied without thromboembolic complications. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential risks during application of reduced heparin levels in patients undergoing coronary surgery., Methods: In this study, 68 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with MiECC were randomized to either the study group with an ACT target of 300 seconds or the control group with an ACT of 450 seconds. All other factors of MiECC remained unchanged., Results: The study group received significantly less heparin and protamine (heparin [international units] median [min-max], Red&#95;AC: 32,800 [23,000-51,500] vs. Full&#95;AC: 50,000 [35,000-65,000] p  < 0.001; protamine [international units], Red&#95;AC: 18,000 [10,000-35,000] vs. Full&#95;AC: 30,000 [20,000-45,000] p  < 0.001). The ACT in the study group was significantly lower at the start of MiECC (mean ± standard deviation: study group 400 ± 112 vs. control group 633 ± 177; p  < 0.0001). Before termination of CPB the ACT levels were: study group 344 ± 60 versus control group 506 ± 80. In both groups, the values of the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) decreased simultaneously. None of the study participants experienced thromboembolic complications., Conclusion: Since no evidence of increased thrombin formation (ETP) was found from a laboratory standpoint, we concluded that the use of MiECC with a reduced anticoagulation strategy seems possible. This alternative anticoagulation strategy leads to significant reduction in dosages of both heparin and protamine. We can confidently move forward with investigating this anticoagulation concept. However, to establish clinical safety of ACT below 300 seconds, we need larger clinical studies., Competing Interests: Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work., (Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Objectives: At the moment, the main application of minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) is reserved for elective cardiac operations such as coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and/or aortic valve replacement. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of emergency CABG operations using either MiECC or conventional extracorporeal circulation (CECC) in patients requiring emergency CABG with regard to the perioperative course and the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE)., Methods: We analysed the emergency CABG operations performed by a single surgeon, between January 2007 and July 2013, in order to exclude the differences in surgical technique. During this period, 187 emergency CABG patients (113 MiECC vs 74 CECC) were investigated retrospectively with respect to the following parameters: in-hospital mortality, MACCE, postoperative hospital stay and perioperative transfusion rate., Results: The mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation was higher in the CECC group (MiECC 12.1 ± 16 vs CECC 15.0 ± 20.8, P = 0.15) and the number of bypass grafts per patient was similar in both groups (MiECC 2.94 vs CECC 2.93). There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospital stay or in major postoperative complications. The in-hospital mortality was higher in the CECC group 6.8% versus MiECC 4.4% (P = 0.48). The perioperative transfusion rate was lower with MiECC compared with CECC (MiECC 2.6 ± 3.2 vs CECC 3.8 ± 4.2, P = 0.025 units of blood per patient)., Conclusions: In our opinion, the use of MiECC in urgent CABG procedures is safe, feasible and shows no disadvantages compared with the use of CECC. Emergency operations using the MiECC system showed a significantly lower blood transfusion rate and better results concerning the unadjusted in-hospital mortality., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Minimized perfusion circuits (MPCs), although aiming at minimizing the adverse effects of cardiopulmonary bypass, have not yet gained popularity. This can be attributed to concerns regarding their safety, as well as lack of sufficient evidence of their benefit., Methods: Described is a randomized, multicentre study comparing the MPC - ROCsafeRX to standard cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting and/ or aortic valve replacement., Results: Five hundred patients were included in the study (252 randomized to the ROCsafeRX group and 248 to standard cardiopulmonary bypass). Both groups were well matched for demographic characteristics and type of surgery. No operative mortality and no device-related complications were encountered. Transfusion requirement (333 ± 603 vs. 587 ± 1010 ml; p=0.001), incidence of atrial fibrillation (16.3% vs. 24.2%; p=0.03) and the incidence of major adverse events (9.1% vs. 16.5%; p=0.02) were all in favour of the MPC group., Conclusion: These results confirm both the safety and efficacy of the ROCsafeRX MPC for a large variety of cardiac patients. Minimized perfusion circuits should, therefore, play a greater role in daily practice so that as many patients as possible can benefit from their advantages.

Objective: Minimised perfusion circuits (MPCs) are expected to reduce the side effects of conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CCPB); however, conclusive data from sufficiently powered clinical trials are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the ROCsafeRX minimised perfusion circuit., Methods: A randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial comparing both perfusion circuits in patients subjected to elective coronary artery bypass and/or aortic valve replacement is described. The primary end points of safety, defined as procedure success without device-related complications, and secondary end point of efficacy, including reduction of transfusion requirement and incidence of atrial fibrillation, are analysed., Results: To date, 291 patients have been enrolled and randomised (146 MPC vs 145 CCPB). With the exception of a significantly higher male population in the MPC group (83.6% vs 71.0%, p=0.01), both groups were well matched for demographic data and type of surgery. There were no device-related complications but a hard-shell reservoir had to be integrated in one MPC because of a tear in the right atrium that was managed uneventfully. Total transfusion requirement (329+/-599 ml vs 783+/-1638 ml, p < or = 0.001) and erythrocyte transfusion (181+/-341 ml vs 434+/-798 ml, p < or = 0.001) were significantly reduced in the MPC group. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was significantly lower in the MPC group (7.1% vs 19.5%, p < or = 0.01), while freedom of major adverse events showed no significant difference., Conclusions: Lack of device-related complications combined with a significant reduction in postoperative atrial fibrillation and transfusion requirements have shown the ROCsafeRX MPC to be both safe and efficient for large-scale use in cardiac patients. Additional data are expected to confirm these initial findings., (Copyright 2010 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Although minimal extracorporeal circulation (MECC) and off-pump surgery are equal or better alternatives to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CCPB) regarding perioperative morbidity, use of blood and blood products and completeness of revascularization, CCPB is still being used in the majority of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operations., Methods and Results: We investigated 1472 CABG operations in our center. A total of 1143 CABG operations were performed using CCPB, 220 using MECC and 109 were performed as off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB). All patients were recorded prospectively. Perioperative follow-up was focused on the occurrence of arrhythmia, neurocognitive disorders and the need of blood and blood products. Operative mortality rates were comparable in all three groups. The mean number of distal anastomoses was 3.2+/-0.6 in the MECC group, 3.4+/-0.7 in the CCPB group and 1.9+/-0.8 in the OPCAB group (P=0.01). Arrhythmia occurred in 25% of the MECC group and in 35.6% of the CCPB group (P=0.05). Arrhythmia occurred in 21.7% of the OPCAB group. Seven patients (3%) of the MECC group suffered neurocognitive disorders perioperatively compared to 74 (7%) patients of the CCPB group (P=0.05) and three patients of the OPCAB group (3%). The median number of blood transfusions per patient was 0.8 in the MECC group, 1.8 in the CCPB group and 0.8 in the OPCAB group (P<0.0001)., Conclusions: Perioperative morbidity of MECC and OPCAB is comparable to or even less in comparison to CCPB. MECC allows CABG surgery in cardiac arrest so that completeness of revascularization is being warranted and longer patency rates can be guaranteed. Furthermore, the use of blood and blood products is significantly less in MECC surgery so that MECC should be considered first choice in CABG surgery over CCPB and OPCAB.

Patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes mellitus have an increased risk of mortality when undergoing either interventional or surgical revascularization. However, the rate of necessary reinterventions is significantly lower after surgical revascularization than after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). As yet, no results of long-term follow-up after stent implantation are available. The risk for a patient with diabetes mellitus and CAD of dying of myocardial infarction after a bypass operation is significantly lower than after PTCA. Bypass operation with sternotomy in patients with diabetes mellitus carries, however, an increased risk of postoperative mediastinitis, especially when both internal thoracic arteries are used for "totally arterial" revascularization. For this reason the internal thoracic artery should be used only unilaterally in surgical revascularization in these patients. Preoperative and postoperative stabilization of the blood sugar level is very important. Sclerosis of the vessels in close proximity to the heart (ascending aorta, carotid arteries) must be clarified preoperatively. The operation should be carried out particularly carefully, with the wound area kept as small as possible. Reexploration should definitely be avoided. If these guidelines are followed, surgical revascularization in patients with CAD and diabetes mellitus can achieve very good results.

Objective: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with endstage coronary disease (CAD) significantly improves symptoms and prolongs life expectancy. Left ventricular function is also improved in some patients, but not in others. Factors which influence functional recovery of hibernating myocardium after revascularization are at present under investigation., Methods: From 3/2000 to 8/2002, we analyzed 41 patients with an ejection fraction (EF) of < or =30%, who underwent CABG, prospectively. All patients received low-dose dobutamine echocardiography (DE), dobutamine myocardial scintigraphy with SPECT, dobutamine magnetic resonance tomography (MRI), contrast-enhanced MRI and, when necessary, positron emission tomography (PET). Hibernating myocardium (area of interest) was identified with these diagnostic tools preoperatively and biopsy samples were taken intraoperatively., Results: All patients received complete coronary revascularization. Early mortality was 2.4%. Three patients died during follow-up. Six months after the operation DE, MRI and SPECT were repeated. EF increased in 23 patients (group I) by at least >or =5%, and in 14 patients (group II) it did not improve. The wall motion score in the area of interest had increased during preoperative DE in group I significantly. The score did not change in group II. In addition the diastolic-systolic wall thickness increase in the area of interest rose >15% during DE in group I preoperatively; the increase was < or =15% in group II. MRI hyperenhancement of the left ventricle was significantly lower in group I compared to group II preoperatively. SPECT showed myocardial viability in the area of interest in all 37 patients. There were no significant differences between group I and II seen in SPECT. When the area of interest was located in the anterior wall the patients more frequently showed ventricular improvement postoperatively than patients with an area of interest located in the inferior, lateral or posterior wall. Light microscopy showed more severe myocardial cell hypertrophy (>19 microm) and less severe destruction of myocardial cell architecture in biopsies of group I compared to group II (myocardial cell hypertrophy < or =17 microm). Electron microscopy showed mitochondrial abnormalities in size and shape, lack of contractile material and large areas containing nonspecified cytoplasm, lipid droplets, and large glycogen-filled regions, but no significant differences between the two groups. Gene expresssion of the pro-apoptotic genes BAK and BAX was lowered compared to expression in 'normal' myocardium. The anti-apoptotic gene BCL-XL was significantly more expressed in the 'area of interest' of group II patients than in group I patients., Conclusions: We conclude that in patients with endstage CAD myocardial recovery after coronary revascularization can be predicted using DE and MRI preoperatively. Myocardial regions without any potential of functional recovery show less adaptation (less pronounced myocardial cell hypertrophy), a more severe degree of myocardial architecture destruction and a higher degree of anti-apoptotic gene expression. We recommend a myocardial biopsy when DE and MRI are not favorable in a patient with end stage coronary artery disease referred to us with the option of heart transplantation or coronary bypass.

Background: Among other preoperative parameters, extremely low or extremely high body mass index (BMI) has been discussed as a substantial risk factor for postoperative complications after cardiac surgery. However, the exact relationship between BMI and postoperative risk has not yet been defined., Methods: We retrospectively investigated consecutive patients (n=22666) who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with or without concomitant valve surgery between 1990 and 2001 in our institution. A number of preoperative and intraoperative variables and BMI (as a quadratic term) were used in a logistic regression model as covariates. Further, the patients were divided into 20 groups each with an increase in BMI of 1kg/m(2)(BMI as a categorical variable). The calculations of odds ratios (ORs) for re-intubation, infection, re-exploration, prolonged stay (>1 day) on the intensive care unit (ICU) and 30-day mortality were adjusted for age, gender and type of surgery., Results: In the multivariate analysis only age (OR between 1.01 and 1.038, P<0.01), additional aortic valve (OR between 1.335 and 2.977, P<0.01) or mitral valve surgery (OR between 2.123 and 3.301, P<0.01) showed significant impact on all five end-points. Patients with BMI between 25 and 35kg/m(2)were not at elevated risk for any of the investigated end-points, except for infection. Patients with BMI between 21 and 27kg/m(2)were not at elevated risk for infection. The ORs for postoperative complications were significantly higher in underweight patients compared with obese or severely obese patients, except those for infection. Further, the underweight patients presented significantly more comorbidity., Conclusion: Patients with low BMI are at higher risk after cardiac surgery than obese or severely obese patients. We hypothesize that a preoperative focus on avoiding and/or reversing cachexia may be more efficacious than reducing obesity in reducing the overall risk associated with heart surgery.

Background: Left ventricular function is the most important predictor of survival in patients with coronary artery disease. It is also an important indicator for hospital and late mortality after operation for endstage coronary artery disease., Methods: Between April 1986 and December 1994, 514 patients with end-stage coronary artery disease and left ventricular ejection fraction between 0.10 and 0.30 underwent coronary artery bypass grafting at the German Heart Institute Berlin. Two hundred twenty-five of these patients had been referred as possible candidates for heart transplantation. The prime criterion for bypass grafting was ischemia diagnosed by myocardial scintigraphy and echocardiography ("hibernating myocardium")., Results: Operative mortality for the group was 7.1%. The actuarial survival rate was 90.8% after 2 years, 87.6% after 4, and 78.9% after 6. Left heart catheterizations performed 1 year after the operation showed that left ventricular ejection fraction had increased from a mean of 0.24 +/- 0.03 preoperatively to 0.39 +/- 0.06 postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Preoperatively 91.6% of the patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV; 6 months postoperatively 90.2% of the surviving patients were in NYHA class I or II. Two hundred thirty-one patients with end-stage coronary artery disease and predominant heart failure underwent heart transplantation. Their actuarial survival rate was 74.9% after 2 years, 73.2% after 4, and 68.9% after 6. All of the patients could be recategorized into NYHA class I or II after the operation., Conclusions: We conclude that coronary artery bypass grafting and heart transplantation can be used successfully to improve the life expectancy of patients with end-stage coronary artery disease. Coronary artery bypass grafting leads to an excellent prognosis for these high-risk patients when the myocardium is preoperatively identified as being viable.

Background and Methods: In 21 patients intraoperatively receiving coronary revascularization, segments of the saphenous vein were prepared for aortocoronary bypass. Postoperatively, the endothelial intima was subjected to electron microscopy. Venous segments in which an intraluminal mean pressure of 263 mmHg +/- 52 mmHg had been measured during preparation were compared with venous segments that had been explanted with the aid of a venous protection bulldog and with pharmacological treatment through papaverine., Results: Those segments of high-pressure distension that had not been protected showed intimal damage with erythrocytes and thrombocytes. On the other hand, venous segments with low-pressure distension that had been protected in the described way during harvesting appeared similar to native veins., Conclusion: We conclude that during the preparation of the saphenous vein for aortocoronary bypass surgery, the application of papaverine and the use of the venous protection bulldog clamp is effective in preventing pressure damage during preparation of the vein.

Heart transplantation has now become an accepted treatment for end-stage coronary heart disease (CAD). However, the limited supply of suitable donor organs imposes constraints upon the decision of whether patients are selected for transplantation or for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). From April 1986 until the end of March 1992, 265 patients with end-stage CAD involving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 10% to 30% and predominant angina pectoris underwent CABG. All patients received an average of 2.9 +/- 0.3 venous grafts. Intraaortic balloon pumps were implanted in 30 patients (11.3%) who began to develop low cardiac output syndrome intraoperatively. The actuarial survival rate was 87.8% after 2 years and 86.9% after 3 years. LVEF was measured in 35 patients via left heart catheterization 12 months after their operations and was found to have increased from a mean of 23.8% to 38.1%. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure had decreased from 16.2 mmHg to an average of 12.1 mmHg. Swan-Ganz catheterization was performed on 120 patients 6 months postoperatively. The pulmonary wedge pressure had reduced significantly from 18.1 mmHg to a mean of 12.7 mmHg (p < 0.01). From 1990 until the end of March 1992, 55 patients with CAD and predominant heart failure received transplants. Their 2-year survival rate was 66.3%. Mean LVEF was 55.6% postoperatively. We conclude that CABG is adequate for patients who have end-stage CAD and angina pectoris symptoms, and that it significantly improves hemodynamic functions. Patients suffering predominantly from heart failure (NYHA Class IV) can be transplanted and subsequently regain normal heart function.

A total of 224 patients with angina pectoris and a left ventricular ejection fraction in the range of 10-30% (mean 24.2%) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting between April 1986 and August 1991. These patients received a mean (s.d.) of 2.9 (0.3) aortocoronary vein grafts. The overall operative mortality rate was 8.9%. The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 87.7%, 86.7% and 85.2%, respectively. Analysis of operative risk factors showed that patients with an end-diastolic left ventricular pressure > 24 mmHg were significantly more at risk (mortality rate 20.0%, P < 0.05) than those with an end-diastolic left ventricular pressure < or = 24 mmHg (mortality rate 6.2%). Patients with a perioperative cardiac index < 2.5 l min-1m-2 had higher mortality (25.4%) than those with a cardiac index > or = 2.5 l min-1m-2 (mortality 1.9%, P < 0.001). The operative mortality rate of patients with a cardiac index < 2.5 l min-1m-2 and an end-diastolic left ventricular pressure > 24 mmHg was 40.5%. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 10-20% were not significantly more at risk (P > 0.05) than those with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 21-30%.

From 4/1986-12/1990, 177 pts. with endstage coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular ejection fraction 10-30% received coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Preoperatively myocardial infarction rate was 1.5 (mean). Presupposition for CABGs was myocardial ischaemia at present demonstrated in myocardial viability test. 66.1% of the pts. had signs of ischaemia at e.c.g. after work. Additionally 97.6% of the pts. had myocardial ischaemia defined as redistribution in myocardial scintigraphy. Angina pectoris was present in 93.8% of the pts. preoperatively. 1-5 (mean 2.9) CABG per pt. were performed. 35 pts. received an internal mammaria bypass to the left coronary artery also. Operative mortality was 11.3% (1986-1990) and in 1990 alone 7.3%. Actuarial survival rate was calculated after one year to 87.4% after two years to 86.1% and after three years to 84.8%. Postoperatively all pts. were free from angina pectoris. 5 months after the operation e.c.g. after work was performed. The physical stress bearing area was increased to 82.7 Watt (mean) compared to 51.7 Watt (mean) preoperatively (p less than 0.001 s.). In conclusion pts. with endstage CAD and left ventricular ejection fraction 10-30% appeared to be good candidates for CABG with good prognosis and significant symptomatic improvement when signs of myocardial ischaemia are present preoperatively.

This study compared different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods with Tl(201) single photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) and the "gold standard" for viability assessment, functional recovery after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Twenty patients (64+/-7.3 years) with severely impaired left ventricular function (ejection fraction [EF] 28.6+/-8.7%) underwent MRI and SPECT before and 6 months after CABG. Wall-motion abnormalities were assessed by stress cine MRI using low-dose dobutamine. A segment with a nonreversible defect in Tl(201)-SPECT and a delayed enhancement (DE) in an area >50% of the entire segment, as well as an end-diastolic wall thickness <6 mm, was defined as nonviable. The mean postoperative EF (n=20) improved slightly from 28.6+/-8.7% to 32.2+/-12.4% (not significant). Using the Tl(201)-SPECT as the reference method, end-diastolic wall thickness, MRI-DE, and stress MRI showed high sensitivity of 94%, 93%, and 84%, respectively, but low specificities. Using the recovery of contractile function 6 months after CABG as the gold standard, MRI-DE showed an even higher sensitivity of 99%, end-diastolic wall thickness 96%, stress MRI 88%, and Tl(201)-SPECT 86%. MRI-DE showed advantages compared with the widely used Tl(201)-SPECT and all other MRI methods for predicting myocardial recovery after CABG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]