Search

Objectives: In the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-2 trial (ISAR-2), we sought to investigate the effect of abciximab on angiographic and clinical restenosis after stenting following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We also intended to assess the impact of abciximab on clinical outcome in this setting., Background: It is unclear whether abciximab reduces neointima formation after stenting. Such an effect may be particularly prominent in thrombus-containing lesions., Methods: Patients undergoing stenting within 48 h after onset of AMI were randomly assigned to receive either standard-dose heparin or abciximab plus reduced-dose heparin. Of 401 patients randomized, 366 without 30-day adverse events were eligible for six-month angiographic follow-up. Scheduled angiography was performed in 80% of these patients., Results: By 30 days, the composite clinical end point of death, reinfarction, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) was reached in 5.0% of the abciximab group and in 10.5% of the control group (p = 0.038). At one year, absolute reduction in the composite clinical end point by abciximab was still 5.7% but had lost its statistical significance. Our primary end point, late lumen loss, was 1.26+/-0.85 mm with abciximab and 1.21+/-0.74 mm with standard heparin (p = 0.61), and binary angiographic restenosis rates were 31.1% and 30.6%, respectively (p = 0.92)., Conclusions: In patients undergoing stenting following AMI, abciximab exerted beneficial effects by substantially reducing the 30-day rate of major adverse cardiac events. During one-year follow-up, there was no additional benefit from a reduction in TLR nor did abciximab reduce angiographic restenosis.

Background-The modified American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) lesion morphology criteria are predictive of early outcome after various coronary catheter interventions. Their potential prognostic value after stent implantation and, in particular, for restenosis and long-term clinical outcome has not been studied. We assessed the prognostic value of the modified ACC/AHA criteria for the long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of patients after coronary stenting. Methods and Results-This study includes 2944 consecutive patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease treated with coronary stent placement. Modified ACC/AHA lesion morphology criteria were used to qualitatively assess the angiograms; type A and B1 lesions were categorized as simple, and type B2 and C lesions were designated complex. Primary end points were angiographic restenosis and 1-year event-free survival. Restenosis rate was 33.2% in complex lesions and 24.9% in simple lesions (P<0.001). It was 21. 7% for type A, 26.3% for type B1, 33.7% for type B2, and 32.6% for type C lesions. One-year event-free survival was 75.6% for patients with complex lesions and 81.1% for patients with simple lesions (P<0. 001). It was 85.2% for patients with type A, 79.4% for type B1, 75. 9% for type B2, and 75.2% type C lesions. The higher risk for restenosis and an adverse outcome associated with complex lesions was also maintained after multivariate adjustment for other clinical and angiographic characteristics. Conclusions-The modified ACC/AHA lesion morphology scheme has significant prognostic value for the outcome of patients after coronary stent placement. Lesion morphology is able to influence the restenosis process and thus the entire 1-year clinical course of these patients.

Background: High-pressure dilatation is considered a better stent placement strategy, but this has not yet been proved by appropriately designed studies. The objective of this randomized trial was to assess the role of high-pressure dilatation in the early and late outcome of patients undergoing coronary stent placement., Methods and Results: Consecutive patients with coronary stent placement were randomly assigned to high- (15 to 20 atm, 468 patients) or low- (8 to 13 atm, 466 patients) balloon-pressure dilatation. The primary end point of the study was the event-free survival at 1 year. Secondary end points were the incidence of stent thrombosis at 30 days and angiographic restenosis (>/=50% diameter stenosis) at 6 months. The incidence of stent thrombosis was 1.7% in the high-pressure and 1.9% in the low-pressure group (relative risk 0.89; 95% CI 0.30 to 2.56). During the first 30 days, although there was no significant difference in the incidence of Q-wave myocardial infarction, the incidence of non-Q-wave infarction was 6.4% in the high-pressure and 3.4% in the low-pressure group (relative risk 1. 87; 95% CI 1.02 to 3.42). The restenosis rate was 30.4% in the high-pressure and 31.4% in the low-pressure group (relative risk 0. 97; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.26). Event-free survival at 1 year was not significantly different between the groups, with 78.8% in high-pressure patients and 75.5% in patients assigned to low-pressure dilatation (hazard ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.65 to 1.11)., Conclusions: The systematic use of high-balloon-pressure inflation (15 to 20 atm) during coronary stent placement is not associated with any significant influence on the 1-year outcome of patients undergoing this intervention.

This study was designed to assess the extent of potential discrepancies between intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) measurement of intrastent minimal luminal diameter and to evaluate the impact of dilation pressures and the balloon:artery ratio on the assessment of the minimal lumen diameter (MLD) by these imaging modalities. IVUS is recommended as an adjunct to angiography to assess stent expansion; however, the extent of potential discrepancies between the two imaging modalities is not well defined. Included were 225 patients in whom coronary Palmaz-Schatz stents were successfully placed after PTCA. IVUS and QCA were performed at the end of the intervention. We compared the MLD assessed by QCA and IVUS in the instent and reference site. The MLD assessed by IVUS and QCA were 2.68 +/- 0.41 mm and 3.08 +/- 0.47 mm (P < 0.001), respectively, at the tightest intrastent site and 3.19 +/- 0.50 mm and 3.17 +/- 0.52 ns at the reference site. There was a correlation between the dilation pressure and the difference between QCA- and IVUS-based intrastent MLD measurement (y = -0.05x + 1.11; r = -0.53; P < 0.0001). At low dilation pressures, a significant difference between the image modalities was found, but after high dilation pressures no discrepancies were detected. No relation was found with the balloon:artery ratio. These data provide clear evidence that in the case of low-pressure dilation, the exclusive reliance on data obtained by QCA will not yield sufficiently accurate information on intrastent MLD, whereas after high dilation pressure, the differences between the imaging modalities are minimized.