Search

Purpose : To determine the repeatability and reproducibility of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and Scheimpflug photography for several measurements of corneal scars, including scar size, scar depth, and corneal thickness. Methods : A series of patients treated for fungal keratitis at a tertiary eye care center in South India were recalled two years after successful treatment. Eyes with corneal scars had a slit lamp examination performed by two ophthalmologists masked to the other's examination. For AS-OCT and Scheimpflug photography, each eye had two scans taken by one technician and a third scan taken by a separate technician. Scar measurements were subsequently assessed from AS-OCT images by three graders masked to each other's results. Repeatability and reproducibility were assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) from mixed effects linear regression models. Results : Fifty eyes had all measurements taken. The corneal scar size, measured as the geometric mean of the two longest perpendicular meridians, ranged from 0.8 to 5.4 (mean 2.8 mm, 95%CI 2.6 to 3.1). Scar size measurements taken by two separate individuals were most reproducible when the border of the scar was traced from the OCT (ICC 0.90, 95%CI 0.86 to 0.94), and least repeatable when assessed from slit lamp examination (ICC 0.80, 95%CI 0.70 to 0.90). Conclusions : AS-OCT and Scheimpflug imaging of corneal scars produced measurements with acceptable reproducibility that could be useful as cornea-specific outcomes for clinical trials.

Purpose: We compare results from regression discontinuity (RD) analysis to primary results of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) utilizing data from two contemporaneous RCTs for treatment of fungal corneal ulcers., Methods: Patients were enrolled in the Mycotic Ulcer Treatment Trials I and II (MUTT I & MUTT II) based on baseline visual acuity: patients with acuity ≤ 20/400 (logMAR 1.3) enrolled in MUTT I, and >20/400 in MUTT II. MUTT I investigated the effect of topical natamycin versus voriconazole on best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. MUTT II investigated the effect of topical voriconazole plus placebo versus topical voriconazole plus oral voriconazole. We compared the RD estimate (natamycin arm of MUTT I [N = 162] versus placebo arm of MUTT II [N = 54]) to the RCT estimate from MUTT I (topical natamycin [N = 162] versus topical voriconazole [N = 161])., Results: In the RD, patients receiving natamycin had mean improvement of 4-lines of visual acuity at 3 months (logMAR -0.39, 95% CI: -0.61, -0.17) compared to topical voriconazole plus placebo, and 2-lines in the RCT (logMAR -0.18, 95% CI: -0.30, -0.05) compared to topical voriconazole., Conclusions: The RD and RCT estimates were similar, although the RD design overestimated effects compared to the RCT.

Purpose: Here, we report risk factors associated with outcome in severe bacterial keratitis (BK), fungal keratitis (FK), and Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) in India., Methods: Prospective observational cohort study conducted in Aravind Eye Hospital, India. Adults presenting with severe microbial keratitis (MK) were enrolled (size ≥3 mm) and followed to 21 days post-enrolment. Ulcer clinical features were recorded at presentation. Outcomes by final visit were classified as good (completely healed or reduced infiltrate size) or poor (enlarged infiltrate size, perforated, or surgery performed)., Results: Of 252 participants with severe MK, 191 had FK, 18 had AK, 19 had BK, 4 had mixed BK/FK, and 20 were microbiologically negative. Median age was 50 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 37-60 years), 64% were male, 63% were agriculturalists, and 45% had no formal education. Corneal trauma occurred in 72%, and median symptom duration before presentation was 7 days (IQR: 5-15 days). Clinical features associated with FK were feathery margins (p < 0.001), raised profile (p = 0.039), or dry surface (p = 0.007). Hypopyon was more likely in BK (p = 0.001) and ring infiltrate in AK (p < 0.001). Ulcers with poor outcome (n = 106/214) were more likely to be larger (odds ratio [OR]: 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.30-2.05, p < 0.001), involve the posterior cornea at presentation (OR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.16-4.59, p = 0.017), involve Aspergillus sp. (OR: 3.23, 95% CI: 1.26-8.25, p = 0.014), or occur in females (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.03-4.04, p = 0.04). Even after treatment, 34% (n = 76/221) had severe visual impairment by the final visit., Conclusions: Severe MK occurred predominantly in agriculturalists post-corneal trauma and often had poor outcomes. Provision of community-based eyecare may allow earlier treatment and improve outcomes.

PURPOSE: To determine if smartphone photography could be a useful adjunct to blindness prevalence surveys by providing an accurate diagnosis of corneal opacity. METHODS: A total of 174 patients with infectious keratitis who had undergone corneal culturing over the past 5 years were enrolled in a diagnostic accuracy study at an eye hospital in South India. Both eyes had an ophthalmologist-performed slit lamp examination, followed by anterior segment photography with a handheld digital single lens reflex (SLR) camera and a smartphone camera coupled to an external attachment that provided magnification and illumination. The diagnostic accuracy of photography was assessed relative to slit lamp examination. RESULTS: In total, 90 of 174 enrolled participants had a corneal opacity in the cultured eye and no opacity in the contralateral eye, and did not have a penetrating keratoplasty or missing photographs. Relative to slit lamp examination, the sensitivity of corneal opacity diagnosis was 68% (95%CI 58-77%) using the smartphones default settings and 59% (95%CI 49-69%) using the SLR, and the specificity was 97% (95%CI 93-100%) for the smartphone and 97% (95%CI 92-100%) for the SLR. The sensitivity of smartphone-based corneal opacity diagnosis was higher for larger scars (81% for opacities 2 mm in diameter or larger), more visually significant scars (100% for eyes with visual acuity worse than 20/400), and more recent scars (85% for eyes cultured in the past 12 months). CONCLUSION: The diagnostic performance of a smartphone coupled to an external attachment, while somewhat variable, demonstrated high specificity and high sensitivity for all but the smallest opacities.

Corneal involvement in HIV-infected individuals may be broadly classified into two categories, namely, infectious and noninfectious with the vast majority of manifestations occurring in the former. In this article, we shall focus on these two categories and strive to highlight those presentations that should alert the clinician to suspect underlying HIV infection. Infectious group mainly consists of Herpitic group of viral infections. Bacterial causes may be due to Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeroginosa, alpha hemolytic Streptococcus, Micrococcus and Bacillus. Fungalf keratitis in HIV-infected individuals depends on the geographic locations from which patient comes. Microsporidia and Acanthamoeba are common Protozoal causes. Non-infective inflammatory causes include peripheral ulcerative keratitis, keratoconjunctivitis sicca, and squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva. Severity which is abnormally severe or very minimally reactive makes the clinician suspect of immunosuppression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]