Search

Neonicotinoid seed treatment (NST) is a routine practice used worldwide to control insect pests in a variety of crops, including maize (Zea mays mays L.). However, previous work indicates that systemic insecticides can compromise plant defenses, counteracting efforts to control insect pests. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of thiamethoxam-neonicotinoid seed treatment on the resistance of two maize genotypes (B73 and MC 4050) against the major non-target pest, fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). In preference and performance assays, we evaluated the effect of NST on fall armyworm behavior and biology. We also determined the influence of NST on induced plant defenses, quantifying phytohormone levels and plant volatile emissions, in treatments with and without fall armyworm herbivory. NST did not affect caterpillar host preference, however it reduced caterpillar performance on the genotype B73 across both maize growth stages (V4 and V6). NST-treated B73 plants also had lower induced volatile production (V4 stage) compared to untreated herbivore-damage plants and lower constitutive salicylic acid (V6 stage). In contrast, MC 4050 was not affected by the insecticide, regardless of growth stage. In conclusion, we found that the effects of NST on maize defenses vary by plant genotype and growth stage, suggesting growers may need to tailor their selection of plant genotypes to avoid negative impacts of NST on plant resistance and ultimately pest control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Plants can detect herbivore‐induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) from their damaged neighbours and respond by enhancing or priming their defenses against future herbivore attack. Plant communication and defense priming by volatile cues has been well documented, however, the extent to which plants are able to perceive and respond to these cues across different environmental contexts remains poorly understood. We investigated how abiotic changes that modulate stomatal conductance and/or defense signalling affect the ability of maize plants to perceive HIPVs and respond by priming their defenses. During light exposure, when stomata were open and conditions allowed for defense signal biosynthesis, the individual compounds indole and (Z)−3‐hexenyl acetate primed maize defenses. Neither compound primed defenses under environmental conditions that closed stomata and/or altered defense signalling. Moreover, plants were not primed when exposed to indole or (Z)−3‐hexenyl acetate in darkness (while stomata were closed) and then subjected to simulated herbivory in the light, to ensure defense induction. The full blend of HIPVs primed maize defenses in light conditions but suppressed defense induction during dark exposure and wounding. These findings indicate that environmental context is important for plant communication and defense priming and suggest that stomata play a role in plant perception of HIPVs. Summary Statement: This work indicates that environmental conditions impact the ability of Zea mays to detect volatile compounds and prime defense responses, lending support to the idea that plant stomata are involved in volatile uptake and perception. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]