Search

The function of cooperative traits can change over time. For example, helping behaviors that originally evolved by kin selection can later yield direct fitness benefits and be stabilized by partner choice. In such cases, there may be multiple interacting factors that drive cooperation. Here, I review evidence that food sharing in vampire bats evolved as form of extended maternal care that was co‐opted to yield reciprocal benefits, and that such reciprocal relationships may have led to investment strategies that balance the trade‐offs between greater quality and quantity of cooperative relationships. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Juveniles of the cooperatively breeding cichlid fish Neolamprologus pulcher either consistently provide help in form of alloparental egg care ("cleaners") or consistently abstain from helping ("noncleaners"). These phenotypes are not based on heritable genetic differences. Instead, they arise during ontogeny, which should lead to differences in brain structure or physiology, a currently untested prediction. We compared brain gene expression profiles of cleaners and noncleaners in two experimental conditions, a helping opportunity and a control condition. We aimed to identify (a) expression differences between cleaners and noncleaners in the control, (b) changes in gene expression induced by the opportunity and (c) differences in plasticity of gene expression between cleaners and noncleaners. Control cleaners and noncleaners differed in the expression of a single gene, irx2, which regulates neural differentiation. During the opportunity, cleaners and noncleaners had three upregulated genes in common, which were implicated in neuroplasticity, hormonal signalling and cell proliferation. Thus, the stimulus in the opportunity was sufficiently salient. Cleaners also showed higher expression of seven additional genes that were unique to the opportunity. One of these cleaner‐specific genes is implicated in neuropeptide metabolism, indicating that this process is associated with cleaning performance. This suggests that the two types employed different pathways to integrate social information, preparing them for accelerated reaction to future opportunities. Interestingly, three developmental genes were downregulated between the control and the opportunity in cleaners only. Our results indicate that the two behavioural types responded differently to the helping opportunity and that only cleaners responded by downregulating developmental genes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite essential progress towards understanding the evolution of cooperative behaviour, we still lack detailed knowledge about its underlying molecular mechanisms, genetic basis, evolutionary dynamics and ontogeny. An international workshop 'Genetics and Development of Cooperation,' organized by the University of Bern (Switzerland), aimed at discussing the current progress in this research field and suggesting avenues for future research. This review uses the major themes of the meeting as a springboard to synthesize the concepts of genetic and nongenetic inheritance of cooperation, and to review a quantitative genetic framework that allows for the inclusion of indirect genetic effects. Furthermore, we argue that including nongenetic inheritance, such as transgenerational epigenetic effects, parental effects, ecological and cultural inheritance, provides a more nuanced view of the evolution of cooperation. We summarize those genes and molecular pathways in a range of species that seem promising candidates for mechanisms underlying cooperative behaviours. Concerning the neurobiological substrate of cooperation, we suggest three cognitive skills necessary for the ability to cooperate: (i) event memory, (ii) synchrony with others and (iii) responsiveness to others. Taking a closer look at the developmental trajectories that lead to the expression of cooperative behaviours, we discuss the dichotomy between early morphological specialization in social insects and more flexible behavioural specialization in cooperatively breeding vertebrates. Finally, we provide recommendations for which biological systems and species may be particularly suitable, which specific traits and parameters should be measured, what type of approaches should be followed, and which methods should be employed in studies of cooperation to better understand how cooperation evolves and manifests in nature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Studies on the evolution of cooperative behaviour are typically confined to understanding its adaptive value. It is equally essential, however, to understand its potential to evolve, requiring knowledge about the phenotypic consistency and genetic basis of cooperative behaviour. While previous observational studies reported considerably high heritabilities of helping behaviour in cooperatively breeding vertebrates, experimental studies disentangling the relevant genetic and non-genetic components of cooperative behaviour are lacking. In a half-sibling breeding experiment, we investigated the repeatability and heritability of three major helping behaviours performed by subordinates of the cooperatively breeding fish Neolamprologus pulcher. To experimentally manipulate the amount of help needed in a territory, we raised the fish in two environments differing in egg predation risk. All three helping behaviours were significantly repeatable, but had very low heritabilities. The high within-individual consistencies were predominantly due to maternal and permanent environment effects. The perceived egg predation risk had no effect on helping, but social interactions significantly influenced helping propensities. Our results reveal that developmentally plastic adjustments of provided help to social context shape cooperative phenotypes, whereas heritable genetic variation plays a minor role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract In highly social species, individuals frequently face opportunities to cooperate. The molecular and neural mechanisms that integrate internal and external information prior to cooperative responses are not well understood. Using expression levels of egr-1 , a genomic marker of neural activity, we quantified the neural response to an alloparental-care opportunity in a cooperatively breeding fish, a component of cooperative behaviour, across brain regions and time. In this species, alloparental care and submission are considered alternative strategies to appease dominants. We therefore investigated whether brood care and defence as well as submissive displays were associated with egr-1 expression. Finally, we predicted potential targets of the egr-1 transcription factor in the cichlid genome. This target prediction suggested that egr-1 regulates the expression of transcription factors involved in nervous system development, which could be implicated in social memory formation associated with cooperation. Egr-1 expression levels differed between test and control individuals and across time. Compared to a control, individuals experiencing the cooperation opportunity expressed less egr-1 in two brain regions, the cerebellum and the telencephalon. This down-regulation was independent of their behavioural reaction, i.e. whether they cooperated or not. However, within the subset of test individuals, egr-1 expression increased as a function of the amount of submissive behaviours, but not of cooperative behaviours, in the hypothalamus and potentially the telencephalon. These regions host structures that play a role in social decision-making; suggesting that egr-1 might be a suitable proxy for neural activation due to the social interaction component of the cooperation opportunity, rather than the actual alloparental care component. Highlights • Egr-1 was down-regulated in the cerebellum and the telencephalon of test fish • This down-regulation was independent of the amount of cooperative behaviours • More submissive test fish had higher egr-1 expression in two brain regions • Egr-1 regulates transcription factors involved in nervous system development • Egr-1 alone is not a suitable marker for neural activation due to alloparental care [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]