Search

Purpose: To compare the postoperative eye alignment in patients who underwent bilateral medial rectus advancement with those who underwent unilateral medial rectus advancement plus ipsilateral lateral rectus recession in the case of large angle consecutive exotropia without adduction deficit. Methods: Thirty-four patients with large angle consecutive exotropia that developed after infantile esotropia surgery were included in this retrospective study. Nineteen patients underwent bilateral medial rectus muscle advancement (group I) and 15 underwent unilateral medial rectus muscle advancement with ipsilateral lateral rectus muscle recession (group II). The follow-up periods were at least 12 months. Postoperative eye alignment was assessed and orthotropia within 10 prism diopters was considered a successful result. Results: The mean age of patients was 9.45± 2.71 years in group I and 9.93± 2.05 years in group II. Sixty percent of patients were female in group II and 57.89% in group I. In group I, the mean preoperative angle of deviation was 56.26± 3.78 PD at distance and 53.11± 3.49 PD at near. In group II, patients had a mean preoperative angle of deviation of 56± 3.38 and 52.47± 2.77 PD at distance and near, respectively. At the end of the follow-up period, the success rate was 52.63% in group I and 73.33% in group II (p = 0.22). The mean of the dose-effect relationship in group I was 2.62± 1.35 PD/mm while in group II it was 2.36± 0.84 PD/mm (p = 0.52). Conclusion: In patients with large angle consecutive exotropia, unilateral medial rectus advancement combined with ipsilateral lateral rectus recession produced better postoperative eye alignment than bilateral medial rectus advancement. Group I had a higher dose-effect relationship than group II. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Evaluation of asymmetrical and symmetrical horizontal strabismus surgery as regards efficacy and postoperative lateral gaze incomitance. Patients and Methods: This prospective comparative interventional case series study included 40 patients of age more than 3 years with alternating horizontal strabismus. Patients were divided according to the type of horizontal deviation into esotropia and exotropia groups, which were further subdivided into asymmetrical and symmetrical subgroups in each type. The surgery was defined as symmetrical procedure if the surgery was done on the same muscle in the two eyes and it was defined as asymmetric in recess-resect procedures in one eye, and three horizontal muscles surgery. Preoperative and postoperative measurements were done in primary position, right, and left gaze using alternate prism cover test and hand-held orthopedic goniometer. Results: At the end of follow-up period, a statistically insignificant difference (P value = 0.8057) was present in the success rate between the asymmetrical and symmetrical subgroups of esotropia (90 and 86.67%, respectively) and it was 100% in both exotropia subgroups. Lateral gaze incomitance results were different between esotropia and exotropia subgroups. In esotropia, a statistically significant difference was reported at 1 month (0.009), which became insignificant at 6 months (0.077) and 12 months (0.077) between asymmetrical and symmetrical subgroups. In exotropia subgroups, there was a statistically insignificant difference in lateral gaze incomitance at 1, 6, and 12 months (P = 1). Conclusion: Asymmetrical procedure had the same efficacy and success rate of symmetrical procedure for the correction of concomitant horizontal deviations in primary gaze without persistent postoperative lateral gaze incomitance, especially in exotropia. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04199286. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]