1. Evaluation of international guidance for the community treatment of 'personality disorders': A systematic review.
- Author
-
Zhan Yuen Wong, Nicholas, Barnett, Phoebe, Sheridan Rains, Luke, Johnson, Sonia, and Billings, Jo
- Subjects
- *
PERSONALITY disorders , *BIBLIOGRAPHIC databases , *MENTAL health services , *TRAUMA registries , *GREY literature , *INTEGRATED health care delivery , *CONTINUUM of care - Abstract
Background: Guidelines for the treatment and management of 'personality disorders' have been introduced to provide guidance on best practice based on evidence and views of key stakeholders. However, guidance varies and there is yet to be an overall, internationally recognised consensus on the best mental health care for people with 'personality disorders'. Aims: We aimed to identify and synthesise recommendations made by different mental health organisations from across the world on community treatment for people with 'personality disorders'. Methods: This systematic review consisted of three stages: 1. systematic literature and guideline search, 2. quality appraisal, and 3. data synthesis. We combined a search strategy involving both systematic searching of bibliographic databases and supplementary search methods of grey literature. Key informants were also contacted to further identify relevant guidelines. Codebook thematic analysis was then conducted. The quality of all included guidelines was assessed and considered alongside results. Results: After synthesising 29 guidelines from 11 countries and 1 international organisation, we identified four main domains, with a total of 27 themes. Important key principles on which there was consensus included continuity of care, equity of access, accessibility of services, availability of specialist care, taking a whole systems approach, trauma informed approaches, and collaborative care planning and decision making. Conclusions: Existing international guidelines shared consensus on a set of principles for the community treatment of 'personality disorders'. However, half of the guidelines were of lower methodological quality, with many recommendations not backed by evidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF