Search

There is limited research regarding interpretation services training and its benefit in contact tracing programs. This study seeks to assess the impact of optional formal interpretation services training on contact tracers and identify specific barriers tracers face when contacting patients with limited English proficiency, who have been disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Contact tracing has proven successful at controlling coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) globally, and the Center for Health Security has recommended that the United States add 100,000 contact tracers to the current workforce., Methods: To address gaps in local contact tracing, health professional students partnered with their academic institution to conduct contact tracing for all COVID-19 cases diagnosed onsite, which included identifying and reaching their contacts, educating participants, and providing social resources to support effective quarantine and isolation., Results: From March 24 to May 28, 536 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases were contacted and reported an average of 2.6 contacts. Contacts were informed of their exposure, asked to quarantine, and monitored for the onset of symptoms. Callers reached 94% of cases and 84% of contacts. Seventy-four percent of cases reported at least one contact. Household members had higher rates of reporting symptoms (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.28). The average test turnaround time decreased from 21.8 days for the first patients of this program to 2.3 days on the eleventh week., Conclusions: This provides evidence for the untapped potential of community contact tracing to respond to regional needs, confront barriers to effective quarantine, and mitigate the spread of COVID-19., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends aggressive contact tracing to control the COVID-19 pandemic. In this work, we (1) describe the development of a COVID-19 contact tracing initiative that includes medical, nursing, and public health students, and is led by clinicians and infectious disease epidemiologists within our health system, and, (2) articulate process steps for contact tracing including workflows and telephone scripts, and, (3) highlight the key challenges and strategies to overcome these challenges., Methods: A single academic institution-based contact tracing initiative was rapidly scaled to 110 health professional students, four physicians, two epidemiologists, and a research team. Following training, students called patients who were COVID-19 positive and the individuals they were in contact with to ensure proper isolation and quarantine measures. Students also assisted those who faced barriers to quarantine., Implications: In total, between March 24 and May 28 - this initiative completed contact tracing for 536 confirmed cases, which resulted in the identification of 953 contacts. We aim to disseminate this process, including telephone scripts and workflow, to other health systems for use in their initiatives to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and future public health emergencies., (Copyright © 2020 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

• A 2017 mumps outbreak on a college campus triggered a test, trace, and isolate response. • Response teams documented average contacts per case and compliance with quarantine and isolation protocols. • We identify strategies to increase compliance with contact tracing efforts and quarantine and isolation protocols to reduce pathogen transmission on campus. • Lessons learned from the outbreak can applied to future outbreak management on college campuses, including SARS-CoV-2. In 2017, Penn State University's campus experienced a mumps outbreak that coincided with unrelated restrictions on social gatherings. University Health Services implemented testing, contact tracing, and quarantine and isolation protocols. Approximately half of the supplied contact tracing information was usable, ∼70% of identified contacts were reached, and <50% of those contacted complied with quarantine protocol. Students with confirmed mumps reported ∼7.4 (1-35) contacts on average. Findings from this outbreak can inform future outbreak management on college campuses, including COVID-19, by estimating average contacts per case, planning capacity for testing and quarantine/isolation, and strategically increasing compliance with suggested interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Contact tracing elicits probable contacts from COVID-19 cases. Our student-led contact tracing initiative promoted isolation of both confirmed and probable cases and quarantine of contacts to reduce disease in Central Pennsylvania.Methods: Close contacts of COVID-19 cases were contacted by tracers, advised to quarantine, and monitored for 14 days for symptoms. Symptomatic contacts were classified as probable cases and advised to isolate. Data was collected from March 24, 2020 to May 26, 2020. Poisson regression and linear regression were utilized to examine the relationships between case and number of contacts and proportion of symptomatic contacts.Results: Study sample comprised of 346 confirmed and 157 probable cases. Our results indicate a significant difference in percent of household contacts who became symptomatic between confirmed and probable cases (22% vs. 3%; adjusted P<.01). Similarly, probable cases had significantly fewer non-household contacts compared to confirmed cases (0.87 vs. 0.55; adjusted P<.01).Conclusions: Timely notification of exposure to a COVID-19 positive individual by student contact tracers allowed for probable cases to quarantine early in the disease process. Our data suggests that early quarantine and/or isolation may have directly contributed to probable cases having fewer non-household contacts and a smaller proportion of symptomatic household-contacts compared to confirmed cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]