Search

Background Quality of bowel cleansing in hospitalized patients undergoing colonoscopy is often unsatisfactory. No study has investigated the inpatient or outpatient setting as cause of inadequate cleansing. Aims To assess degree of bowel cleansing in inpatients and outpatients and to identify possible predictors of poor bowel preparation in the two populations. Methods Prospective multicentre study on consecutive colonoscopies in 25 regional endoscopy units. Univariate and multivariate analysis with odds ratio estimation were performed. Results Data from 3276 colonoscopies were analyzed (2178 outpatients, 1098 inpatients). Incomplete colonoscopy due to inadequate cleansing was recorded in 369 patients (11.2%). There was no significant difference in bowel cleansing rates between in- and outpatients in both colonic segments. In the overall population, independent predictors of inadequate cleansing both at the level of right and left colon were: male gender (odds ratio, 1.20 [1.02–1.43] and 1.27 [1.05–1.53]), diabetes mellitus (odds ratio, 2.35 [1.68–3.29] and 2.12 [1.47–3.05]), chronic constipation (odds ratio, 1.60 [1.30–1.97] and 1.55 [1.23–1.94]), incomplete purge intake (odds ratio, 2.36 [1.90–2.94] and 2.11 [1.68–2.65]) and a runway time >12 h (odds ratio, 3.36 [2.40–4.72] and 2.53 [1.74–3.67]). Conclusions We found no difference in the rate of inadequate bowel preparation between hospitalized patients and outpatients.

The purpose of this study was to examine short-term outcomes of rehabilitation treatment in patients with or without previous stapled transanal resection (STARR) for rectal outlet obstruction by using a novel rehabilitation score system (Brusciano score). This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single tertiary referral institution including all patients with chronic functional constipation admitted to the outpatient unit from 2004 to 2009. Among 330 consecutive patients, 247 (74.8 %) (204 females and 43 males) showing a significantly higher rehabilitation score (mean of 15.7 ± 1.8; range, 7–25) than healthy controls (mean, 3.2 ± 1.2; range 2–6) (p

Constipation accounts for 20% in western world population. In absence of any organic aetiology, this disorder may be related to bad alimentary habits based on inadequate introduction of the three components of stool (fibres, probiotics and water) that are essential for the physiologic activity of colon. Chronic constipation may be also associated with either colic or rectal anatomo-functional alterations. Colonic constipation (slow transit constipation) is usually related to a motility disorder (inertia coli) associated with a reduction of propagating contraction waves and decreased Cajal’ cells; on the other hand, rectal outlet dysfunction type constipation may be related to anatomical alterations (e.g. internal mucosal prolapse, rectocele) causing difficult rectal outlet and functional pelviperineal dyssynergia. The physiologic defaecatory act involves not only synchronism between rectum and anus, but even correct thoraco-abdominoperineal dynamics and vertebral position. This has to be carefully assessed by considering patient’s ability to accomplish adequate thoraco-abdominoperineal muscle movements needed for both adequate defaecatory dynamics and urine and stool retention. Therefore, the ideal treatment should not only address anatomical alterations such as mucosal prolapse, rectocele, rectorectal intussusception and sphincter defects, usually requiring a surgical approach, but even functional disorders, often insidious and difficult to detect. Surgery is mandatory to treat pathological findings, that physically represent an obstacle to fecal transit in the rectum. Many surgical techniques have been developed for the treatment of outlet obstruction with conflicting results. STARR (stapled transanal rectal resection) is a new surgical procedure that was launched by Longo in 2001. It is a minimally invasive transanal operation for rectocele and mucosal/rectal prolapse using a double circular stapler. This procedure is indicated when rectal mucosal prolapse is thought to be the cause of difficult defecation, and appears to be a rational treatment. This treatment aims to normalize the anatomical relationship of the anal mucosa with hemorrhoidal piles and anal sphincters by restoring the prolapse and improving venous perfusion. The procedure pulls the anal

Background No studies have specifically reported on the use of a diagnostic tool based on physiatric assessment of constipated or incontinent patients Methods Sixty-seven constipated and 37 incontinent patients were submitted to a standard protocol based on proctologic examination, clinico-physiatric assessment (puborectalis contraction, pubococcygeal test, perineal defence reflex, muscular synergies, postural examination) and instrumental evaluation (anorectal manometry, anal US and dynamic defaecography). Patients were offered pelvic floor rehabilitation (thoraco-abdominoperineal muscle coordination training, biofeedback, electrical stimulation and volumetric rehabilitation). Results After rehabilitation treatment, decreases of Wexner constipation score (p=0.0001) and Pescatori incontinence score (p=0.0001) were observed. Conclusions This diagnostic protocol might improve the selection of patients with defaecatory disorders amenable for rehabilitation treatment.