Search

Diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic procedures for patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDoCs) vary significantly across countries and clinical settings, likely due to organizational factors (e.g., research vs. non-academic hospitals), expertise and availability of resources (e.g., financial and human). Two international guidelines, one from the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) and one from the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) in collaboration with the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM) and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR), were developed to facilitate consistent practice among professionals working with this challenging patient population. While the recommendations of both guidelines agree in principle, it remains an open issue how to implement them into clinical practice in the care pathway for patients with pDoCs. We conducted an online survey to explore health professional clinical practices related to the management of patients with pDoCs, and compare said practices with selected recommendations from both the guidelines. The survey revealed that while some recommendations are being followed, others are not and/or may require more honing/specificity to enhance their clinical utility. Particular attention should be given to the implementation of a multimodal assessment of residual consciousness, to the detection and treatment of pain, and to the impact of restrictions imposed by COVID-19 pandemics on the involvement of patients' families/representatives., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: Evaluate the prevalence of epileptic seizures (ES) and epileptiform discharges (EDs) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (DOC), and potential influence of amantadine on epilepsy., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in 34 patients hospitalized in a DOC care unit for prolonged DOC between 2012 and 2018, who received a long-term EEG monitoring (LTM). We reviewed the prevalence of ES, EDs and nonconvulsive seizures (NCSz), the type of DOC recovery treatment administered, and neurological outcome., Results: LTM was more effective than standard EEGs in detecting EDs (32% vs 21% respectively). Moreover, 12% of the LTM showed NCSz. Among patients with EDs in LTM, 73% showed no EDs in standard EEG recordings, even when performed more than once. The presence of EDs and/or NCSz in LTM was significantly associated with the occurrence of remote clinical epileptic seizures (p = 0.017) but did not influence neurological outcome (p = 1). Amantadine was not associated with higher occurrence of EDs/NCSz or clinical seizures., Conclusion: In our prolonged DOC population, LTM showed more pathological results (EDs and NCSz) than standard EEGs, which was significantly associated with remote clinical seizures., Significance: The use of LTM might be advised to rule out NCSz in patients with prolonged DOC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Neuro-orthopedic disorders are common in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) and can lead to potential pain. However, the patients' inability to communicate makes pain detection and management very challenging for clinicians. In this crossover randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, we investigated the effects of an analgesic treatment on the presence of nociception-related behaviors. At baseline, the Nociception Coma Scale-Revised (NCS-R) was performed in 3 conditions: a non-noxious stimulation, a noxious stimulation, and during a physiotherapy session. Patients with a NCS-R total score during physiotherapy equal or above the score observed after the noxious stimulation could participate to the clinical trial, as well as patients with a score above 5. They received an analgesic treatment and a placebo on 2 consecutive days in a randomized order followed by an assessment with the NCS-R. Of the 18 patients, 15 displayed signs of potential pain during physiotherapy. Patients showed higher NCS-R scores during physiotherapy compared with the other conditions, suggesting that mobilizations were potentially painful. Of these 15 patients, 10 met the criteria to participate in the placebo-controlled trial. We did not find any effect of analgesic treatment on the NCS-R scores. This study highlights that physiotherapy may be potentially painful for patients with DOC, while analgesic treatments did not reduced NCS-R scores. Therefore, careful monitoring with appropriate assessment and treatment before and during mobilization should become a priority in clinical settings. Future studies should focus on the development of assessment tools sensitive to analgesic dosage to manage pain in DOC., (Copyright © 2021 International Association for the Study of Pain.)

Background and Purpose: Patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (pDoC) have a high mortality rate due to medical complications. Because an accurate prognosis is essential for decision-making on patients' management, we analysed data from an international multicentre prospective cohort study to evaluate 2-year mortality rate and bedside predictors of mortality., Methods: We enrolled adult patients in prolonged vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) or minimally conscious state (MCS) after traumatic and nontraumatic brain injury within 3 months postinjury. At enrolment, we collected demographic (age, sex), anamnestic (aetiology, time postinjury), clinical (Coma Recovery Scale-Revised [CRS-R], Disability Rating Scale, Nociception Coma Scale-Revised), and neurophysiologic (electroencephalogram [EEG], somatosensory evoked and event-related potentials) data. Patients were followed up to gather data on mortality up to 24 months postinjury., Results: Among 143 traumatic (n = 55) and nontraumatic (n = 88) patients (VS/UWS, n = 68, 19 females; MCS, n = 75, 22 females), 41 (28.7%) died within 24 months postinjury. Mortality rate was higher in VS/UWS (42.6%) than in MCS (16%; p < 0.001). Multivariate regression in VS/UWS showed that significant predictors of mortality were older age and lower CRS-R total score, whereas in MCS female sex and absence of alpha rhythm on EEG at study entry were significant predictors., Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a feasible multimodal assessment in the postacute phase can help clinicians to identify patients with pDoC at higher risk of mortality within 24 months after brain injury. This evidence can help clinicians and patients' families to navigate the complex clinical decision-making process and promote an international standardization of prognostic procedures for patients with pDoC., (© 2021 European Academy of Neurology.)

To date, no guideline exists for the management of epilepsy in patients with prolonged Disorders of Consciousness (DoC). This review aimed to assess the occurrence of epilepsy and epileptic abnormalities (EA) in these patients, to determine their impact on recovery; and to review the effect of antiepileptic drugs (AED) and therapeutic interventions on seizure occurrence and consciousness recovery. A structured search for studies on prolonged DoC and epilepsy was undertaken following PRISMA guidelines. From an initial search resulting in 5,775 titles, twelve studies met inclusion criteria. The occurrence of epilepsy and EA in DoC was poorly and inconsistently reported across studies. The results estimated a seizure prevalence of 27% in DoC. No conclusive data were found for the effects of AED on recovery nor on the influence of any therapeutic interventions on seizure occurrence. Given the scarcity of data, it is premature to make evidence-based recommendations on epilepsy in prolonged DoC. Based on this review and current clinical practices the following are recommended: (1) repeated standard EEG for detecting seizures and EA; (2) treating epilepsy while avoiding AEDs with sedating or cognitive side-effects. Future research should use standardized classification systems for seizures and EA.

Establishing an accurate diagnosis is crucial for patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) following a severe brain injury. The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is the recommended behavioral scale for assessing the level of consciousness among these patients, but its long duration of administration is a major hurdle in clinical settings. The Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs) is a shorter scale that was developed to tackle this issue. It consists of six mandatory items, observation, command-following, visual pursuit, visual fixation, oriented behaviors, and arousal, and two conditional items, communication and localization to pain. The score ranges between 0 and 8 and corresponds to a specific diagnosis (i.e., coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, minimally conscious state minus/plus, or emergence from the minimally conscious state). A first validation study on patients with prolonged DoC showed high concurrent validity and intra- and inter-rater reliability. The SECONDs requires less training than the CRS-R and its administration lasts about 7 minutes (interquartile range: 5-9 minutes). An additional index score allows the more precise tracking of a patient's behavioral fluctuation or evolution over time. The SECONDs is therefore a fast and valid tool for assessing the level of consciousness in patients with severe brain injury. It can easily be used by healthcare staff and implemented in time-constrained clinical settings, such as intensive care units, to help decrease misdiagnosis rates and to optimize treatment decisions. These administration guidelines provide detailed instructions for administering the SECONDs in a standardized and reproducible manner, which is an essential requirement for achieving a reliable diagnosis.

Background: Patients with chronic disorders of consciousness face a significant lack of treatment options., Objective: We aimed at investigating the feasibility and the behavioral effects of home-based transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), applied by relatives or caregivers, in chronic patients in minimally conscious state (MCS)., Methods: Each participant received, in a randomized order, 20 sessions of active and 20 sessions of sham tDCS applied over the prefrontal cortex for 4 weeks; separated by 8 weeks of washout. Level of consciousness was assessed using the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised before the first stimulation (baseline), at the end of the 20 tDCS sessions (direct effects) and 8 weeks after the end of each stimulation period (long-term effects). Reported adverse events and data relative to the adherence (i.e., amount of sessions effectively received) were collected as well., Results: Twenty-seven patients completed the study and 22 patients received at least 80% of the stimulation sessions. All patients tolerated tDCS well, no severe adverse events were noticed after real stimulation and the overall adherence (i.e., total duration of stimulation) was good. A moderate effect size (0.47 and 0.53, for modified intention to treat and per protocol analysis, respectively) was observed at the end of the 4 weeks of tDCS in favor of the active treatment., Conclusions: We demonstrated that home-based tDCS can be used adequately outside a research facility or hospital by patients' relatives or caregivers. In addition, 4 weeks of tDCS moderately improved the recovery of signs of consciousness in chronic MCS patients., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Copyright of Douleur et Analgésie is the property of John Libbey Eurotext Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)