Search

Objectives: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) in CTDs has highly variable morphology. We aimed to identify imaging features and their impact on ILD progression, mortality, and immunosuppression response., Methods: Patients with CTD-ILD had high-resolution chest CT (HRCT) reviewed by expert radiologists blinded to clinical data for overall imaging pattern [usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP); non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP); organizing pneumonia (OP); fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP); and other]. Transplant-free survival and change in percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) were compared using Cox and linear mixed-effects models adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and baseline FVC. FVC decline after immunosuppression was compared with pre-treatment., Results: Among 645 CTD-ILD patients, the most frequent CTDs were SSc (n = 215), RA (n = 127), and inflammatory myopathies (n = 100). NSIP was the most common pattern (54%), followed by UIP (20%), fHP (9%), and OP (5%). Compared with the case for patients with UIP, FVC decline was slower in patients with NSIP (by 1.1%/year, 95% CI 0.2, 1.9) or OP (by 3.5%/year, 95% CI 2.0, 4.9), and mortality was lower in patients with NSIP [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.45, 0.93] or OP (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05, 0.57), but higher in fHP (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.01, 2.40). The extent of fibrosis also predicted FVC decline and mortality. After immunosuppression, FVC decline was slower compared with pre-treatment in NSIP (by 2.1%/year, 95% CI 1.4, 2.8), with no change for UIP or fHP., Conclusion: Multiple radiologic patterns are possible in CTD-ILD, including a fHP pattern. NSIP and OP were associated with better outcomes and response to immunosuppression, while fHP had worse survival compared with UIP., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF) has features of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD), but without meeting criteria for a specific CTD. We compared baseline characteristics, survival, and response to treatment of IPAF to both CTD-ILD and unclassifiable ILD., Methods: Measurements were extracted from a prospective registry. Baseline features and survival were compared in IPAF against both CTD-ILD and unclassifiable ILD. Linear trajectory of lung function decline (%-predicted forced vital capacity [FVC%] and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide [DLCO%]) before and after initiation of mycophenolate or azathioprine were compared in IPAF against both CTD-ILD and unclassifiable ILD using linear mixed models., Results: Compared to CTD-ILD (n = 1240), patients with IPAF (n = 128) were older, more frequently male, and had greater smoking history. Compared to unclassifiable ILD (n = 665), patients with IPAF were younger, more frequently female, and had worse baseline lung function. IPAF had higher mortality compared to CTD-ILD and similar risk of mortality compared to unclassifiable ILD. Mycophenolate initiation was associated with stabilization of FVC% and DLCO% in all ILD subtypes except for FVC% in patients with IPAF, and azathioprine initiation with stabilization of FVC% and DLCO% in all ILD subtypes except for FVC% decline in IPAF and DLCO% decline in CTD-ILD., Conclusion: Patients with IPAF had worse survival compared to those with CTD-ILD and similar mortality to unclassifiable ILD, with treatment being associated with stabilization in lung function in all three ILDs. It is uncertain whether IPAF should be considered a distinct ILD diagnostic subgroup., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest CJR, NK, KAJ, DA, HM, JF, MK, NH, SV report personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: SV reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: JA reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: BZ reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: K. Donohoe reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: N. Hambly reports grants from Roche and Janssen; personal fees from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK and Janssen. Conflict of interest: K.A. Johannson reports grants from Three Lakes and University Hospital Foundation. K.J. reports consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Hoffman-La Roche Ltd, Pliant Therapeutics, Three Lakes, Thyron and Brainomix. Conflict of interest: D. Assayag reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: J. Fisher reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: V. Marcoux reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada and Hoffman-La Roche Ltd and Astra Zeneca, grants from the University of Saskatchewan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Astra Zeneca and Hoffman-La Roche. VM reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada and Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. Conflict of interest: H. Manganas reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim Canada, Hoffmann La Roche, Galapagos, BMS. Conflict of interest: N. Khalil reports no conflicts of interest relevant to this manuscript. Conflict of interest: M. Kolb reports consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Horizon, Cipla Abbvie, Bellerophon, Algernon, CSL Behring, United Therapeutics, LabCorp, Structure Therapeutics and Astra Zeneca. M. Kolb reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, United Therapeutics and Structure Therapeutics. M. Kolb reports payment for expert testimony from Roche. Conflict of interest: C.J. Ryerson reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Trevi Therapeutics, Pliant Therapeutics, Astrazeneca and Veracyte., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a frequent cause of interstitial lung disease (ILD); however, the impact of rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated peptide antibody seropositivity in ILD without connective tissue disease (CTD) is unclear. We examined the association of seropositivity with ILD progression, mortality and response to immunosuppression in non-CTD ILD., Methods: A total of 1570 non-CTD patients (with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features or unclassifiable ILD) and 181 RA-ILD patients were included from a prospective registry. Longitudinal forced vital capacity (FVC), transplant-free survival and incidence of progressive fibrosing-ILD (PF-ILD) were compared between seronegative non-CTD ILD (reference group), seropositive non-CTD ILD and RA-ILD using linear mixed-effect and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, sex, smoking pack-years and baseline FVC. Interaction between seropositivity and immunosuppression on FVC decline was assessed in patients with ≥6 months of follow-up before and after the treatment., Results: Two hundred and seventeen (13.8%) patients with seropositive non-CTD ILD had similar rates of FVC decline and transplant-free survival compared to seronegative non-CTD ILD, but more frequently met the criteria for PF-ILD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.35, p = 0.004). RA-ILD had slower FVC decline (p = 0.03), less PF-ILD (HR = 0.75, p = 0.03) and lower likelihood of lung transplant or death (HR = 0.66, p = 0.01) compared to seronegative non-CTD ILD. No interaction was found between seropositivity and treatment on FVC decline in non-CTD ILD., Conclusion: Seropositivity in non-CTD ILD was not associated with improved outcomes or treatment response, highlighting the importance of other disease features in determining prognosis and predicting response to immunosuppression., (© 2022 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.)

Rationale: Early access to subspecialty care is associated with improved outcomes for patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). Access to ILD care may be limited for patients living far from subspecialty clinics. Objectives: To test the hypothesis that greater travel distance to access ILD clinical care would be associated with more severe disease at time of referral and worse clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients with fibrotic ILD were recruited from a multicenter national pulmonary fibrosis registry. Residential postal codes were geocoded to estimate travel distance from the home to the clinic. Travel distance was dichotomized at ⩽70 km (near) and >70 km (far). Demographics and disease severity at the initial referral, changes in lung function, and the risk of death or lung transplant were analyzed in unadjusted and adjusted models for their association with travel distance. Results: The cohort included 1,162 patients, of whom 856 lived near to their ILD clinic and 306 lived far from their ILD clinic. Patients residing farther from their clinic were younger, more likely to have smoked, had a greater 6-minute-walk distance, and had lower composite risk scores than patients residing closer to their clinic. In models adjusted for age, sex, and baseline forced vital capacity, patients from farther away had a greater risk of death or lung transplant than patients residing closer (hazard ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.11), a finding predominantly driven by patients with connective tissue disease-related ILD (hazard ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.16-3.94). Conclusions: Patients with fibrotic ILD with a longer travel distance to their ILD clinic had better prognostic indices at baseline but had a higher risk of death or lung transplant in the total cohort and in patients with connective tissue disease-related ILD. Assuming that disease epidemiology and severity are distributed evenly across geographic regions, these findings raise important questions about equitable access to patient care in large healthcare regions with centralized subspecialty programs.