Search

Data on infections in patients exposed to biologic therapies are mainly focused on rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Little is known about the safety profile in other immune-mediated connective tissue diseases (ICTD). The purpose of this study was to describe and to compare the risk of serious infections (SI) in patients with RA and other ICTD on anti-TNF or rituximab and to identify predictors of SI. We analyzed RA or other ICTD patients on anti-TNF or rituximab included in the Spanish registry BIOBADASER 2.0 (2000-2011). For each disease group, incidence rate (IR), mortality rate (MR) and IR ratio (IRR) of SI with 95% CI were estimated. Risks were then standardized by age and sex to the general population. Risk factors for SI were assessed by Poisson regression models. A total of 3,301 patients on anti-TNF (n = 3,166) or rituximab (n = 135), of which 176 (5%) had ICTD other than RA, were analyzed. IR of SI was higher in non-RA ICTD than in RA, with an IRR of 3.15 (95% CI 1.86, 5.31) before adjustment and 1.96 (95% CI 1.06, 3.65) after adjustment for age, comorbidity and corticoid use. Mortality due to infections was higher in ICTD although it did not reach statistical significance. Age, disease duration, comorbidities, corticosteroids and ICTD different to RA were all independently associated with SI. Patients with ICTD other than RA are at a high risk of SI when prescribed anti-TNF or rituximab, partly due to the excess comorbidity and immunosuppressive co-treatment, but also to the inflammatory disease. When evaluating the risk/benefit ratio of off-label medications in ICTD patients, age, comorbidities and corticoid use should carefully be taken into account, applying adequate preventive measures.

Background: Inflammatory idiopathic myositis (IIM) comprises a heterogeneous group of systemic muscular diseases that can occur together with other connective tissue diseases (CTD), named overlap myositis (OM). The question of whether OM is a distinct entity still remains controversial. Aim: The present study was conducted to assess the clinical and prognostic differences between patients diagnosed with OM, primary polymyositis (PM) and primary dermatomyositis (DM). Method: The study consists of a retrospective longitudinal and multicenter series of IIM patients. Patients were classified as OM, PM and DM. Overlap myositis was defined as patients fulfilling criteria for IIM plus criteria for other CTD (namely systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed connective tissue disease, rheumatoid arthritis and primary Sjögren's syndrome). Result: A total of 342 patients were included (98 OM, 137 PM and 107 DM). Overlap myositis patients, in comparison with PM and DM, showed significant differences, with more extramuscular involvement, particularly more arthritis (66%, 34.6% and 48.1%, respectively), puffy fingers (49.5%, 11.1% and 24.3%), sclerodactyly (45.4%, 2.2% and 2%), dysphagia (41.8%, 18.2% and 26.4%), Raynaud phenomenon (65.3%, 16.9% and 19.8%), leucopenia (28.9%, 2.2% and 8.4%), thrombocytopenia (8.2%, 2.2% and 1.9%), interstitial lung disease (ILD) (48%, 35% and 30.8%), renal manifestations (13.4%, 3.7% and 1.9%), and more severe infections (41.3%, 26.7% and 21%). No significant differences were found in survival between groups in log rank test (P = 0.106). Multivariate adjusted survival analyses revealed a worse prognosis for severe infections, ILD and baseline elevation of acute phase reactants. Conclusion: Overlap myositis stands out as a distinct entity as compared to PM and DM, featuring more extramuscular involvement and more severe infections. Close monitoring is recommended in this subset for early detection and treatment of possible complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the study was to analyze the efficacy and satisfaction of multidisciplinary dermatology-rheumatology management for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We conducted a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to September 2015. Selection criteria include (1) adult patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and PsA, (2) assessed in a multidisciplinary consultation, (3) comparison with routine separate consultations, and (4) outcome measures to evaluate efficacy and/or satisfaction. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, clinical trials, cohort studies, and case series were included. The quality of the studies included was graded according to the Oxford Level of Evidence scale. Of 195 articles, three studies complied with the inclusion criteria: two case series and one descriptive study in which 506 patients were evaluated. Patients were referred to the multidisciplinary consultation from dermatology and rheumatology consultations in all but one study, in which primary care was also involved. The reason for the referral was to confirm the diagnosis and/or treatment. Patients were evaluated on a weekly and monthly basis in two and one study, respectively. The evidence obtained is scarce but suggests the efficacy of multidisciplinary consultations in terms of improved skin and joint symptoms after changing treatment (82-56 %), showing higher scores for this type of consultation compared to the usual [4.91 vs. 2.85 (0-5)] and a high level of satisfaction among patients (94 % 'very satisfied'). However, waiting times were higher. With the limited evidence found, multidisciplinary management seems to be more effective and more satisfactory for patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and PsA than conventional consultations, though this could not be conclusively demonstrated. The results of this review support the benefit of implementing this type of consultation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]