Search

Background: Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations during pregnancy have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in a few studies but not in other studies. Objectives: We assessed the serum 25(OH)D concentration at 10-14 wk of pregnancy and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes and examined the predictive accuracy. Design: In this nested case-control study, we measured serum 25(OH)D in 5109 women with singleton pregnancies who were attending first-trimester screening in New South Wales, Australia. Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to examine the association between low 25(OH)D concentrations and adverse pregnancy outcomes (small for gestational age, preterm birth, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, miscarriage, and stillbirth). The predictive accuracy of models was assessed. Results: The median (IQR) 25(OH)D concentration for the total population was 56.4 nmol/L (43.3-69.8 nmol/L). Serum 25(OH)D concentrations showed significant variation by parity, smoking, weight, season of sampling, country of birth, and socioeconomic status. After adjustment for maternal and clinical risk factors, low 25(OH)D concentrations were not associated with most adverse pregnancy outcomes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and likelihood ratio for a composite of severe adverse pregnancy outcomes of 25(OH)D concentrations <25 nmol/L were 0.51 and 1.44, respectively, and, for risk factors alone, were 0.64 and 2.87, respectively. The addition of 25(OH)D information to maternal and clinical risk factors did not improve the ability to predict severe adverse pregnancy outcomes (AUC: 0.64; likelihood ratio: 2.32; P = 0.39). Conclusion: Low 25(OH)D serum concentrations in the first trimester of pregnancy are not associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and do not predict complications any better than routinely assessed clinical and maternal risk-factor information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective The aim of this study was to determine whether outcomes in a first pregnancy were associated with changes into and out of public maternity care. Methods The study population included 155 492 women with first and second sequential singleton births, 2000-09 in New South Wales. Analyses were stratified by whether obstetric care for the first birth involved private or public maternity care. Interventions, infant and maternal outcomes were assessed as predictors of a change in care. Adjusted odds ratios for changing care were obtained from logistic regression using backwards elimination. Results Similar proportions of women changed from private to public care between first and second births (9.6% compared with 9.4% public to private, P-value = 0.10). Although interventions (operative delivery, epidural) and outcomes (low Apgar, preterm birth, perinatal death, postpartum haemorrhage, perineal tear and severe maternal morbidity) were all associated with changes from public to private care, only poor infant condition (adjusted odds ratio 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.15-1.68) was associated with a change from private to public care. Conclusions The majority of women had consistent care type for both births. This may indicate that women are generally satisfied with care, they rationalise that their first birth care was optimal or they value continuity of carer across pregnancies. What is known about the topic? There is some evidence to suggest that interventions and outcomes of one pregnancy are associated with changes in type of delivery, timing of delivery and outcomes of subsequent births. What does this paper add? Obstetric interventions and adverse maternal and infant outcomes were associated with changing maternity care sector and influenced whether or not women remained with the same care provider. What are the implications for practitioners? Continuity of carer may be important to women in choosing their subsequent pregnancy maternity care sector. Most women do not change provider, but first-birth experiences appear to influence those who do change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We determined recent trends and recurrence rates of placenta praevia in 790,366 deliveries in NSW. From 2001 to 2009, the rate of placenta praevia increased by 26%, from 0. 69% to 0. 87% (trend P < 0.001). The placenta praevia recurrence rate in a second birth was 4.8%. Two-thirds of the increase in placenta praevia was accounted for by trends in known risk factors, and the unexplained portion may reflect changes in unidentified risk factors or in the threshold for placenta praevia diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]