Search

The hidden geometry of simplicial complexes can influence the collective dynamics of nodes in different ways depending on the simplex-based interactions of various orders and competition between local and global structural features. We study a system of phase oscillators attached to nodes of 4-dimensional simplicial complexes and interacting via positive/negative edges-based pairwise $K_1$ and triangle-based triple $K_2\geq 0$ couplings. Three prototypal simplicial complexes are grown by aggregation of 5-cliques, controlled by the chemical affinity parameter $\nu$, resulting in sparse, mixed, and compact architecture, all of which have 1-hyperbolic graphs but different spectral dimensions. By changing the interaction strength $K_1\in[-4,2]$ along the forward and backward sweeps, we numerically determine individual phases of each oscillator and a global order parameter to measure the level of synchronisation. Our results reveal how different architectures of simplicial complexes, in conjunction with the interactions and internal-frequency distributions, impact the shape of the hysteresis loop and lead to patterns of locally synchronised groups that hinder global network synchronisation., Comment: 9 pages, 7 figures; regular article, submitted

Recent studies of dynamic properties in complex systems point out the profound impact of hidden geometry features known as simplicial complexes, which enable geometrically conditioned many-body interactions. Studies of collective behaviours on the controlled-structure complexes can reveal the subtle interplay of geometry and dynamics. Here, we investigate the phase synchronisation dynamics under the competing interactions embedded on 1-simplex (edges) and 2-simplex (triangles) faces of a homogeneous 4-dimensional simplicial complex. Its underlying network is a 1-hyperbolic graph with the assortative correlations among the node's degrees and the spectral dimension that exceeds $d_s=4$. We determine the time-averaged system's order parameter to characterise the synchronisation level. In the absence of higher interactions, the complete synchrony is continuously reached with the increasing positive pairwise interactions ($K_1>0$), and a partial synchronisation for the negative couplings ($K_1<0$) with no apparent hysteresis. Similar behaviour occurs in the degree-preserved randomised network. In contrast, the synchronisation is absent for the negative pairwise coupling in the entirely random graph and simple scale-free networks. Increasing the strength $K_2\neq 0$ of the triangle-based interactions gradually hinders the synchronisation promoted by pairwise couplings, and the non-symmetric hysteresis loop opens with an abrupt desynchronisation transition towards the $K_1<0$ branch. However, for substantial triangle-based interactions, the frustration effects prevail, preventing the complete synchronisation, and the abrupt transition disappears. These findings shed new light on the mechanisms by which the high-dimensional simplicial complexes in natural systems, such as human connectomes, can modulate their native synchronisation processes., Comment: 9 pages, 6 figures included

We analyze the time series obtained from different dynamical regimes of the logistic map by constructing their equivalent time series (TS) networks, using the visibility algorithm. The regimes analyzed include both periodic and chaotic regimes, as well as intermittent regimes and the Feigenbaum attractor at the edge of chaos. We use the methods of algebraic topology to define the simplicial characterizers, which can analyse the simplicial structure of the networks at both the global and local levels. The simplicial characterisers bring out the hierarchical levels of complexity at various topological levels. These hierarchical levels of complexity find the skeleton of the local dynamics embedded in the network which influence the global dynamical properties of the system, and also permit the identification of dominant motifs. We also analyze the same networks using conventional network characterizers such as average path lengths and clustering coefficients. We see that the simplicial characterizers are capable of distinguishing between different dynamical regimes and can pick up subtle differences in dynamical behavior, whereas the usual characterizers provide a coarser characterization. However, the two taken in conjunction, can provide information about the dynamical behavior of the time series, as well as the correlations in the evolving system. Our methods can therefore provide powerful tools for the analysis of dynamical systems., Comment: 14 pages, 8 figure, 4 tables