Search

Visual exploration of multi-classification models with large number of classes would help machine learning experts in identifying the root cause of a problem that occurs during learning phase such as miss-classification of instances. Most of the previous visual analytics solutions targeted only a few classes. In this paper, we present our interactive visual analytics tool, called MultiCaM-Vis, that provides \Emph{overview+detail} style parallel coordinate views and a Chord diagram for exploration and inspection of class-level miss-classification of instances. We also present results of a preliminary user study with 12 participants.

The recent advancements in machine learning have motivated researchers to generate classification models dealing with hundreds of classes such as in the case of image datasets. However, visualization of classification models with high number of classes and inter-model comparison in such classification problems are two areas that have not received much attention in the literature, despite the ever-increasing use of classification models to address problems with very large class categories. In this paper, we present our interactive visual analytics tool, called Circles, that allows a visual inter-model comparison of numerous classification models with 1K classes in one view. To mitigate the tricky issue of visual clutter, we chose concentric a radial line layout for our inter-model comparison task. Our prototype shows the results of 9 models with 1K classes

Many visual analytics systems allow users to interact with machine learning models towards the goals of data exploration and insight generation on a given dataset. However, in some situations, insights may be less important than the production of an accurate predictive model for future use. In that case, users are more interested in generating of diverse and robust predictive models, verifying their performance on holdout data, and selecting the most suitable model for their usage scenario. In this paper, we consider the concept of Exploratory Model Analysis (EMA), which is defined as the process of discovering and selecting relevant models that can be used to make predictions on a data source. We delineate the differences between EMA and the well-known term exploratory data analysis in terms of the desired outcome of the analytic process: insights into the data or a set of deployable models. The contributions of this work are a visual analytics system workflow for EMA, a user study, and two use cases validating the effectiveness of the workflow. We found that our system workflow enabled users to generate complex models, to assess them for various qualities, and to select the most relevant model for their task.