Search

We prove a few new lower bounds on the randomized competitive ratio for the $k$-server problem and other related problems, resolving some long-standing conjectures. In particular, for metrical task systems (MTS) we asympotically settle the competitive ratio and obtain the first improvement to an existential lower bound since the introduction of the model 35 years ago (in 1987). More concretely, we show: 1. There exist $(k+1)$-point metric spaces in which the randomized competitive ratio for the $k$-server problem is $\Omega(\log^2 k)$. This refutes the folklore conjecture (which is known to hold in some families of metrics) that in all metric spaces with at least $k+1$ points, the competitive ratio is $\Theta(\log k)$. 2. Consequently, there exist $n$-point metric spaces in which the randomized competitive ratio for MTS is $\Omega(\log^2 n)$. This matches the upper bound that holds for all metrics. The previously best existential lower bound was $\Omega(\log n)$ (which was known to be tight for some families of metrics). 3. For all $k

In a 1989 paper titled "shortest paths without a map", Papadimitriou and Yannakakis introduced an online model of searching in a weighted layered graph for a target node, while attempting to minimize the total length of the path traversed by the searcher. This problem, later called layered graph traversal, is parametrized by the maximum cardinality $k$ of a layer of the input graph. It is an online setting for dynamic programming, and it is known to be a rather general and fundamental model of online computing, which includes as special cases other acclaimed models. The deterministic competitive ratio for this problem was soon discovered to be exponential in $k$, and it is now nearly resolved: it lies between $\Omega(2^k)$ and $O(k2^k)$. Regarding the randomized competitive ratio, in 1993 Ramesh proved, surprisingly, that this ratio has to be at least $\Omega(k^2 / \log^{1+\epsilon} k)$ (for any constant $\epsilon > 0$). In the same paper, Ramesh also gave an $O(k^{13})$-competitive randomized online algorithm. Since 1993, no progress has been reported on the randomized competitive ratio of layered graph traversal. In this work we show how to apply the mirror descent framework on a carefully selected evolving metric space, and obtain an $O(k^2)$-competitive randomized online algorithm, nearly matching the known lower bound on the randomized competitive ratio.

We consider a generalization of the fundamental online metrical service systems (MSS) problem where the feasible region can be transformed between requests. In this problem, which we call T-MSS, an algorithm maintains a point in a metric space and has to serve a sequence of requests. Each request is a map (transformation) $f_t\colon A_t\to B_t$ between subsets $A_t$ and $B_t$ of the metric space. To serve it, the algorithm has to go to a point $a_t\in A_t$, paying the distance from its previous position. Then, the transformation is applied, modifying the algorithm's state to $f_t(a_t)$. Such transformations can model, e.g., changes to the environment that are outside of an algorithm's control, and we therefore do not charge any additional cost to the algorithm when the transformation is applied. The transformations also allow to model requests occurring in the $k$-taxi problem. We show that for $\alpha$-Lipschitz transformations, the competitive ratio is $\Theta(\alpha)^{n-2}$ on $n$-point metrics. Here, the upper bound is achieved by a deterministic algorithm and the lower bound holds even for randomized algorithms. For the $k$-taxi problem, we prove a competitive ratio of $\tilde O((n\log k)^2)$. For chasing convex bodies, we show that even with contracting transformations no competitive algorithm exists. The problem T-MSS has a striking connection to the following deep mathematical question: Given a finite metric space $M$, what is the required cardinality of an extension $\hat M\supseteq M$ where each partial isometry on $M$ extends to an automorphism? We give partial answers for special cases.

There has been a surge of progress in recent years in developing algorithms for testing and learning quantum states that achieve optimal copy complexity. Unfortunately, they require the use of entangled measurements across many copies of the underlying state and thus remain outside the realm of what is currently experimentally feasible. A natural question is whether one can match the copy complexity of such algorithms using only independent---but possibly adaptively chosen---measurements on individual copies. We answer this in the negative for arguably the most basic quantum testing problem: deciding whether a given $d$-dimensional quantum state is equal to or $\epsilon$-far in trace distance from the maximally mixed state. While it is known how to achieve optimal $O(d/\epsilon^2)$ copy complexity using entangled measurements, we show that with independent measurements, $\Omega(d^{4/3}/\epsilon^2)$ is necessary, even if the measurements are chosen adaptively. This resolves a question of Wright. To obtain this lower bound, we develop several new techniques, including a chain-rule style proof of Paninski's lower bound for classical uniformity testing, which may be of independent interest., Comment: 31 pages, comments welcome

We introduce the problem of $k$-chasing of convex functions, a simultaneous generalization of both the famous k-server problem in $R^d$, and of the problem of chasing convex bodies and functions. Aside from fundamental interest in this general form, it has natural applications to online $k$-clustering problems with objectives such as $k$-median or $k$-means. We show that this problem exhibits a rich landscape of behavior. In general, if both $k > 1$ and $d > 1$ there does not exist any online algorithm with bounded competitiveness. By contrast, we exhibit a class of nicely behaved functions (which include in particular the above-mentioned clustering problems), for which we show that competitive online algorithms exist, and moreover with dimension-free competitive ratio. We also introduce a parallel question of top-$k$ action regret minimization in the realm of online convex optimization. There, too, a much rougher landscape emerges for $k > 1$. While it is possible to achieve vanishing regret, unlike the top-one action case the rate of vanishing does not speed up for strongly convex functions. Moreover, vanishing regret necessitates both intractable computations and randomness. Finally we leave open whether almost dimension-free regret is achievable for $k > 1$ and general convex losses. As evidence that it might be possible, we prove dimension-free regret for linear losses via an information-theoretic argument.

A landmark result of non-smooth convex optimization is that gradient descent is an optimal algorithm whenever the number of computed gradients is smaller than the dimension $d$. In this paper we study the extension of this result to the parallel optimization setting. Namely we consider optimization algorithms interacting with a highly parallel gradient oracle, that is one that can answer $\mathrm{poly}(d)$ gradient queries in parallel. We show that in this case gradient descent is optimal only up to $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{d})$ rounds of interactions with the oracle. The lower bound improves upon a decades old construction by Nemirovski which proves optimality only up to $d^{1/3}$ rounds (as recently observed by Balkanski and Singer), and the suboptimality of gradient descent after $\sqrt{d}$ rounds was already observed by Duchi, Bartlett and Wainwright. In the latter regime we propose a new method with improved complexity, which we conjecture to be optimal. The analysis of this new method is based upon a generalized version of the recent results on optimal acceleration for highly smooth convex optimization.

We consider parametrized versions of metrical task systems and metrical service systems, two fundamental models of online computing, where the constrained parameter is the number of possible distinct requests $m$. Such parametrization occurs naturally in a wide range of applications. Striking examples are certain power management problems, which are modeled as metrical task systems with $m=2$. We characterize the competitive ratio in terms of the parameter $m$ for both deterministic and randomized algorithms on hierarchically separated trees. Our findings uncover a rich and unexpected picture that differs substantially from what is known or conjectured about the unparametrized versions of these problems. For metrical task systems, we show that deterministic algorithms do not exhibit any asymptotic gain beyond one-level trees (namely, uniform metric spaces), whereas randomized algorithms do not exhibit any asymptotic gain even for one-level trees. In contrast, the special case of metrical service systems (subset chasing) behaves very differently. Both deterministic and randomized algorithms exhibit gain, for $m$ sufficiently small compared to $n$, for any number of levels. Most significantly, they exhibit a large gain for uniform metric spaces and a smaller gain for two-level trees. Moreover, it turns out that in these cases (as well as in the case of metrical task systems for uniform metric spaces with $m$ being an absolute constant), deterministic algorithms are essentially as powerful as randomized algorithms. This is surprising and runs counter to the ubiquitous intuition/conjecture that, for most problems that can be modeled as metrical task systems, the randomized competitive ratio is polylogarithmic in the deterministic competitive ratio.

Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a family of sets in some metric space. In the $\mathcal{F}$-chasing problem, an online algorithm observes a request sequence of sets in $\mathcal{F}$ and responds (online) by giving a sequence of points in these sets. The movement cost is the distance between consecutive such points. The competitive ratio is the worst case ratio (over request sequences) between the total movement of the online algorithm and the smallest movement one could have achieved by knowing in advance the request sequence. The family $\mathcal{F}$ is said to be chaseable if there exists an online algorithm with finite competitive ratio. In 1991, Linial and Friedman conjectured that the family of convex sets in Euclidean space is chaseable. We prove this conjecture., Comment: 14 pages

The convex body chasing problem, introduced by Friedman and Linial, is a competitive analysis problem on any normed vector space. In convex body chasing, for each timestep $t\in\mathbb N$, a convex body $K_t\subseteq \mathbb R^d$ is given as a request, and the player picks a point $x_t\in K_t$. The player aims to ensure that the total distance $\sum_{t=0}^{T-1}||x_t-x_{t+1}||$ is within a bounded ratio of the smallest possible offline solution. In this work, we consider the nested version of the problem, in which the sequence $(K_t)$ must be decreasing. For Euclidean spaces, we consider a memoryless algorithm which moves to the so-called Steiner point, and show that in a certain sense it is exactly optimal among memoryless algorithms. For general finite dimensional normed spaces, we combine the Steiner point and our recent previous algorithm to obtain a new algorithm which is nearly optimal for all $\ell^p_d$ spaces with $p\geq 1$, closing a polynomial gap.

We consider metrical task systems on tree metrics, and present an $O(\mathrm{depth} \times \log n)$-competitive randomized algorithm based on the mirror descent framework introduced in our prior work on the $k$-server problem. For the special case of hierarchically separated trees (HSTs), we use mirror descent to refine the standard approach based on gluing unfair metrical task systems. This yields an $O(\log n)$-competitive algorithm for HSTs, thus removing an extraneous $\log\log n$ in the bound of Fiat and Mendel (2003). Combined with well-known HST embedding theorems, this also gives an $O((\log n)^2)$-competitive randomized algorithm for every $n$-point metric space.

Friedman and Linial introduced the convex body chasing problem to explore the interplay between geometry and competitive ratio in metrical task systems. In convex body chasing, at each time step $t \in \mathbb{N}$, the online algorithm receives a request in the form of a convex body $K_t \subseteq \mathbb{R}^d$ and must output a point $x_t \in K_t$. The goal is to minimize the total movement between consecutive output points, where the distance is measured in some given norm. This problem is still far from being understood, and recently Bansal et al. gave an algorithm for the nested version, where each convex body is contained within the previous one. We propose a different strategy which is $O(d \log d)$-competitive algorithm for this nested convex body chasing problem, improving substantially over previous work. Our algorithm works for any norm. This result is almost tight, given an $\Omega(d)$ lower bound for the $\ell_{\infty}$.

We present an $O((\log k)^2)$-competitive randomized algorithm for the $k$-server problem on hierarchically separated trees (HSTs). This is the first $o(k)$-competitive randomized algorithm for which the competitive ratio is independent of the size of the underlying HST. Our algorithm is designed in the framework of online mirror descent where the mirror map is a multiscale entropy. When combined with Bartal's static HST embedding reduction, this leads to an $O((\log k)^2 \log n)$-competitive algorithm on any $n$-point metric space. We give a new dynamic HST embedding that yields an $O((\log k)^3 \log \Delta)$-competitive algorithm on any metric space where the ratio of the largest to smallest non-zero distance is at most $\Delta$.

We consider the problem of linear regression where the $\ell_2^n$ norm loss (i.e., the usual least squares loss) is replaced by the $\ell_p^n$ norm. We show how to solve such problems up to machine precision in $O^*(n^{|1/2 - 1/p|})$ (dense) matrix-vector products and $O^*(1)$ matrix inversions, or alternatively in $O^*(n^{|1/2 - 1/p|})$ calls to a (sparse) linear system solver. This improves the state of the art for any $p\not\in \{1,2,+\infty\}$. Furthermore we also propose a randomized algorithm solving such problems in {\em input sparsity time}, i.e., $O^*(Z + \mathrm{poly}(d))$ where $Z$ is the size of the input and $d$ is the number of variables. Such a result was only known for $p=2$. Finally we prove that these results lie outside the scope of the Nesterov-Nemirovski's theory of interior point methods by showing that any symmetric self-concordant barrier on the $\ell_p^n$ unit ball has self-concordance parameter $\tilde{\Omega}(n)$., Comment: 16 pages

We consider revenue maximization in online auction/pricing problems. A seller sells an identical item in each period to a new buyer, or a new set of buyers. For the online posted pricing problem, we show regret bounds that scale with the best fixed price, rather than the range of the values. We also show regret bounds that are almost scale free, and match the offline sample complexity, when comparing to a benchmark that requires a lower bound on the market share. These results are obtained by generalizing the classical learning from experts and multi-armed bandit problems to their multi-scale versions. In this version, the reward of each action is in a different range, and the regret w.r.t. a given action scales with its own range, rather than the maximum range., Comment: Preliminary conference version In the Proc. of 18th ACM conference on Economics and Computation (EC 2017)

In 1988, Johnson, Papadimitriou and Yannakakis wrote that "Practically all the empirical evidence would lead us to conclude that finding locally optimal solutions is much easier than solving NP-hard problems". Since then the empirical evidence has continued to amass, but formal proofs of this phenomenon have remained elusive. A canonical (and indeed complete) example is the local max-cut problem, for which no polynomial time method is known. In a breakthrough paper, Etscheid and R\"oglin proved that the smoothed complexity of local max-cut is quasi-polynomial, i.e., if arbitrary bounded weights are randomly perturbed, a local maximum can be found in $n^{O(\log n)}$ steps. In this paper we prove smoothed polynomial complexity for local max-cut, thus confirming that finding local optima for max-cut is much easier than solving it., Comment: added some remarks and corollaries; to appear in STOC 2017

We consider the adversarial convex bandit problem and we build the first $\mathrm{poly}(T)$-time algorithm with $\mathrm{poly}(n) \sqrt{T}$-regret for this problem. To do so we introduce three new ideas in the derivative-free optimization literature: (i) kernel methods, (ii) a generalization of Bernoulli convolutions, and (iii) a new annealing schedule for exponential weights (with increasing learning rate). The basic version of our algorithm achieves $\tilde{O}(n^{9.5} \sqrt{T})$-regret, and we show that a simple variant of this algorithm can be run in $\mathrm{poly}(n \log(T))$-time per step at the cost of an additional $\mathrm{poly}(n) T^{o(1)}$ factor in the regret. These results improve upon the $\tilde{O}(n^{11} \sqrt{T})$-regret and $\exp(\mathrm{poly}(T))$-time result of the first two authors, and the $\log(T)^{\mathrm{poly}(n)} \sqrt{T}$-regret and $\log(T)^{\mathrm{poly}(n)}$-time result of Hazan and Li. Furthermore we conjecture that another variant of the algorithm could achieve $\tilde{O}(n^{1.5} \sqrt{T})$-regret, and moreover that this regret is unimprovable (the current best lower bound being $\Omega(n \sqrt{T})$ and it is achieved with linear functions). For the simpler situation of zeroth order stochastic convex optimization this corresponds to the conjecture that the optimal query complexity is of order $n^3 / \epsilon^2$., Comment: 45 pages

We propose a new framework for black-box convex optimization which is well-suited for situations where gradient computations are expensive. We derive a new method for this framework which leverages several concepts from convex optimization, from standard first-order methods (e.g. gradient descent or quasi-Newton methods) to analytical centers (i.e. minimizers of self-concordant barriers). We demonstrate empirically that our new technique compares favorably with state of the art algorithms (such as BFGS)., Comment: 19 pages

We extend the Langevin Monte Carlo (LMC) algorithm to compactly supported measures via a projection step, akin to projected Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD). We show that (projected) LMC allows to sample in polynomial time from a log-concave distribution with smooth potential. This gives a new Markov chain to sample from a log-concave distribution. Our main result shows in particular that when the target distribution is uniform, LMC mixes in $\tilde{O}(n^7)$ steps (where $n$ is the dimension). We also provide preliminary experimental evidence that LMC performs at least as well as hit-and-run, for which a better mixing time of $\tilde{O}(n^4)$ was proved by Lov{\'a}sz and Vempala., Comment: Preliminary version; 23 pages

We propose a new method for unconstrained optimization of a smooth and strongly convex function, which attains the optimal rate of convergence of Nesterov's accelerated gradient descent. The new algorithm has a simple geometric interpretation, loosely inspired by the ellipsoid method. We provide some numerical evidence that the new method can be superior to Nesterov's accelerated gradient descent.

We present a new bandit algorithm, SAO (Stochastic and Adversarial Optimal), whose regret is, essentially, optimal both for adversarial rewards and for stochastic rewards. Specifically, SAO combines the square-root worst-case regret of Exp3 (Auer et al., SIAM J. on Computing 2002) and the (poly)logarithmic regret of UCB1 (Auer et al., Machine Learning 2002) for stochastic rewards. Adversarial rewards and stochastic rewards are the two main settings in the literature on (non-Bayesian) multi-armed bandits. Prior work on multi-armed bandits treats them separately, and does not attempt to jointly optimize for both. Our result falls into a general theme of achieving good worst-case performance while also taking advantage of "nice" problem instances, an important issue in the design of algorithms with partially known inputs.