Remote sensing and digital agriculture have emerged as practical tools in modern farming, promising significant advancements in agricultural efficiency, sustainability, and productivity. These technologies could enable farmers and researchers to gather essential data, make informed decisions, and manage resources more effectively, ultimately contributing to the global challenge of feeding a growing population while minimizing environmental impact. Remote sensing data, especially high-resolution UAS-based imagery, could provide detailed and real-time information about crop health, soil moisture, nutrient levels, and pest infestations. This information play an important role in addressing key agricultural challenges including I) limited resources, II) newly emerging or common diseases, iii) climate change and extreme weather outbreaks, and IV) sustainability. The wealth of data enables farmers to implement precision agriculture techniques, tailoring interventions and resources to specific areas of the field. The timely detection and monitoring of crop diseases allows farmers to take proactive measures and prevent large-scale outbreaks. Early-stage detection of problems enable farmers to mitigate losses, improve crop quality, and reduce the need for excessive chemical treatments. Remote sensing data enables high-thruput phenotyping and selection of more resilient and climate-adept crop varieties. Finally, constant monitoring and precise resource management facilitate sustainable production. All advantages of remote sensing applications discussed above depends on the accuracy and reliability of the data collected and correct interpretation of the data.Despite the extensive deployment of remote sensing tools in agricultural industry for several decades, the anticipated outcomes have often fallen short of initial expectations. This shortcoming can be attributed to several interrelated factors including challenges related to data accuracy, resolution, data interpretation issues, and inconsistency across different spatial and temporal scales. Additionally, the dynamic nature of environmental processes and the inherent complexity of ecosystems makes it challenges to establish cause-and-effect relationships between remote sensing and ground truth data. The aforementioned challenges and limitations motivated our first study, which aims to comprehensively review the current platforms, applications, and methodologies employed in remote sensing (with a focus on nut crops) and identify the potential error sources that cause these shortcomings. In this study we realized that radiometric correction, which is an essential data preprocessing step, has not been taken seriously in most studies. Without correct radiometric calibration, the recorded values may not represent true surface reflectance, leading to inaccuracies in the quantitative analysis. Additionally, inaccurate calibration can hinder the ability to compare and integrate data from different sensors or acquired at different times, as the variations in sensor responses or environments may not be properly accounted for, hence preventing generalizability of the methods and results. Further investigation into the radiometric calibration steps and associated issues highlighted a significant environmental factor that can impact the collected data and lead to questionable interpretations. Specifically, the relationship between sun-plant-sensor geometry and the acquired remote sensing data stood up as a crucial discrepancy source. Conventionally, researchers collect reflectance data around “solar noon” in an attempt to minimize the irradiance changes. However, solar noon could be very different in terms of sun angle depending on the location and season. This formed our main study which focuses on understanding the impact of sun-view geometry on spectral reflectance variability of crops. In this study we showed that even a small 2° change in view angle of the remote sensing camera can lead to substantial differences in canopy reflectance, especially close to hotspot area. These variations, often assumed negligible, can exceed ± 50% of the nadir view due to directional solar radiation within a drone image. We introduced a model based on the Laplacian distribution function that can be used to compensated for these variations with up to %88 accuracy. With this model data become more comparable and hence the results more generalizable. Additionally, several other factors that are critical for radiometric calibration were investigated and recommendations for more reliable data collection or processing were suggested. Finally we developed an application, which is publicly accessible through Digital Ag Lab’s website (https://digitalag.ucdavis.edu/decision-support-tools/when2fly), recommends the best UAS flight time to collect more reliable agricultural remote sensing data based on the sites location, date, and camera’s field of view.