Search

Education is a place to introduce culture and micro, small and medium enterprises in areas far from the capital. In Technology Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Jakarta has the vision to produce educators and education personnel in the field of learning to engineer based on academic principles and ethics. Engineering new media learning through augmented reality becomes a tool for lectures introducing SMEs. For this reason, researchers collaborated with material expert lecturers, design experts, media experts, and 30 students in developing augmented reality as a new learning application. The results of the review obtained from the instructional design experts were 3.20, material expert 3,30, and media experts 3.14. Based on the test results obtained from students in the one-to-one stage of 3.55; and at the small group stage of 3.23. Based on the results of the evaluation, it can be concluded that Augmented Reality can be implemented and used to introduce SMEs to college students. Students can use this product as material strengthening in engineering learning using new media applications

Blended learning is not just simply combining online learning with face-to-face learning. It is dynamic and context dependent. It can be viewed from different contexts and perspectives. Different context has different needs and characteristics. It needs different blend of blended learning. But, blended learning has one same ultimate goal, i.e. to determine the most appropriate blend to make optimum learning experience occur. Recent literatures and studies showed that e-learning and blended learning are synonymous with synchronous and asynchronous learning. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to propose a conceptual model of blended learning design and its definition viewed from the perspective of those learning setting. This conceptual model, called quadrant of blended learning. It consists of four quadrants, i.e.: 1) quadrant 1: live synchronous learning; 2) quadrant 2: virtual synchronous learning; 3) quadrant 3: collaborative asynchronous learning; and 4) quadrant 4: self-directed asynchronous learning. As a conceptual model, it is expected that it can provide framework and idea for instructional designers in designing effective blended learning strategies.

This research was aimed to describe the application of e-learning at the Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education Science, Jakarta State University. This research used case study research method with multiple data collection. Research findings revealed that (1) there are 20 courses conducted using e-learning by 7 lecturers; (2) blended learning was used; (3) e-learning itself developed through analysis, design and development phases; (4) analysis phase including students characteristics analysis, e-elarning environment analysis and content analysis; (5) design phase including online leaerning design (designing content, discussion for online discussion forum, assignment for online assignment, and test item for online evaluation) and face-to-face learning design including deep discussion, case study, and demonstration and practices; (6) student acceptance on blended was high; (7) there were several barriers in implementing e-learning due to lack of policy and ICT infrastructure support; and (8) supporting factors of implementation e-learning were the high commitment from lecturers and students, and the familiarity of students toward ICT. Based on research findings, Department of Educational Technology was recommended to have a minimum standard of development and implementation of e-learning and to enhance ICT infrastructure support, esp. access adequate internet connectivity. References Chaeruman, U.A. (2008). Penerapan blended learning.Diakses melalui http://www.teknologipendidikan.net/2008/11/27/contoh-penerapan-blended-learning/ Clark, R.C. & Meyer, R.E. (2003). E-learning strategies: Design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Dabbagh, N. & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concept, strategies, and application. New Jersey: Pearson education, Inc. Gredler, M.E. (2011). Learning and instruction: Teori danaplikasi. Terjemahan Tri Wibowo B.S. edisi keenam. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. Holmes, B. & Gardner, J. (2006). E-learning concepts andpractice. London: SAGE Publication, Ltd. Khan, B. (2005). Managing e-learning strategies: Design,delivery, implementation, and evaluation. USA:Idea Group, Inc. Miarso,Y. (2005). Menyemai benih teknologi pendidikan.Jakarta: Kencana. Morrison, G.R., Ross, S.M., & Kemp, J.E. (2007). Designing effective instruction. USA: John Wiley&Sons, Inc. Prawiradilaga, D.S. (2007). Prinsip desain pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. Prawiradilaga, D.S & Siregar, E. (2004). Mozaik teknologi pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana. Siregar, E., & Nara, H. (2010). Teori belajar dan pembelajaran. Ciawi, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia. Wahono, R.S. (2008). Meluruskan salah kaprah tentang e-learning. Diakses melalui http://romisatriawahono.net/2008/01/23/meluruskan-salahkaprah-tentang-e-learning/ Yin, R.K. (2008). Studi kasus: Desain dan metode. Jakarta: PT. Grafindo Persada., Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan penerapan e-learning di program studi Teknologi Pendidikan Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Jakarta. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi kasus dengan berbagai teknik pengumpulan data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa (1) terdapat 20 mata kuliah yang diselenggarakan dengan e-learning oleh 7 orang dosen; (2) e-learning yang diterapkan adalah blended learning; (3) penerapan e-learning telah melalui tahap analisis, desain dan pengembangan; (4) tahap analisis meliputi analisis karakteristik siswa dan analisis lingkungan e-learning; (5) tahap desain dimana sebagian besar dirancang dengan pola pembelajaran online (mempelajari materi, memperdalam materi melalui forum diskusi online, menerapkan pengetahuan melalui penugasan online, dan evaluasi melalui tes online), dan pembelajaran tatap muka lebih menekankan pada diskusi mendalam, demonstrasi, studi kasus, serta praktik; (6) tahap pengembangan dosen mengembangkan materi dengan memanfaatkan materi yang telah ada; (7) implementasi blended learning menarik dan disukai oleh mahasiswa; (8) pelaksanaan e-learning berjalan dengan baik karena adanya komitmen yang kuat dari dosen, kefamiliaran TIK mahasiswa dan dukungan program studi; serta (9) faktor penghambat penerapan e-learning lebih pada lemahnya dukungan kebijakan dan infrastruktur TIK yang belum memadai. Berdasarkan temuan penelitian direkomendasikan agar program studi Teknologi Pendidikan memiliki standar minimal pengembangan dan implementasi blended learning serta meningkatkan dukungan fasilitas dan akses terhadap internet yang memadai.