1. Benchmarking immunoinformatic tools for the analysis of antibody repertoire sequences
- Author
-
Lmar Babrak, Christopher Galli, Johannes Trück, Branden J. Olson, Mikhail Shugay, Bryan Briney, Enkelejda Miho, Victor Greiff, Sai T. Reddy, William D. Lees, Igor Edmondo Paolo D'angelo, Vendi Grobelsek, Susanna Marquez, Mats Ohlin, Erand Smakaj, Deniz Tosoni, University of Zurich, and Birols, Inanc
- Subjects
Statistics and Probability ,1303 Biochemistry ,Computer science ,610 Medicine & health ,Computational biology ,Biochemistry ,Antibodies ,Germline ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Antibody Repertoire ,1312 Molecular Biology ,1706 Computer Science Applications ,Humans ,2613 Statistics and Probability ,Molecular Biology ,Gene ,030304 developmental biology ,chemistry.chemical_classification ,0303 health sciences ,High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ,Reproducibility of Results ,Benchmarking ,Original Papers ,Computer Science Applications ,Amino acid ,Computational Mathematics ,Computational Theory and Mathematics ,chemistry ,10036 Medical Clinic ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Complementarity (molecular biology) ,Human genome ,Sequence Analysis ,2605 Computational Mathematics ,1703 Computational Theory and Mathematics - Abstract
Summary Antibody repertoires reveal insights into the biology of the adaptive immune system and empower diagnostics and therapeutics. There are currently multiple tools available for the annotation of antibody sequences. All downstream analyses such as choosing lead drug candidates depend on the correct annotation of these sequences; however, a thorough comparison of the performance of these tools has not been investigated. Here, we benchmark the performance of commonly used immunoinformatic tools, i.e. IMGT/HighV-QUEST, IgBLAST and MiXCR, in terms of reproducibility of annotation output, accuracy and speed using simulated and experimental high-throughput sequencing datasets. We analyzed changes in IMGT reference germline database in the last 10 years in order to assess the reproducibility of the annotation output. We found that only 73/183 (40%) V, D and J human genes were shared between the reference germline sets used by the tools. We found that the annotation results differed between tools. In terms of alignment accuracy, MiXCR had the highest average frequency of gene mishits, 0.02 mishit frequency and IgBLAST the lowest, 0.004 mishit frequency. Reproducibility in the output of complementarity determining three regions (CDR3 amino acids) ranged from 4.3% to 77.6% with preprocessed data. In addition, run time of the tools was assessed: MiXCR was the fastest tool for number of sequences processed per unit of time. These results indicate that immunoinformatic analyses greatly depend on the choice of bioinformatics tool. Our results support informed decision-making to immunoinformaticians based on repertoire composition and sequencing platforms. Availability and implementation All tools utilized in the paper are free for academic use. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF