Search

We introduce a learning framework that combines elements of the well-known PAC and mistake-bound models. The KWIK (knows what it knows) framework was designed particularly for its utility in learning settings where active exploration can impact the training examples the learner is exposed to, as is true in reinforcement-learning and active-learning problems. We catalog several KWIK-learnable classes as well as open problems, and demonstrate their applications in experience-efficient reinforcement learning.

Several algorithms for learning near-optimal policies in Markov Decision Processes have been analyzed and proven efficient. Empirical results have suggested that Model-based Interval Estimation (MBIE) learns efficiently in practice, effectively balancing exploration and exploitation. This paper presents a theoretical analysis of MBIE and a new variation called MBIE-EB, proving their efficiency even under worst-case conditions. The paper also introduces a new performance metric, average loss, and relates it to its less ''online'' cousins from the literature.

Factored representations, model-based learning, and hierarchies are well-studied techniques for improving the learning efficiency of reinforcement-learning algorithms in large-scale state spaces. We bring these three ideas together in a new algorithm. Our algorithm tackles two open problems from the reinforcement-learning literature, and provides a solution to those problems in deterministic domains. First, it shows how models can improve learning speed in the hierarchy-based MaxQ framework without disrupting opportunities for state abstraction. Second, we show how hierarchies can augment existing factored exploration algorithms to achieve not only low sample complexity for learning, but provably efficient planning as well. We illustrate the resulting performance gains in example domains. We prove polynomial bounds on the computational effort needed to attain near optimal performance within the hierarchy.

For a Markov Decision Process with finite state (size S) and action spaces (size A per state), we propose a new algorithm---Delayed Q-Learning. We prove it is PAC, achieving near optimal performance except for O(SA) timesteps using O(SA) space, improving on the O(S2 A) bounds of best previous algorithms. This result proves efficient reinforcement learning is possible without learning a model of the MDP from experience. Learning takes place from a single continuous thread of experience---no resets nor parallel sampling is used. Beyond its smaller storage and experience requirements, Delayed Q-learning's per-experience computation cost is much less than that of previous PAC algorithms.

This work takes an empirical approach to evaluating three model-based reinforcement-learning methods. All methods intend to speed the learning process by mixing exploitation of learned knowledge with exploration of possibly promising alternatives. We consider /spl epsi/-greedy exploration, which is computationally cheap and popular, but unfocused in its exploration effort; R-Max exploration, a simplification of an exploration scheme that comes with a theoretical guarantee of efficiency; and a well-grounded approach, model-based interval estimation, that better integrates exploration and exploitation. Our experiments indicate that effective exploration can result in dramatic improvements in the observed rate of learning.

Several algorithms for learning near-optimal policies in Markov Decision Processes have been analyzed and proven efficient. Empirical results have suggested that Model-based Interval Estimation (MBIE) learns efficiently in practice, effectively balancing exploration and exploitation. This paper presents the first theoretical analysis of MBIE, proving its efficiency even under worst-case conditions. The paper also introduces a new performance metric, average loss, and relates it to its less "online" cousins from the literature.